Corneal Collagen Cross-Linking With Photoactivated Chromophore for Infectious Keratitis After Penetrating Keratoplasty

A double-masked, sham-controlled trial of rose bengal photodynamic therapy for the treatment of fungal and acanthamoeba keratitis: Rose Bengal Electromagnetic Activation with Green Light for Infection Reduction (REAGIR) study

BACKGROUND

Infectious keratitis secondary to fungus or acanthamoeba often has a poor outcome despite receiving the best available medical therapy. In vitro rose bengal photodynamic therapy (RB-PDT) appears to be effective against fungal and acanthamoeba isolates (Atalay HT et al., Curr Eye Res 43:1322-5, 2018, Arboleda A et al. Am J Ophthalmol 158:64-70, 2014). In one published series, RB-PDT reduced the need for therapeutic penetrating keratoplasty in severe bacterial, fungal, and acanthamoeba keratitis not responsive to medical therapy.

METHODS

This international, randomized, sham and placebo controlled 2-arm clinical trial randomizes patients with smear positive fungal and acanthamoeba and smear negative corneal ulcers in a 1:1 fashion to one of two treatment arms: 1) topical antimicrobial plus sham RB-PDT or 2) topical antimicrobial plus RB-PDT.

DISCUSSION

We anticipate that RB-PDT will improve best spectacle-corrected visual acuity and also reduce complications such as corneal perforation and the need for therapeutic penetrating keratoplasty. This study will comply with the NIH Data Sharing Policy and Policy on the Dissemination of NIH-Funded Clinical Trial Information and the Clinical Trials Registration and Results Information Submission rule. Our results will be disseminated via ClinicalTrials.gov website, meetings, and journal publications. Our data will also be available upon reasonable request.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

NCT, NCT05110001 , Registered on November 5, 2021.

A double-masked, sham-controlled trial of rose bengal photodynamic therapy for the treatment of fungal and acanthameoba keratitis: Rose Bengal Electromagnetic Activation with Green Light for Infection Reduction (REAGIR) Study

Background

Infectious keratitis secondary to fungus or acanthamoeba often has a poor outcome despite receiving the best available medical therapy. In vitro Rose Bengal Photodynamic therapy (RB-PDT) appears to be effective against fungal and acanthamoeba isolates.22,23 In one published series RB-PDT reduced the need for therapeutic penetrating keratoplasty in severe bacterial, fungal, and acanthameoba keratitis not responsive to medical therapy.

Methods

This international, randomized, sham and placebo controlled 2-arm clinical trial, randomizes patients with smear positive fungal and acanthameoba and smear negative corneal ulcers in a 1:1 fashion to one of two treatment arms: 1) Topical antimicrobial plus sham RB-PDT or 2) Topical antimicrobial plus RB-PDT.

Discussion

We anticipate that RB-PDT will improve best spectacle corrected visual acuity and also reduce complications such as corneal perforation and the need for therapeutic penetrating keratoplasty. This study will comply with the NIH Data Sharing Policy and Policy on the Dissemination of NIH-Funded Clinical Trial Information and the Clinical Trials Registration and Results Information Submission rule. Our results will be disseminated via clinicaltrials.gov website, meetings, and journal publications. Our data will also be available upon reasonable request.

Trial Registration

NCT, NCT05110001, Registered November 5, 2021. https://www.clinicaltrials.gov/study/NCT05110001.

Therapeutic non-ectasia applications of cornea cross-linking

Corneal cross-linking is a photopolymerization technique traditionally used to strengthen corneal tissue. Corneal cross-linking utilizes riboflavin (vitamin B2) as a photosensitizer and ultraviolet-A light (UVA) to create strong covalent bonds within the corneal stroma, increasing tissue stiffness. Multiple studies have demonstrated corneal cross-linking's effectiveness in treating corneal ectasia, a progressive, degenerative, and non-inflammatory thinning disorder, as quantified by key tomographic, refractive, and visual parameters. Since its introduction two decades ago, corneal cross-linking has surpassed its original application in halting corneal ectatic disease and its application has expanded into several other areas. Corneal cross-linking also possesses antibacterial, antienzymolytic and antioedematous properties, and has since become a tool in treating microbial keratitis, correcting refractive error, preventing iatrogenic ectasia, stabilising bullous keratopathy and controlling post keratoplasty ametropia. This review provides an overview of the current evidence base for the therapeutic non-ectasia applications of cornea cross-linking and looks at future developments in the field.

PACK Cross-Linking as Adjuvant Therapy Improves Clinical Outcomes in Culture-Confirmed Bacterial Keratitis

PURPOSE

We recently showed the positive clinical effects of combining accelerated corneal cross-linking (PACK-CXL) with antibiotic treatment in patients with presumed bacterial keratitis. In this study, we compare the impacts of a combined PACK-CXL/standard antibiotic treatment (PACK-ABX group) with standard antibiotic treatment alone (ABX group) in patients with culture-confirmed bacterial keratitis.

