Sequential Intracorneal Ring Segment Implantation and Corneal Transepithelial Collagen Cross-Linking in Keratoconus

Intrastromal Corneal Ring Segment Implantation Followed by Simultaneous Topography-Guided Photorefractive Keratectomy and Corneal Cross-Linking for Contact Lens-Intolerant Keratoconus

PURPOSE

This study aimed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of Keraring implantation followed by simultaneous topography-guided photorefractive keratectomy (TGPRK) and corneal cross-linking (CXL) in the management of keratoconus.

METHODS

This is a single-center, private practice, retrospective review. Patients with keratoconus who were intolerant to contact lens wear underwent implantation of the Keraring, followed by TGPRK with CXL from 2 to 36 months after implantation. Main outcome measures were uncorrected distance visual acuity (UDVA), corrected distance visual acuity (CDVA), refraction (cylinder and spherical equivalent), keratometry (steep, maximum, and central), and central corneal thickness (CCT). Patients were followed up for 3 to 60 months postoperatively.

RESULTS

Fifty-seven eyes from 45 patients were included. The mean time between Keraring and TGPRK/CXL was 6.0 ± 6.0 months. Patients were followed up for a mean of 28.6 ± 20.1 months after Keraring insertion. At 12-month follow-up, there was a statistically significant improvement in mean UDVA (0.94 ± 0.49-0.35 ± 0.23, P < 0.01), CDVA (0.39 ± 0.26-0.17 ± 0.15, P < 0.01), cylinder (-4.97 ± 2.68 to -1.74 ± 1.25, P < 0.01), steep keratometry (51.25 ± 3.37-45.03 ± 2.27, P < 0.01), central keratometry (52.59 ± 4.98-46.99 ± 3.53, P < 0.01), and maximum keratometry (58.78 ± 4.22-50.76 ± 3.42, P < 0.01). These results were sustained at 48-month follow-up. CCT decreased at 12 months after TGPRK (461.84 ± 27.46-418.94 ± 45.62, P < 0.01) and remained stable at 60 months. Postoperatively, 2 eyes (3.51%) had corneal haze, resulting in decrease in CDVA; 1 was treated successfully with repeat PRK; and 1 patient (1.75%) had wound melt due to partial Keraring extrusion, which settled with repositioning.

CONCLUSIONS

Keraring implantation followed by simultaneous TGPRK and CXL appears to be effective in the long term in improving UDVA, CDVA, cylinder, CCT, and keratometry in patients with keratoconus who are intolerant to contact lenses.

The efficacy of 2 different phakic intraocular lens implant in keratoconus as an isolated procedure or combined with collagen crosslinking and intra-stromal corneal ring segments: a systematic review and meta-analysis

PURPOSE

To compare the efficacy of phakic intra-ocular lenses in isolation or in combination with corneal crosslinking (CXL) and/or intra-stromal corneal ring segments (ICRS) in keratoconus.

METHODS

Data extracted from the publications meeting the selection. The outcome parameters included mean pre- and post-operative uncorrected distance visual acuity, corrected distance visual acuity (CDVA), sphere and cylinder of refraction and complications. Available data analyzed with Cochrane Review Manager.

RESULTS

A total of 23 studies including 464 eyes were included. All the parameters showed significant improvement in all subgroups other than CDVA in ACPIOL + CXL subgroup and cylinder in PIOL + CXL subgroups. There was not a significant difference between PCPIOL and ACPIOL in the outcomes, exception was more improvement of CDVA in "ACPIOL only" than" PCPIOL only" subgroup.

CONCLUSION

Both PCPIOLs and ACPIOLs are comparably safe and efficient options in management of KCN and their efficacy significantly improves when combined with CXL/ICRS.

Short- and long-term safety and efficacy of corneal collagen cross-linking in progressive keratoconus: A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials

PURPOSE

The purpose of the study is to evaluate the safety and outcomes of corneal collagen cross-linking (CXL) and different CXL protocols in progressive keratoconus (PK) population at short and long-term.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A systematic review and meta-analysis was conducted. A total of eight literature databases were searched (up to February 15, 2022). Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) comparing CXL versus placebo/control or comparing different CXL protocols in the PK population were included. The primary objective was assessment of outcomes of CXL versus placebo and comparison of different CXL protocols in terms of maximum keratometry (Kmax) or Kmax change from baseline (Δ), spherical equivalent, best corrected visual acuity (BCVA), and central corneal thickness (CCT) in both at short term (6 months) and long term (1^st, 2^nd, and 3^rd year or more). The secondary objective was comparative evaluation of safety. For the meta-analysis, the RevMan5.3 software was used.

