The Reliability of Successive Scheimpflug Imaging and Anterior Segment Optical Coherence Tomography Measurements Decreases With Increasing Keratoconus Severity

Agreement in anterior segment measurements between swept-source optical coherence and dual Scheimpflug tomography devices in keratoconus eyes

PURPOSE

To evaluate the agreement of ocular biometry measured using a swept-source optical coherence (Casia 2) and a dual Scheimpflug (Galilei G6) tomography in keratoconus.

METHODS

This retrospective study included 102 eyes from 102 keratoconus patient examined using both devices. Parameters compared included flat (Kf) and steep (Ks) keratometry, astigmatism of anterior, posterior, and total keratometry, central (CCT) and thinnest (TCT) corneal thickness. To assess the agreement, intraclass coefficient (ICC) and Bland-Altman analysis with 95% limits of agreement (LoA) were used.

RESULTS

Anterior and total Ks and Kf showed moderate or good agreement with 95% limits of agreement (LoA) range over 9.75 D. Posterior Ks and Kf were lower in the Galilei G6 (all p < 0.001). Astigmatism showed moderate, poor, and moderate agreement for anterior, posterior, and total keratometry, respectively. CCT and TCT showed excellent agreement; however, the 95% LoA range was over 60 μm.

CONCLUSION

The agreement between the two devices was not excellent for most parameters used to diagnose keratoconus and assess disease progression, and the differences were clinically significant. Therefore, the measurements from these two devices are not interchangeable for patients with keratoconus.

Excimer Laser-Assisted Deep Anterior Lamellar Keratoplasty Versus Penetrating Keratoplasty for Patients With Keratoconus: A Retrospective Analysis From the Homburg Keratoconus Center

PURPOSE

To evaluate the outcome of excimer laser-assisted deep anterior lamellar keratoplasty (Exc-DALK) and penetrating keratoplasty (Exc-PKP) for keratoconus (KC).

METHODS

We included 123 eyes and compared the outcome of 30 eyes undergoing big-bubble Exc-DALK after stromal debulking (G1) against a matched group of 83 eyes undergoing Exc-PKP (G2) in our department. G2 was created after performing a pseudorandom stratified bootstrapping of our PKP database starting with 2802 surgeries with removal of any bias. Main outcomes included best corrected visual acuity (BCVA), spherical equivalent (SE), tomographic changes, and endothelial cell density (ECD). Data were compared preoperatively, postoperatively with 2 double-running cross-stitch sutures according to Hoffmann [2 and 10 months postoperatively (T1 and T2)], after first suture removal [15 months postoperatively (T3)], and after final suture removal [26 months postoperatively (T4)].

RESULTS

Preoperatively, all parameters were comparable without significant differences. At T1, G1 showed significantly better BCVA (P = 0.01), lower SE (P = 0.04), lower anterior and posterior topographic astigmatism (ATA and PTA, P < 0.01), lower maximal keratometry (P = 0.02), and lower central corneal thickness (P < 0.01). At T2, G1 showed significantly better BCVA (P = 0.04), lower PTA (P < 0.01), and higher ECD (P < 0.01). At T3, G1 showed significantly lower ATA (P = 0.01) and PTA (P < 0.01) and higher ECD (P = 0.02). At T4, G1 showed significantly lower PTA and higher ECD (P < 0.01) but no significant difference in BCVA (P = 0.07).

CONCLUSIONS

Exc-DALK provided faster visual rehabilitation and represented an endothelial cell-sparing method compared with Exc-PKP. After final suture removal, Exc-DALK showed noninferior outcomes compared with Exc-PKP if the graft was placed on naked Descemet membrane.

Repeatability and agreement of two ocular biometers with single and dual Scheimpflug cameras in keratoconus eyes

BACKGROUND

To evaluate the repeatability and agreement of two different ocular biometers and Scheimpflug devices in keratoconus eyes.

