Microbial Keratitis After Descemet Stripping Automated Endothelial Keratoplasty

Suture-Related Fungal Interstitial Interface Keratitis in Deep Anterior Lamellar Keratoplasty: A Case Report

Interstitial interface keratitis (IIK) in lamellar keratoplasty is a term used to describe infectious keratitis that primarily involves the graft-host interface. It poses specific challenges due to impaired access for microbiological testing and poor penetration of antimicrobial drugs, as well as ease of deeper extension of the microorganism. A 33-year-old male with a medical history of left eye deep anterior lamellar keratoplasty (DALK) with keratoconus, subsequently complicated with steroid-induced glaucoma controlled with Xen tube insertion, presented with acute left eye pain and redness for two days due to one broken corneal graft suture at 5 o’clock position with infiltrate at the graft-host junction. He was treated for suture-related bacterial keratitis (culture-negative) with intensive single broad-spectrum topical antibiotic after suture removal. However, the condition worsened, with dense stromal infiltrate extending into the graft-host interface junction which further progressed to an endothelial plaque. Systemic and topical antifungal treatments were started with adjunctive intracameral and subconjunctival voriconazole before improvement was observed. The condition was resolved with localized scarring without the need for repeat keratoplasty. The best-corrected vision was maintained at 6/36 due to residual sutured-related astigmatism with no signs of corneal graft rejection. Lamellar keratoplasty poses an increased risk of fungal IIK even after several years if there is a predisposing factor e.g., steroid usage and broken suture. Timely diagnosis and intervention are the keys to ensure an optimal outcome.

Early postoperative infection following lamellar keratoplasty: a review

With the growing popularity of lamellar keratoplasty for selective replacement of diseased corneal tissue, it is important to understand the risk of developing an infection after the procedure. Although lesser than that postpenetrating keratoplasty, the reports on post lamellar keratoplasty infectious keratitis are not negligible. Trends of acute infections arising within 2 months of surgery are a subject of interest. Most of these infections are reported post Descemet's stripping endothelial keratoplasty with a preponderance of Candida species. A donor to host transmission of infection is not uncommon. Among the Candida cases, about 80% seem to occur due to a donor to host transmission. Infections presenting as or progressing to endophthalmitis lead to a poor visual outcome. Strict aseptic measures and protocols during corneal tissue harvesting, tissue processing, tissue storage and surgery are essential to prevent occurrence of these infections. After the infection has occurred, determining the aetiology and drug susceptibility through microbiological testing is vital. This helps to guide treatment protocols and hence determines final outcome of these cases. Most cases require some form of surgical management for resolution of infection, most often a graft removal and therapeutic keratoplasty. Secondary surgical interventions are performed to restore graft clarity and achieve a good final visual outcome.

Incidence of Fungal Infection in Positive Donor Rim Cultures after Corneal Transplantation

PURPOSE

To determine the clinical outcomes of corneal transplant patients that had positive rim cultures for fungi.

METHODS

Retrospective study.

RESULTS

Of 1276 rim cultures obtained between 2009 and 2019, 16 were positive for fungus (incidence of 1.25%). Clinical data were available for 12 patients. Candida and Cladosporium species were the most common organisms. Recipient ages ranged from 51 to 86 (median age 69 years; 9 males, 7 females). The most common surgery was Endothelial Keratoplasty (n = 8). There were no instances of fungal keratitis or endophthalmitis. Three patients were treated with prophylactic antimycotics. One patient developed bacterial keratitis. One patient had a varicella zoster virus reactivation without corneal involvement.

CONCLUSIONS

This study adds to the growing data on the low rate of fungal keratitis and endophthalmitis after a corneal transplant, even in the case of positive rim cultures. This study also suggests that positive rim cultures do not advance the risk of postoperative fungal infection in the recipient.

