Evolution Profiles of Different Corneal Parameters in Progressive Keratoconus

Keratoconus Diagnosis: From Fundamentals to Artificial Intelligence: A Systematic Narrative Review

The remarkable recent advances in managing keratoconus, the most common corneal ectasia, encouraged researchers to conduct further studies on the disease. Despite the abundance of information about keratoconus, debates persist regarding the detection of mild cases. Early detection plays a crucial role in facilitating less invasive treatments. This review encompasses corneal data ranging from the basic sciences to the application of artificial intelligence in keratoconus patients. Diagnostic systems utilize automated decision trees, support vector machines, and various types of neural networks, incorporating input from various corneal imaging equipment. Although the integration of artificial intelligence techniques into corneal imaging devices may take time, their popularity in clinical practice is increasing. Most of the studies reviewed herein demonstrate a high discriminatory power between normal and keratoconus cases, with a relatively lower discriminatory power for subclinical keratoconus.

Natural history and predictors for progression in pediatric keratoconus

We studied the demographic and clinical predictors associated with keratoconus progression in a pediatric population. Retrospective cohort study. We evaluated 305 eyes without previous surgeries from 168 patients, 9 to < 18 years old, and with a minimum 36-month follow-up in a hospital corneal ambulatory. We used Kaplan-Meyer survival curves; the dependent variable (main outcome measure) was the interval time (months) until the event, defined as an increase of 1.5 D in the maximum keratometry (Kmax), obtained with Pentacam. We evaluated the predictors: age (< or ≥ 14 years), sex, keratoconus familial history, allergy medical history, and the baseline tomographic parameters: mean keratometry (Km), Kmax (< or ≥ 55 D); and thinnest pachymetry (TP). We used log-rank tests and compared median survival times for right (RE)/left eyes (LE) and better (BE)/worse eyes (WE). A p value < 0.05 was considered significant. The patients' mean ± SD age was 15.1 ± 2.3 years old; 67% were boys, 30% were < 14 years, 15% had keratoconus familial history, and 70% were allergic. The general Kaplan-Meyer curves showed no differences between RE/LE or BE/WE. RE with allergy and LE with Kmax ≥ 55 D had smaller survival times ((95%CI 9.67-32.1), p 0.031 and (95%CI 10.1-44.1), p 0.042, respectively). For BE and WE, Kmax ≥ 55 D had smaller survival times ((95% CI 6.42- ), p 0.031 and (95%CI 8.75-31.8), p 0.043, respectively). Keratoconus progression was similar between RE/LE and BE/WE. Steepest corneas are predictors of faster progression. Allergy is also a predictor of keratoconus progression in RE.

MicroRNA Profiling in the Aqueous Humor of Keratoconus Eyes

Purpose

To identify differentially expressed (DE) microRNAs (miRNAs) in the aqueous humor (AH) of keratoconus (KC) eyes using next-generation sequencing and to explore whether DE miRNAs might play roles in KC pathophysiology.

Methods

The small RNAs in the AH of 15 KC eyes and 15 myopia eyes (the control group) were sequenced on an Illumina NovaSeq 6000 platform. Gene Oncology and Kyoto Encyclopedia of Genes and Genome enrichment analyses were performed. Receiver operating characteristic curves were used to identify potential KC biomarkers.

Results

We identified 204 miRNAs in the AH of the KC group and 200 in the AH of the control group. Fourteen miRNAs were differentially expressed between the two groups; four miRNAs were upregulated and 10 downregulated in KC AH. The possible pathways regulated by the DE miRNAs included antigen processing and presentation, endocytosis, mismatch repair, and Hippo signaling. The AH concentrations of miR-222-3p, miR-363-3p, and miR-423-5p exhibited areas under the curves of 1.

Conclusions

We profiled the DE miRNAs of the AH of KC eyes. These miRNAs may be associated with KC pathogenesis and could serve as KC biomarkers.

Translational Relevance

Data on aberrantly expressed miRNAs in KC combined with bioinformatics analyses suggest possible roles for specific miRNAs. The DE miRNAs may serve as diagnostic KC biomarkers.

