Performance of New Hypothermic Corneal Storage Media With an Antimycotic Tablet in Comparison to Traditional Hypothermic Media During Simulated Eye Bank Processing

A Comprehensive Review of Donor Corneal Preservation Strategies

ABSTRACT

Successful corneal transplantation relies on the viability of the corneal endothelium. Although various preservation systems have been developed in the field of eye banking, long-term storage of the corneal endothelium poses challenges and is costly. Optisol-GS in the past has been the most commonly used solution for intermediate-term corneal storage in the United States. However, disruptions in the availability of Optisol-GS, caused by rising costs and supply shortages, have necessitated alternative methods of corneal preservation. Previously described preservation methods include hypothermia (2-8°C) for short-term storage (7-14 days), organ culture (28-37°C) for intermediate storage (4-7 weeks), and cryopreservation for longer-term storage. In this review, we examine standard practice and alternative methods for corneal storage.

Prospective In Vitro Comparison of Kerasave and Optisol-GS Corneal Storage Solutions

PURPOSE

The aim of this study was to compare the performance of Kerasave and Optisol-GS for hypothermic corneal storage for 14 days.

METHODS

This study was a prospective laboratory investigation. Mate corneas were recovered into Kerasave or Optisol-GS (27 pairs) and stored at 2°C to 8°C for 14 days. Corneas were evaluated by trained eye bank technicians, and study parameters were compared between the initial and final evaluations. Endothelial cell density (ECD), hexagonality (HEX), and coefficient of variation (CV) were evaluated by specular microscopy, and central corneal thickness (CCT) was examined by optical coherence tomography after 1, 3, 7, and 14 days of storage. Corneal transparency was scored using slit lamp examination at days 1 and 14.

RESULTS

Average ECD, HEX, and CV for the Kerasave (2653 ± 303 cells/mm 2 , 57 ± 4%, and 36 ± 3%) and Optisol-GS (2623 ± 306 cells/mm 2 , 57 ± 5%, and 36 ± 4%) groups were not significantly different at day 1. There was also no difference at any other study time points (all P > 0.05). ECD did not significantly change from day 1 to day 14 in either group ( P > 0.05), but a statistically significant change in HEX and CV was observed between day 1 and day 14 in both groups ( P < 0.01). Average CCT measured at day 1 for corneas stored in Kerasave was 622 ± 49 μm and those stored in Optisol-GS was 580 ± 35 μm ( P < 0.01). The difference in CCT measurements was not significantly different at day 14 (Kerasave: 674 ± 46 μm vs. Optisol-GS: 647 ± 58 μm, P > 0.05). Corneal transparency was not significantly different between the 2 groups at day 1 or day 14.

CONCLUSIONS

The corneal quality and clinically relevant parameters including ECD, endothelial morphometry, and corneal transparency were not different in corneas stored in Kerasave or Optisol-GS for 14 days. The initial difference in CCT between the 2 groups decreased at day 14. These results demonstrated that Kerasave corneal storage solution preserves the corneal endothelium similarly to Optisol-GS.

Donor related corneal graft infection: a review of literature and preventive strategies

PURPOSE

Donor-related infections are a serious threat to patient safety after corneal transplantation. We provide a concise review of literature from the last decade on donor-related graft infections, sources of contamination and means to reduce the contamination of donor tissue and preservation media.

METHODS

We reviewed 50 papers from year 2005 to 2021 related to donor-related graft infections. We included 14 studies related to the risk factors associated with post-keratoplasty infection and preventive methods.

RESULTS

Incidence of post-keratoplasty infections has been reported to be approximately 0.2%-0.77% for endophthalmitis and 6.5%-10.5% for microbial keratitis. We analyzed six important studies regarding the risk factors related to donor contamination. It was observed that younger donor age, increased death to retrieval time, warming cycles and increased eye bank processing time and positive corneo-scleral rim cultures were important risk factors for donor-related infections post keratoplasty. Eye banks have adapted newer protocols over the time period for prevention of donor-related contamination. Recommended preventive strategies were published in about eight important studies over the past decade. In addition to meticulous donor screening, rapid warming cycles, double contact with povidone iodine during retrieval and addition of antifungals like amphotericin B, Voriconazole and cycloheximide have been suggested over the last decade although their use is still in debate with regard to the efficacy, toxicity and cost-effectiveness.

