Prospective In Vitro Comparison of Kerasave and Optisol-GS Corneal Storage Solutions

Comparative Analysis of Endothelial Cell Density and Central Thickness of Corneas Used for Endothelial Keratoplasty Procedures Using Various Storage Solutions

PURPOSE

The goal of this study was to evaluate the effect of various Food and Drug Administration-approved storage solutions on endothelial cell density (ECD) and central corneal thickness (CCT).

METHOD

We analyzed 6220 tissues used for endothelial keratoplasty procedures between January 2022 and June 2023 that were stored in either Life4°C, Optisol-GS, Kerasave, or Eusol-C under hypothermic conditions. We analyzed preprocessing CCT, success rate of meeting surgeon's Descemet stripping automated endothelial keratoplasty (DSAEK) thickness preferences, and preprocessing and postprocessing ECD. Results were analyzed using one-way analysis of variance, followed by multiple pairwise comparisons using the Tukey test.

RESULTS

Mean preprocessing CCT was significantly lower in the Life4°C group (532 μm) than in Optisol-GS (549 μm), Kerasave (582 μm), and Eusol-C (589 μm) groups (all P < 0.0001). Preprocessing CCT in the Optisol-GS group was significantly lower than in Kerasave and Eusol-C groups (F (3, 3273) = 153.1, all P < 0.0001). Success rate of meeting surgeon DSAEK preferences was statistically similar among all 4 groups. Preprocessing ECD of the Kerasave group (2821 cells/mm2) was numerically higher than of the Eusol-C (2791 cells/mm2), Life4°C (2759 cells/mm2), and Optisol-GS (2768 cells/mm2) groups (P = 0.3232, 0.0004, and 0.0015, respectively).

CONCLUSIONS

Corneal tissues stored in Kerasave and Eusol-C are significantly thicker than those in Life4°C and Optisol-GS. However, the success rate of meeting surgeon DSAEK preferences is similar among all 4 storage solutions.

Comparative Proteomics Reveals Prolonged Corneal Preservation Impaired Ocular Surface Immunity Accompanied by Fibrosis in Human Stroma

Cornea transplantation is one of the most commonly performed allotransplantations worldwide. Prolonged storage of donor corneas leads to decreased endothelial cell viability, severe stromal edema, and opacification, significantly compromising the success rate of corneal transplantation. Corneal stroma, which constitutes the majority of the cornea, plays a crucial role in maintaining its shape and transparency. In this study, we conducted proteomic analysis of corneal stroma preserved in Optisol-GS medium at 4 °C for 7 or 14 days to investigate molecular changes during storage. Among 1923 identified proteins, 1634 were quantifiable and 387 were significantly regulated with longer preservation. Compared to stroma preserved for 7 days, proteins involved in ocular surface immunomodulation were largely downregulated while proteins associated with extracellular matrix reorganization and fibrosis were upregulated in those preserved for 14 days. The increase in extracellular matrix structural proteins together with upregulation of growth factor signaling implies the occurrence of stromal fibrosis, which may compromise tissue clarity and cause vision impairments. This study is the first to provide insights into how storage duration affects corneal stroma from a proteomic perspective. Our findings may contribute to future research efforts aimed at developing long-term preservation techniques and improving the quality of preserved corneas, thus maximizing their clinical application.

Comparison of corneal endothelial cell density and morphology with Optisol GS and Life4C storage media in the eye bank: a 5-year retrospective analysis

Purpose

Optisol GS and Life4C are corneal storage media used by eye banks worldwide. We sought to determine if either solution was associated with superior corneal endothelial cell density (ECD) or morphology in a large cohort of donor corneas.

Methods

From January 2016 through December 2020, 10,316 corneas from 5,624 unique donors were acquired and analyzed at Rocky Mountain Lions Eye Bank. In April 2019, Life4C replaced Optisol GS as the sole storage medium. We compared ECD and morphology before and after April 2019, and excluded corneas processed within the transition period. Univariable and multivariable regression analyses accounted for age, sex, tobacco use, heavy alcohol use, and diabetes. Only right corneas were analyzed to account for the correlation between eyes.

Results

Of 5042 right corneas analyzed, 3486 were stored in Optisol GS and 1556 in Life4C. There was no significant difference in ECD across groups (2794 vs. 2793 cells/mm2 in Optisol GS and Life4C, p=0.88). In multivariate analyses, there was no significant difference in corneal ECD (0.6 cells/mm2 higher with Life4C, p=0.96) or hexagonality (0.22% higher with Life4C, p=0.31). However, the coefficient of variation was significantly lower in the Life4C group (-0.0039, p=0.03). After adjustment for above factors, corneas in Life4C demonstrated a 3.1% decreased likelihood of exhibiting CV values greater than 0.40 (p=0.009).

Conclusions

This study demonstrates comparable and favorable outcomes using both storage media and confirms their overall efficacy. The decreased CV in Life4C is not of clinically significant magnitude, but merits further research in clinical and long-term settings.