METHODS

This prospective, comparative trial took place at the University hospital, Goethe University, Frankfurt am Main, Germany. We included eyes with keratoconus, one eye per patient, randomly selected. Measurements were taken with Galilei G6 (Ziemer, Switzerland) and Pentacam AXL (Oculus, Germany), three consecutive measurements each. Repeatability and agreement were evaluated for simulated keratometry (simK), astigmatism (simA), maximum keratometry (KMax) and its axis, total keratometry (TCP), axial length (AL), anterior chamber depth (ACD), and thinnest pachymetry (TCT).

RESULTS

Both devices showed an excellent repeatability with intra class correlation (ICC) of > 0.97 for all parameters. The 95% limits of repeatability (LoR95%) and agreement (LoA95%) were narrow for all parameters. The Galilei G6 had a narrower LoAR95% for TCT (2.1 μm vs. 4.6 μm), but a wider LoR95% for KMax (0.52D vs. 1.18D). No relevant difference was found for the other parameters. Agreement between the devices was good to moderate, especially for simK and TCP.

CONCLUSIONS

Both devices show excellent repeatability with narrow LoR95% and high ICC for all parameters. The only relevant difference was found for KMax and TCT in favor of Pentacam AXL and Galilei G6, respectively. Agreement was good to moderate, and most parameters should not be considered interchangeable.

Keratectasia severity staging and progression assessment based on the biomechanical E-staging

Until recently, corneal topography has been the gold standard in detecting keratectasia and monitoring its progression. The recently introduced ABCD tomographic keratoconus staging system focuses on anterior ("A") and posterior ("B") radius of curvature, thinnest corneal thickness ("C"), best-corrected visual acuity with spectacles ("D") and is supplemented with the introduction of the biomechanical E-staging (BEST, "E"). The need for biomechanical staging arose from the fact of altered biomechanical characteristics of keratectasia in comparison to healthy corneas. Ectatic corneas usually exhibit a biomechanical weakening and greater deformation than healthy corneas when exposed to a biomechanical stressor such as a standardized air puff indentation as provided by the Corvis ST® (CST, Oculus, Wetzlar, Germany). The BEST is based on the linear term of the Corvis Biomechanical Index (CBI) and provides a biomechanical keratoconus severity staging and progression assessment within the CST software. This review traces the development of the BEST as an addition to the tomographic ABCD staging system and highlights its strengths and limitations when applied in daily practice for the detection, monitoring and progression assessment in keratectasia.

A comparison of keratoconus progression following collagen cross-linkage using standard or personalised keratometry thresholds

OBJECTIVE

To define how estimates of keratoconus progression following collagen cross-linking (CXL) vary according to the parameter selected to measure corneal shape.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

We estimated progression following CXL in 1677 eyes. We compared standard definitions of keratoconus progression based on published thresholds for Kmax, front K2, or back K2, or progression of any two of these three parameters, with the option of an increased threshold for Kmax values ≥ 55D. As corneal thickness reduces unpredictably after CXL, it was excluded from the principal analysis. We then repeated the analysis using novel adaptive estimates of progression for Kmax, front K2, or back K2, developed separately using 6463 paired readings from keratoconus eyes, with a variation of the Bland-Altman method to determine the 95% regression-based limits of agreement (LoA). We created Kaplan-Meier survival plots for both standard and adaptive thresholds. The primary outcome was progression five years after a baseline visit 9-15 months following CXL.

RESULTS

Progression rates were 8% with a standard (≥ 1.5D) threshold for K2 or 6% with the static multi-parameter definition. With a ≥ 1D threshold for Kmax, the progression was significantly higher at 29%. With adaptive Kmax or K2, the progression rates were similar (20%) but less than with the adaptive multi-parameter method (22%).

CONCLUSIONS

Estimates of keratoconus progression following CXL vary widely according to the reference criteria. Using adaptive thresholds (LoA) to define the repeatability of keratometry gives estimates for progression that are markedly higher than with the standard multi-parameter method.

Comparison of Femtosecond Laser Assistance and Manual Trephination in Deep Anterior Lamellar Keratoplasty in the Treatment of Keratoconus: A Meta-Analysis

PURPOSE

To compare the efficacy and safety of femtosecond laser-assisted deep anterior lamellar keratoplasty (F-DALK) with those of manual-trephination DALK (M-DALK) in treating keratoconus.