CONCLUSION

The last decade has witnessed a relative rise of fungal infections and multidrug resistant bacterial infections post-keratoplasty. Eye bank prepared corneas for lamellar surgeries are at increased risk for donor contamination due to increased exposure to the higher temperatures during their processing. Addition of antifungals and broad spectrum antibiotics to the hypothermic preservation media needs to be considered in the new era of increasing trends of lamellar keratoplasty.

Cold Storage Media versus Optisol-GS in the Preservation of Corneal Quality for Keratoplasty: A Systematic Review

Optisol-GS is the most widely used pharmaceutical composition to preserve corneas for transplantation. This systematic review investigated the effects of different cold corneal storage media (CCSM) compared with Optisol-GS on the quality of stored corneas. The literature was searched throughout May 2022 on six databases and grey literature. Studies including corneas (population) exposed to distinct cold storage media (exposure) and Optisol-GS (comparison) that reported qualitative and/or quantitative parameters of cornea quality (outcome) were included. Methodological quality was assessed using ToxRTool. From 4520 identified studies, fourteen were included according to the eligibility criteria, comprising 769 evaluated cornea samples comparing Optisol-GS with commercial and noncommercial media. All studies showed good methodological quality. Experimental times ranged from 1–28 days, mainly using 4 °C as the preservation temperature. Viable endothelial cell density (ECD) and endothelial cell morphology (EC) were the most assessed parameters. ECD results for Cornisol were higher than Optisol-GS in 10 days (p = 0.049) and favored Cornea ColdTM up to 4 weeks (p < 0.05), which also showed better qualitative results. While the standardization of test protocols could improve comparisons, evidence indicates that most CCSM present similar performances on cornea preservation for transplantation at seven days, while some formulations may increase preservation at extended times.

Overview of Short-Term and Intermediate-Term Corneal Storage Solution: Comparison of Clinical Outcomes and Need For Future Research

ABSTRACT

Corneal donor tissue preservation techniques have incrementally improved since the introduction of McCarey-Kaufman storage solution from short-term storage to intermediate duration of storage with the advent of organ culture and Optisol GS storage solutions. Improved understanding of the corneal endothelial cell physiology has helped in designing newer storage solutions, such as the Life 4C and Cornea Cold. The incorporation of antibiotics, ATP precursors, minerals, and vitamins has improved the viability of tissues. In addition, these modifications to the newer storage solutions have increased the endothelial longevity and metabolic activity. Despite these advances, the duration of tissue storage has largely been restricted to 2 weeks in Optisol GS and 4 weeks in organ culture. The role and cost-effectiveness of antifungal supplementation and the need for improved epithelial preservation are additional areas that need to be explored. This review intends to summarize the efficacy and viability of donor corneas in different tissue storage solution and compare clinical outcomes while providing an insight into the challenges in developing newer methods of corneal preservation.

Endophthalmitis secondary to donor to host infection in posterior lamellar keratoplasties: A systematic review

Donor to host transmission of infectious agents is a well-recognized entity, more commonly related to Endothelial Keratoplasty (EK) than to Penetrating Keratoplasty (PK), that involves complications ranging from interface keratitis to endophthalmitis. A systematic review of the literature was conducted to identify the published articles until December 2020 reporting cases of endophthalmitis secondary to corneal graft contamination in posterior lamellar keratoplasties (DSAEK and DMEK) along with donor characteristics, microbiological profile, treatment and outcomes. Each identified article was assessed to meet donor to host infection criteria, defined as a post-procedural infection in which the same microbiological agent was identified in both the donor corneoscleral rim or preservation medium and receptor ocular tissue. From 23 research articles, eight reports of endophthalmitis in nine patients following DSAEK or DMEK secondary to donor to host infection fulfilled the inclusion criteria. The majority were male and the median age was 72.0 (45.0-81.0) years old. Indications of surgery were primarily pseudophakic bullous keratopathy and Fuchs dystrophy. A fungal pathogen was identified in eight of nine patients. All the cases underwent surgical management with lenticule removal or endothelial plaque aspiration. The final corrected distance visual acuity (CDVA) in all cases was 20/200 or better. Endophthalmitis after an EK procedure is a rare complication whose outcome depends on the aggressive and precocious treatment. Identification of early signs of interface keratitis and lenticule removal seems mandatory in patients undergoing DSAEK or DMEK to prevent further involvement of the globe.