METHODS

We reviewed patients with moderate and severe bacterial keratitis and confirmed bacterial cultures. Clinical outcomes were compared for standard antibiotic treatment alone, before the initiation of PACK-CXL, and after adjuvant use of PACK-CXL.

RESULTS

A total of 47 eyes of 47 patients were included: 26 eyes in the PACK-ABX group and 21 eyes in the ABX group. Pathogens, baseline demographics (besides age), and clinical parameters were similar between the 2 groups. The PACK-ABX patients had better final uncorrected visual acuity [mean difference 0.57 Logarithm of the Minimum Angle of Resolution, 95% Confidence Interval (CI): 0.16-0.99, P = 0.07] and best-corrected visual acuity (mean difference 0.70 Logarithm of the Minimum Angle of Resolution, 95% CI: 0.23-1.16, P = 0.04), shorter reepithelialization time (mean difference 9.63 days, 95% CI: 3.14-16.12, P = 0.004), and reduced number of clinic visits (mean difference 4.8 meetings, 95% CI: 1.4-8.2, P = 0.007) and need for tectonic grafts (0 vs. 33.3%, P = 0.002). A multivariate analysis controlling for age, sex, ulcer size, and Gram stain showed that PACK-ABX treatment remained significantly associated with reepithelialization time (β = 14.5, P = 0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

In our study, PACK-CXLs addition to the standard of care in cases of culture-proven bacterial keratitis had a positive effect on the final visual acuity and time to resolution, compared with the standard-of-care treatment.

Review of the literature on the currently available evidence for the management of infectious keratitis with PACK-CXL

Infectious keratitis (IK) is one of the most common causes of monocular blindness worldwide, especially in developing countries and may account for 5.1%-32.3% of all indications for penetrating keratoplasty (PK). However, performing a therapeutic PK on a "hot eye" is associated with a higher incidence of IK recurrence and graft rejection. Standard treatment includes antimicrobials (ATM) and, once the causative pathogen has been identified, must be continued with targeted treatment, depending on antibiogram sensitivity. However, appearance of multiresistant strains to ATM is progressively increasing at an alarming rate. Besides that, the diversity of the causative microorganisms (bacteria, fungi, parasites, viruses) may hinder the clinical diagnosis and secondarily the proper treatment from the beginning. It is estimated that only 50% of eyes will have a good visual result if the correct therapy is delayed. All these factors make the identification of alternatives to ATM treatment of paramount importance. Due to the ATM properties of photoactivated chromophore (riboflavin, RB) and ultraviolet (UV) light of wavelength (λ) 200-400 nanometers (nm), used in multiple medical and non-medical applications for disinfection, photoactivated chromophore for corneal cross-linking (CXL) of IK (PACK-CXL), as an addition to the therapeutic arsenal for the management of IK has been proposed. It must be differentiated from CXL used for the management of progressive keratoconus (KC). The objective of this review is to update the available evidence on the efficacy and safety of PACK-CXL in IKs.

A Targeted Photosensitizer Mediated by Visible Light for Efficient Therapy of Bacterial Keratitis

Bacterial keratitis is a serious bacterial infection of the cornea that can cause sight loss in severe cases because of the sharp decline of efficacious antibiotics. Herein, a targeted photosensitizer based on BODIPY severing as a photobactericidal agent was developed for treating bacterial keratitis. The water solubility of the material was as high as 10 mg/mL, which was attributable to the introduction of pathogen-targeting galactose and fucose. The photosensitizer was able to preferentially bind Pseudomonas aeruginosa instead of mammalian cells and trigger the aggregation of bacteria, which ultimately facilitated effective pathogen ablation upon the generation of reactive oxygen species (ROS) via laser irradiation. Photoexcited targeted photosensitizers can promote wound healing by eradicating P. aeruginosa in rat eyes and reducing the inflammatory response, thus exhibiting the significant therapeutic effect on bacterial keratitis. We also performed molecular level mechanistic studies using the unique field-induced droplet ionization mass spectrometry methodology and confirmed that the generated ROS were mainly singlet oxygen that caused lipid peroxidation (Type II mechanism). We anticipate that the targeted photosensitizer will have great potential in the application of clinical photodynamic therapy to ocular infection.

Genipin Delays Corneal Stromal Enzymatic Digestion

Purpose

To evaluate the use of genipin in delaying enzymatic digestion of corneal stroma.

Methods

Human corneal stromal tissue was treated with genipin, a known chemical crosslinker, and then along with control tissue was subjected to enzymatic digestion with collagenase. The effects of genipin treatment in retarding stromal digestion were analyzed with phase contrast microscopy, a protein quantification assay, second harmonic generation imaging, and transmission electron microscopy.

