Best Indicators for Detecting Keratoconus Progression in Children: A Report From the Shahroud Schoolchildren Eye Cohort Study

Repeatability and agreement of two ocular biometers with single and dual Scheimpflug cameras in keratoconus eyes

BACKGROUND

To evaluate the repeatability and agreement of two different ocular biometers and Scheimpflug devices in keratoconus eyes.

METHODS

This prospective, comparative trial took place at the University hospital, Goethe University, Frankfurt am Main, Germany. We included eyes with keratoconus, one eye per patient, randomly selected. Measurements were taken with Galilei G6 (Ziemer, Switzerland) and Pentacam AXL (Oculus, Germany), three consecutive measurements each. Repeatability and agreement were evaluated for simulated keratometry (simK), astigmatism (simA), maximum keratometry (KMax) and its axis, total keratometry (TCP), axial length (AL), anterior chamber depth (ACD), and thinnest pachymetry (TCT).

RESULTS

Both devices showed an excellent repeatability with intra class correlation (ICC) of > 0.97 for all parameters. The 95% limits of repeatability (LoR95%) and agreement (LoA95%) were narrow for all parameters. The Galilei G6 had a narrower LoAR95% for TCT (2.1 μm vs. 4.6 μm), but a wider LoR95% for KMax (0.52D vs. 1.18D). No relevant difference was found for the other parameters. Agreement between the devices was good to moderate, especially for simK and TCP.

CONCLUSIONS

Both devices show excellent repeatability with narrow LoR95% and high ICC for all parameters. The only relevant difference was found for KMax and TCT in favor of Pentacam AXL and Galilei G6, respectively. Agreement was good to moderate, and most parameters should not be considered interchangeable.

Ultra-High Resolution Optical Aberrometry in Patients with Keratoconus: A Cross-Sectional Study

INTRODUCTION

This study performs optical aberration assessment in patients using a novel ultra-high-resolution device. The objective of this study is to analyze optical aberrations, especially the very high order wavefront (more than 10th order of Zernike coefficients), and compare between keratoconus and healthy patients.

METHODS

In this cross-sectional study, we analyzed 43 eyes from 25 healthy patients and 43 eyes from 27 patients with keratoconus using corneal tomography and a very high-resolution (8.55 µm) aberrometer prototype (T-eyede) outfitted with a sensor originally developed for use in the field of astrophysics. Corneal aberration values were assessed using an optical model built with Zemax optical software, while ocular aberrations were assessed using T-eyede. In addition, image-processing analysis was performed of the wavefront phase, creating a high-pass filter map.

RESULTS

We found lower values for ocular aberrations than corneal aberrations in both groups (p < 0.001). Specifically, we found a reduction in primary astigmatism (0.145 µm) and primary coma (0.017 µm). Also, the keratoconus group showed significantly higher wavefront aberration values compared with controls (p < 0.001). An analysis of the high-pass filter map revealed 2 contrasting results: one smooth or clear, while the other presented a banding pattern. Almost all in the control group (95%) showed the first pattern, while 77% of the keratoconus group showed a banding pattern on the filtered map (chi-squared test, p < 0.001).

CONCLUSION

This device provides reliable, precise measurements of ocular aberrations that correlate well with corneal aberrations. Furthermore, the extraordinary high-resolution measurements revealed unprecedented micro changes in the wavefront phase of patients with keratoconus that varied with disease stage. These findings could lead to new screening or follow-up methods.

Three-year change in corneal asphericity in children at the age of emmetropisation

PURPOSE

To determine the 3-year changes in anterior and posterior values of corneal asphericity (Q) in 6- to 12-year-old children.

METHODS

The first and second phases of the study were conducted in 2015 and 2018, respectively. The target population in the first phase was 6- to 12-year-old students in Shahroud, Iran. Multistage cluster sampling was performed on urban students. Additionally, all rural students in Shahroud county were invited to participate. Corneal imaging and ocular biometry were performed using the Pentacam-HR and Allegro Biograph, respectively.

RESULTS

A total of 4961 right eyes were analysed in this report. The mean (95% confidence interval) anterior and posterior Q values for an 8-mm chord diameter were -0.38 ± 0.11 (-0.39 to -0.38) and -0.32 ± 0.12 (-0.33 to -0.32) in the first phase of the study, respectively. The mean 3-year changes in anterior and posterior Q values were 0.00 ± 0.08 (95% CI: 0.00-0.00) and -0.01 ± 0.06 (95% CI: -0.01 to -0.01), respectively. Based on a multiple regression model, advancing age (β = -0.002; [-0.003 to -0.001]), 3-year increase in mean keratometry (β = -0.04; [-0.06 to -0.02]), central corneal thickness (β = -0.001; [-0.001 to -0.000]), lens thickness (-0.05; [-0.11 to -0.003]) and anterior chamber depth (-0.09; [-0.15 to -0.03]) showed a statistically significant association with increased anterior Q prolation. Increased axial length was associated with a decrease in Q (β = 0.02; [0.004 to 0.03]). In addition, female gender (β = -0.004; [-0.007 to -0.001]) was significantly associated with a more prolate posterior Q value, while rural residence (β = 0.005; [0.002 to 0.009]) was significantly associated with a more oblate posterior Q value.

CONCLUSION

Three-year changes in anterior and posterior Q values were very small. The cornea tends to become more prolate with increasing age.

Personalized Model to Predict Keratoconus Progression From Demographic, Topographic, and Genetic Data

PURPOSE

To generate a prognostic model to predict keratoconus progression to corneal crosslinking (CXL).

DESIGN

Retrospective cohort study.

METHODS

We recruited 5025 patients (9341 eyes) with early keratoconus between January 2011 and November 2020. Genetic data from 926 patients were available. We investigated both keratometry or CXL as end points for progression and used the Royston-Parmar method on the proportional hazards scale to generate a prognostic model. We calculated hazard ratios (HRs) for each significant covariate, with explained variation and discrimination, and performed internal-external cross validation by geographic regions.

RESULTS

After exclusions, model fitting comprised 8701 eyes, of which 3232 underwent CXL. For early keratoconus, CXL provided a more robust prognostic model than keratometric progression. The final model explained 33% of the variation in time to event: age HR (95% CI) 0.9 (0.90-0.91), maximum anterior keratometry 1.08 (1.07-1.09), and minimum corneal thickness 0.95 (0.93-0.96) as significant covariates. Single-nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) associated with keratoconus (n=28) did not significantly contribute to the model. The predicted time-to-event curves closely followed the observed curves during internal-external validation. Differences in discrimination between geographic regions was low, suggesting the model maintained its predictive ability.

CONCLUSIONS

A prognostic model to predict keratoconus progression could aid patient empowerment, triage, and service provision. Age at presentation is the most significant predictor of progression risk. Candidate SNPs associated with keratoconus do not contribute to progression risk.