RESULTS

A total of 48 RCTs were included. Compared to control, CXL was associated with improvement in Δ Kmax at 1 year (4 RCTs, mean difference [MD], -1.78 [-2.71, -0.86], P = 0.0002) and 2 and 3 years (1 RCT); ΔBCVA at 1 year (7 RCTs, -0.10 [-0.14, -0.06], P < 0.00001); and Δ CCT at 1 year (2 RCTs) and 3 years (1 RCT). Compared to conventional CXL (C-CXL), deterioration in Δ Kmax, ΔBCVA and endothelial cell density was seen at long term in the transepithelial CXL (TE-CXL, chemical enhancer). Up to 2 years, there was no difference between TE-CXL using iontophoresis (T-ionto) and C-CXL. At 2 and 4 years, C-CXL performed better compared to accelerated CXL (A-CXL) in terms of improving Kmax. Although CCT was higher in the A-CXL arm at 2 years, there was no difference at 4 years. While exploring heterogeneity among studies, selection of control eye (fellow eye of the same patient vs. eye of different patient) and baseline difference in Kmax were important sources of heterogeneity.

CONCLUSION

CXL outperforms placebo/control in terms of enhancing Kmax and CCT, as well as slowing disease progression over time (till 3 years). T-ionto protocol, on the other hand, performed similarly to C-CXL protocol up to 2 years.

Long-Term Visual, Refractive and Topographic Outcomes of KeraRings Combined with Accelerated Transepithelial Crosslinking for Management of Different Grades of Progressive Keratoconus: A Retrospective Cohort Study

Purpose:

To evaluate long-term visual, refractive, and topographic outcomes of KeraRings intrastromal implantation combined with accelerated transepithelial cross-linking for management of different stages of progressive keratoconus.

Materials and Methods:

This retrospective cohort study included 70 eyes of 70 patients with Amsler-Krumeich grades 1 to 4 keratoconus. They were divided into two groups: group-A included 37 eyes with grades 1-2 keratoconus, and group-B included 33 eyes with grades 3-4 keratoconus. Both groups underwent combined Keraring implantation with TCXL treatment. The main outcome measures included the preoperative and postoperative visual acuity, refraction, keratometry readings, and pachymetry.

Results:

At postoperative month 60, group-B exhibited significantly higher values of all mean uncorrected distance visual acuity (UDVA), corrected distance visual acuity (CDVA), sphere/cylinder/spherical equivalent/defocus equivalent (DEQ), and K1/K2/Kaverages/Kmax parameters compared to that of group A. However, group-A exhibited better stability of postoperative improvements. Keratoconus progression (KCP) was greater in group-B (45.5%) than group-A (10.8%). Two eyes revealed segments' migration while one eye showed tunnel vascularization and opacification with segments' migration.

Conclusion:

The diagnostic criteria of preoperative-KCP are not adequate for the diagnosis of postoperative-KCP following ICRS implantation. UDVA and K average posterior seemed to be more sensitive parameters than K max in documenting early postoperative-KCP. We suggest that deterioration of UDVA≥0.10 log MAR and/or K average posterior ≥0.25 D are highly suspicious of post-ring implantation keratoconus progression (PR-KCP). The occurrence of two of the following parameters: Kmax≥0.50 D, Kaverageanterior≥0.50 D, K average posterior ≥0.25 D, or pachymetry≥1.5% thinning, is diagnostic of PR-KCP. The occurrence of two or more of the following parameters: Kmax≥0.50 D, Kaverageanterior≥0.50 D, Kaverageposterior ≥0.25 D, pachymetry≥ 1.5% thinning or UDVA≥0.10 logMAR, is diagnostic of PR-KCP. We also suggest that Kmax≥0.75 D alone is diagnostic of PR-KCP.

Intracorneal Ring Segments Followed by Simultaneous Topography-Guided Removal of Epithelium and Stroma With Accelerated Collagen Cross-Linking For Keratoconus (I-TRESK/CXL)

PURPOSE

The aim of this study was to assess the visual, topographic, and aberrometric outcomes of a novel tissue sparing technique, topography-guided removal of epithelium, and stroma in keratoconus (TRESK) along with accelerated collagen cross-linking (CXL), 1 month after Intacs insertion.

DESIGN

Prospective interventional study.

