New Sutureless, Scleral-Fixated Intraocular Lens (Carlevale, Soleko) Implantation Combined With Descemet Stripping Automated Endothelial Keratoplasty: An Innovative Surgical Approach

Current Evidence for a New Surgical Technique for Scleral Fixation: The Implantation of a Carlevale Lens, a Systematic Review

Background: The Carlevale lens (FIL SSF, Soleko IOL Division, Italy) is a new lens for suture-less scleral fixation. This paper aimed to systematically review articles on this lens, the surgical techniques used for its implantation, complications and outcomes. Methods: This systematic review was performed following the PRISMA guidelines. The search string used was "Carlevale" AND "scleral fixation" from inception until March 2024. For completeness, either case-control studies, case reports or case series written in English were included. The authors used the Newcastle-Ottawa scale for the case-control studies and the JBI Critical Appraisal Checklist for case reports and case series. Results: Twenty-nine articles were included. Scleral fixation with Carlevale lens can be performed by creating scleral flaps or, alternatively, by using scleral pockets. The two sclerotomies must be diametrically opposed, and are preferably created by 25-gauge trocars. A pars plana vitrectomy should be performed every time, and the design of the lens should be suitable for self-anchoring to the sclera; the most accredited strategy to achieve this is to avoid scleral sutures. There were only a few intraoperative and postoperative complications reported; vitreous hemorrhages were the most frequent intraoperative events, while the most relevant postoperative complications were vitreous hemorrhages, cystoid macular oedema and transient variations in the intraocular pressure. Excellent results have been obtained in terms of BCVA, IOL centration and stability, mean intraocular pressure, postoperative spherical equivalent, separation between anterior and posterior chamber and the distance of the IOL from anterior chamber structures. Conclusions: The foldable hydrophilic design of the Carlevale lens has shown good effectiveness, IOL stability and few intra and post-operative complications.

A mini-invasive surgical technique for Carlevale IOL implantation: case series study and description of concomitant surgery

PURPOSE

To examine the feasibility and outcomes of a modified technique for the implantation of scleral fixated Carlevale intraocular lens (IOL) (I71 FIL SSF. Soleko IOL Division, Pontecorvo, Italy), and to analyze the occurrence of adverse events.

METHODS

This is a retrospective observational study conducted revising patients charts from 2018 to 2023. Thirty-five eyes of 33 patients were included. Patients requiring IOL explantation had either IOL dislocation or opacification. The implantation of the Carlevale IOL was performed with the subconjunctival positioning of the anchors without any scleral flap. All maneuvers were performed transconjunctivally. The anatomical outcomes considered were IOL positioning, and the absence of postoperative complications. The functional outcomes analyzed were best correctedvisual acuity (BCVA) and refraction.

RESULTS

In all the cases, the IOL was well positioned and centered postoperatively. No cases of conjunctival erosion were recorded. The best corrected visual acuity (BCVA) was 0.9±0.6 logMar (mean±standard deviation) preoperatively and 0.5±0.5 logMar (mean±standard deviation) postoperatively. The mean preoperative spherical equivalent was +6.8±7.7 dioptres, while postoperatively it was -1.1±1.6 dioptres. The most frequent procedure associated to secondary IOL implantation was posterior vitrectomy (25 eyes, 71.4%), which was performed with 25-gauge transconjunctival cannulas in the ciliary sulcus. The follow-up period was 24.5±16.9 months (mean±standard deviation).

CONCLUSION

The described mini-invasive technique for Carlevale IOL implantation is safe and effective. It can be recommended either as a stand-alone operation or associated to concurrent surgical procedures.

Descemet Membrane Endothelial Keratoplasty with cornea press technique and implantation of a Carlevale scleral-fixated intraocular lens

Purpose

We describe a combined Descemet Membrane Endothelial Keratoplasty (DMEK) using the Cornea-press (C-Press) technique, with implantation of a new sutureless, scleral fixated intraocular lens (IOL) (Carlevale, Soleko), in a case of bullous keratopathy and IOL mispositioning.

Observations

Two scleral pockets were created along two scleral radial incisions, 180° apart, followed by two 23 G sclerotomies at the pockets' sites. After removal of the dislocated IOL through a corneoscleral incision, posterior vitrectomy was completed. The Carlevale IOL was injected into the anterior chamber (AC) and placed above the iris. The haptics were then externalized using opening distal forceps through the sclerotomies, and the plugs were secured in the scleral pockets. DMEK was then performed using the "C-press" technique, where corneal indentation allowed to artificially shallow the AC to ensure successful graft unrolling. Fifteen months postoperatively, the cornea was clear, the Carlevale IOL well positioned, and the patient's vision improved.