Infectious keratitis after lamellar keratoplasty

Infectious keratitis after lamellar keratoplasty is a potentially devastating complication that may severely limit the visual and anatomical outcomes. The deep-seated location of the infiltrates, sequestration of the pathogenic microorganisms and limited penetration of the currently available antimicrobial agents often results in delayed diagnosis that may jeopardize the management in these cases. Fungal keratitis is more common as compared with bacterial or viral keratitis and classically presents as white interface infiltrates that may not be associated with significant inflammation. Confocal microscopy may help to establish a rapid diagnosis in such cases, and anterior segment optical coherence tomography may be used to determine the extent of infection and monitor its progression. Conservative measures such as topical antimicrobials and interface irrigation with antimicrobial agents may be done. Surgical intervention in the form of partial excision/removal of the graft in endothelial keratoplasty or a full-thickness keratoplasty is often required for the effective management of deep-seated infections. Timely diagnosis and intervention may result in complete resolution of infection in both anterior lamellar and endothelial keratoplasty. Infections after anterior lamellar keratoplasty have a fair prognosis, and a clear graft with functional visual acuity may be achieved in most cases. By contrast, infections after endothelial keratoplasty have a guarded prognosis, and the presence of concomitant endophthalmitis may further complicate the graft survival and visual outcomes.

Microbial keratitis and clinical outcomes following penetrating and endothelial keratoplasty

PURPOSE

The goal of this study was to review the incidence, risk factors and outcomes of microbial keratitis after penetrating keratoplasty (PK) and endothelial keratoplasty (EK).

METHODS

The electronic medical records at Wills Eye Hospital were queried for cases of microbial keratitis following PK or EK performed between 1 May 2007 and 1 September 2018. Charts were reviewed to obtain demographic data, transplant characteristics, details of microbial keratitis, graft survival and clinical outcomes.

RESULTS

During the study period, 2098 transplants were performed in 1601 patients. Of these, 1267 (60.4%) were PKs and 831 (39.6%) were EKs. We identified 86 (4.1%) cases of subsequent microbial keratitis. The incidence of microbial keratitis after PK was significantly higher than after EK (5.9% versus 1.3%; p = 0.005). Furthermore, the rate of infection was higher after repeat transplants (either PK or EK) compared to initial keratoplasties (5.5% versus 3.4%; p = 0.02). Twenty-six (32.1%) grafts remained clear at most recent follow-up after microbial keratitis, and the proportion of clear grafts was higher after EK than PK (66.7% versus 27.8%; p = 0.03).

CONCLUSION

Rates of microbial keratitis were significantly higher after PK compared to EK, and repeat transplantation was a risk factor for microbial keratitis. To the best of our knowledge, there is no prior study in the literature evaluating microbial keratitis rates after PK and EK and comparing outcomes.

Excisional penetrating keratoplasty for fungal interface keratitis after endothelial keratoplasty: surgical timing and visual outcome

PURPOSE

In this paper, we describe two cases of fungal interface infectious keratitis (IIK) developed after endothelial keratoplasty (EK) who underwent delayed therapeutic penetrating keratoplasty (TPK) with a poor visual outcome. Furthermore, we conducted a review of the literature and analyzed the visual outcomes of TPK in relation to the time from IIK diagnosis.

METHODS

We searched the literature for fungal IIK cases occurred after EK and treated by TPK. We identified 17 cases of fungal IIK, mostly caused by Candida spp. (88%).

RESULTS

Infection was diagnosed at a median time of 21 (range 1-90 days) days after EK. The median lag time between infection diagnosis and TPK was 30 (range 7-393) days. The median distance corrected visual acuity (DCVA) measured 4-12 months after surgery was 20/40 (range 20/200-20/20). When TPK was performed within one month from diagnosis, the final median DCVA was 20/30 (range 20/100-20/20), with 83% of patients achieving ≥ 20/40 vision. When TPK was carried out later, the final median DCVA was 20/50 (range 20/200-20/22) with 44% of patients achieving ≥ 20/40 vision. One patient in the early surgery and four patients in the late surgery group showed postoperative DCVA ≤ 20/100 despite clear grafts.

CONCLUSION

TPK with removal of the sequestered infection is advocated as a safe and effective measure to treat a post-EK infection. Early surgery allows a reduced exposure time to infection and therefore may result in better visual outcomes and lower risk of complications caused by prolonged inflammation.