Comparison of corneal tomography using a novel swept-source optical coherence tomographer and rotating Scheimpflug system in normal and keratoconus eyes: repeatability and agreement analysis

Background

To determine the repeatability and agreement using corneal tomography of a swept-source optical coherence tomographer (SS-OCT) compared to a rotating Scheimpflug camera (RSC) in normal eyes and keratoconus (KC) eyes.

Methods

This prospective repeatability analysis was performed at the Department of Ophthalmology of University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus, Dresden, Germany. Forty-three normal and 57 KC eyes were enrolled in the study. Three consecutive measurements were performed by the same operator on each device. Corneal parameters of anterior and posterior corneal surface, such as simulated keratometry (SimK), as well as central and thinnest corneal thickness were evaluated. Repeatability and agreement were assessed by using the coefficient of repeatability and Bland-Altman analysis.

Results

The repeatability of anterior corneal parameters was comparable between RSC and SS-OCT in normal eyes (repeatability < 0.5 D). Repeatability was increased in mild and moderate KC for all parameters using both devices. In moderate KC, repeatability of Kmax was 1.33 D and 0.78 D for RSC and SS-OCT, respectively. Repeatability of posterior corneal parameters was consistently better for SS-OCT. Significant offsets and wide ranges of limits of agreement were found between the devices for SimK and corneal thickness values.

Conclusions

SS-OCT showed highly repeatable measurements of anterior and posterior corneal parameters in normal and KC eyes. Compared to RSC, the SS-OCT had a better repeatability of anterior corneal parameters in mild and moderate KC as well as posterior corneal parameters in all groups. Both devices should not be used interchangeably in the diagnostic process of patients.

Trial registration NCT04251143 at Clinicaltrials.gov, registered on 12 March 2018, https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT04251143?cond=Keratoconus&cntry=DE&city=Dresden&draw=2&rank=1

Comparing the natural progression and clinical features of keratoconus between pediatric and adult patients

To present the natural course of keratoconus (KC) and compare pediatric and adult patients. Design A retrospective cohort study. Setting Hospital-based. Patient Population In total, 152 patients (288 eyes) diagnosed with KC at Chang Gung Memorial Hospital, Taiwan, were included. Previously managed patients and those with missing optical data were excluded. Observation Procedures Patients were divided into pediatric (≤ 18 years) and adult (> 18 years) groups. Demographics, clinical data, and optical variables were collected, including corrected distance visual acuity (CDVA), refractive error, and keratometric readings (K). Main Outcome Measure Optical variables at the final follow-up before aggressive treatment. Results In total, 20 pediatric (37 eyes) and 132 adults (251 eyes) patients were eligible for this study. The mean follow-up time was 2.98 years. Male predominance was observed in both groups. Both groups had similar clinical characteristics and optical variables at the initial diagnosis. Pediatric patients progressed significantly more rapidly in refractive errors, including spheres and cylinders, spherical equivalence, steep K, and flat K during the follow-up. However, significant change between the two study groups was only seen in sphere refractive error spherical equivalence. Conclusion Pediatric patients had more rapidly progressive KC than adult patients, so early detection and frequent follow-up for prompt interventions are necessary for these patients.

Astigmatic Vectorial Analysis in Pediatric Keratoconus After Unilateral Cross-Linking Treatment

PURPOSE

The aims of this study were to evaluate the treatment response of pediatric keratoconus (KC) patients to unilateral corneal collagen cross-linking (CXL) in treated eyes, disease progression in untreated eyes, and define the predictive value of astigmatic parameters by astigmatic vectorial analysis.

METHODS

Pediatric patients with KC with CXL-treated progressive eye and untreated fellow eye were included. Patients with other ocular conditions and a history of previous ocular surgery were excluded. Astigmatic changes in anterior and posterior corneal surfaces were evaluated with vectorial analysis. The receiver operating characteristic curves were analyzed to detect the best parameter that discriminates treated and untreated groups.

