Graft Edge Reflection of a Tightly Scrolled Roll Using Endoillumination as a Simple Method for Determining Graft Orientation in Descemet Membrane Endothelial Keratoplasty

Challenges of DMEK Technique with Young Corneal Donors' Grafts: Surgical Keys for Success-A Pilot Study

PURPOSE

To report on the surgical maneuvers recommended for a successful unfolding of very young donors in order to accomplish an uneventful Descemet Membrane Endothelial Keratoplasty (DMEK) surgery.

METHODS

Five patients (three females and two males, mean age 71.2 ± 6.7 years) with Fuchs endothelial cell dystrophy who underwent DMEK with very young donors (between 20 and 30 years old) were included. The following demographic data were assessed: donor's age, donor's endothelial cell density (ECD), preservation time, recipient's age and sex and unfolding surgical time. Best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA; decimal system), ECD and corneal central thickness (CCT) were assessed preoperatively and at 6-month follow-up.

RESULTS

Donors' mean age was 23.6 ± 3.6 years (range 21 to 30) and the mean ECD was 2748.6 ± 162.6 cells/mm2. All of them underwent an uneventful DMEK as a single procedure performed by one experienced surgeon (MAG) with a mean unfolding time of 7.2 ± 4.9 min (range 4 to 15). The essential steps, including patient preparation as well as DMEK graft implantation, orientation, unrolling and centering are detailed. At 6 months, BCVA was 0.6 ± 0.2, ECD was 1945.0 ± 455.5 cells/mm2 and CCT was 497.0 ± 19.7 microns.

CONCLUSIONS

We hereby present the keys to overcome tightly scrolled grafts of very young donors, which prove perfectly suitable for DMEK surgery. The graft shape tends towards a double-roll and specific maneuvers are strongly recommended.

Graft rejection episodes after keratoplasty in Japanese eyes

We aimed to investigate the clinical characteristics and risk factors for graft rejection after keratoplasty in Japanese patients. We enrolled 730 cases (566 patients) of penetrating keratoplasty (PK, N = 198), Descemet's stripping automated endothelial keratoplasty (DSAEK, N = 277), non-Descemet's stripping automated endothelial keratoplasty (nDSAEK, N = 138), and Descemet membrane endothelial keratoplasty (DMEK, N = 117). The incidence, clinical characteristics, and possible risk factors for graft rejection were analyzed. Graft rejection occurred in 65 cases (56 patients, 8.9%). The incidence rate of rejection was highest with PK (3.45/100 person-years), followed by DSAEK (2.34), nDSAEK (1.55), and DMEK (0.24). Cox regression analysis revealed keratoplasty type, younger age, indications (such as failed keratoplasty and infection), and steroid eyedrop use as possible risk factors. In the multivariate model adjusting baseline characteristics, PK and DSAEK had significantly higher hazard ratios (HRs) than DMEK (HR = 13.6, 95% confidence interval [CI] [1.83, 101] for PK, 7.77 [1.03, 58.6] for DSAEK). Although not statistically significant, the HR estimate of nDSAEK to DMEK (HR = 7.64, 95% CI [0.98, 59.6]) indicated higher HR in nDSAEK than in DMEK. DMEK is the favorable option among the four surgical procedures to avoid graft rejection after keratoplasty.

Anterior segment reconstruction with artificial iris and Descemet membrane endothelial keratoplasty: a staged surgical approach

PURPOSE

To describe a surgical approach that involves anterior segment reconstruction with CustomFlex Artificial Iris (CAI; HumanOptics, Erlangen, Germany) followed by Descemet membrane endothelial keratoplasty (DMEK) in complex eyes with corneal decompensation.

METHODS

Restrospective case series of eyes that underwent anterior segment restoration involving (1) synechiolysis of peripheral anterior synechiae and excision of iris remnants, (2) securing a well-fixated posterior chamber intraocular lens and (3) suture-fixated or capsular bag placement of CAI. All eyes then underwent DMEK using a pull-through technique with the DMEK EndoGlide (Network Medical Products, Ripon, UK). Main outcomes were successful anterior segment restoration and corneal clarity with central corneal thickness (CCT).

RESULTS

Five eyes of five patients (median age 61 years, range 27-69 years; 60% female) underwent anterior segment reconstruction with CAI implantation (4 suture-fixated), followed by successful DMEK surgery (median 2 months later, range 1-5 months). There were no major intraoperative complications or primary graft failure, with one peripheral graft detachment that underwent a successful re-bubble at 1 week. All eyes had stable CAI implants and DMEK grafts remained clear at last follow-up with reduction in mean central corneal thickness (preoperative: 658±86 µm vs postoperative: 470±33 µm, p=0.005).

CONCLUSION

This pilot study highlights a feasible approach of initial anterior segment reconstruction with CAI implantation, prior to DMEK, in eyes with significant anterior segment abnormalities such as iris damage or extensive peripheral anterior synechiae and corneal decompensation.