Multipurpose solutions and rates of biocidal efficacy

Bacterial adhesion forces to Ag-impregnated contact lens cases and transmission to contact lenses

PURPOSE

To measure adhesion forces of Pseudomonas aeruginosa, Staphylococcus aureus, and Serratia marcescens to a rigid contact lens (CL), standard polypropylene, and Ag-impregnated lens cases using atomic force microscopy and determine bacterial transmission from lens case to CL.

METHODS

Adhesion forces of bacterial strains to Ag-impregnated and polypropylene lens cases and a rigid CL were measured using atomic force microscopy. Adhesion forces were used to calculate Weibull distributions, from which transmission probabilities from lens case to CL were derived. Transmission probabilities were compared with actual transmission of viable bacteria from a lens case to the CL in 0.9% NaCl and in an antimicrobial lens care solution.

RESULTS

Bacterial transmission probabilities from polypropylene lens cases based on force analysis coincided well for all strains with actual transmission in 0.9% NaCl. Bacterial adhesion forces on Ag-impregnated lens cases were much smaller than that on polypropylene and CLs, yielding a high probability of transmission. Comparison with actual bacterial transmission indicated bacterial killing due to Ag ions during colony-forming unit transmission from an Ag-impregnated lens case, especially for P. aeruginosa. Transmission of viable bacteria from Ag-impregnated lens cases could be further decreased by use of an antimicrobial lens care solution instead of 0.9% NaCl.

CONCLUSIONS

Bacterial transmission probabilities are higher from Ag-impregnated lens cases than from polypropylene lens cases because of small adhesion forces, but this is compensated for by enhanced bacterial killing due to Ag impregnation, especially when in combination with an antimicrobial lens care solution. This calls for a balanced combination of antimicrobial lens care solutions and surface properties of a lens case and CL.

In-vitro analysis of the microbicidal activity of 6 contact lens care solutions

BACKGROUND

Contact lens-related infections are often associated with inadequate contact lens hygiene, and therefore, contact lens care products should be able to sufficiently minimise the amount of pathogens that are responsible for these infections. In 2001, the EN ISO 14729 was introduced to ensure adequate disinfection efficacy of contact lens care solutions, but this norm has recently been criticised.

METHODS

In this study, six frequently used contact lens care solutions were retested according to the Stand Alone Test of the EN ISO 14729 (2001). The Stand Alone Test is a quantitative suspension test. In addition, the products were tested in a modified setting adding an organic load. The load was a mixture of human blood serum, lysozyme, and mucine, which resembles tear fluid.

RESULTS

The criteria of the Stand Alone Test recommended in EN ISO 14729 were only met by Aosept Plus. This 3% hydrogen-peroxide-based contact lens care solution attained a reduction factor of > 5 log units for bacteria and > 4 for fungi in all cases. Two further contact lens care solutions, Blue Vision and Optifree Replenish, met the criteria of a reduction factor of > 3 log units for bacteria and > 1 log unit for fungi, but only in the presence of artificial tear fluid. The three remaining products did not exhibit adequate disinfecting efficacy, at least against one of the tested microorganisms.

CONCLUSIONS

Through the observation that the artificial tear fluid used in this study influences the disinfecting efficacy of contact lens care solutions, especially that of multi-purpose solutions, in a different way than does albumin, mucine, or even the organic load suggested in EN ISO 14729, it becomes obvious that the test conditions in the EN ISO 14729 should be revised in order to create more realistic conditions, e.g., by using a more realistic artificial tear fluid. Furthermore, we suggest adapting the EN ISO 14729 to the European test hierarchy for chemical disinfectants and antiseptics, which consists of three test phases and also requests meeting stricter criteria in order to pass the test. Unless the test conditions guarantee a sufficient reduction of potential pathogens, the risk of contact lens-related microbial keratitis and other infections will remain for the users.

Lens material and formulation of multipurpose solutions affects contact lens disinfection

PURPOSE

To assess the disinfection efficacy of multipurpose solutions (MPS) against different bacterial species adhered either to silicon hydrogel or to conventional hydrogel contact lenses (CLs). The influences of the MPS formulation and the chemical composition of the lens material were investigated.

METHODS

This investigation followed the standard 14729, which establishes the guidelines for assessing CL disinfecting solutions. Two commercially available (Opti-Free(®) Express(®) and Renu(®) Multiplus) solutions and one recalled solution (Complete(®) MoisturePlus™) were used in this study. After disinfection, the number of survivors was estimated by the colony forming units' method.

RESULTS

The lens material appears to influence disinfection. The conventional hydrogel polymacon exhibited the highest disinfection scores, a fact that should be related with the lack of electrostatic attraction towards the biocides and its hydrophilicity. The MPS formulation appears to have influence in disinfection efficacy as well. For most adhered bacteria, Opti-Free(®) was capable of reducing cell concentration in 4-log.

CONCLUSION

Disinfection results from multivariate factors and this study confirmed that the lens material and the MPS play a very important role in the disinfection efficacy of CL.

Contact lens case contamination during daily wear of silicone hydrogels

PURPOSE

Contamination of contact lens cases has been associated with the production of adverse responses in the eye during contact lens wear. This study aimed to evaluate the contamination rate and types of microbes contaminating cases during use of contact lens disinfecting solutions and silicone hydrogel lenses.

METHODS

Two hundred thirty-two participants were allocated to one or more groups. The participants wore one or more of three silicone hydrogel lenses and used one or more of four contact lens disinfecting solutions. Cases were collected after use for 1 month and sent for routine microbial testing. The rate of contamination of cases and the types of microbes contaminating cases were evaluated.

RESULTS

Between 76 and 92% of all cases were contaminated. Use of different contact lenses did not affect contamination rate or the types of microbes isolated from cases. Use of AQuify (PHMB as disinfectant) was associated with the highest contamination rate (92%; p = 0.015) of cases for any microbe. Level and type of contamination with use of ClearCare (H2O2) was similar to use of PHMB (polyhexamethylene biguanide)- or Polyquat/Aldox-containing solutions. There was no difference in contamination rate of cases by fungi or Gram-positive bacteria, but for Gram-negative bacteria, use of Opti-Free Express (Polyquat and Aldox as disinfectants) resulted in a lower contamination rate (7% vs. 29 to 45%; p < 0.001). The average number of microbes contaminating a case was significantly less for Opti-Free Express (223 +/- 1357 cfu/case) compared with Opti-Free RepleniSH (Polyquat and Aldox as disinfectants; 63,244 +/- 140,630 cfu/case; p < 0.001), driven mostly by differences in numbers of Gram-negative bacteria, particularly contamination by Delftia acidovorans in cases exposed to Opti-Free RepleniSH.

CONCLUSIONS

Different disinfecting solutions used during storage in cases result in different levels of contamination and contamination by different types of microbes. These differences are not simply because of the types of disinfectants used, suggesting that other excipients in, or formulation of, the solution affect contact lens storage case contamination.