RESULTS

Thirty-two eyes of 16 patients with at least 2-year follow-up were analyzed. The maximum keratometry (K) in CXL-treated eyes remained stable (from 53.51 ± 2.86-53.41 ± 2.84 diopter (D), P = 0.84) while the steepest K increased in untreated eyes (from 47.82 ± 1.71-49.59 ± 3.32 D, P = 0.03). The oblique components of corneal astigmatism in CXL-treated eyes were higher than those of fellow eyes (all P < 0.05), which significantly decreased in the anterior 3-mm zone after treatment (P = 0.048). The mean differential astigmatism magnitudes were significantly higher in treated eyes (all P < 0.05). The refractive centroid remained unchanged in treated eyes (P = 0.553) and shifted in the oblique direction in untreated eyes (P = 0.04). The oblique differential astigmatism in the anterior 7-mm zone showed the highest area under the curve value in predicting treatment efficacy (0.813, 95% confidence interval: 0.646-0.981, P < 0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

Astigmatic vectorial analysis is an objective tool for longitudinal assessment of clinical outcomes in KC. Changes in the oblique components of corneal astigmatism might predict progression and treatment efficacy.

Superiority of Baseline Biomechanical Properties over Corneal Tomography in Predicting Keratoconus Progression

Objectives:

To determine corneal biomechanical and tomographic factors associated with keratoconus (KC) progression.

Materials and Methods:

This study included 111 eyes of 111 KC patients who were followed-up for at least 1 year. Progression was defined as the presence of progressive change between the first two consecutive baseline visits in any single parameter (A, B, or C) ≥95% confidence interval or two parameters ≥80% confidence interval for the KC population evaluated by the Belin ABCD progression display. The eye with better initial tomographic findings was chosen as the study eye. Analyzed Pentacam parameters were maximum keratometry (Kmax), minimum pachymetry (Kmin), central corneal thickness, thinnest corneal thickness, 90° vertical anterior and posterior coma data in Zernike analysis, and Belin Ambrosio Enhanced Ectasia Display Final D value. Corneal hysteresis (CH) and corneal resistance factor (CRF) were analyzed together with the waveform parameters obtained with Ocular Response Analyzer (ORA). Factors related to KC progression were evaluated using t-tests and logistic regression tests. Statistical significance was accepted as p<0.05.

Results:

There were 44 (mean age: 27.1±8.5 years, female: 25) and 67 (mean age: 31.1±9.1 years, female: 36) patients in the progressive and non-progressive groups, respectively. Although Pentacam parameters along with CH and CRF were similar between the two groups, ORA waveform parameter derived from the second applanation signal p2area was statistically significantly lower in the progressive group (p=0.02). Each 100-unit decrease in p2area increased the likelihood of keratoconus progression by approximately 30% in the logistic regression analysis (β=0.707, p=0.001, model r2=0.27).

Conclusion:

Parameters derived from the second applanation signal of ORA may be superior to conventional ORA parameters and corneal tomography in predicting KC progression.

Determining the Most Suitable Tomography-Based Parameters to Describe Progression in Keratoconus. The Retrospective Digital Computer Analysis of Keratoconus Evolution Project

OBJECTIVES

To identify the most suitable parameters to describe keratoconus progression.

METHODS

Longitudinal retrospective cohort study. Monotonicity and consistency of over 250 parameters extracted from the Pentacam tomographies (Oculus, Germany) of 743 patients was analyzed. Repeatability was calculated for 69 patients (published elsewhere). The parameters were scored based on their performance for each desired feature and a global ranking was created.

RESULTS

Overall, parameters that average a higher number of corneal points performed better than single-point parameters. Zonal keratometries on areas surrounding the maximum curvature point and the steepest front keratometry performed best, followed by front best-fit sphere and mean keratometry of both surfaces. Platform-dependent indices (e.g., Belin-Ambrósio Deviation- or index height decentration-) obtained good scores, but platform-independent LOGIK performed slightly better. Finally, although minimum radius in both surfaces worked competently, minimum pachymetry (PachyMin) performed considerably poorer.

CONCLUSIONS

We presented a list of parameters whose behavior was repeatable, monotonic and consistent, features desirable to describe change. The parameters normally used to follow keratoconus progression may not be the most adequate, as evidenced by the poor performance of PachyMin. Although calculated for a specific Scheimpflug device, most of the best-performing parameters are platform-independent variables, and results may be generalized, pending validation.

Baseline Findings in the Retrospective Digital Computer Analysis of Keratoconus Evolution (REDCAKE) Project

PURPOSE

To present the baseline data for a large cohort of patients with keratoconus enrolled in the Retrospective Digital Computer Analysis of Keratoconus Evolution (REDCAKE) study.