Conclusions and importance

DMEK using the C-Press technique, combined with a sutureless, scleral-fixated IOL such as the Carlevale in a single procedure, may be a safe and effective option to restore vision in case of bullous keratopathy and dislocated IOL.

Efficacy and safety of UT-DSAEK combined with Carlevale's sutureless scleral fixation IOL

PURPOSE

To evaluate a novel surgical combination of ultrathin Descemet stripping automated endothelial keratoplasty (UT-DSAEK) and sutureless scleral fixation for Carlevale intraocular lens (SSF-Carlevale IOL) implantation to manage corneal endothelial decompensation when there is a concomitant need for secondary IOL fixation.

METHODS

Clinical data collected from 10 eyes of 9 patients with bullous keratopathy (BK) who underwent combined UT-DSAEK and SSF-Carlevale IOL implantation in a single procedure were retrospectively analyzed. Anterior chamber IOL (4 cases), aphakia (4 cases, 1 of which associated with PEX), and previous trauma (2 cases) were the conditions responsible for BK. Corrected distance visual acuity (CDVA), intraocular pressure (IOP), endothelial cell density (ECD), central corneal thickness (CCT), graft thickness (GT) and complications were recorded over a 12-month follow-up period.

RESULTS

In 90% (9/10) of eyes graft clarity was maintained during follow-up. The mean CDVA improved significantly (p < 0.0001) from 1.78 ± 0.76 logMAR preoperatively to 0.53 ± 0.3 logMAR at 12 months. ECD on average decreased from 2575 ± 125.3 cells/mm2 (donor tissue) to 1697 ± 133.3 cells/mm2 in 12 months. The mean CCT decreased from 870 ± 200 µm to 650 µm ± 9 at 12 months (ANOVA, p = 0.0005).

CONCLUSIONS

Combined UT-DSAEK and SSF-Carlevale IOL implantation was associated with good corneal graft survival and IOP control, with few complications. These findings suggest that this surgical approach is a practical option for patients requiring both treatment for corneal endothelial dysfunction and secondary IOL implantation.

Outcomes of Secondary Intraocular Lens Implantation and Descemet Stripping Endothelial Keratoplasty-Comparing Staged Versus Combined Surgical Approach

PURPOSE

The aim of this study was to compare the outcomes of staged versus combined surgical approach for secondary intraocular lens (IOL) implantation and Descemet stripping endothelial keratoplasty (DSEK).

METHODS

This is a retrospective review of 124 eyes from 124 patients who underwent either staged or combined secondary IOL implantation in addition to DSEK over a 5-year period at 2 academic tertiary referral centers, between January 1, 2014, and October 1, 2019. Corrected distance visual acuity (CDVA), presence of graft detachment, primary graft failure (PGF), and cystoid macular edema were documented and analyzed.

RESULTS

The CDVA for the 1- to 2- month follow-up period was significantly better in the staged group compared with the combined group ( P = 0.011). By the postoperative 6- to 9-month follow-up period, there was no significant difference in the CDVA between the groups ( P = 0.591). There was no significant difference in the incidence of PGF or graft detachment between the 2 groups ( P > 0.05). In addition, there was no significant difference in the CDVA or rate of postoperative complications between the different methods of IOL fixation.

CONCLUSIONS

The short-term visual outcomes were significantly better in eyes that underwent staged secondary IOL implantation and DSEK versus the combined surgical approach, although the difference was no longer present at 6 to 9 months. There was no difference in the rate of PGF or graft detachment between the 2 groups.

Concomitant sutureless scleral fixation of intraocular lens with keratoplasty: Review of surgical techniques

Sutureless scleral fixation of intraocular lens (sSFIOL) is a commonly employed method of optical rehabilitation of aphakic patients with deficient capsular support, and corneal transplant surgeries can be simultaneously combined with sSFIOL to handle aphakic corneal opacities. A single-stage procedure circumvents the need for repeat intraocular procedures and carries lower risk of graft endothelial damage, endophthalmitis, and macular edema associated with sequential surgeries. However, it mandates surgical expertise and increases the chances of postoperative inflammation. A basket of options is available with the corneal surgeons regarding the manner of host and donor preparation as well as the approaches to scleral fixation and certain intraoperative modifications along with postoperative vigilance may enhance the surgical outcomes. Most of the studies pertaining to keratoplasty with sSFIOL categorize to case reports/series, surgical techniques, and retrospective studies with very limited prospective data available currently. The purpose of the present review is to consolidate all available literature on concomitant sSFIOLs and keratoplasty procedures.