Late-onset fungal interface keratitis following endothelial keratoplasty with positive donor fungal culture

Purpose

To describe late-onset fungal keratitis after Descemet's stripping endothelial keratoplasty (DSEK) with positive fungal culture of the donor corneal rim.

Observations

A case report of a patient undergoing DSEK is described whereby the donor corneal rim culture grew fungus. No infection was initially noted, but the patient developed fungal keratitis 1 year after the original DSEK procedure, despite prophylactic treatment at the time of the positive donor culture. The patient responded to antifungal therapy, but fungal keratitis recurred following completion of a 1-year course of antifungal treatment. The patient eventually underwent full thickness keratoplasty.

Conclusions and importance

A positive fungal culture of the donor rim tissue at the time of endothelial keratoplasty is a risk factor for fungal keratitis. Even with prophylactic antifungal treatment, fungal keratitis may eventually develop as late as 1 year after the initial endothelial keratoplasty procedure. Treatment may need to be aggressive, but keratitis may recur despite resolution with antifungal treatment.

Interface infectious keratitis after anterior and posterior lamellar keratoplasty. Clinical features and treatment strategies. A review

Interface infectious keratitis (IIK) is a novel corneal infection that may develop after any type of lamellar keratoplasty. Onset of infection occurs in the virtual space between the graft and the host where it may remain localised until spreading with possible risk of endophthalmitis. A literature review identified 42 cases of IIK. Thirty-one of them occurred after endothelial keratoplasty and 12 after deep anterior lamellar keratoplasty. Fungi in the form of Candida species were the most common microorganisms involved, with donor to host transmission of infection documented in the majority of cases. Donor rim cultures were useful to address the infectious microorganisms within few days after surgery. Due to the sequestered site of infection, medical treatment, using both topical and systemic antimicrobials drugs, was ineffective on halting the progression of the infection. Injection of antifungals, right at the graft–host interface, was reported successful in some cases. Spreading of the infection with development of endophthalmitis occurred in five cases after Descemet stripping automated endothelial keratoplasty with severe sight loss in three cases. Early excisional penetrating keratoplasty showed to be the treatment with the highest therapeutic efficacy, lowest rate of complications and greater visual outcomes.

Incidence and Outcomes of Positive Donor Rim Cultures and Infections in the Cornea Preservation Time Study

PURPOSE

To assess donor rim culture results and outcomes of ocular infections in the Cornea Preservation Time Study (CPTS).

METHODS

Donor corneal rim cultures were optional. Donor characteristics were assessed for association with positive cultures using the Fisher exact test and Poisson regression analyses. Incidence rates of ocular infections were estimated, and 95% confidence intervals were calculated.

RESULTS

Cultures were performed in 784 (58.9%) of the 1330 cases. For the 0 to 7-day versus 8 to 14-day preservation time groups, respectively, positive fungal growth occurred in 10 of 397 (2.5%) versus 5 of 387 (1.3%) corneas (P = 0.30), whereas positive bacterial cultures occurred in 6 of 397 (1.5%) versus 4 of 387 (1.0%) corneas (P = 0.75). Surgeon-prepared tissue remained a significant risk for positive fungal cultures [relative risk (RR) of surgeon- versus eye-bank-prepared, 2.85; 95% CI (1.02-7.98)], whereas younger donors [RR per year of age, 0.96; 95% CI (0.93-1.00)] and accidental death donors [RR of accident versus disease, 3.71; 95% CI (1.36-10.13)] were at a greater risk for positive bacterial cultures. Fungal infection (Candida glabrata) developed in 1 (6.7%) of 15 recipients with a positive fungal culture, and no recipient infections occurred with positive bacterial culture. With one additional fungal keratitis (Candida albicans) and one bacterial endophthalmitis (E. coli) with no rim culture performed, a total of 2 of 1330 eyes (0.15%) developed fungal and 1/1330 eyes (0.08%) developed bacterial postkeratoplasty infections.

CONCLUSIONS

A longer preservation time was not associated with a higher rate of positive donor rim cultures. The overall rate of infection across the entire cohort was low.

