Comparison of Corneal Aberration Changes After Laser In Situ Keratomileusis Performed With Mechanical Microkeratome and IntraLase Femtosecond Laser: 1-Year Follow-up

Evaluation of morphological features: femtosecond-LASIK flap vs. SMILE cap, and the effects on corneal higher-order aberrations

PURPOSE

The aim of this study is to evaluate morphological features of corneal flap/cap and the correlations with corneal higher-order aberrations (HOAs) changes after femtosecond laser in situ keratomileusis (FS-LASIK) and small incision lenticule extraction (SMILE).

METHODS

This was a retrospective study. Pre- and postoperative (1 and 3 months) corneal HOAs were assessed with Pentacam HR. The corneal flap/cap thickness at 32 points (± 1.5 mm, ± 2 mm, ± 2.5 mm, and ± 3 mm from the corneal vertex on meridian 0°/45°/90°/135°) were measured using anterior segment optical coherence tomography at 3 months postoperatively. Morphological features of corneal flap/cap including predictability (P), uniformity (U), and symmetry (S) were calculated and used for correlation analysis with corneal HOAs changes.

RESULTS

Eighty-six eyes (44 patients) and ninety-six eyes (50 patients) were involved in FS-LASIK and SMILE groups, respectively. Significant thicker corneal flap/cap than the predicted was observed at each measuring point and meridian in both groups (difference > 2.225 μm, the within-subject standard deviation over 6-mm optical zone). There was no statistically significant difference in predictability of corneal flap/cap thickness, while U_6 mm (P < .0001), U₀ (P < .001), U₄₅ (P = .002), U₉₀ (P < .0001), U₁₃₅ (P = .004), S_6 mm (P < .0001), S₀ (P < .001), and S₉₀ (P < .0001) over 6 mm zone were less in SMILE than in FS-LASIK. The changes of corneal tHOAs, Z (3, - 1), Z (3, 1), and SA were significantly correlated with morphological features of corneal flap/cap.

CONCLUSION

Both FS-LASIK and SMILE had good predictability in flap or cap thickness, while the uniformity and symmetry of SMILE cap were better than FS-LASIK flap. The quality of flap/cap was closely associated with the changes of corneal HOAs.

Evolution of visual acuity, flap thickness, and optical density after laser in situ keratomileusis performed with a femtosecond laser

PURPOSE

To describe the postoperative evolution of visual acuity, flap morphology, and stromal optical density femtosecond laser-assisted laser in situ keratomileusis (FS-LASIK).

SETTING

Clínica Rementería, Madrid, Spain.

DESIGN

Prospective case series.

METHODS

The study comprised 44 consecutive eyes that had FS-LASIK performed with the WaveLight FS200 and the Allegretto excimer laser to correct myopia. Visual outcomes, flap thickness, and stromal optical density were assessed 1 day, 1 week, 1 month, and 3 months postoperatively.

RESULTS

A statistically significant improvement in the mean uncorrected distance visual acuity at 1 day (0.94 ± 0.2) and 1 week (0.93 ± 0.2) to 1 month (1.04 ± 0.2) and 3 months (1.11 ± 0.1) postoperatively (P < .05). At 3 months postoperatively, the femtosecond laser had good outcomes in efficacy (0.98 ± 0.1), safety (0.98 ± 0.1), and predictability (100% of eyes were within ± 0.5 D of emmetropia). The femtosecond-created flaps were slightly thicker than intended, the mean SD intraflap was 7.1 μm, the range between the thickest and thinnest points in each flap was 25.4 μm, and the mean flap thickness homogeneity was 7.6 μm at 3 months postoperatively. A progressive decrease in the optical density of the flap stroma and the residual stromal bed was detected during follow-up.

CONCLUSIONS

The femtosecond laser study appears to be a safe, effective, and predictable platform to obtain LASIK flaps. The flaps were planar and homogeneous but slightly thicker than intended. The optical density of the flap stroma was slightly higher at early follow-up and decreased over time.

Comparison of early visual quality in patients with moderate myopia using different optical zones in small incision lenticule extraction (SMILE)

Background

The early visual qualities of patients with moderate myopia were evaluated after small incision lenticule extraction (SMILE) using different optical zones.

Methods

In this retrospective case study, 27 cases (51 eyes) were selected, including 10 cases in Group A (19 eyes), 6.6–6.8 mm in the optical zone, 10 cases in Group B (19 eyes), 6.4–6.5 mm in the optical zone, and 7 cases in Group C (13 eyes),6.1–6.3 mm in the optical zone. The following items were examined preoperatively and 1 month postoperatively: uncorrected visual acuity (UCVA), best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA), spherical, cylinder, central corneal thickness (CCT), corneal mean curvature (CMC), total ocular aberrations (TA), total low order aberrations (tLOAs), defocus, astigmatism and total high order aberrations (tHOAs), spherical, coma, trefoil, modulation transfer function (MTF), MTF_cutoff, SR, objective scatter index (OSI), point scatter function at 50 and 10% (PSF50%, PSF10%), and contrast visual acuity of 100, 20, and 9% (VA100%, VA20%, and VA9%). We compared the three groups by Kruskal-Wallis test. Wilcoxon signed ranks test was used for each group before and 1 month after surgeries. P< 0.05 was considered statistically significant.

Results

There was no significant difference in UCVA, BCVA, CCT, cylinder, and CMC in three groups preoperatively and 1 month postoperatively (P> 0.05). Comparison of the aberrations of the three groups showed statistically significant difference only in TA, tLOA, defocus, astigmatism and SA preoperatively, and trefoil 1 month postoperatively(P< 0.05). The postoperative TA, tLOAs, defocus, astigmatism and trefoil of the three groups were lower than those before surgeries (P< 0.05). The postoperative tHOAs of Group B and C was lower than those before surgeries (P< 0.05). The MTF results showed that before surgeries, there were significant differences in three groups (P< 0.05) in spatial frequencies 5~15 cycles per degree (cpd), and no differences in 20~30 cpd(P> 0.05), while no difference were observed in all spatial frequencies postoperatively (P> 0.05). Comparing the preoperative and postoperative MTF values for each group, the results showed that there was a significant difference in Group C at 5~20 cpd after surgeries(P< 0.05). There was no significant difference in MTF_cutoff, SR, OSI, PSF50%, PSF10%, VA100%, VA20%, and VA9% in the three groups preoperatively (P> 0.05). One month after surgeries, higher VA9% values were measured for Group C compared to Group A and B (P < 0.05). There was no significant difference in each group before and after surgeries (P> 0.05).

