Synergy Testing of Antiamoebic Agents for Acanthamoeba: Antagonistic Effect of Voriconazole

Antiamoebic Susceptibility in Acanthamoeba Keratitis: Comparison of Isolates From South India and Northern California

PURPOSE

Outcomes of Acanthamoeba keratitis are often worse in India than in the United States. The goal of this study was to determine whether antiamoebic susceptibility patterns were different when comparing Acanthamoeba isolates from India with those of the United States.

METHODS

Acanthamoeba isolates were obtained from corneal scrapings of 43 patients with infectious keratitis seen at the Francis I. Proctor Foundation (N = 23) and Aravind Eye Hospital (N = 20) from 2008 through 2012 and plated on growth media. A previously described minimum cysticidal concentration (MCC) assay was performed by a single laboratory technician to assess susceptibility to 5 antiamoebic agents for all isolates. Testing was conducted in triplicate, with the median MCC chosen for analyses.

RESULTS

The MCC (μg/mL) of polyhexamethylene biguanide was 6.25 [IQR 5.47-12.5] for Aravind isolates and 6.25 [IQR 6.25-9.375] for Proctor isolates ( P = 0.75), corresponding values were 6.25 [IQR 3.125-6.25] and 3.125 [IQR 3.125-9.375] for chlorhexidine ( P = 0.81), 2500 [IQR 2500-5000] and 5000 [IQR 1250-20,000] for voriconazole ( P = 0.25), 15.6 [IQR 15.6-39.0625] and 15.6 [IQR 15.6-31.25] for hexamidine ( P = 0.92), and 15.6 [IQR 7.81-15.6] and 15.6 [IQR 7.81-31.25] for propamidine ( P = 0.42).

CONCLUSIONS

This study found no statistically significant differences in antiamoebic susceptibility of Indian versus US samples from Acanthamoeba keratitis clinical isolates. These findings suggest that differences in antiamoebic susceptibility are likely not responsible for differential outcomes in Acanthamoeba keratitis between the 2 locations.

Evaluation of in vitro activity of five antimicrobial agents on Acanthamoeba isolates and their toxicity on human corneal epithelium

BACKGROUND

Acanthamoeba keratitis (AK) is an important cause of ocular morbidity in both contact lens wearers and non wearers. Medical management comprises prolonged empiric treatment with multiple drugs, leading to adverse effects and suboptimal cure. The present study evaluated the efficiency and safety of common antimicrobial agents used in treatment of AK.

METHODS

Six Acanthamoeba isolates (four AK, two water samples) were axenized and subjected to in vitro susceptibility testing against chlorhexidine, pentamidine isethionate, polymyxin B, miltefosine, and fluconazole to check for trophocidal and cysticidal activity. The safety profile was analysed by observing the cytotoxicity of the highest cidal concentration toward human corneal epithelial cell (HCEC) line.

RESULTS

Chlorhexidine had the lowest cidal concentration against both cysts and trophozoites (range 4.16-25 μg/ml) followed by pentamidine isethionate (range 25-166.7 μg/ml). Both agents were nontoxic to HCEC. Polymyxin B (range 25-200 μg/ml) and fluconazole (range 64-512 μg/ml) had relatively higher minimum inhibitory concentrations (MIC); fluconazole was nontoxic even at 1024 μg/ml, but cytotoxicity was observed at 400 μg/ml with polymyxin B. Miltefosine was not effective against cysts at tested concentrations. A. castellanii were more susceptible to all agents (except pentamidine isethionate) than A. lenticulata. Clinical isolates were less susceptible to polymyxin B and fluconazole than environmental isolates, reverse was true for miltefosine.

CONCLUSION

Chlorhexidine and pentamidine isethionate were the most effective and safe agents against both trophozoites and cysts forms of our Acanthamoeba isolates. Fluconazole had higher MIC but was nontoxic. Polymyxin B was effective at high MIC but therapeutic dose was found toxic. Miltefosine, at tested concentrations, could not inhibit cysts of Acanthamoeba. Clinical isolates had higher MICs for polymyxin B and fluconazole.

Evaluation of Amebicidal and Cysticidal Activities of Antifungal Drug Isavuconazonium Sulfate against Acanthamoeba T4 Strains

Acanthamoeba species of amebae are often associated with Acanthamoeba keratitis, a severe corneal infection. Isavuconazonium sulfate is an FDA-approved drug for the treatment of invasive aspergillosis and mucormycosis. This prodrug is metabolized into the active isavuconazole moiety. Isavuconazole was previously identified to have amebicidal and cysticidal activity against Acanthamoeba T4 strains, but the activity of its prodrug, isavuconazonium sulfate, against trophozoites and cysts remains unknown. Since it is not known if isavuconazonium can be metabolized into isavuconazole in the human eye, we evaluated the activities of isavuconazonium sulfate against trophozoites and cysts of three T4 genotype strains of Acanthamoeba. Isavuconazonium displayed amebicidal activity at nanomolar concentrations as low as 1.4 nM and prevented excystation of cysts at concentrations as low as 136 μM. We also investigated the cysticidal activity of isavuconazonium sulfate in combination with a currently used amebicidal drug polyhexamethylene biguanide (PHMB). Although combination of isavuconazonium with PHMB did not elicit an obvious synergistic cysticidal activity, the combination did not cause an antagonistic effect on the cysts of Acanthamoeba T4 strains. Collectively, these findings suggest isavuconazonium retains potency against Acanthamoeba T4 strains and could be adapted for Acanthamoeba keratitis treatment.

