Cyclophotocoagulation in the Control of Glaucoma in Patients With the Boston Keratoprosthesis Type 1

Glaucoma after penetrating keratoplasty and keratoprosthesis

PURPOSE

To compare visual and glaucoma outcomes in patients with known glaucoma after a penetrating keratoplasty (PKP) or a Boston Keratoprosthesis Type 1 (KPro) as a second corneal replacement procedure.

DESIGN

Retrospective interventional case series.

PARTICIPANTS

Charts of 141 eyes that underwent either a PKP or KPro at the Centre hospitalier de l'Université de Montréal after one failed PKP from 2008 to 2020 were reviewed. Forty-six eyes with preoperative glaucoma were included.

METHODS

Data collected included demographics, indication for the initial surgery, best corrected visual acuity (BCVA), concurrent ocular disorders, number of glaucoma medications, need for glaucoma surgery, cup-to-disc ratios (CDRs), mean RNFL thickness, and visual field (VF) characteristics. Primary outcomes were glaucoma progression trends. Secondary outcomes were visual outcomes and need for additional procedures.

RESULTS

Mean follow-up was 4.7 years for the PKP and 7.3 for the KPro group (P<0.007). 30.6% of PKP compared to 70.5% of KPro patients were diagnosed with glaucoma preoperatively. Glaucoma worsened similarly in both groups; this is based on an analysis of the number of glaucoma medications, CDR, need for glaucoma surgery, and characteristic VF changes. Patients in the PKP group required significantly more regrafts than patients in the KPro group (31.8 vs. 8.3%; P=0.045).

CONCLUSIONS

A preoperative diagnosis of glaucoma does not preclude KPro implantation. In glaucomatous eyes, the disease progressed similarly in both groups. Since both procedures increase the risk of worsening glaucoma, close follow-up is recommended. KPro may decrease the need for further corneal transplantation surgery.

Glaucoma management in patients with penetrating keratoplasty or keratoprosthesis

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Advances in surgical techniques and postoperative care have significantly improved rates of short-term complications following keratoplasty; however, glaucoma remains a highly prevalent long-term and potentially devastating complication for postkeratoplasty patients. In this review, we provide an overview of recent literature on glaucoma management in patients who have undergone penetrating keratoplasty or the Boston keratoprosthesis type I (KPro) implantation.

RECENT FINDINGS

New research suggests an inflammatory cause underlying glaucoma following KPro. Accurate IOP measurement is difficult in patients postkeratoplasty; study of objective techniques such as PDCT or Tono-Pen in penetrating keratoplasty eyes and trans-palpebral Diaton tonometry in KPro eyes have shown promising results. Early glaucoma surgical intervention should be considered for patients undergoing penetrating keratoplasty and KPro.

SUMMARY

Patients who have undergone penetrating keratoplasty or implantation of the Boston keratoprosthesis type I should be monitored frequently for elevated intraocular pressure and for other signs of glaucomatous optic nerve damage. Intraocular pressure elevation should be treated promptly either medically or surgically while minimizing risk to the corneal graft. Further research into inflammatory causes and other treatment modalities is promising for the long-term visual success in these patients.

Probing mechanisms and improving management of glaucoma following Boston keratoprosthesis surgery