Conclusion

SMILE could improve the visual qualities of patients with moderate myopia. Reducing the surgical optical zone will only affect night vision slightly.

Keratorefractive Surgery Outcomes in Keratoconus Suspect Patients

Purpose. To examine the outcomes of keratorefractive surgeries in keratoconus suspect patients. Methods. This study included 192 keratoconus suspects (351 eyes), treated with photorefractive keratectomy (PRK) (211 eyes), Lasik (96 eyes), and Femto-Lasik (44 eyes) surgeries in an eye clinic. The best spectacle-corrected visual acuity (BSCVA) and subjective refraction were evaluated preoperatively and postoperatively (three months and five years after the procedure). The Orbscan II topography system was also used preoperatively and five years after the procedure. Results. The patients’ mean age was 31.6 ± 5.49 years (range: 21–47 years) in the last follow-up. There was no significant difference between the preoperative and postoperative mean values of BSCVA in any of the surgical methods ( $P$  = 0.49). The mean spherical equivalent, cylindrical power, corneal curvature, the thinnest corneal thickness, and the central corneal thickness decreased significantly in the last follow-up ( $P$  < 0.001). Four patients (3.50%) in the PRK group and one patient (1.85%) in the Lasik group needed glasses in the last follow-up. Eleven cases of corneal ectasia were detected in the last follow-up (six eyes of four patients [2.84%] and five eyes of four patients [5.20%] in the PRK and Lasik groups, respectively). Conclusion. In the present study, the high risk of postoperative ectasia was detected in keratoconus suspects following PRK and Lasik surgeries. According to the results, it can be concluded that Femto-Lasik surgery provides better outcomes than Lasik and PRK. Overall, the surgical criteria are suggested to be evaluated case by case, and the patients must be followed up over time to assess the corneal topography and refraction stability.

Effect of flap homogeneity on higher-order aberrations induction after femtosecond LASIK for myopia

PURPOSE

To assess the relevance of the homogeneity of femtosecond laser flap thickness regarding induction of higher-order aberrations (HOAs).

SETTING

Clínica Rementería & Clínica Novovisión, Madrid, Spain.

DESIGN

Prospective observational study.

METHODS

Two hundred thirty-one patients underwent in situ keratomileusis using 5 different femtosecond lasers. The flap thicknesses were measured using anterior segment optical coherence tomography 3 months postoperatively. The same masked observer measured 6 symmetrical points nasally and temporally 1.0 mm, 2.0 mm, and 3.0 mm from the center of the flap in each case. HOAs induced in the cornea were measured using tomography.

RESULTS

Positive and significant correlations were found between HOA induction and the flap thickness heterogeneity 3.0 mm from the center of the flap. Pearson correlation coefficients for the induction of HOAs were third-order 0.17112 (P = .0224), fourth-order 0.22474 (P = .0026), fifth-order 0.16449 (P = .0282), coma-like 0.17370 (P = .0204), and total HOAs 0.18182 (P = .0151).

CONCLUSIONS

The amount of flap-thickness heterogeneity at 3.0 mm from the center of the flap created using femtosecond lasers was correlated with the magnitude of the HOAs induced.

Laser-assisted in-situ keratomileusis (LASIK) with a mechanical microkeratome compared to LASIK with a femtosecond laser for LASIK in adults with myopia or myopic astigmatism

BACKGROUND

Laser-assisted in-situ keratomileusis (LASIK) is a surgical procedure that corrects refractive errors. This technique creates a flap of the outermost parts of the cornea (epithelium, bowman layer, and anterior stroma) to expose the middle part of the cornea (stromal bed) and reshape it with excimer laser using photoablation. The flaps can be created by a mechanical microkeratome or a femtosecond laser.

OBJECTIVES

To compare the effectiveness and safety of mechanical microkeratome versus femtosecond laser in LASIK for adults with myopia.

SEARCH METHODS

We searched CENTRAL (which contains the Cochrane Eyes and Vision Trials Register) (2019, Issue 2); Ovid MEDLINE; Embase; PubMed; LILACS; ClinicalTrials.gov and the World Health Organization (WHO) International Clinical Trials Registry Platform (ICTRP). We used no date or language restrictions. We searched the reference lists of included trials. We searched the electronic databases on 22 February 2019.

SELECTION CRITERIA

We included randomized controlled trials (RCTs) of LASIK with a mechanical microkeratome compared to a femtosecond laser in people aged 18 years or older with more than 0.5 diopters of myopia or myopic astigmatism.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

We used standard methodological procedures expected by Cochrane.

MAIN RESULTS

We included 16 records from 11 trials enrolling 943 adults (1691 eyes) with spherical or spherocylindrical myopia, who were suitable candidates for LASIK. Five hundred and forty-seven participants (824 eyes) received LASIK with a mechanical microkeratome and 588 participants (867 eyes) with a femtosecond laser. Each trial included between nine and 360 participants. In six trials, the same participants received both interventions. Overall, the trials were at an uncertain risk of bias for most domains. At 12 months, data from one trial (42 eyes) indicates no difference in the mean uncorrected visual acuity (logMAR scale) between LASIK with a mechanical microkeratome and LASIK with a femtosecond laser (mean difference (MD) -0.01, 95% confidence interval (CI) -0.06 to 0.04; low-certainty evidence). Similar findings were observed at 12 months after surgery, regarding participants achieving 0.5 diopters within target refraction (risk ratio (RR) 0.97, 95% CI 0.85 to 1.11; 1 trial, 79 eyes; low-certainty evidence) as well as mean spherical equivalent of the refractive error 12 months after surgery (MD 0.09, 95% CI -0.01 to 0.19; 3 trials, 168 eyes [92 participants]; low-certainty evidence). Based on data from three trials (134 eyes, 66 participants), mechanical microkeratome was associated with lower risk of diffuse lamellar keratitis compared with femtosecond laser (RR 0.27, 95% CI 0.10 to 0.78; low-certainty evidence). Thus, diffuse lamellar keratitis was a more common adverse event with femtosecond laser than with mechanical microkeratome, decreasing from an assumed rate of 209 per 1000 people in the femtosecond laser group to 56 per 1000 people in the mechanical microkeratome group. Data from one trial (183 eyes, 183 participants) indicates that dry eye as an adverse event may be more common with mechanical microkeratome than with femtosecond laser, increasing from an assumed rate of 80 per 1000 people in the femtosecond laser group to 457 per 1000 people in the mechanical microkeratome group (RR 5.74, 95% CI 2.92 to 11.29; low-certainty evidence). There was no evidence of a difference between the two groups for corneal haze (RR 0.33, 95% CI 0.01 to 7.96; 1 trial, 43 eyes) and epithelial ingrowth (RR 1.04, 95% CI 0.11 to 9.42; 2 trials, 102 eyes [50 participants]). The certainty of evidence for both outcomes was very low.

AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS

Regarding the visual acuity outcomes, there may be no difference between LASIK with mechanical microkeratome and LASIK with femtosecond laser. Dry eye and diffuse lamellar keratitis are likely adverse events with mechanical microkeratome and femtosecond laser, respectively. The evidence is uncertain regarding corneal haze and epithelial ingrowth as adverse events of each intervention. The limited number of outcomes reported in the included trials, some with potentially significant risk of bias, makes it difficult to draw a firm conclusion regarding the effectiveness and safety of the interventions investigated in this review.

Comparison of optical quality after implantable collamer lens implantation and wavefront-guided laser in situ keratomileusis

AIM

To compare the optical quality after implantation of implantable collamer lens (ICL) and wavefront-guided laser in situ keratomileusis (WG-LASIK).

METHODS

The study included 40 eyes of 22 patients with myopia who accepted ICL implantation and 40 eyes of 20 patients with myopia who received WG-LASIK. Before surgery and three months after surgery, the objective scattering index (OSI), the values of modulation transfer function (MTF) cutoff frequency, Strehl ratio, and the Optical Quality Analysis System (OQAS) values (OVs) were accessed. The higher order aberrations (HOAs) data including coma, trefoil, spherical, 2^nd astigmatism and tetrafoil were also obtained. For patients with pupil size <6 mm, HOAs data were analyzed for 4 mm-pupil diameter. For patients with pupil size ≥6 mm, HOAs data were calculated for 6 mm-pupil diameter. Visual acuity, refraction, pupil size and intraocular pressures were also recorded.

RESULTS

In both ICL and WG-LASIK group, significant improvements in visual acuities were found postoperatively, with a significant reduction in spherical equivalent (P< 0.001). After the ICL implantation, the OSI decreased slightly from 2.34±1.92 to 2.24±1.18 with no statistical significance (P=0.62). While in WG-LASIK group, the OSI significantly increased from 0.68±0.43 preoperatively to 0.91±0.53 postoperatively (Wilcoxon signed ranks test, P=0.000). None of the mean MTF cutoff frequency, Strehl ratio, OVs showed statistically significant changes in both ICL and WG-LASIK groups. In the ICL group, there were no statistical differences in the total HOAs for either 4 mm-pupil or 6 mm-pupil. In the WG-LASIK group, the HOA parameters increased significantly at 4 mm-pupil. The total ocular HOAs, coma, spherical and 2^nd astigmatism were 0.12±0.06, 0.06±0.03, 0.00±0.03, 0.02±0.01, respectively. After the operation, these values were increased into 0.16±0.07, 0.08±0.05, -0.04±0.04, 0.03±0.01 respectively (Wilcoxon signed ranks test, all P<0.05). At 6 mm-pupil, the induction of total HOAs was not statistically significant in the WG-LASIK group.

CONCLUSION

ICL implantation has a less disturbance to optical quality than WG-LASIK. The OQAS is a valuable complementary measurement to the wavefront aberrometers in evaluating the optical quality.

Postoperative Efficacy, Predictability, Safety, and Visual Quality of Laser Corneal Refractive Surgery: A Network Meta-analysis

PURPOSE

To compare the postoperative efficacy, predictability, safety, and visual quality of all major forms of laser corneal refractive surgeries for correcting myopia.

DESIGN

Systematic review and network meta-analysis.

METHODS

Search of MEDLINE, EMBASE, Cochrane Library, and the US trial registry was conducted up to November 2015. Randomized controlled trials (RCT) reporting in accordance with the eligibility criteria were included in this review. We performed a Bayesian random-effects network meta-analysis.

RESULTS

Forty-eight RCTs were identified. For efficacy (uncorrected visual acuity [UCVA]), there were no statistically significant differences between any pair of treatments analyzed. The SUCRA (surface under the cumulative ranking curve) ranking (from best to worst) was femtosecond-based laser in situ keratomileusis (FS-LASIK), LASIK, small-incision lenticule extraction, femtosecond lenticule extraction (FLEx), photorefractive keratectomy (PRK), laser epithelial keratomileusis (LASEK), epipolis (Epi)-LASIK, transepithelial PRK (T-PRK). For predictability (refractive spherical equivalent [SE]), a statistically significant difference was found when FS-LASIK was compared with LASIK (odds ratio [OR] 2.29, 95% credible interval [CrI] 1.20-4.14), PRK (OR 2.16, 95% CrI 1.15-4.03), LASEK (OR 2.09, 95% CrI 1.08-4.55), and Epi-LASIK (OR 2.74, 95% CrI 1.11-6.20). The SUCRA ranking (from best to worst) was FS-LASIK, T-PRK, LASEK, PRK, LASIK, Epi-LASIK. There were no statistically significant differences in the safety (best spectacle-corrected visual acuity) comparisons. For both postoperative higher-order aberrations (HOAs) and contrast sensitivity (CS), there were no statistically significant differences between any pair of treatments analyzed. The SUCRA ranking results show that some corneal surface ablation techniques (PRK and LASEK) rank highest.

CONCLUSIONS

This network meta-analysis shows that there were no statistically significant differences in either visual outcomes (efficacy and safety) or visual quality (HOAs and CS). FS-LASIK behaved better in predictability than any other type of surgeries.

Femtosecond-Assisted LASIK Versus PRK: Comparison of 6-Month Visual Acuity and Quality Outcome for High Myopia

OBJECTIVE

To compare the results of femtosecond-assisted laser in situ keratomileusis (femto-LASIK) and photorefractive keratectomy with mitomycin C (PRK-MMC) for the correction of myopia more than 7.0 diopters (D).