Acanthamoeba Keratitis: an update on amebicidal and cysticidal drug screening methodologies and potential treatment with azole drugs

Introduction: Acanthamoeba encompasses several species of free-living ameba encountered commonly throughout the environment. Unfortunately, these species of ameba can cause opportunistic infections that result in Acanthamoeba keratitis, granulomatous amebic encephalitis, and occasionally systemic infection.Areas covered: This review discusses relevant literature found through PubMed and Google scholar published as of January 2021. The review summarizes current common Acanthamoeba keratitis treatments, drug discovery methodologies available for screening potential anti-Acanthamoeba compounds, and the anti-Acanthamoeba activity of various azole antifungal agents.Expert opinion: While several biguanide and diamidine antimicrobial agents are available to clinicians to effectively treat Acanthamoeba keratitis, no singular treatment can effectively treat every Acanthamoeba keratitis case.Efforts to identify new anti-Acanthamoeba agents include trophozoite cell viability assays, which are amenable to high-throughput screening. Cysticidal assays remain largely manual and would benefit from further automation development. Additionally, the existing literature on the effectiveness of various azole antifungal agents for treating Acanthamoeba keratitis is incomplete or contradictory, suggesting the need for a systematic review of all azoles against different pathogenic Acanthamoeba strains.

Assessment of Antimicrobial Activity of Dehydrated Amniotic Membrane in Infectious Keratitis: A Small Retrospective Case Series and In Vitro Study

PURPOSE

To describe a small case series of infectious keratitis with poor visual outcomes after amniotic membrane (AM) placement and to prospectively evaluate whether AM demonstrates antibacterial activity in vitro against pathogens commonly isolated from infectious corneal ulcers.

METHODS

A retrospective case series and in vitro study of antibacterial activity of dehydrated AM using disk diffusion and measurement of inhibitory zones for bacterial assessment and inverted microscopy analysis for Acanthamoeba sp. growth.

RESULTS

Three cases of known etiology infectious keratitis are described where the clinical presentation worsened after treatment with AM. In vitro analysis of dehydrated AM, with and without a soft contact lens, demonstrated no inhibition of growth against Pseudomonas aeruginosa or Streptococcus pneumoniae. There was minimal growth inhibition of Staphylococcus aureus, although these zones of inhibition were much smaller than that surrounding the positive control. For Acanthamoeba sp., solubilized, dehydrated AM did not alter cyst density.

CONCLUSIONS

In an in vitro analysis, dehydrated AM did not provide evidence for a potentially clinically meaningful antibacterial effect against organisms commonly isolated from corneal ulcers.

Voriconazole in the successful management of a case of Acanthamoeba-Cladosporium keratitis

Purpose

Acanthamoeba and fungal infections can be recalcitrant to therapy - more so when the deeper layers of the corneas are involved. We describe the diagnosis and successful management strategies employed in a case of deep keratitis due to co-infection with Acanthamoeba and Cladosporium sp.

Observations

Once the diagnosis of co-infection with both Acanthamoeba and Cladosporium was made, treatment was initiated with a combination of PHMB, chlorhexidine, natamycin, and voriconazole; to which the response was favorable. Signs of relapse with spread of the infection to the deeper plane and the presence of endothelial exudates were noted at 5 weeks. This was attributed to poor compliance. Though the response to re-initiation of therapy under direct supervision was once again favorable; it was only after the introduction of intrastromal voriconazole repeated at timely intervals that rapid and complete resolution was obtained.

Conclusions

Severe keratitis due to fungi or Acanthamoeba very often requires surgical intervention. Complete resolution with medical therapy was obtained only after the introduction of intrastromal voriconazole; thereby avoiding a therapeutic keratoplasty. The addition of voriconzole both topically and particularly intrastromally facilitated faster resolution as well as restricted the duration of therapy with more toxic drugs such as phmb and chlorhexidine.

A randomized masked pilot clinical trial to compare the efficacy of topical 1% voriconazole ophthalmic solution as monotherapy with combination therapy of topical 0.02% polyhexamethylene biguanide and 0.02% chlorhexidine in the treatment of Acanthamoeba keratitis

PURPOSE

To compare the efficacy of topical voriconazole 1% and the combination therapy of 0.02% polyhexamethylene biguanide (PHMB) and 0.02% chlorhexidine for the treatment of Acanthamoeba keratitis (AK).

METHODS

This is a prospective, pilot, double-masked randomized comparative study. Twenty-three eyes of 23 patients with microbiologically (smear and/or growth on culture) confirmed AK were randomized to group BG (PHMB 0.02% and chlorhexidine 0.02%) or group VZ (voriconazole 1%). Primary outcome measure was change in geometric mean (GM) of the corneal ulcer size at final visit. Secondary outcome measures were change in visual acuity.

RESULTS

Out of 71 patients with confirmed AK seen during study period, 23 patients were recruited and 18 patients completed minimum 2 weeks of treatment and further analyzed. Ten patients received BG, whereas eight received VZ. Median ulcer size measured as GM of infiltrate decreased from 5.7 mm (IQR, 5.3-6.5 mm) (p = 0.02) to 1 mm (IQR, 0-4.3 mm) in group BG and from 4.5 mm (IQR, 1.8-5.1 mm) (p < 0.05) to 0.7 mm (IQR, 0-1.6 mm) in VZ group. Median visual acuity improved from 1.79 (IQR, 1.48-2.78) to 1.10 (IQR, 0.48-1.79) in BG group (p = 0.02) and from 1.60 (IQR, 1.00-2.78) to 0.80 (IQR, 0.48-1.30) in VZ group (p = 0.18).

CONCLUSION

These outcomes suggest that topical VZ as a monotherapy in AK treatment is effective and comparable to BG combination therapy but needs trials with larger sample size and longer follow-up to provide conclusive evidence.