DESIGN

Systematic review and meta-analysis.

METHODS

Through November 2022, we comprehensively searched PubMed, EMBASE, the Cochrane Library, and 4 Chinese databases. Studies that involved comparisons between F-DALK and M-DALK groups and that reported on relevant efficacy and/or safety parameters were included. Primary outcomes were uncorrected- and corrected-distance visual acuity and intraoperative complication rates. Secondary outcomes were spherical equivalent, topographic astigmatism, refractive cylinder, mean keratometry, endothelial cell density, suture removal time, and postoperative complication rates. These data were analyzed using Cochrane Review Manager software version 5.3.

RESULTS

This meta-analysis included 9 nonrandomized controlled studies involving 1713 eyes. In eyes treated with F-DALK, corrected-distance visual acuity at 1 to 6 months (weighted mean difference = -0.07 [95% confidence interval {CI} -0.10 to -0.03]; I2 = 0%; P < .001) after surgery was better and intraoperative Descemet membrane perforation occurred less often (odds ratio = 0.53 [95% CI 0.31-0.92]; I2 = 6%; P = .02) than in eyes treated with M-DALK. No clinically significant differences in other outcomes were found among the groups.

CONCLUSIONS

Both F-DALK and M-DALK are safe and efficacious for patients with keratoconus. Compared with M-DALK, F-DALK can provide better early visual acuity and reduce the intraoperative perforation rate, and its likely improvements to long-term visual quality and endothelial cell preservation warrant further investigation. In addition, the 2 techniques seem to be comparable regarding refractive outcomes and other complications.

Repeatability and Interobserver Reproducibility of a Swept-Source Optical Coherence Tomography for Measurements of Anterior, Posterior, and Total Corneal Power

INTRODUCTION

The aim of this work is to evaluate the intraobserver repeatability and interobserver reproducibility of corneal power measurements obtained with a swept-source optical coherence tomographer (CASIA 2, Tomey, Japan) in healthy subjects.

METHODS

A total of 67 right eyes from 67 healthy subjects were enrolled. Two experienced observers measured each eye three times consecutively with the CASIA 2. Corneal power values were recorded as simulated keratometry, anterior, posterior, and total corneal power. Parameters were flattest keratometry (Kf), steepest keratometry (Ks), mean keratometry (Km), astigmatism magnitude, astigmatism power vectors J0 and J45. Intraobserver repeatability and interobserver reproducibility of the CASIA 2 were assessed by the within-subject standard deviation (Sw), test-retest repeatability (TRT), coefficients of variation (CoV), and intraclass correlation coefficients (ICCs). Double-angle plots were used for astigmatism vector analysis.

RESULTS

The CASIA 2 had high repeatability for all corneal power values, with Sw values ≤ 0.17 diopters (D), TRT ≤ 0.46 D, and ICCs ranging from 0.866 to 0.998. Interobserver reproducibility was also high, showing all Sw values ≤ 0.10 D, TRT ≤ 0.27 D, and ICCs ≥ 0.944. The reproducibility of the average of three consecutive measurements (Sw 0.01-0.10 D, TRT 0.03-0.27 D, ICC 0.944-0.998) was higher than the reproducibility of single measurements (Sw 0.01-0.17 D, TRT 0.03-0.47 D, ICC 0.867-0.996).

CONCLUSIONS

The CASIA 2 showed high intraobserver repeatability and interobserver reproducibility for anterior, posterior, and total corneal power measurements in 6.0-mm diameter area. In addition, we suggest that using the average of three consecutive measurements can improve reproducibility between observers, compared to single measurements only.