METHODS

In this comparative nonrandomized trial, 60 eyes (30 eyes in each group) were enrolled. Patients were tested for uncorrected distance visual acuity (UDVA), corrected distance visual acuity (CDVA), manifest refraction spherical equivalent, ocular and corneal aberrations, and contrast sensitivity (CS) before surgery and at 3 and 6 months postoperatively.

RESULTS

Mean preoperative myopia was -8.65±1.51 and -8.04±1.70 D in the femto-LASIK and PRK-MMC groups, respectively (P=0.149). Intergroup differences in baseline indices were not statistically significant. At 6 months after surgery, UDVA showed an improving trend, but it was better in the femto-LASIK group (P=0.026). CDVA in the two groups remained similarly unchanged (P=0.170). For the femto-LASIK and PRK-MMC groups, the safety indices were 1.01±0.05 and 1.01±0.14 (P=0.949), respectively, and the efficacy indices were 0.99±0.07 and 0.93±0.22 (P=0.192), respectively. Comparing CS, only CS18 showed a significantly greater decrease in the femto-LASIK group compared with the PRK-MMC group (P=0.016). Intergroup differences were not statistically significant in other spatial frequencies. Changes in the ocular and corneal higher order aberrations were not statistically different between the two groups except ocular coma, which increased in the femto-LASIK group (P=0.041).

CONCLUSION

Femto-LASIK improves UDVA better than PRK-MMC in high myopia. However, because of increased coma, the quality of vision is reduced. In other words, visual acuity outcome is better with femto-LASIK and visual quality outcome is better with PRK-MMC.

Induced Higher-order aberrations after Laser In Situ Keratomileusis (LASIK) Performed with Wavefront-Guided IntraLase Femtosecond Laser in moderate to high Astigmatism

Background

Wavefront-guided Laser-assisted in situ keratomileusis (LASIK) is a widespread and effective surgical treatment for myopia and astigmatic correction but whether it induces higher-order aberrations remains controversial. The study was designed to evaluate the changes in higher-order aberrations after wavefront-guided ablation with IntraLase femtosecond laser in moderate to high astigmatism.

Methods

Twenty-three eyes of 15 patients with moderate to high astigmatism (mean cylinder, −3.22 ± 0.59 dioptres) aged between 19 and 35 years (mean age, 25.6 ± 4.9 years) were included in this prospective study. Subjects with cylinder ≥ 1.5 and ≤2.75 D were classified as moderate astigmatism while high astigmatism was ≥3.00 D. All patients underwent a femtosecond laser–enabled (150-kHz IntraLase iFS; Abbott Medical Optics Inc) wavefront-guided ablation. Uncorrected (UDVA), corrected (CDVA) distance visual acuity in logMAR, keratometry, central corneal thickness (CCT) and higher-order aberrations (HOAs) over a 6 mm pupil, were assessed before and 6 months, postoperatively. The relationship between postoperative change in HOA and preoperative mean spherical equivalent refraction, mean astigmatism, and postoperative CCT were tested.

Results

At the last follow-up, the mean UDVA was increased (P < 0.0001) but CDVA remained unchanged (P = 0.48) and no eyes lost ≥2 lines of CDVA. Mean spherical equivalent refraction was reduced (P < 0.0001) and was within ±0.50 D range in 61 % of eyes. The average corneal curvature was flatter by 4 D and CCT was reduced by 83 μm (P < 0.0001, for all), postoperatively. Coma aberrations remained unchanged (P = 0.07) while the change in trefoil (P = 0.047) postoperatively, was not clinically significant. The 4th order HOAs (spherical aberration and secondary astigmatism) and the HOA root mean square (RMS) increased from −0.18 ± 0.07 μm, 0.04 ± 0.03 μm and 0.47 ± 0.11 μm, preoperatively, to 0.33 ± 0.19 μm (P = 0.004), 0.21 ± 0.09 μm (P < 0.0001) and 0.77 ± 0.27 μm (P < 0.0001), six months postoperatively. The change in spherical aberration after the procedure increased with an increase in the degree of preoperative myopia.

Conclusions

Wavefront-guided IntraLASIK offers a safe and effective option for vision and visual function improvement in astigmatism. Although, reduction of HOA is possible in a few eyes, spherical-like aberrations are increased in majority of the treated eyes.

Comparison of Higher Order Aberrations after Wavefront-guided LASIK and PRK: One Year Follow-Up Results

PURPOSE

To evaluate the changes and predictability of higher order aberrations (HOAs) after personalized laser in situ keratomileusis (LASIK) and personalized photorefractive keratectomy (PRK) for simple myopia and compound myopic astigmatism.

METHODS

In this prospective cross-sectional study, 100 eyes were included. A total of 50 eyes underwent personalized LASIK and 50 eyes underwent personalized PRK. Preoperative and postoperative wavefront data were compared between the two groups. The influential factors and predictability of HOAs were also assessed.

RESULT

Total HOA increased in the amount of 0.01 ± 0.14 μm for the 5 mm pupil (P = 0.55) and 0.08 ± 0.22 μm for the 6 mm pupil (P = 0.02) after PRK; however after LASIK the corresponding values for the 5 and 6 mm pupil sizes were 0.05 ± 0.12 and 0.15 ± 0.18 μm, respectively (P < 0. 001). Mean changes were not significantly different between the PRK and LASIK groups for both 5 and 6 mm pupil sizes (P = 0.21 and P = 0.13, respectively). Spherical aberration increased following LASIK more than following PRK (P < 0.001). Changes in the root mean square (RMS) of total HOA had a statistically significant negative correlation (P < 0.001) with its preoperative value. HOA and spherical aberration reduced in majority of eyes when the preoperative spherical equivalent refraction was low.

CONCLUSION

For the 6mm pupil size, the total HOA increased following both personalized PRK and LASIK with no significant difference between the two groups. Change of the total HOA RMS was influenced by the preoperative values. The known influencing factors could predict nearly 50% of the changes in total HOA.

Postoperative ocular higher-order aberrations and contrast sensitivity: femtosecond lenticule extraction versus pseudo small-incision lenticule extraction

PURPOSE

To evaluate and compare changes in contrast sensitivity and ocular higher-order aberrations (HOAs) after femtosecond lenticule extraction (FLEx) and pseudo small-incision lenticule extraction (SMILE).