Killing efficacy of a new hypothermic corneal storage medium against the micro-organisms frequently found in human donor cornea intended for transplantation

Objective

To study the in vitro killing efficacy of Kerasave (AL.CHI.MI.A Srl), a medium provided with amphotericin B tablet for hypothermic storage of human donor corneas, against relevant contaminants associated with postkeratoplasty infections.

Methods and Analysis

The antimicrobial activity of Kerasave was determined after 0, 3 and 14 days of incubation at 2°C-8°C, inoculating Kerasave and the control medium with 10⁵-10⁶ colony forming units (CFU) of Candida albicans (CA), Fusarium solani (FS), Aspergillus brasiliensis (AB), Staphylococcus aureus (SA), Enterococcus faecalis (EF), Bacillus subtilis spizizenii (BS), Pseudomonas aeruginosa (PA), Enterobacter cloacae (EC) and Klebsiella pneumoniae (KP). Log₁₀ reductions at different time intervals were determined by assessing the number of viable CFU using the serial dilution plating technique.

Results

After 3 days, Kerasave induced the highest log₁₀ decrease in the concentrations of KP, PA, CA and EC (5.37, 4.15, 2.97 and 2.67, respectively; all p<0.001). The log₁₀ decreases of SA and EF were 2.27 and 2.11, respectively (all p<0.001). The lowest log₁₀ decrease was observed in BS, AB and FS concentrations (0.25, 0.30 and 0.67, respectively; p<0.001 for BS and AB and p=0.004 for FS). After 14 days, the microbial count of CA, FS, SA, EF, PA and EC further decreased (p=0.006 for FS; p<0.001 for the others).

Conclusion

Kerasave effectively reduced or kept unchanged the microbial concentration of almost all tested strains after 3 days. Thus, this novel medium represents a valuable tool to control the microbial contamination of human donor corneas during hypothermic storage for up to 14 days before transplantation.

A new storage medium containing amphotericin B versus Optisol-GS for preservation of human donor corneas

BACKGROUND/AIM

We compared the quality of human donor corneas stored in a cold storage medium containing 2.5 μg/ml of amphotericin B (Kerasave, AL.CHI.MI.A. S.R.L., Ponte San Nicolò, Italy) and Optisol-GS (Bausch & Lomb Inc., Bridgewater, NJ, USA) for 14 days.

METHODS

Sixteen pairs of human donor corneas were collected in Eusol-C (AL.CHI.MI.A. S.R.L., Ponte San Nicolò, Italy). Next, all tissues underwent the first evaluation that included the assessments of central corneal thickness (CCT), endothelial cell density (ECD) measured using both trypan blue staining and specular microscopy, endothelial cell (EC) mortality and morphology, and corneal transparency within 24 hours from recovery (Day 1). Afterwards, one cornea of each pair was transferred into Kerasave or Optisol-GS. ECD and CCT were also assessed at Day 7, and all the metrics were evaluated again at the end of the storage period (Day 14).

RESULTS

At all tested time points, no differences were found in the qualitative (corneal transparency, EC morphology) and quantitative metrics (ECD, CCT, EC mortality) between the Kerasave and the Optisol-GS storage groups. At Day 14, the corneas stored in Kerasave and Optisol-GS showed ECD of 2312±98 and 2335±128 cells/mm² (p=0.886), CCT of 717±17 and 697±19 μm (p=0.454) and central EC mortality of 0.54%±0.40% and 0.14%±0.14% (p=0.719), respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

The new amphotericin B-containing medium Kerasave was comparable to Optisol-GS in terms of preservation of corneal characteristics at 2-8°C for 14 days.