Results

Genipin increased stromal resistance to enzymatic digestion when compared with untreated stroma. A morphologic analysis and protein quantification showed increased stromal resistance to enzymatic digestion once stromal tissue was treated with genipin. Second harmonic generation imaging revealed persistent fibrillar collagen signaling in genipin-treated tissue in contrast with untreated tissue suggesting that genipin retards collagenolysis.

Conclusions

Genipin increases stromal resistance to enzymatic digestion in controlled experiments as demonstrated by protein quantification studies and through morphologic imaging.

Translational Relevance

This study explores the novel use of genipin in delaying enzymatic stromal digestion. Delaying stromal melting in the setting of corneal infectious or autoimmune keratitis can potentially decrease clinical morbidity.

Corneal Cross-Linking: The Evolution of Treatment for Corneal Diseases

Corneal cross-linking (CXL) using riboflavin and ultraviolet A (UVA) light has become a useful treatment option for not only corneal ectasias, such as keratoconus, but also a number of other corneal diseases. Riboflavin is a photoactivated chromophore that plays an integral role in facilitating collagen crosslinking. Modifications to its formulation and administration have been proposed to overcome shortcomings of the original epithelium-off Dresden CXL protocol and increase its applicability across various clinical scenarios. Hypoosmolar riboflavin formulations have been used to artificially thicken thin corneas prior to cross-linking to mitigate safety concerns regarding the corneal endothelium, whereas hyperosmolar formulations have been used to reduce corneal oedema when treating bullous keratopathy. Transepithelial protocols incorporate supplementary topical medications such as tetracaine, benzalkonium chloride, ethylenediaminetetraacetic acid and trometamol to disrupt the corneal epithelium and improve corneal penetration of riboflavin. Further assistive techniques include use of iontophoresis and other wearable adjuncts to facilitate epithelium-on riboflavin administration. Recent advances include, Photoactivated Chromophore for Keratitis-Corneal Cross-linking (PACK-CXL) for treatment of infectious keratitis, customised protocols (CurV) utilising riboflavin coupled with customised UVA shapes to induce targeted stiffening have further induced interest in the field. This review aims to examine the latest advances in riboflavin and UVA administration, and their efficacy and safety in treating a range of corneal diseases. With such diverse riboflavin delivery options, CXL is well primed to complement the armamentarium of therapeutic options available for the treatment of a variety of corneal diseases.

Alternative Indications for Corneal Crosslinking

ABSTRACT

Corneal crosslinking (CXL) is the current mainstay treatment for progressive keratoconus. In the past 15 years, a variety of other indications have been tested. A systematic review was conducted to examine these alternative indications for CXL. In total, of 143 papers on crosslinking as a treatment for infectious keratitis, bullous keratopathy, pellucid marginal degeneration, post- laser in situ keratomileusis (LASIK) ectasia, and as a way to improve vision either on its own or in combination with other interventions were included. Post-LASIK ectasia is a definite indication for crosslinking. Surprisingly, only limited research has been performed on pellucid marginal degeneration, with no randomized trials available to date. Other interesting applications are the combined use of refractive lasers and crosslinking for suspicious or ectatic corneas and crosslinking as a standalone intervention for minor refractive errors. CXL might offer a solution for refractory bacterial keratitis. In bullous keratopathy, it seems to offer only a transient benefit.

Cross-Linking Assisted Infection Reduction (CLAIR): A Randomized Clinical Trial Evaluating the Effect of Adjuvant Cross-Linking on Bacterial Keratitis

PURPOSE

To determine whether there is a benefit to adjuvant corneal cross-linking (CXL) for bacterial keratitis.

METHODS

This is an outcome-masked, randomized controlled clinical trial. Consecutive patients presenting with a smear-positive bacterial ulcer at Aravind Eye Hospitals at Madurai, Pondicherry, and Coimbatore in India were enrolled. Study eyes were randomized to topical moxifloxacin 0.5% or topical moxifloxacin 0.5% plus CXL. The primary outcome of the trial was microbiological cure at 24 hours on repeat culture. Secondary outcomes included best spectacle corrected visual acuity at 3 weeks and 3 months, percentage of study participants with epithelial healing at 3 weeks and 3 months, infiltrate and/or scar size at 3 weeks and 3 months, 3-day smear and culture, and adverse events.

RESULTS

Those randomized to CXL had 0.60 decreased odds of culture positivity at 24 hours (95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.10-3.50; P = 0.65), 0.9 logarithm of the minimum angle of resolution lines worse visual acuity (95% CI: -2.8 to 4.6; P = 0.63), and 0.41-mm larger scar size (95% CI: -0.48 to 1.30; P = 0.38) at 3 months. We note fewer corneal perforations or need for therapeutic penetrating keratoplasty in the CXL group.

CONCLUSIONS

We were unable to confirm a benefit to adjuvant CXL in the primary treatment of moderate bacterial keratitis. However, CXL may reduce culture positivity and complication rates; therefore, a larger trial to fully evaluate this is warranted.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

NCT02570321.