SETTING

Singapore National Eye Centre, Singapore.

DESIGN

Retrospective case series.

METHOD

Patients had femtosecond lenticule extraction (Group 1) or pseudo small-incision lenticule extraction (Group 2) between March 2010 and December 2011. The main outcome measures were manifest refraction, HOAs, and contrast sensitivity 1, 3, 6, and 12 months postoperatively.

RESULTS

Fifty-two consecutive patients (102 eyes) were recruited, 21 patients (42 eyes) in Group 1 and the 31 patients (60 eyes) in Group 2. The uncorrected and corrected distance visual acuities were significantly better in Group 2 than in Group 1 at 12 months (P = .032). There was no significant increase in 3rd- or 4th-order aberrations at 1 year and no significant difference between the 2 groups preoperatively or postoperatively. At 1 year, there was a significant increase in mesopic contrast sensitivity in Group 2 at 1.5 cycles per degree (cpd) (P = .008) that was not found in Group 1, and photopic contrast sensitivity at 6.0 cpd was higher in Group 2 (P = .027).

CONCLUSIONS

These results indicate that refractive lenticule extraction is safe and effective with no significant induction of HOAs or deterioration in contrast sensitivity at 1 year. Induction of HOAs was not significantly different between both variants of refractive lenticule extraction. However, there was significant improvement in photopic contrast sensitivity after pseudo small-incision lenticule extraction, which persisted through 1 year.

FINANCIAL DISCLOSURE

No author has a financial or proprietary interest in any material or method mentioned.

Comparison of the femtosecond laser and mechanical microkeratome for flap cutting in LASIK

AIM

To compare refractive results, higher-order aberrations (HOAs), contrast sensitivity and dry eye after laser in situ keratomileusis (LASIK) performed with a femtosecond laser versus a mechanical microkeratome for myopia and astigmatism.

METHODS

In this prospective, non-randomized study, 120 eyes with myopia received a LASIK surgery with the VisuMax femtosecond laser for flap cutting, and 120 eyes received a conventional LASIK surgery with a mechanical microkeratome. Flap thickness, visual acuity, manifest refraction, contrast sensitivity function (CSF) curves, HOAs and dry-eye were measured at 1wk; 1, 3, 6mo after surgery.

RESULTS

At 6mo postoperatively, the mean central flap thickness in femtosecond laser procedure was 113.05±5.89 µm (attempted thickness 110 µm), and 148.36±21.24 µm (attempted thickness 140 µm) in mechanical microkeratome procedure. An uncorrected distance visual acuity (UDVA) of 4.9 or better was obtained in more than 98% of eyes treated by both methods, a gain in logMAR lines of corrected distance visual acuity (CDVA) occurred in more than 70% of eyes treated by both methods, and no eye lost ≥1 lines of CDVA in both groups. The difference of the mean UDVA and CDVA between two groups at any time post-surgery were not statistically significant (P>0.05). The postoperative changes of spherical equivalent occurred markedly during the first month in both groups. The total root mean square values of HOAs and spherical aberrations in the femtosecond treated eyes were markedly less than those in the microkeratome treated eyes during 6mo visit after surgery (P<0.01). The CSF values of the femtosecond treated eyes were also higher than those of the microkeratome treated eyes at all space frequency (P<0.01). The mean ocular surface disease index scores in both groups were increased at 1wk, and recovered to preoperative level at 1mo after surgery. The mean tear breakup time (TBUT) of the femtosecond treated eyes were markedly longer than those of the microkeratome treated eyes at postoperative 1, 3mo (P<0.01).

CONCLUSION

Both the femtosecond laser and the mechanical microkeratome for LASIK flap cutting are safe and effective to correct myopia, with no statistically significant difference in the UDVA, CDVA during 6mo follow-up. Refractive results remained stable after 1mo post-operation for both groups. The femtosecond laser may have advantages over the microkeratome in the flap thickness predictability, fewer induced HOAs, better CSF, and longer TBUT.

Effect of Myopic Defocus on Visual Acuity after Phakic Intraocular Lens Implantation and Wavefront-guided Laser in Situ Keratomileusis

This study aimed to investigate the effect of myopic defocus on visual acuity after phakic intraocular lens (IOL) implantation and wavefront-guided laser in situ keratomileusis (wfg-LASIK). Our prospective study comprised thirty eyes undergoing posterior chamber phakic IOL implantation and 30 eyes undergoing wfg-LASIK. We randomly measured visual acuity under myopic defocus after cycloplegic and non-cycloplegic correction. We also calculated the modulation transfer function by optical simulation and estimated visual acuity from Campbell &Green's retinal threshold curve. Visual acuity in the phakic IOL group was significantly better than that in the wfg-LASIK group at myopic defocus levels of 0, -1, and -2 D (p < 0.001, p < 0.001, and p = 0.02, Mann-Whitney U-test), but not at a defocus of -3 D (p = 0.30). Similar results were also obtained in a cycloplegic condition. Decimal visual acuity values at a myopic defocus of 0, -1, -2, and -3 D by optical simulation were estimated to be 1.95, 1.21, 0.97, and 0.75 in the phakic IOL group, and 1.39, 1.11, 0.94, and 0.71 in the wfg-LASIK group, respectively. From clinical and optical viewpoints, phakic IOL implantation was superior to wfg-LASIK in terms of the postoperative visual performance, even in the presence of low to moderate myopic regression.

Comparison of LASEK, mechanical microkeratome LASIK and Femtosecond LASIK in low and moderate myopia

PURPOSE

We conducted a prospective study to determine the best treatment option for patients with low-to-moderate spherical myopia or myopic astigmatism who are considered equally eligible for LASEK with mitomycin-C (MMC) and LASIK with either mechanical microkeratome or femtosecond laser flap creation.

METHODS

Forty-six adult patients (86 eyes) who underwent LASEK with MMC (16 patients, 31 eyes), and mechanical microkeratome LASIK (13 patients, 23 eyes) or Femtosecond LASIK (17 patients, 32 eyes) were assessed for clinical outcomes 1, 3 and 6 months post-operatively.