Scleral Fixation of Akreos AO60 Intraocular Lens Using Gore-Tex Suture: An Eye on Visual Outcomes and Postoperative Complications

Purpose

“In-the-bag” placement of an IOL is the Holy Grail for any cataract surgeon. However, in the absence of capsular integrity, alternative surgical options to place the IOL must be sought. We aim to report the clinical outcomes and safety profile of scleral-fixated Akreos AO60 intraocular lens implantation using Gore-Tex suture, combined with pars plana vitrectomy.

Methods

This is a single-center, retrospective case series descriptive study. Electronic clinical records of all patients subjected to scleral fixation of a Bausch and Lomb Akreos AO60 IOL combined with pars plana vitrectomy, between April 1, 2017, and August 1, 2021, were reviewed. Data concerning age, sex, laterality, past ophthalmological history, pre- and postoperative best-available visual acuity, surgical indication, and intra- and postoperative complications were collected. Measured outcomes were the differences in best-available visual acuity and frequency of postoperative complications.

Results

A total of 37 eyes (20 right eyes and 17 left eyes) from 36 patients (16 females and 20 males) were included in the statistical analysis. The mean age at time of surgery was 72.0 ± 12.4 years. The mean follow-up period was 548.9 days (range 39–1564 days). Globally, the mean best-available logMAR visual acuity improved from 1.61 preoperatively (0.025 decimal equivalent) to 0.57 postoperatively (0.3 decimal equivalent), this difference being statistically significant (P < 0.001). Indications for surgery included aphakia due to complicated cataract surgery (24.3%; n = 9); subluxated IOL due to closed trauma (21.6%; n = 8); PEX-related subluxated IOL (16.2%; n = 6); non-traumatic, non-PEX-related subluxated IOL (18.9%; n = 7); subluxated crystalline lens due to closed trauma (8.1%; n = 3); aphakia due to open-globe injury (5.4%; n = 2); silicone-induced IOL opacification (2.7%; n = 1); and aphakia post-endophthalmitis (2.7%; n = 1). Postoperative complications included transient ocular hypertension (27.0%; n = 10), transient corneal edema (18.9%; n = 7), cystoid macular edema (18.9%, n = 7), self-limited hypotension (5.4%, n = 2), self-limited vitreous hemorrhage (2.7%, n = 1), central retinal vein occlusion (2.7%, n = 1), late retinal detachment (2.7%, n = 1), and Akreos IOL opacification (2.7%, n = 1). No suture-related complications were observed.

Conclusion

There was a statistically significant improvement in visual acuity after scleral fixation of Akreos AO60 intraocular lens using Gore-Tex suture, with no suture-related problems recorded. This procedure seems to be a valuable alternative for posterior chamber IOL placement when secondary IOL implantation is required.

FIL-SSF Carlevale intraocular lens for sutureless scleral fixation: 7 recommendations from a serie of 72 cases. MICA study (Multicentric Study of the Carlevale IOL)

PURPOSE

Lacking a standard technique, the surgical management of aphakia without capsular support remains to be optimized. The goal of this study is to analyze results for the Carlevale FIL-SSF intraocular lens and propose surgical recommendations.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

The P1.5 Collective performed a retrospective analysis, with a minimum follow-up of 6 months, of the records of 72 implantations of the Carlevale FIL-SSF intraocular lens, specifically designed for sutureless scleral fixation in the ciliary sulcus.

RESULTS

The most common indication was exchange of a posterior chamber intraocular lens (70.8%). The surgery lasted a mean of 53.4minutes due to the creation of scleral flaps. The implant was damaged in 12.5% of cases. Visual acuity was improved in 83.3% of cases. The postoperative spherical equivalent was -0.3 diopters, with no change in corneal astigmatism. The implant was centered and stable in all cases. Two cases (2.8%) of cystoid macular edema were observed and resolved over six months.

DISCUSSION

A number of advantages of the Carlevale FIL-SSF intraocular lens make it a safe and effective solution for correction of aphakia in the absence of capsular support. It requires a longer than usual surgical procedure, and the implant must be handled with care. From their experience, the authors propose 7 recommendations to accelerate the learning curve.

CONCLUSION

In light of the results of this study, we propose the Carlevale FIL-SSF intraocular lens as the new standard for the correction of aphakia without capsular support, but other studies are necessary to determine its exact place within the heirarchy of other available techniques.