METHODS

Fourty-eight eyes (45 patients) with keratoconus underwent femto-assisted Intacs insertion. After 1 month, TRESK and CXL (9 mW/cm2 for 10 minutes) was done. TRESK is a decentered trans-PTK (phototherapeutic keratectomy) with center and area of ablation at the location of the steepest tangential anterior curvature and area of the cone respectively. Total ablation (epithelium plus stroma) was limited to 75 μm. Postoperative measurements were performed 1 month after Intacs, 6 weeks after Intacs followed by TRESK/CXL, and at the final visit 12 months after Intacs followed by TRESK/CXL.

RESULTS

For all eyes studied, uncorrected distance visual acuity and corrected distance visual acuity (CDVA) (logMAR) improved from preoperative means of 1.05 ± 0.05 and 0.31 ± 0.03 logMAR to postoperative means of 0.52 ± 0.05 (P < 0.001) and 0.20 ± 0.02 logMAR (P = 0.009), respectively. The mean preoperative sphere, cylinder and mean refractive spherical equivalent decreased from -4.52 ± 0.98 D, -4.81 ± 0.25 D, -6.93 ± 0.99 D to -0.77 ± 0.53 D (P = 0.029), -3.13 ± 0.24 D (P = 0.002), and -2.34 ± 0.53 D (P = 0.021), respectively with a mean keratometric flattening of 5.06D (P < .0001) at the final visit. In total, 2.08% of the eyes lost 1 Snellen line of CDVA. Sixty eight percent and 27% of the eyes gained 2 Snellen lines or more of uncorrected distance visual acuity and CDVA, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

Simultaneous TRESK with CXL done 1 month after Intacs insertion (I-TRESK) in keratoconus eyes provided significant visual gain with refractive and topographic improvement. This novel procedure involving customized PTK before CXL is safe, easy to plan and perform, and provides good outcomes.

Effect of Sequential Intrastromal Corneal Ring Segment Implantation and Corneal Collagen Crosslinking in Corneal Ectasia

Purpose

To assess the clinical efficacy of sequential intrastromal corneal ring segment (ICRS) implantation and corneal crosslinking (CXL) in corneal ectasia.

Methods

This retrospective case series included eight eyes in which both ICRS implantation and CXL had been performed. CXL was performed within 1 month after ICRS implantation. The clinical outcomes (visual acuity, refractive errors, keratometry, and topographic indices) of these patients were compared with those of patients who had undergone only ICRS implantation (eight eyes) or CXL (20 eyes).

Results

Greater improvement in uncorrected visual acuity was observed in the ICRS + CXL group than in the ICRS or CXL alone groups at both 6 (p = 0.008) and 12 months (p = 0.028). Refractive errors of sphere and spherical equivalent were significantly reduced in both the ICRS (p = 0.002 at 6 months, p = 0.004 at 12 months) and ICRS + CXL groups (p < 0.001 at both 6 and 12 months). Keratometric values including the maximum, minimum, and average were significantly reduced in all 3 groups at postoperative 6 and 12 months; however, the greatest reductions were observed in the ICRS + CXL group (all p < 0.001).

Conclusions

ICRS implantation followed by CXL within 1 month seems to be effective, and may be superior to ICRS or CXL alone in improving visual acuity and reducing refractive errors and keratometric values.

Long-Term Stability With the Athens Protocol (Topography-Guided Partial PRK Combined With Cross-Linking) in Pediatric Patients With Keratoconus

PURPOSE

To evaluate the safety, efficacy, and stability of topography-guided partial PRK combined with corneal cross-linking (CXL) (the Athens Protocol [AP]) in pediatric patients with keratoconus over a 4-year follow-up period.

METHODS

This prospective study included 39 keratoconic eyes of 21 patients younger than 18 years with clinical and imaging evidence of keratoconus progression. Partial topography-guided excimer laser ablation in conjunction with high-fluence CXL was performed in all patients according to the AP. Uncorrected distance visual acuity, corrected distance visual acuity, refraction, keratometry, endothelial cell density, topography, and tomography using both Scheimpflug and optical coherence tomography (OCT) were evaluated for 4 years postoperatively.