ENGLISH SUMMARY

Corneal blindness is a leading cause of visual impairment worldwide. The most common treatment is to replace the diseased cornea by standard corneal transplantation. In eyes at high risk of graft failure, the Boston keratoprosthesis type 1 (KPro) can be used to restore vision and is currently the most frequently used artificial cornea in the world. However, glaucoma is a well-known complication of KPro surgery and is the most important threat to vision in KPro-implanted eyes (paper I). This chronic disease is influenced by elevated intraocular pressure (IOP) and damages the optic nerve, leading to progressive vision loss. In KPro patients, glaucoma is highly prevalent and extremely challenging to manage, yet its exact cause remains unknown. The overall purpose of this PhD Thesis (Geoffrion, 2021) was to better understand the mechanisms and how to improve management of glaucoma after KPro implantation. The approaches used in this thesis included investigating one of the largest KPro patient cohorts in North America, with a total of 157 operated patients at that time, as well as studying KPro surgery and outcomes in mice. The first objective was to identify risk factors for glaucoma development and progression after KPro implantation (paper II). Multivariate logistic regression revealed that high preoperative IOP signals a higher risk for both glaucoma development and progression. Stromal and endothelial corneal disorders were less associated with glaucoma progression, while autoimmune and ocular surface diseases precipitated glaucoma development. Second, there is no objective evidence that indicates the best order for glaucoma surgeries and KPro implantation. By comparing medical and surgical management in KPro eyes with either preexisting or de novo glaucoma (paper III), we showed that glaucoma surgery may be performed before or at the time of KPro in eyes with preexisting glaucoma to limit progression without increasing complications. In eyes with de novo glaucoma, glaucoma surgery did not increase complications compared with medications. Third, among glaucoma surgery interventions, the two most frequently implanted glaucoma drainage devices were compared in KPro patients (paper IV). Compared with the Ahmed glaucoma valve, the Baerveldt glaucoma implant was associated with lower failure rates, without increased postoperative complications. Fourth, even with aggressive management, many KPro patients suffer from progressive optic nerve damage, sometimes despite normal IOP. Inflammatory cytokines play an important role in glaucomatous optic neuropathy, but their role in KPro-associated glaucoma is still unknown. By analysing tear fluid of KPro patients by multiplex bead immunoassay (paper V), we identified that cytokines TNF-a, IL-1b, FGF-basic and IFN-g were elevated in KPro patients with glaucoma compared to those without. These cytokines correlated with optic nerve excavation and IOP. For the first time in humans, these results concorded with the elevations of TNF-a and IL-1b documented in the mouse KPro model. Ocular surface inflammation may thus reflect the inflammatory processes that perpetuate glaucoma damage years after KPro surgery. Fifth, we determined that miniaturized mouse KPro implantation requires extensive practice to be used as a reproducible model of glaucoma post-KPro (paper VI). KPro animal models with larger eyes and a full-thickness, 360-degree corneal excision should be prioritized to best validate human outcomes. In conclusion, glaucoma in KPro eyes is a long-lasting and multifactorial process. Most probable mechanisms combine IOP-independent inflammation mediated by TNF-a and IL-1b that prolong glaucoma damage, together with post-surgical angle closure elevating the IOP. Altogether, our results inform glaucoma risk profiling of transplant recipients, improvement of surgical management of KPro patients with glaucoma and development of targeted treatments to minimize glaucomatous damage after KPro. Ultimately, this work has the potential to preserve the vision of thousands of patients who undergo KPro surgery every year worldwide and to provide insight for the role of inflammation in other diseases involving neuronal damage. RÉSUMÉ (FRENCH SUMMARY): La cécité cornéenne est l'une des causes les plus importantes de déficience visuelle dans le monde. Le traitement usuel est de remplacer la cornée malade par une greffe de cornée traditionnelle. Dans les yeux à haut risque d'échec de greffe, la kératoprothèse de Boston de type 1 (KPro) peut rétablir la vision et est la cornée artificielle la plus utilisée au monde. Cependant, le glaucome est une complication importante de la KPro (papier I). Cette maladie chronique est influencée par une pression intraoculaire (PIO) élevée et endommage le nerf optique, menant à une perte de vision. Chez les patients avec KPro, le glaucome est fréquent et difficile à contrôler, mais sa cause exacte demeure inconnue. L'objectif principal de cette thèse est de découvrir les mécanismes et d'optimiser la prise en charge du glaucome après l'implantation de la KPro. Pour ce faire, nous avons investigué l'une des plus grandes cohortes de patients KPro en Amérique du Nord avec un total de 157 patients, ainsi qu'un groupe de souris ayant reçu une implantation de kératoprothèse. Le premier but était d'identifier les facteurs de risque pour le développement et la progression du glaucome après la KPro (papier II). Par régression logistique multivariée, nous avons démontré qu'une PIO préopératoire élevée mène à un plus grand risque de développement et de progression du glaucome. Les maladies cornéennes stromales ou endothéliales sont moins associées à une progression, alors que les maladies autoimmunes ou de la surface oculaire précipitent le développement du glaucome. Deuxièmement, il n'existe aucune donnée objective pour indiquer le meilleur ordre des chirurgies de glaucome et de KPro. En comparant les traitements médicaux et chirurgicaux des yeux KPro avec glaucome (papier III), nous avons démontré que les chirurgies de glaucome peuvent limiter la progression en étant effectuées avant ou pendant l'implantation de KPro dans les yeux avec glaucome préexistant, sans augmenter les complications. Dans le glaucome de novo, les chirurgies de glaucome n'augmentent pas les complications en comparaison aux médicaments. Troisièmement, les deux implants de glaucome les plus communs ont été étudiés chez les patients KPro (papier IV). Comparé à la valve Ahmed, l'implant Baerveldt est associé à des taux d'échec plus bas, sans augmentation des complications. Quatrièmement, même avec une prise en charge agressive, plusieurs patients KPro souffrent de glaucome qui progresse, parfois sans PIO élevée. Les cytokines inflammatoires jouent un rôle dans la pathophysiologie du glaucome, mais leur rôle dans le glaucome associé à la KPro est inconnu. En analysant les larmes de patients KPro (papier V), nous avons identifié que les cytokines TNF-a, IL-1b, FGF-basic et IFN-g sont élevées chez les patients KPro avec glaucome comparé à ceux sans glaucome. Ces cytokines corrèlent avec l'excavation du nerf optique et la PIO. Pour la première fois chez les humains, ces résultats concordent avec les niveaux élevés de TNF-a et IL-1b documentés dans le modèle murin de KPro. L'inflammation de la surface oculaire pourrait donc refléter les processus inflammatoires qui perpétuent le dommage glaucomateux. Cinquièmement, nous avons déterminé que l'implantation de la KPro miniature chez la souris requiert beaucoup de pratique pour être utilisé comme modèle de glaucome post-KPro (papier VI). Des modèles animaux avec des yeux plus larges et une excision cornéenne de pleine épaisseur sur 360 degrés devraient être priorisés pour valider les résultats chez l'humain. En conclusion, le glaucome associé à la KPro est un processus multifactoriel qui persiste à long terme. Les mécanismes probables combinent l'inflammation médiée par TNF-a et IL-1b et une fermeture de l'angle qui augmente la PIO. Nos résultats contribuent à établir les facteurs de risque de glaucome pour les receveurs de KPro, à améliorer leur prise en charge et à développer des thérapies ciblées. Ce travail a le potentiel de préserver la vision de milliers de patients recevant une KPro chaque année dans le monde et d'aider à mieux comprendre le rôle de l'inflammation dans d'autres maladies avec atteinte neuronale.