METHODS

Eight centers contributed the Scheimpflug tomographical data for 906 patients with keratoconus, 743 measured with a Pentacam and 163 with a Galilei. The stage of keratoconus at baseline, the location of the reference points, minimum pachymetry (Pmin), and maximum keratometry (Kmax) were analyzed. The intereye asymmetry was evaluated for Kmax (anterior and posterior), Pmin, and keratoconus stage. Average maps and elevation profiles were calculated for each degree of keratoconus.

RESULTS

Keratoconus was more frequently diagnosed in men (73%) than in women (27%). At baseline, 500/1155 eyes (43%) presented with moderate to severe changes in the posterior surface, whereas moderate/severe changes were only found in 252 and 63 eyes when evaluating anterior surface and pachymetry, respectively. The location of Pmin was usually inferotemporal (94% OD and 94% OS), while the location of Kmax showed more variability and significantly higher distance from apex (P < 0.05). The keratoconus presentation was chiefly asymmetric for all the parameters studied. Clear differences between stages could be identified in the maps and elevation profiles.

CONCLUSIONS

The staging map set presented can be used as a graphical guidance to classify keratoconus stage. Keratoconus presented asymmetrically, and generally the posterior surface was more affected than the anterior surface or the thickness. Asymmetry is playing a role in KC detection. Although Pmin was almost invariably located inferotemporally, Kmax location showed higher variability and distance from the apex.

Repeatability of the Pentacam HR in Various Grades of Keratoconus

PURPOSE

To evaluate the repeatability of an extensive number of relevant indices with the Pentacam HR in keratoconus of varying severity and normal eyes.

DESIGN

Reliability analysis.

METHODS

This study was performed at Antwerp University Hospital, Belgium, and enrolled 20 healthy volunteers (20 eyes) and 69 patients (69 eyes) with keratoconus. Three consecutive measurements were performed by the same operator with Pentacam HR in keratoconus and normal eyes. Exclusion criteria included past ocular surgery, recent rigid contact lens wear, and corneal scarring. The keratoconus group was subdivided according to the Belin/Ambrosio total deviation value: subclinical, mild, and moderate. The within-subject standard deviation and repeatability limit were computed for repeatability assessment. The tolerance index (TI) was calculated to compare across parameters with different measurement scales. For the sample size included, TI > 0.36 signified statistical significance at the 0.05 level.

RESULTS

Repeatability in subclinical keratoconus did not differ significantly from controls (P > .05), except for wavefront aberrations. In mild keratoconus, 11 of 18 (61.1%) anterior corneal, 7 of 14 (50%) posterior corneal, 2 of 5 (40%) pachymetry, 7 of 11 (63.6%) combined, and 1 of 6 (16.7%) densitometry parameters showed significantly worse repeatability compared to controls (TI > 0.36). Repeatability of most parameters worsened in moderate disease. In particular, maximal keratometry and anterior astigmatism showed significantly worse repeatability in moderate keratoconus.

CONCLUSIONS

Measurement variability of Pentacam HR is of clinical relevance when assessing for progression of keratoconus. We provide reference repeatability values and scale independent analysis of relevant corneal parameters in keratoconus of varying degrees.

The impact of hybrid contact lenses on keratoconus progression after accelerated transepithelial corneal cross-linking

PURPOSE

To investigate the effect of hybrid contact lenses (HCLs) on keratoconus (KCN) progression after accelerated transepithelial cross-linking (A-TE CXL).

METHODS

Thirty-five eyes of 26 patients who preferred Ultrahealth HCLs for an optical correction after A-TE CXL formed the study group, and 45 eyes of 34 patients who preferred spectacle correction were age- and sex-matched to form the control group. Corrected distance visual acuity (CDVA), maximum keratometry, mean keratometry, apical posterior keratometry, cylindrical power, minimum corneal thickness, keratoconus vertex indices and curvature asymmetry indices obtained by Scheimpflug corneal topography were compared before, 6 and 12 months after the procedure. Anterior segment optic coherence tomography (AS-OCT) was performed to measure the apical corneal clearance of HCL-wearing patients.