Candida Endophthalmitis After Descemet Stripping Automated Endothelial Keratoplasty With Grafts From Both Eyes of a Donor With Possible Systemic Candidiasis

PURPOSE

To report 2 cases with late postoperative Candida albicans interface keratitis and endophthalmitis after Descemet stripping automated endothelial keratoplasty (DSAEK) with corneal grafts originating from a single donor with a history of presumed pulmonary candidiasis.

METHODS

Two patients underwent uncomplicated DSAEK by 2 corneal surgeons at different surgery centers but with tissue from the same donor and were referred to the Bascom Palmer Eye Institute with multifocal infiltrates at the graft-host cornea interface 6 to 8 weeks later, and anterior chamber cultures that were positive for the same genetic strain of C. albicans. Immediate explantation of DSAEK lenticules and daily intracameral and instrastromal voriconazole and amphotericin injections failed to control the infection. Thus, both patients underwent therapeutic penetrating keratoplasty with intraocular lens explantation, pars plana vitrectomy, and serial postoperative intraocular antifungal injection.

RESULTS

Both patients are doing well at 2 years postoperatively with best-corrected vision of 20/20 and 20/30+ with rigid gas permeable lenses. One patient required repeat optical penetrating keratoplasty and glaucoma tube implantation 1 year after the original surgery. Literature review reveals that donor lenticule explantation and intraocular antifungals are often inadequate to control fungal interface keratitis, and a therapeutic graft is commonly needed.

CONCLUSIONS

Interface fungal keratitis and endophthalmitis due to infected donor corneal tissue is difficult to treat, and both recipients of grafts originating from the same donor are at risk of developing this challenging condition.

Candida Interface Infections After Descemet Stripping Automated Endothelial Keratoplasty

PURPOSE

To describe 2 Candida interface keratitis infections occurring in the setting of positive donor rim cultures from precut corneal tissue used for Descemet stripping automated endothelial keratoplasty (DSAEK) and the ensuing public health investigation.

METHODS

Following 2 clinical Candida interface keratitis infections, patients from 2012 to 2014 in the same surgical center were evaluated for bacterial and fungal rim cultures and subsequent infection. All cases of fungal infections occurring post-DSAEK were analyzed. Data included patient demographics, surgical technique, donor rim cultures, donor mate outcomes, clinical courses, and outcomes. A review of the relevant literature was also undertaken.

RESULTS

From 2012 to 2014, among 99 DSAEK procedures performed, 7 (7.1%) donor rim cultures were positive for fungi. Use of this tissue with positive donor rim cultures resulted in 2 (28.6%) episodes of confirmed fungal interface keratitis, both Candida species, and presumptive treatment in an additional 2 patients. An investigation did not identify any breach in sterile technique or procedures by the surgeon or surgery center. Our literature review identified 15 reports of postoperative fungal infection associated with DSAEK, of which 11 involved Candida spp.

CONCLUSIONS

While postoperative infection remains rare, our 2 additional cases along with those previously reported suggest that DSAEK may be susceptible to infection with Candida spp. Furthermore, this report of correlated rim cultures and clinical infection suggests a need for reevaluation of the utility of obtaining routine corneoscleral donor rim fungal culture.

Current Concepts in the Management of Unique Post-keratoplasty Infections

As corneal transplantation has evolved, the spectrum of post-surgical infection has changed and often presents a diagnostic and therapeutic challenge. Lamellar techniques hold the potential of improved outcomes and decreased post-operative complications, however, they create a lamellar interface, which is a potential space for sequestration of infectious organisms. In addition, while keratoprosthesis offers vision to patients who are poor candidates for traditional keratoplasty, infectious complications can be severe and sight threatening. Although antimicrobials remain the mainstay of treatment, definitive management often requires surgical intervention.

Interface infection after descemet stripping automated endothelial keratoplasty: outcomes of therapeutic keratoplasty

PURPOSE

The aim of this study was to evaluate the visual outcomes and graft survival rate after therapeutic keratoplasty performed for interface infection after Descemet stripping automated endothelial keratoplasty (DSAEK).