Challenges of Glaucoma Management in Patients with Type I Boston Keratoprosthesis

Type I Boston keratoprosthesis is implanted in patients with severely diseased eyes who are considered poor candidates for traditional keratoplasty. Glaucoma is considered a major visual comorbidity following the implantation of type I Boston keratoprosthesis (KPro). Eyes that receive a Boston KPro are at high risk of progression of pre-existing glaucoma and the development of de novo glaucoma. Both complications can limit best-corrected visual acuity postoperatively. Diagnosis and surveillance for glaucoma in KPro eyes are fundamental to mitigate the risk of visual morbidity. However, managing these patients presents several challenges. The diagnosis of glaucoma after KPro implantation is usually hindered by inaccurate intraocular pressure (IOP) measurements and unreliable ophthalmic investigations such as visual field testing and optical coherence tomography (OCT) of the retinal nerve fiber layer (RNFL). In these eyes, medical management of glaucoma with topical medications is usually insufficient, and glaucoma surgery is usually warranted either prior to or during KPro implantation. Options for glaucoma surgery include glaucoma drainage device (GDD) and cyclodestructive procedures. The aim of this article is to highlight the incidence, pathophysiology, diagnosis, and management options of glaucoma in eyes that have undergone type I Boston keratoprosthesis.

Comparison of Glaucoma Drainage Device Versus Transscleral Cyclophotocoagulation for Secondary Glaucoma Following Ocular Surface Stem Cell Transplantation

PRCIS

Rates of ocular surface failure and glaucoma reoperation were similar between cyclophotocoagulation (CPC) and glaucoma drainage devices (GDDs). CPC is a safe option in the management of secondary glaucoma after ocular surface stem cell transplantation (OSST).

PURPOSE

To assess surgical and ocular surface outcomes in patients requiring glaucoma surgery after OSST.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Retrospective chart review of eyes with previous OSST that underwent either transscleral CPC or implantation of a GDD. Primary outcomes were ocular surface failure (defined as recurrence of corneal conjunctivalization with late fluorescein staining) and glaucoma surgery failure (defined as the need for additional glaucoma surgery, including repeat treatment or revision). Secondary outcomes were changes in intraocular pressure (IOP) and number of glaucoma medications. Additional subgroup analysis was performed for subtypes of CPC and GDD.

RESULTS

Thirty-six glaucoma surgeries (7 Ahmed, 19 Baerveldt, and 10 CPC) were performed in 31 eyes with a history of prior OSST. The ocular surface failure rate was 19% for GDDs and 10% for CPC (P=0.65). Additional glaucoma surgery was needed for 38% of GDDs and 70% of CPC (P=0.14). The mean IOP reduction was 50% for GDDs and 28% for CPC (P=0.05). The mean drop reduction was 1.6 for GDDs and 0.1 for CPC (P=0.02). All glaucoma failures in the GDD group were related to tube erosion and/or hypotony, whereas all glaucoma failures in the CPC group were because of uncontrolled IOP. There were no significant differences in primary or secondary outcomes between CPC or GDD subgroups.

CONCLUSION

Glaucoma is a frequent comorbidity in patients with severe ocular surface disease, and treatment poses unique challenges in those with prior OSST. In this study, ocular surface failure and glaucoma reoperation rates were similar between CPC and GDD groups, suggesting that CPC, including repeat treatment, is a safe option for the management of secondary glaucoma after OSST. A multidisciplinary approach is recommended in the management of these complex eyes.