RESULTS

The median pre-CXL CDVA value of the patients in the HCL group was logMAR 0.30 (0.20-1.0), and it was logMAR 0.30 (0.10-1.0) in the spectacle-corrected group. There was a significant increase in CDVA 6 and 12 months after CXL procedure in both groups (p < 0.001, 0.003, respectively). The median front curve asymmetry index (FCAsym) significantly improved after A-TE CXL in the HCL group. The pre-CXL and 12th-month topographic comparisons of the spectacle-corrected group revealed no significant difference. In addition, no significant difference was observed between topographic alterations of two groups (p > 0.05).

CONCLUSION

The CDVA significantly improved, and KCN progression was halted in patients wearing HCL 12 months after A-TE CXL. Besides, FCAsym indices can be considered for follow-up of the HCL-wearing patients as an assistive parameter to AS-OCT measurements.

Distinguishing Highly Asymmetric Keratoconus Eyes Using Dual Scheimpflug/Placido Analysis

PURPOSE

To identify the best metrics or combination of metrics that provide the highest predictive power between normal eyes and the clinically unaffected eye of patients with highly asymmetric keratoconus using data from a Dual Scheimpflug/Placido device.

DESIGN

Retrospective case-control study.

METHODS

Combined Dual Scheimpflug/Placido imaging was obtained from the Galilei G4 device (Ziemer Ophthalmic Systems AG, Port, Switzerland) in 31 clinically unaffected eyes with highly asymmetric keratoconus and 178 eyes from 178 patients with bilaterally normal corneal examinations that underwent uneventful LASIK with at least 1 year follow-up. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves were generated to determine area under the curve (AUC), sensitivity, and specificity for 87 metrics, and logistic regression modeling was used to determine optimal variable combinations.

RESULTS

No individual metric achieved an AUC greater than 0.79. A combined model consisting of 9 metrics yielded an AUC of 0.96, with 90.3% sensitivity and 92.6% specificity. Among those 9 metrics included, 5 related to corneal pachymetry: Opposite Sector Index and Anterior Height BFS Z from the anterior surface, Asphericity and Asymmetry Index, Posterior Height BFS Z, and Posterior Height BFS X from the posterior surface. The strongest variable in the model was the thinnest point location on the horizontal (x) axis.

CONCLUSION

While individual metrics performed poorly, using a combination of metrics from the combined Dual Scheimpflug/Placido device provided a useful model for differentiating normal corneas from the clinically normal eyes of patients with highly asymmetric keratoconus. Pachymetry values were the most impactful metrics.

The natural history of corneal topographic progression of keratoconus after age 30 years in non-contact lens wearers

BACKGROUND/AIMS

To determine if significant progression of disease occurs in older, non-contact lens wearing, subjects with keratoconus and to identify potential predictive factors.

METHODS

Clinical and computerised corneal topography records of subjects with keratoconus attending a specialist optometry practice were retrospectively analysed to identify those aged ≥30 years, with ≥2 consultations ≥12 months apart, no contact lens wear and no corneal scarring, surgery or corneal hydrops. Topographic parameters assessed included: maximum keratometry (Kmax), steep keratometry (Ksteep), flat keratometry (Kflat), inferior-superior (I-S) ratio and the surface asymmetry and regularity (surface asymmetry index and surface regularity index) indices.

RESULTS

Of the 449 subjects with keratoconus assessed, 43 eyes of 27 patients (6.01%) met inclusion criteria, with median age 38.45 (12.86) years at baseline and median follow-up 4.36 (8.68) years. There was a significant increase in Kmax (0.30 (1.21) D), Ksteep (0.27 (0.90) D), Kflat (0.34 (1.12) D) and I-S (0.26 (0.82) D) between baseline and final review, p<0.05. Notably, 18.6%-25.6% of eyes demonstrated ≥1.00 D increase in one or more of four principal topographic parameters (Kmax, Ksteep, Kflat, I-S ratio), while 18.5%-37.0% of subjects had ≥1.00 D increase in the aforementioned parameters in at least one eye over the study period. However, <10% of eyes exhibited ≥1.00 D increase/year in all topographic parameters. The only significant predictor of progression was follow-up time.

CONCLUSIONS

This study confirms that keratoconus may continue to progress beyond age 30. Older subjects with keratoconus should be monitored for progression, particularly with respect to possible corneal collagen cross-linking or astigmatic correction in cataract surgery.