RESULTS

Six months after surgery, all eyes in all three groups were within 1 D of the intended refractive change. UCVA 20/20 or better was achieved in 96% of eyes undergoing LASEK with MMC 88% of eyes in the mechanical microkeratome LASIK and 72% of eyes in the Femtosecond LASIK group at 6 months. Mean spherical equivalent was -0.12 ± 0.22 D, -0.09 ± 0.28 D and -0.25 ± 0.28 D in the three groups, respectively (p = 0.077). Patients in the LASEK with MMC group had less high order aberrations at 3 and 6 months compared to the two LASIK groups. None of the three procedures were associated with early- or late-onset complications or loss of 2 or more lines after surgery.

CONCLUSIONS

After an initially slower visual improvement, LASEK with MMC, and to lesser extent, LASIK with mechanical microkeratome, produced better visual acuity and less corneal aberrations compared to Femtosecond LASIK at 3 and 6 months after surgery. These observations deserve further investigation in a randomized controlled trial.

Laser in situ keratomileusis in 2012: a review

Laser in situ keratomileusis (LASIK) is a safe and effective treatment for refractive error. A combination of technological advances and increasing surgeon experience has served to further refine refractive outcomes and reduce complication rates. In this article, we review LASIK as it stands in late 2012: the procedure, indications, technology, complications and refractive outcomes.

Femtosecond (FS) laser vision correction procedure for moderate to high myopia: a prospective study of ReLEx(®) flex and comparison with a retrospective study of FS-laser in situ keratomileusis

PURPOSE

To present our initial clinical experience with ReLEx(®) flex (ReLEx) for moderate to high myopia. We compare efficacy, safety and corneal higher-order aberrations after ReLEx with femtosecond laser in situ keratomileusis (FS-LASIK).

METHODS

Prospective study of ReLEx compared with a retrospective study of FS-LASIK. ReLEx is a new keratorefractive procedure, where a stromal lenticule is cut by a femtosecond laser and manually extracted. Forty patients were treated with ReLEx on both eyes. A comparable group of 41 FS-LASIK patients were retrospectively identified. Visual acuity, spherical equivalent (SE) and corneal tomography were measured before and 3 months after surgery.

RESULTS

Preoperative SE averaged -7.50 ± 1.16 D (ReLEx) and -7.32 ± 1.09 D (FS-LASIK). For all eyes, mean corrected distance visual acuity remained unchanged in both groups. For eyes with emmetropia as target refraction, 41% of ReLEx and 61% of FS-LASIK eyes had an uncorrected distance visual acuity of logMAR ≤ 0.10 at day 1 after surgery, increasing to, respectively, 88% and 69% at 3 months. Mean SE was -0.06 ± 0.35 D 3 months after ReLEx and -0.53 ± 0.60 D after FS-LASIK. The proportion of eyes within ±1.00 D after 3 months was 100% (ReLEx) and 85% (FS-LASIK). For a 6.0-mm pupil, corneal spherical aberrations increased significantly less in ReLEx than FS-LASIK eyes.

CONCLUSIONS

ReLEx is an all-in-one femtosecond laser refractive procedure, and in this study, results were comparable to FS-LASIK. Refractive predictability and corneal aberrations at 3 months seemed better than or equal to FS-LASIK, whereas visual recovery after ReLEx was slower.

Femtosecond lasers for LASIK flap creation: a report by the American Academy of Ophthalmology

OBJECTIVE

To review the published literature to assess the safety, efficacy, and predictability of femtosecond lasers for the creation of corneal flaps for LASIK; to assess the reported outcomes of LASIK when femtosecond lasers are used to create corneal flaps; and to compare the differences in outcomes between femtosecond lasers and mechanical microkeratomes.

METHODS

Literature searches of the PubMed and Cochrane Library databases were last conducted on October 12, 2011, without language or date limitations. The searches retrieved a total of 636 references. Of these, panel members selected 58 articles that they considered to be of high or medium clinical relevance, and the panel methodologist rated each article according to the strength of evidence. Four studies were rated as level I evidence, 14 studies were rated as level II evidence, and the remaining studies were rated as level III evidence.

RESULTS

The majority of published studies evaluated a single laser platform. Flap reproducibility varied by device and the generation of the device. Standard deviations in flap thicknesses ranged from 4 to 18.4 μm. Visual acuities and complications reported with LASIK flaps created using femtosecond lasers are within Food and Drug Administration safety and efficacy limits. Of all complications, diffuse lamellar keratitis is the most common after surgery but is generally mild and self-limited. Corneal sensation was reported to normalize by 1 year after surgery. Unique complications of femtosecond lasers included transient light-sensitivity syndrome, rainbow glare, opaque bubble layer, epithelial breakthrough of gas bubbles, and gas bubbles within the anterior chamber.

CONCLUSIONS

Available evidence (levels I and II) indicates that femtosecond lasers are efficacious devices for creating LASIK flaps, with accompanying good visual results. Overall, femtosecond lasers were found to be as good as or better than mechanical microkeratomes for creating LASIK flaps. There are unique complications that can occur with femtosecond lasers, and long-term follow-up is needed to evaluate the technology fully.

Visual performance after posterior chamber phakic intraocular lens implantation and wavefront-guided laser in situ keratomileusis for low to moderate myopia

PURPOSE

To compare postoperative visual function after implantable collamer lens (ICL) implantation and after wavefront-guided laser in situ keratomileusis (LASIK) in eyes with low to moderate myopia.

DESIGN

Retrospective observational case study.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

We investigated 30 eyes of 20 patients undergoing ICL implantation and 64 eyes of 38 patients undergoing wavefront-guided LASIK for the correction of low to moderate myopia (manifest spherical equivalent: -3.00 to -5.88 diopters [D]). Ocular higher-order aberrations (HOAs) and contrast sensitivity (CS) function were measured by Hartmann-Shack aberrometry and a contrast sensitivity unit before and 3 months after surgery, respectively. From the contrast sensitivity, the area under the log contrast sensitivity function was calculated.

RESULTS

For 4-mm and 6-mm pupils, the changes in ocular third-order aberrations, fourth-order aberrations, and total HOAs after ICL implantation were significantly less than those after wavefront-guided LASIK (P < .05, Mann-Whitney U test). The postoperative area under the log contrast sensitivity function was significantly increased after ICL implantation (P < .001), whereas, after wavefront-guided LASIK, it was not significantly changed (P = .11).

CONCLUSIONS

ICL implantation induces significantly fewer ocular HOAs than wavefront-guided LASIK. Moreover, CS was significantly improved after ICL implantation but unchanged after wavefront-guided LASIK in eyes with low to moderate myopia. Thus, even in the correction of low to moderate myopia, ICL implantation appears to be superior in visual performance to wavefront-guided LASIK, suggesting that it may be a viable surgical option for the treatment of such eyes.