Influence of Keratoconus Severity on Detecting True Progression with Scheimpflug Imaging and Anterior Segment Optical Coherence Tomography

To determine consistent change over time in keratoconus disease, it is necessary to establish progression cut-off values based on intersession variability of the device used to monitor the cornea. The aim of this study was to analyze the accuracy of corneal parameters using Scheimpflug tomography and anterior segment optical coherence tomography in healthy and keratoconic eyes of varying severity to determine the cut-off values that indicate real progression. Three repeated measurements of each cornea of healthy (20 eyes) and keratoconic eyes (mild = 16, moderate = 25 and severe = 20) were recorded using Pentacam and Casia SS-1000 devices, which were repeated 2-3 weeks later. K1, K2, maximal anterior and posterior keratometry, and corneal thickness at the thinnest location (TCT) were collected. The accuracy was excellent with both devices; however, the Casia device presented better repeatability and reproducibility in all parameters in all groups compared to the Pentacam. The cut-off of the Pentacam and Casia in the mild stage were lower (K1 = 0.50 and 0.37 D; K2 = 0.51 and 0.37 D; Kmax-A = 1.24 and 0.65 D; Kmax-P = 0.38 and 0.17 D; TCT = 19.64 and 11.19 µm) than that of the severe stage (K1 = 1.09 and 0.88 D; K2 = 1.41 and 0.87 D; Kmax-A = 2.74 and 2.15 D; Kmax-P = 0.82 and 0.22 D; TCT = 28.68 and 14.83 µm). These results show that the greater the keratoconus severity, the greater the change that must occur for it to be considered real.

The Biomechanical E-Staging: In Vivo Biomechanics in Keratoconus

Belin's ABCD keratoconus classification system allows keratoconus staging based on the criteria of anterior (A) and posterior (B) corneal curvature, thinnest corneal thickness (C), and best spectacle-corrected visual acuity (D). These parameters also provide a progression assessment, but do not take corneal biomechanics into account. The analysis of corneal biomechanics by the Corvis ST (Oculus, Wetzlar, Germany) allows for separation of healthy and keratoconus corneas, based on the Corvis Biomechanical Index (CBI) and the Tomographic Biomechanical Index (TBI). As Corvis ST measurements are highly reliable and are independent of keratoconus severity, a biomechanical parameter was developed for keratoconus corneas based on the linear term of the CBI. This provides biomechanical keratoconus staging. The Corvis Biomechanical Factor (CBiF) is the basis for the introduction of the biomechanical E-staging, which augments the ABCD classification to the ABCDE classification, thus including the cornerstone of corneal biomechanics. This article highlights strengths and limitations of the ABCDE classification. "Unilateral keratoconus" supposedly turns out to be mostly a snapshot of a highly asymmetric keratectasia. Regular astigmatism is sometimes an important differential diagnosis to keratectasia and may be difficult to differentiate from it. Furthermore, the use of the biomechanical E-staging in daily practice for progression assessment of keratoconus and after its treatment by corneal cross-linking or implantation of intracorneal ring segments will be demonstrated and discussed.

Corneal thickness measurements with the RTVue, Casia-2, and Pentacam devices in patients with mild-to-moderate keratoconus: a comparative study

BACKGROUND

To compare the characteristics of corneal thickness measurements among the RTVue, Casia-2, and Pentacam in patients with mild-to-moderate keratoconus.

METHODS

We recruited 46 eyes of 46 patients diagnosed with mild-to-moderate keratoconus at our hospital between January and March 2022. The central corneal thickness (CCT) and thinnest corneal thickness (TCT) were measured using two optical coherence tomography (OCT) instruments (RTVue and Casia-2) and the more conventional Pentacam. Differences and correlations between the CCTs and TCTs, based on the device and influencing factors, were explored.

RESULTS

The CCTs were highly consistent among the groups (p = 0.434) and correlated with one another (p < 0.001). The TCTs measured by OCTs were thinner than those measured by the Pentacam (p < 0.001); however, all three devices were highly correlated (p < 0.001). The thinnest point location measurements with RTVue and Casia-2 differed significantly from the measurements with the Pentacam. Bland-Altman plots demonstrated a significant agreement between Pentacam and OCTs in TCT measurement (p < 0.001); the 95% limits of agreement were - 3.1 μm to + 33.1 μm for Pentacam and RTVue and - 8.6 μm to + 36.5 μm for Pentacam and Casia-2. RTVue and Casia-2 showed no difference in corneal thickness (p = 0.633) and thinnest point location measurement (p > 0.05). Multivariate analysis identified that the TCT measurement difference between the RTVue and Pentacam was related to the difference between the CCT and TCT (b = 0.490, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.033 to 0.948, p = 0.036), whereas the difference between the Casia-2 and Pentacam was related to the anterior radius for curvature (A) grade (b = 3.9, 95% CI: 1.753 to 6.074, p = 0.001), corneal pachymetry at the thinnest (C) grade (b = - 7.875, 95% CI: - 11.404 to - 4.346, p < 0.001), and the difference between the CCT and TCT (b = 0.425, 95% CI: 0.1 to 0.751, p = 0.012).