RESULTS

At 4 years postoperative, there was significant improvement in mean uncorrected distance visual acuity from 0.51 ± 0.31 (decimal) to 0.65 ± 0.26 (decimal; P < 0.05). Mean corrected distance visual acuity improved from 0.71 ± 0.22 (decimal) preoperatively to 0.81 ± 0.19 (decimal; P < 0.05), respectively. Mean flat keratometry (K1) and mean steep keratometry (K2) readings reduced from 44.95 ± 3.71 D and 49.32 ± 5.05 D, respectively, preoperatively to 43.14 ± 2.95 D and 46.28 ± 4.87 D, respectively, (P < 0.05) at 4 years. The mean anterior maximum keratometry (Kmax) reading reduced from 56.81 ± 2.94 D preoperatively to 48.11 ± 3.17 D at 48 months. The mean index of height decentration was 0.105 ± 0.054 μm preoperatively and 0.049 ± 0.024 (P < 0.05) at 4 years postoperative. Mean preoperative corneal thickness at the thinnest point was 436.7 ± 42.6 μm preoperatively, 392.50 ± 45.68 μm at 12 months postoperative, and 418.42 ± 17.01 μm at 4-year follow-up. Late-onset deep corneal haze, a potential intrinsic complication of this technique in pediatric patients, was encountered in 2 cases at least 1 year after the procedure.

CONCLUSIONS

Long-term results of the AP seem to be safe and effective in pediatric patients, with marked improvement in visual function and keratometric symmetry indices.

Efficacy of Different Procedures of Intra-Corneal Ring Segment Implantation in Keratoconus: a Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Purpose

To evaluate the efficacy of the functional, keratometric, and refractive postoperative parameters of intracorneal ring segment (ICRS) implantation in keratoconus and its association with collagen cross-linking (CXL), photorefractive keratectomy (PRK), and intraocular lenses (IOLs).

Methods

We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis on case series published between 2007 and 2017.

Results

We included 95 case series with a total of 4560 patients. We included 64 studies of the ICRS procedure, 20 studies of ICRS+CXL, 9 studies of ICRS+CXL+PRK, and 5 studies of ICRS+IOL. We demonstrated an overall improvement of all parameters in all procedures. Cylinder was decreased with an overall effect size (ES) of −1.15 (−1.36 to −0.95; I² = 93.7%). Corrected distance visual acuity was improved with an overall ES of 0.89 (0.78 to 1.00; I² = 81.9%). Maximal keratometry was decreased with an overall ES of 0.98 (0.85 to 1.11; I² = 78.9%). ICRS+IOL is the best procedure to improve spherical equivalent and uncorrected distance visual acuity (P < 0.05) compared with other procedures. ICRSs versus ICRS+CXL are similar in all parameters except for corrected distance visual acuity. ICRS+CXL+PRK is better than ICRS alone in all parameters except for the correction of spherical equivalent.

Conclusions

Although the quality and strength of the data are questionable, ICRS implantation is an effective strategy to preserve visual function in keratoconic patients. Particularly, ICRS+CXL+PRK could be a low invasive procedure to propose to young keratoconic patients.

Translational Relevance

To propose an overview of postoperative parameters on each ICRS procedure on keratoconus.

Intrastromal corneal ring segments for treating keratoconus

BACKGROUND

Keratoconus is a degenerative condition of the cornea that profoundly affects vision and vision-specific quality of life. The axial cornea thins and protrudes, resulting in irregularity and, eventually, scarring of the cornea. There are multiple options available for treating keratoconus. Intrastromal corneal ring segments are small, crescent-shaped plastic rings that are placed in the deep, peripheral corneal stroma in order to flatten the cornea. They are made of polymethylmethacrylate (PMMA). The procedure does not involve corneal tissue nor does it invade the central optical zone. Intrastromal corneal ring segments are approved for use when contact lenses or spectacles are no longer adequate.

OBJECTIVES

To evaluate the effectiveness and safety of intrastromal corneal ring segments as a treatment for keratoconus.

SEARCH METHODS

We searched the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL) (which contains the Cochrane Eyes and Vision Trials Register) (2018, Issue 1); Ovid MEDLINE; Embase.com; PubMed; Latin American and Caribbean Health Sciences Literature Database (LILACS); ClinicalTrials.gov and the World Health Organization (WHO) International Clinical Trials Registry Platform (ICTRP). We did not implement any date or language restrictions in the electronic search for trials. We last searched the electronic databases on 25 January 2018.

SELECTION CRITERIA

Two review authors independently assessed records from the electronic searches to identify randomized controlled trials (RCTs). Disagreements were resolved by discussion.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

We planned for two authors to independently review full-text reports, using standard methodological procedures expected by Cochrane.

MAIN RESULTS

We found no RCTs comparing intrastromal corneal ring segments with spectacles or contact lenses.

AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS

In the absence of eligible RCTs to review, no conclusions can be drawn.