METHODS

This is a retrospective, interventional case series. The study population comprised 7 patients who developed unilateral post-DSAEK interface infection unresponsive to conservative treatment, with or without graft exchange, and were treated with penetrating keratoplasty (PK), 9 to 9.5 mm in diameter, with en bloc excision of the recipient cornea and DSAEK graft. The main outcome measures included best spectacle-corrected visual acuity, refractive error, histological examination, reinfection, and rejection and graft survival rates.

RESULTS

Interface infection was diagnosed in 10 (0.92%) of 1088 eyes that underwent DSAEK at our institution between 2005 and 2013. Seven of 10 eyes (0.64% of the total) were unresponsive to conservative treatment and underwent therapeutic keratoplasty. Candida and Staphylococcus species were identified in 3 cases each, and Nocardia species was identified in 1 case. With a mean post-PK follow-up of 25.4 months (range 4-60 months), no recurrence of infection was seen in any eye, and 5 of 7 PK grafts remained clear. Best spectacle-corrected visual acuity was 20/20 in 2 eyes, better than 20/50 in 4 eyes, and 20/100 or worse in 3 eyes, in 2 of which the graft had failed within 1 year of performing the PK.

CONCLUSIONS

Therapeutic keratoplasty is instrumental in eliminating interface infection after DSAEK, possibly leading to excellent visual outcomes with a relatively high graft survival rate.

Intrastromal antifungal injection with secondary lamellar interface infusion for late-onset infectious keratitis after DSAEK

PURPOSE

The aim of this study was to report the successful medical management of 2 cases of late-onset endothelial keratoplasty-related stromal interface infections.

METHODS

All cases of endothelial keratoplasty-related infections treated with intrastromal antifungal injections were compiled. The following information was collected: demographic data, surgical indications, donor rim cultures, donor mate outcomes, clinical course, diagnostic tests, and clinical outcome.

RESULTS

Two cases of interface fungal keratitis diagnosed on clinical appearance and confocal microscopy were identified. Both patients refused to undergo further surgery and failed systemic and/or topical therapy. Each received 3 to 4 intrastromal injections, with secondary infusion into the graft-host interface, which resulted in the complete involution of their interface opacities.

CONCLUSIONS

Intrastromal antifungal injection may be an effective alternative to surgical intervention in late-onset fungal Descemet stripping endothelial keratoplasty interface keratitis. Early treatment may preserve graft viability and result in a good visual outcome without the need for either penetrating keratoplasty or potential pathogen exposure to the anterior chamber.

The clinical characteristics of fungal keratitis in eyes after Descemet's stripping and automated endothelial keratoplasty

The purpose of this study was to describe the clinical characteristics of fungal keratitis caused by Candida albicans in an eye after Descemet stripping automated endothelial keratoplasty (DSAEK). A 72-year-old male with a history of three trabeculectomies, cataract surgery, and two DSAEK procedures developed a corneal ulcer in his right eye two years after his last DSAEK. Fungal keratitis was most likely related to the immunosuppressive conditions that occurred due to the previous operations, the continuous use of steroid eye drops, and the use of disposable soft contact lenses. A smear and culture from the ulcer detected Candida albicans. Slit-lamp examination showed the characteristic feature was the presence of interface infiltrates located between the host and the graft cornea and in the enlarged area around the ulcer. Two weeks after intense antimycotic treatments with voriconazole, miconazole, and natamycin, perforation of the cornea occurred and further therapeutic penetrating keratoplasty was required. Histological analysis revealed an accumulation of infiltrated cells and fibrotic tissue. The poor prognosis for fungal keratitis that occurs in eyes after undergoing DSAEK may be related to the rapid expansion of inflammatory cells through the interface between the host and the graft. In eyes that develop fungal keratitis after DSAEK, special attention should be paid to the possibility that perforation could occur in these patients.

Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus aureus Keratitis after Descemet's Stripping Automated Endothelial Keratoplasty

Purpose

We report a case of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) keratitis after Descemet's stripping automated endothelial keratoplasty (DSAEK).