Cellular effects after laser in situ keratomileusis flap formation with femtosecond lasers: a review

PURPOSE

To provide an overview of the cellular effects of femtosecond laser in laser in situ keratomileusis flap formation.

METHODS

Literature review.

RESULTS

The IntraLase is the only femtosecond laser with sufficient histopathological and confocal studies to allow review of the cellular effects of laser application. Histopathological analyses have demonstrated that the energy per pulse and total energy delivered play important roles in the inflammatory reaction to the surgery. The IntraLase laser triggers cellular necrosis (death accompanied by the release of lysosomal enzymes and other components from membrane-bound intracellular compartments) in the corneal stroma surrounding the lamellar cut rather than apoptosis (gentler form of cell death in which most intracellular components remain confined to membrane-bound apoptotic bodies) that is predominant with the microkeratome. Necrosis is a more inflammatory form of cell death that attracts more inflammatory cells. This is likely why earlier femtosecond lasers, such as the 15-kHz IntraLase laser, which requires higher total energy delivery to cut a flap, are associated with more corneal inflammation and diffuse lamellar keratitis. The design of the 60-kHz IntraLase model allows for much lower energy delivery to cut the flap and, therefore, a substantial reduction in keratocyte necrosis to the point that the overall inflammatory response is not significantly different from the microkeratome. Histopathological analysis performed with the Femtec femtosecond laser noted little change in the corneal stromal structure. Confocal microcopy studies performed with the IntraLase laser showed keratocyte "activation" in the stroma and greater fibrotic scarring at the interface than that induced by a mechanical microkeratome.

CONCLUSIONS

The morphologic alterations in the corneal stroma produced by currently available models of the IntraLase laser are comparable to those produced by mechanical microkeratomes. Advances that have resulted in a reduction in the total amount of energy delivered by the laser when it cuts the flap have resulted in a decrease in the inflammatory response associated with femtosecond flap formation to the point that it is indistinguishable from the microkeratome at the cellular level. Further study of each of the femtosecond laser models, including the 150-kHz IntraLase laser, is needed to fully characterize the corneal response to these lasers.

IntraLase femtosecond laser vs mechanical microkeratomes in LASIK for myopia: a systematic review and meta-analysis

PURPOSE

To evaluate the safety, efficacy, and predictability of IntraLase (Abbott Medical Optics) femtosecond laser-assisted compared to microkeratome-assisted myopic LASIK.

METHODS

A comprehensive literature search of Cochrane Library, PubMed, and EMBASE was conducted to identify relevant trials comparing LASIK with IntraLase femtosecond laser to LASIK with microkeratomes for the correction of myopia. Meta-analyses were performed on the primary outcomes (loss of ≥2 lines of corrected distance visual acuity [CDVA], uncorrected distance visual acuity [UDVA] 20/20 or better, manifest refraction spherical equivalent [MRSE] within ±0.50 diopters [D], final refractive SE, and astigmatism), and secondary outcomes (flap thickness predictability, changes in higher order aberrations [HOAs], and complications).

RESULTS

Fifteen articles describing a total of 3679 eyes were identified. No significant differences were identified between the two groups in regards to a loss of ≥2 lines of CDVA (P=.44), patients achieving UDVA 20/20 or better (P=.24), final UDVA (P=.12), final mean refractive SE (P=.74), final astigmatism (P=.27), or changes in HOAs. The IntraLase group had more patients who were within ±0.50 D of target refraction (P=.05) compared to the microkeratome group, and flap thickness was more predictable in the IntraLase group (P<.0001). The microkeratome group had more epithelial defects (P=.04), whereas the IntraLase group had more cases of diffuse lamellar keratitis (P=.01).

CONCLUSIONS

According to the available data, LASIK with the IntraLase femtosecond laser offers no significant benefits over LASIK with microkeratomes in regards to safety and efficacy, but has potential advantages in predictability.

Femtosecond laser and big-bubble deep anterior lamellar keratoplasty: a new chance

Purpose. To report the 12-month follow-up after big-bubble deep anterior lamellar keratoplasty (DALK) assisted by femtosecond laser that we have called IntraBubble. Methods. A 60 kHz IntraLase femtosecond laser (Abbott Medical Optics) firstly created a 30° angled intrastromal channel to insert the air injection cannula, 50 μ above the thinnest corneal site measured by Sirius Scheimpflug camera (CSO, Firenze, Italy), then performed a full lamellar cut 100 μ above the thinnest corneal point, and from the same corneal depth, created a mushroom incision. The lamella was removed, and the smooth cannula of Fogla was inserted into the stromal channel and air was injected to achieve a big bubble. The follow up is 12 months, and sutures were removed by the 10th postoperative month in all patients. Best Corrected Visual Acuity (BCVA), spherical equivalent and, by Sirius Scheimpflug camera (CSO, Firenze, Italy) keratometric astigmatism were evaluated. Results. All procedures were completed as DALK except 2 converted to PK because an inadvertent intraoperative macroperforation occurred. Mean postoperative BCVA was 0.8, mean spherical equivalent was -3.5 ± 1.7 D, and mean keratometric astigmatism was 4.8 ± 3.1 D. Conclusion. The femtosecond laser could standardize the big-bubble technique in DALK, reducing the risk of intraoperative complications and allowing good refractive outcomes.

Wavefront analysis and Zernike polynomial decomposition for evaluation of corneal optical quality

Wavefront-guided excimer laser refractive surgery and new customized intraocular lens and contact lens designs are major clinical applications of corneal wavefront analysis. Other therapeutic applications include corneal disorders, conventional excimer laser refractive surgery, incisional techniques and cataract surgery, corneal transplantation, intrastromal corneal ring segment implantation, and crosslinking therapy. Basic data regarding corneal wavefront aberrations, such as distribution in the population and changes with aging, are essential for understanding the nature of each aberration and correcting it. Corneal aberrometry also improved our comprehension of the optical effects of the aforementioned topics while helping us assess the success of the procedures. Zernike polynomials are representations of the higher- and lower-order aberrations of the cornea, allowing a mathematical approach to their determination. Polynomials are used to model individual components of the wavefront in familiar terms. This article reviews the current knowledge of the wavefront aberrations of the human cornea and analyzes studies in the fields of anterior segment surgery and/or therapy, diseases, and optical quality in the context of this knowledge.