Conventional and transepithelial corneal cross-linking for patients with keratoconus

Previous studies investigating the effectiveness of conventional corneal collagen cross-linking (CXL) and transepithelial CXL in keratoconus treatment have reported conflicting outcomes. Therefore, we conducted a meta-analysis to compare the effectiveness of these treatments. We searched MEDLINE, EMBASE, and Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials for prospective randomized controlled trials (RCTs) with no restrictions. We included visual acuity (corrected distance visual acuity, uncorrected distance visual acuity) and corneal keratometry (K) as primary outcome parameters, and spherical equivalent, central corneal thickness (CCT), and endothelial cell density, as secondary parameters. We finally included seven reports (including six RCTs involving 305 participants and 344 eyes). Our analysis revealed significant postoperative differences in average K and CCT values between conventional and transepithelial CXL-treated patients [K: weighted mean difference (WMD) = 0.79, 95% confidence interval (CI) = 0.04-1.53, p = 0.04; CCT: WMD = 4.53, 95% CI = 0.42-8.64, p = 0.03]. In contrast, we did not find any significant differences in visual acuity, flattest K value, steepest K value, cylinder K value, apex K value, spherical equivalent, or endothelial cell density between groups. In conclusion, transepithelial CXL has a more protective influence on corneal thickness than conventional CXL, and results in lesser postoperative corneal flattening. Further investigation of the clinical outcomes of transepithelial CXL is required.

Efficacy and safety of transepithelial corneal collagen crosslinking surgery versus standard corneal collagen crosslinking surgery for keratoconus: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials

Background

The aim of this study was to evaluate the efficacy and safety of transepithelial corneal collagen crosslinking (transepithelial CXL) versus standard corneal collagen crosslinking (epithelium-off CXL) on keratoconus.

Methods

Eligible studies were identified by systematically searching PubMed, the Cochrane Library and Embase. Topographic parameters, corrected distant visual acuity (CDVA), uncorrected distant visual acuity (UDVA), and corneal thickness (CT) were assessed by the pooled weighted mean differences (WMDs) of the change from baseline to the end of follow up. Quality was assessed according to Cochrane handbook. And we used Review Manager to analysis the included trials.

Results

Three trials involving 244 eyes were evaluated, with 111 eyes in the standard CXL group and 133 eyes in the transepithelial CXL group. The pooled results showed that there were significant differences between the two groups in maximum keratometry (mean difference = 1.05D, 95% CI 0.19 to 1.92, P = 0.02)),and the standard CXL is more effective in decreasing the maximum keratometry at least 12 months after operation; the transepithelial CXL group gained more improvement in CDVA (mean difference = −0.07, 95% CI -0.12 to −0.02, P = 0.007);there were no significant differences in uncorrected distant visual acuity (UDVA) between the two groups (mean difference = −0.03, 95% CI -0.20 to 0.15, P = 0.75). A similar change was found in corneal thickness (mean difference = 4.35, 95% CI -0.43 to 9.13, P = 0.07)).

Conclusions

The standard CXL is more effective in decreasing the maximum keratometry than the transepithelial CXL; the transepithelial CXL provided favorable visual outcomes; they both exhibit similar safety.

Sequential Keraring implantation and corneal cross-linking for the treatment of keratoconus in children with vernal keratoconjunctivitis

Purpose

The purpose of this study was to assess the safety and efficacy of femtosecond laser-assisted Keraring implantation followed by transepithelial accelerated corneal collagen cross-linking (CXL) for the treatment of keratoconus in children with vernal keratoconjunctivitis (VKC).

Study design

This is a prospective interventional non-comparative case series.

Patients and methods

Eighteen eyes of 11 children with keratoconus and VKC were included in this study. All the cases were treated with femtosecond laser-assisted Keraring implantation followed after 2 weeks by transepithelial accelerated CXL, and the patients were followed up for 1 year.

Results

The preoperative mean uncorrected visual acuity (UCVA) was 1.01±0.2 (logMAR), whereas the postoperative mean UCVA was 0.6±0.2. The preoperative mean best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA) was 0.6±0.1, whereas the postoperative mean BCVA was 0.40±0.2. The preoperative average keratometry was 50.3±2.7 D, whereas the postoperative average keratometry was 45.8±3.1 D.

Conclusion

The results of this study suggest that femtosecond laser-assisted Keraring implantation followed by CXL is safe and effective in the management of keratoconus in children with VKC. However, studies with a longer follow-up period are needed.