CONCLUSIONS

CCTs in patients with mild-to-moderate keratoconus were similar among all three devices, but the TCTs and the thinnest point locations were not. Furthermore, the TCT measurement differences between the OCT devices and the Pentacam were more pronounced in keratoconus cases with a steeper anterior surface, thicker TCTs, and a larger difference between the CCT and TCT.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

Number: 2021118-1. Retrospectively registered: September 01, 2021.

Reliability analysis of successive Corneal Visualization Scheimpflug Technology measurements in different keratoconus stages

BACKGROUND

This study assesses the reliability of successive corneal biomechanical response measurements by the Corneal Visualization Scheimpflug Technology (CST, Corvis ST^® , Oculus Optikgeräte, Wetzlar, Germany) in different keratoconus (KC) stages.

METHODS

A total of 173 eyes (15 controls: 15 eyes, and 112 KC patients: stages 1|1-2|2|2-3|3|3-4|4, n = 26|16|36|18|31|26|5 according to Topographical KC Classification, TKC) were repeatedly examined five times with the CST, each after repositioning the patient's head and re-adjusting the device. Tomographical analysis (Pentacam HR^® ; Oculus, Wetzlar, Germany) was performed once before and once after CST measurements. Outcome measures included (1) A1 velocity, (2) deformation amplitude (DA) ratio 2 mm, (3) integrated radius, (4) stiffness parameter A1 and (5) Ambrósio relational thickness to the horizontal profile (ARTh). The Corvis Biomechanical Index (CBI) is reported to be extracted out of these parameters. Mean values of the five measurements and Cronbach's α were calculated as a measure for reliability.

RESULTS

Ambrósio relational thickness to the horizontal profile and SPA1 were significantly higher in controls (534|123) compared to TKC1 (384|88), TKC2 (232|66), TKC3 (152|55) and TKC4 (71|27; p < 0.0001). The other parameters were similar in controls and TKC1 (A1 velocity: 0.148|0.151 m/s; integrated radius: 8.2|8.6 mm^-1 ), but significantly higher in TKC stages 2 to 4 (DA ratio 2 mm: 5.5|6.3|8.0; A1 velocity: 0.173|0.174|0.186 m/second; integrated radius: 10.9|12.8|19.0 mm^-1 ; p < 0.0001). All parameters proved to be highly reliable (Cronbach's α ≥ 0.834) and the corneal tomography remained unaffected.

CONCLUSIONS

The individual parameters included in the CBI (consisting of ARTh, SPA1, DA ratio 2 mm, A1 velocity and integrated radius) are highly reliable but differ KC stage-dependently.

[Stage-appropriate treatment of keratoconus]

Keratoconus (KC) is a progressive cone-shaped corneal protrusion that causes paracentral thinning at the apex of the cone and typically occurs asymmetrically on both sides. After a careful anamnesis and classification of the degree of severity a targeted treatment appropriate to the stage of the disease is available. If the visual acuity is no longer sufficient, rigid gas-permeable contact lenses (CL) are fitted by a specialist. Riboflavin UVA cross-linking (CXL) is recommended in cases of progression and visual acuity that is still useful for the patient. Intracorneal ring segments (ICRS) are indicated for CL intolerance in cases of reduced visual acuity and a clear central cornea. If the stage is more advanced, deep anterior lamellar keratoplasty (DALK) or penetrating keratoplasty (PKP) is recommended. A PKP is contraindicated in acute KC but deep stromal sutures for readaptation of the Descemet tear with gas filling of the anterior chamber can considerably shorten the course. Almost no other eye disease is nowadays as easily accessible for an early instrument-based diagnosis and stage-appropriate treatment as KC.