Clinicopathologic correlation of textural interface opacities in descemet stripping automated endothelial keratoplasty: a case study

Late Spontaneous Reabsorption of Interface Fluid after Descemet's Stripping Automated Endothelial Keratoplasty Surgery

An 80-year-old male was referred to our hospital for chronic bullous keratopathy in the right eye. Ten years before, he was affected by an attack of primary acute angle closure glaucoma in high hyperopia and Fuchs' endothelial dystrophy. A bilateral iridotomy was performed. Thereafter, the patient developed an endothelial decompensation in the left eye, and, in another hospital, he underwent an open-sky combined cataract extraction and penetrating keratoplasty. Our surgical approach for the right eye consisted of phacoemulsification and, after 1 month, a Descemet's stripping automated endothelial keratoplasty (DSAEK). After the procedure, an interface fluid was suspected, and an anterior segment optical coherence tomography (OCT) confirmed it. The graft was well centered but thickened, showing no movement in the anterior chamber, adherent to the periphery of the recipient cornea but with a pool of fluid in the center. Seven days postoperatively, an anterior segment OCT showed initial signs of reabsorption of the fluid. On day 45, the graft was adherent with normal thickness and the interface fluid had completely disappeared. The corneal stroma was clear, but a faint interface opacity appeared and is still present. We obtained a good surgical result and best corrected visual acuity was 7/10 at postoperative month 4. No further surgical procedures are scheduled.

Surgical management of post-Descemet stripping automated endothelial keratoplasty interface haze associated with interface deposits

We describe an effective technique for the management of graft–host interface haze associated with interface deposits after Descemet-stripping automated endothelial keratoplasty (DSAEK) with bimanual irrigation/aspiration. A Tan marginal dissector was used to separate the graft from the stroma in the nasal two-thirds of the graft–host interface. The aspiration handpiece was inserted in the interface through the nasal side-port corneal incision and a separate irrigation tip was placed in the anterior chamber (AC) through the temporal corneal paracentesis. Meticulous rinsing of the two-thirds of the interface area and the AC was performed. At the end of the procedure, air was injected into the AC to float the donor graft against the host stromal bed and facilitate graft adherence. Postoperative anterior segment optical coherence tomography and slit-lamp examination confirmed elimination of the interface haze–deposits and a well-attached graft. An improvement in visual acuity was noted.

Evaluation of interface reflectivity and corneal aberrations following Descemet's stripping automated endothelial keratoplasty

PURPOSE:

This study aims to evaluate visual outcome after Descemet's membrane stripping automated endothelial keratoplasty (DSAEK) and relate to interface and corneal higher-order aberrations (HOAs).

MATERIALS AND METHODS:

We enrolled 16 eyes of 16 patients (eight males and eight females) in this interventional case series and followed DSAEK operation for about two to 20 months. OCULUS Pentacam, as well as other ophthalmic evaluations in follow-up visits, examined interface reflectivity and HOAs. Statistical relations were analyzed.

RESULTS:

There was statistically significant correlation between interface reflectivity and best corrected visual acuity (BCVA) (r = 0.56, P = 0.021). Pachymetry (central corneal thickness) and BCVA had a moderate correlation (r = 0.6, P = 0.013). There was no statistically significant correlation between pachymetry and follow-up time (r = −0.36, P = 0.16). Negative correlation between follow-up and interface reflectivity was also not statistically significant (r = −0.24, P = 0.35). Coma had a significant correlation with BCVA in cornea and cornea front maps (r = 0.74, P = 0.009 and r = 0.71, P = 0.013, respectively).

CONCLUSION:

Significant correlation between interface reflectivity and BSCVA was found, and anterior corneal HOAs are significantly higher than posterior HOAs.

Association between transient interface fluid on intraoperative OCT and textural interface opacity after DSAEK surgery in the PIONEER study

PURPOSE

The aim of this study was to examine the association between transient interface fluid (TIF) and textural interface opacity (TIO) after Descemet stripping automated endothelial keratoplasty (DSAEK) surgery using intraoperative optical coherence tomography (iOCT) in the PIONEER (Prospective Intraoperative and Perioperative Ophthalmic ImagiNg with Optical CoherEncE TomogRaphy) study.

METHODS

All consecutive eyes that underwent DSAEK between October 2011 and September 2013 from the PIONEER intraoperative and perioperative OCT study were included. iOCT images were captured after lenticule apposition with complete air fill and after air-fluid exchange. Postoperative day 1 OCT images were obtained. Outcome variables included the presence of TIO at the graft-host junction and the presence of intraoperative and postoperative interface fluid on OCT.

RESULTS

Seventy-six eyes from 69 patients who underwent DSAEK with iOCT were included. The mean age of the patients was 71 years (range 31-90). The 2 most common indications for surgery were Fuchs dystrophy (63%) and pseudophakic bullous keratopathy (24%). In 18 of 76 (23.7%) eyes, TIF was visible on iOCT post air-fluid exchange. Of these eyes, 14 developed TIO. TIO was observed in 18 of 76 (23.7%) eyes. TIF on iOCT was associated with a significantly higher rate of postoperative TIO (odds ratio = 47.25; P < 0.0001). Sixteen of the 18 eyes that had TIF on iOCT had had resolution on the postoperative day 1 OCT. There was no significant difference in the mean graft thickness between eyes with TIF on iOCT and those without (P = 0.58).

CONCLUSIONS

Eyes with TIF on iOCT are more likely to develop TIO in the postoperative period. It is believed that the process of gap closure results in TIO, possibly secondary to precipitated solutes, retained viscoelastic, or lamellar irregularities caused by delayed adhesion or uneven matching of lamellar fibrils.