The Role of Topical Azithromycin in the Treatment of Meibomian Gland Dysfunction

Efficacy of azithromycin hydrate ophthalmic solution for treatment of internal hordeolum and meibomitis with or without phlyctenular keratitis

PURPOSE

To evaluate the efficacy of azithromycin hydrate ophthalmic solution for the treatment of internal hordeolum and meibomitis with or without phlyctenular keratitis.

STUDY DESIGN

Retrospective study.

METHODS

Patients diagnosed with internal hordeolum or meibomitis were prescribed azithromycin hydrate ophthalmic solution twice daily for 2 days and then once daily for 12 days. Depending on the presence of meibomitis-related keratoconjunctivitis (MRKC), we further divided the patients with meibomitis into three subgroups: meibomitis alone (non-MRKC group), meibomitis with non-phlyctenular MRKC (non-phlyctenular group), and meibomitis with phlyctenular MRKC (phlyctenular group). Inflammatory findings (eyelid redness and conjunctival hyperemia) were scored before and after treatment. Some patients also underwent culture testing fluids discharged by the meibomian gland orifices.

RESULTS

Three patients (3 eyes) had internal hordeolum and 16 patients (16 eyes) had meibomitis. After treatment, the inflammatory findings disappeared in all eyes with internal hordeolum. Among the patients with meibomitis, three eyes were in the non-MRKC, six in the non-phlyctenular, and seven in the phlyctenular group. The inflammatory findings were significantly improved only in the phlyctenular group. Among seven eyes with positive culture results, Cutibacterium acnes was detected in five, and treatment improved the inflammatory findings in all of these eyes.

CONCLUSION

Azithromycin hydrate ophthalmic solution is effective for the treatment of inflammatory meibomian gland diseases, including internal hordeolum and meibomitis. In particular, the agent is highly efficient in patients with phlyctenular MRKC.

Effect of Treatment with Topical Azithromycin or Oral Doxycycline on Tear Film Thickness in Patients with Meibomian Gland Dysfunction: A Randomized Controlled Trial

Purpose: This prospective, randomized, observer-masked, parallel-group study aimed to compare the effect of topical azithromycin and oral doxycycline on tear film thickness (TFT) and signs and symptoms of ocular surface disease (OSD) in patients with meibomian gland dysfunction (MGD). Methods: Patients were randomized to either receive topical azithromycin or oral doxycycline. After a baseline visit, three follow-up visits at intervals of 2 weeks were scheduled. Main outcome of the study was change in TFT as measured with ultrahigh resolution optical coherence tomography. Results: Twenty patients were included in the analysis. TFT significantly increased in both groups (P = 0.028 vs. baseline) with no difference between the groups (P = 0.096). As secondary outcomes, ocular surface disease index (OSDI) score and composite signs of OSD significantly decreased in both groups (P = 0.023 for OSDI and P = 0.016 for OSD signs vs. baseline). While eye-related adverse events (AEs) occurred more frequently in the azithromycin group, systemic AEs were more common in the doxycycline group. Conclusions: Both treatments improved signs and symptoms of OSD in patients with MGD with no difference between the groups. Due to the higher frequency of systemic side effects of doxycycline, azithromycin eye drops seem to be an alternative with comparable efficacy. Clinical Trial Registration number: NCT03162497.

Latest developments on meibomian gland dysfunction: Diagnosis, treatment and management

Background: Meibomian gland dysfunction (MGD) is one of the leading causes of evaporative dry eye disease and one of the most common ophthalmic conditions found in clinical practice. Meibomian gland dysfunction tends to be overlooked because its signs and symptoms do not cause blindness. Meibomian gland dysfunction is characterised by the obstruction of the meibomian gland terminal ducts resulting in tear film instability.Aim: The purpose of this article was to provide an update on MGD’s diagnosis and treatment.Method: A literature review was conducted using search engines such as Google Scholar, Medline and ScienceDirect databases. Keywords such as MGD diagnosis and management and treatment of MGD were used to search the databases.Results: A total of 44 relevant papers were reviewed. These papers were then curated to include only those concerning diagnosis of meibomian gland dysfunction, treatment of meibomian gland dysfunction and management options of meibomian gland dysfunction. The references of individual papers from the curated results were checked to yield a further 13 papers.Conclusion: Meibomian gland dysfunction is not a single entity but is multifactorial in origin; however, our understanding of the condition is evolving rapidly because of newer imaging technology. There is no gold standard treatment option for MGD, but many options are available that include medications and other procedures. 