Case Report

An 87-year-old woman who had undergone a DSAEK 4 months previously was referred to Tokushima University Hospital with a diagnosis of infectious keratitis after DSAEK. A white abscess and infiltration in the inferior cornea of the right eye were observed. We started an empiric therapy using topical levofloxacin and chloramphenicol on the basis of the microscopic findings of the corneal scraping concurrently with cultivation of the cornea.

Results

A strain of MRSA was isolated from the corneal sample. Although the strain was susceptible to chloramphenicol, it was resistant to quinolone. The keratitis improved rapidly due to empiric therapy, and topical steroids could be resumed 6 days after initiation of the empiric therapy.

Conclusions

To our knowledge, this is the first case of MRSA keratitis, and the second case of bacterial keratitis, after DSAEK. MRSA keratitis can occur following uneventful DSAEK. The empiric therapy on the basis of results from a light microscopic examination of a Gram-stained corneal scraping and restarting topical steroids in the early stages of medication contributed to the good clinical course of this case.

Endothelial keratoplasty: a revolution in evolution

Endothelial keratoplasty (EK) is continually evolving both in surgical technique and clinical outcomes. Descemet's stripping endothelial keratoplasty (DSEK) has replaced penetrating keratoplasty (PK) as the treatment of choice for corneal endothelial dysfunction. It is safe and predictable and offers early visual rehabilitation. Newer iterations include Descemet's membrane endothelial keratoplasty, Descemet's membrane automated endothelial keratoplasty, and other hybrid techniques. Early data on these newer EK techniques suggests that they provide significantly better visual outcomes compared to DSEK. Initial 5-year survival data indicates that EK is at least comparable to PK, and more widespread survival data is anticipated. Further work is needed to simultaneously optimize visual outcomes, refractive predictability, and endothelial cell survival, as well as surgical techniques of donor preparation and insertion.

Simultaneous Interface Candida Keratitis in 2 Hosts Following Descemet Stripping Endothelial Keratoplasty With Tissue Harvested From a Single Contaminated Donor and Review of Clinical Literature

PURPOSE

The objective of this study was to report 2 cases of interface fungal keratitis in 2 separate patients following Descemet stripping automated endothelial keratoplasty (DSAEK) with tissue harvested from the same donor.

DESIGN

This was a retrospective simultaneous interinstitutional hosptial-based case reports.

METHODS

Two patients with corneal infections following DSAEK were identified from 2 individual practices. Both patients had undergone DSAEK from the same donor. Preoperative and postoperative eye examination included visual acuity, anterior and posterior segment evaluations, and clinical follow-up course from the time of surgery. Methods of medical therapy and surgical intervention are additionally discussed.

RESULTS

The 2 patients presented in our series present with interface fungal keratitis postoperatively in the face of the original source coming from a single donor (patient 1: 7 days postoperatively and patient 2: 7 weeks postoperatively). As medical treatment failed in both cases, surgery was undertaken in both cases (therapeutic penetrating keratoplasty). With prompt recognition as well as medical and surgical treatment, patient 1 achieved best corrected visual acuity of 20/30 at 6 months postoperatively, and patient 2 had best corrected visual acuity of 20/80 at 10 months postoperatively.

CONCLUSIONS

Fungal keratitis following DSAEK occurs in a sequestered space and therefore represents a treatment challenge with potentially devastating outcome. We recommend an aggressive surgical approach with early removal of the donor button and irrigation with intracameral antifungal agents.

A case of interface keratitis following anterior lamellar keratoplasty

Anterior lamellar keratoplasty (ALK) is indicated in patients with anterior corneal opacities. Benefits over penetrating keratoplasty include quicker visual rehabilitation, less postoperative astigmatism, and preservation of the host endothelium, thus minimizing the chances of graft rejection. A rare complication of lamellar corneal surgery is infectious interface keratitis between the donor and host tissue. We report a case of infectious interface keratitis following automated ALK successfully treated medically and by removal of the ALK disk, eventually having a deep anterior lamellar keratoplasty with good visual recovery.