A Practical Approach to Severity Classification and Treatment of Dry Eye Disease: A Proposal from the Mexican Dry Eye Disease Expert Panel

Dry eye disease (DED) has a higher prevalence than many important systemic disorders like cardiovascular disease and diabetes mellitus, representing a significant quality of life burden for the affected patients. It is a common reason for consultation in general eye clinics worldwide. Nowadays, the diagnostic and therapeutic approach at the high corneal and ocular surface specialty level should be reserved for cases of severe and chronic dry eye disease associated with systemic autoimmune diseases or complicated corneal and ocular surface pathologies. In such cases, the diagnostic and therapeutic approach is often complex, elaborate, time-consuming, and costly due to the use of extensive dry eye questionnaires, noninvasive electronic diagnostic equipment, and clinical laboratory and ancillary tests. However, other eye care specialists attend a fair amount of DED cases; therefore, its diagnosis, classification, and management should be simple, practical, achievable, and effective. Considering that many patients attending non-specialized dry eye clinics would benefit from better ophthalmological attention, we decided to elaborate a practical DED classification system based on disease severity to help clinicians discriminate cases needing referral to subspecialty clinics from those they could attend. Additionally, we propose a systematic management approach and general management considerations to improve patients' therapeutic outcomes according to disease severity.

Effects of lid debris debridement combined with meibomian gland expression on the ocular surface MMP-9 levels and clinical outcomes in moderate and severe meibomian gland dysfunction

Background

To evaluate the effects of lid debris debridement and meibomian gland expression (MGX) on extracellular matrix metalloproteinase-9 (MMP-9) levels and clinical outcomes of moderate and severe MGD.

Methods

In this retrospective case series study, a total 48 eyes of 24 patients with moderate and severe MGD underwent one session of lid debris debridement using the BlephEx combined with MGX. We evaluated the tear film break-up time (TBUT), corneal and conjunctival fluorescein staining scores, Schirmer 1 test, biomicroscopic examination of lid margins and meibomian gland (MG), ocular surface disease index (OSDI) questionnaire score, and extracellular MMP-9 levels using a point-of-care MMP-9 immunoassay device before and 4 weeks after lid debris debridement and MGX. Linear mixed model and generalized estimating equations model were used to evaluate possible differences.

Results

There were significant improvements in the TBUT (P = 0.002), SICCA and Oxford staining scores (all P < 0.001), lid margin telangiectasia (P < 0.001 for upper and lower eyelids), lid thickness (P < 0.001 for upper and lower eyelids), MG orifice plugging (P < 0.001 for upper and lower eyelids), meibum color (P = 0.026 for upper eyelid, P < 0.001 for lower eyelid), meibum consistency (P < 0.001 for upper and lower eyelids), meibum grade (P < 0.001), MGD stage (P < 0.001), and OSDI score (P = 0.002). MMP-9 immunoassay positivity rate significantly decreased from 83.3 to 50.0% 4 weeks after treatment (P = 0.014).

Conclusions

In patients with moderate to severe MGD, lid debris debridement using the BlephEx combined with MGX improved clinical findings, subjective symptoms, meibomian gland function, along with ocular surface MMP-9 level. We hereby suggest lid debris debridement using BlephEx combined with MGX as an effective clinical strategy for treatment of moderate to severe MGD.

Efficacy of Azithromycin Eyedrops for Individuals With Meibomian Gland Dysfunction-Associated Posterior Blepharitis

PURPOSE

To examine the safety and efficacy of azithromycin eyedrops in Japanese individuals with meibomian gland dysfunction (MGD)-associated posterior blepharitis.

METHODS

Individuals with MGD-associated posterior blepharitis who visited the Itoh Clinic, Saitama, Japan, were randomly assigned to receive azithromycin (1%) eyedrops (AZM group, 16 eyes of 16 patients) or preservative-free artificial tears (control group, 20 eyes of 20 patients) for 2 weeks. All subjects also applied a warming eyelid compress twice per day. Subjective symptoms (Standardized Patient Evaluation of Eye Dryness [SPEED] score), lipid layer thickness (LLT) and interferometric pattern of the tear film, plugging and vascularity of the lid margin, noninvasive break-up time of the tear film (NIBUT) and fluorescein-based break-up time of the tear film (TBUT), corneal-conjunctival fluorescein staining score, tear meniscus height, meibum grade, meiboscore, tear osmolarity, and Schirmer test value were determined before and after treatment. Side effects of treatment were also recorded.

RESULTS

In the AZM group, SPEED score, LLT, interferometric pattern, plugging and vascularity of the lid margin, NIBUT, TBUT, meibum grade, and tear osmolarity were significantly improved after treatment compared with baseline. The SPEED score, interferometric pattern, plugging, vascularity, meibum grade, and tear osmolarity were also significantly improved after treatment in the AZM group compared with the control group. Common side effects in the AZM group were transient eye irritation and blurred vision.

CONCLUSION

Azithromycin eyedrops improved eyelid inflammation, the quality and quantity of the lipid layer of the tear film, and tear film stability. Such eyedrops thus seem to be a safe and effective treatment for MGD-associated posterior blepharitis.