Efficacy, predictability, and safety of wavefront-guided refractive laser treatment: metaanalysis

PURPOSE

To compare the efficacy, predictability, safety, and induced higher-order aberrations (HOAs) between wavefront-guided and non-wavefront-guided ablations.

SETTING

Division of Ophthalmology and Visual Sciences, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, United Kingdom.

DESIGN

Metaanalysis.

METHODS

The Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, PubMED, and EMBASE were searched for randomized controlled trails. Trials meeting the selection criteria were quality appraised and data extracted by 2 independent authors. Measures of association were pooled quantitatively using metaanalytical methods. Comparison between wavefront-guided and non-wavefront-guided ablations was measured as pooled odds ratios (ORs) or weighted mean differences. The pooled ORs and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were computed for efficacy, safety, and predictability. The weighted mean difference and 95% CIs were used to compare induced HOAs.

RESULTS

Eight trials involving 955 eyes were included. After wavefront-guided LASIK, the pooled OR of achieving uncorrected distance visual acuity (UDVA) of 20/20 (efficacy) was 1.10 (95% CI, 0.66-1.83; P=.72), the pooled OR of achieving a result within ± 0.50 diopter of intended target (predictability) was 1.03 (95% CI, 0.60-1.75; P=.92), and the weighted mean difference in induced HOAs was -0.09 (95% CI, -0.17 to -0.01; P=.04). No study reported loss of 2 or more lines of Snellen acuity (safety) with either modality.

CONCLUSIONS

Metaanalysis showed no clear evidence of a benefit of wavefront-guided over non-wavefront-guided ablations. However, there was a lack of standardized reporting of UDVA better than 20/20, which might mask an advantage in wavefront-guided treatment. With high preexisting HOAs, wavefront-guided has advantages over non-wavefront-guided treatment.

Advanced corneal surface ablation efficacy in myopia: changes in higher order aberrations

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the change of ocular and corneal higher order aberrations (HOAs) after wavefront-guided advanced surface ablation (WF-ASA) for myopia using 4 different epithelial management techniques (AA-PRK, LASEK, Epi-PRK, and Epi-LASIK).

DESIGN

Retrospective single centre excimer database analysis.

PARTICIPANTS

Two hundred and forty eyes equally divided between the 4 WF-ASA techniques, matched for mean and range of required spherical correction.

METHODS

Ocular wavefront aberrations were measured using the wavescan aberrometer and corneal aberrations were obtained from corneal topography elevation maps and calculated by ray-tracing. All data were collected preoperatively and 3 months following treatment. The aberrations were described as Zernike polynomials, and analysis focused on total HOAs and spherical aberration (SA).

RESULTS

Three months postoperatively, there was a statistically significant surgically induced increase in total HOAs and SA both for ocular and corneal analysis (p < 0.001). There was no statistically significant difference in the induced ocular SA and HOAs between the groups, but the differences in induced corneal SA and HOAs were significant (p < 0.010). Ocular changes in SA were weakly correlated to preoperative SA (20.30, p < 0.001) but strongly correlated to applied spherical correction (20.68, p < 0.001). Surgically induced corneal SA was weakly correlated to preoperative corneal SA (20.34, p < 0.001) and applied spherical correction (20.46, p < 0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

Three months postoperatively, all procedures resulted in an increase in ocular and cornealHOAs and SA. Induced aberrations were most strongly correlated to the applied spherical power correction. Modifying the existing ablation pattern to compensate for induced HOAs might improve the outcome.

Comparison of the predictability, uniformity and stability of a laser in situ keratomileusis corneal flap created with a VisuMax femtosecond laser or a Moria microkeratome

This prospective study compared the predictability, uniformity and stability of laser in situ keratomileusis corneal flap thickness created by a femtosecond laser or a classic microkeratome. Twenty-five femtosecond laser (VisuMax, Carl Zeiss Meditec) flaps and 38 microkeratome (Moria M3) flaps were measured using anterior segment optical coherence tomography at 1 week, 1 month and 6 months postoperatively. Flap thickness at seven points on each of the four meridians was calculated. At 6 months, VisuMax flaps showed better prediction than Moria flaps for central flap thickness. The standard deviation within individual flaps was smaller for VisuMax flaps and their index of symmetry was better. The mean thicknesses among the four eccentricities in the VisuMax flaps were the same, while Moria flaps were thicker at the 3-mm radius compared with the centre. The VisuMax femtosecond laser created corneal flaps with better predictability and uniformity, and similar reproducibility and stability, compared with the microkeratome.

Femtosecond laser vs mechanical microkeratome for hyperopic laser in situ keratomileusis

PURPOSE

To compare the outcomes of laser in situ keratomileusis (LASIK) performed with a femtosecond laser vs a mechanical microkeratome for the correction of low to moderate hyperopia.

DESIGN

Retrospective, nonrandomized, interventional, comparative case series.

METHODS

settings: Vissum Santa Hortensia, Madrid, Spain.study population and procedures: Patients who had undergone LASIK to correct their hyperopia using the 60-kHz IntraLase femtosecond laser were compared to age- and refraction-matched patients in whom the Moria M2 microkeratome was used. Visual and refractive results 3 months postoperatively were compared between both groups.

RESULTS

A total of 144 eyes were analyzed (72 in each group). Mean preoperative sphere was +3.45 ± 1.0 diopters (D) in the IntraLase group vs +3.18 ± 1.3 D in the M2 group (P = .1). Results 3 months postoperatively were: mean residual sphere, +0.44 ± 0.6D vs +0.72 ± 0.8 D (P = .02), respectively; uncorrected visual acuity (UCVA), 0.89 ± 0.2 vs 0.80 ± 0.2 (P = .04); best spectacle-corrected visual acuity (BSCVA), 0.96 ± 0.2 vs 0.92 ± 0.2 (P = .2); safety index, 0.97 ± 0.1 vs 0.98 ± 0.1 (P = .5); efficacy index, 0.89 ± 0.2 vs 0.84 ± 0.2 (P = .3).

CONCLUSIONS

Hyperopic LASIK performed with the IntraLase femtosecond laser seems to achieve better refractive results 3 months after the surgery compared to the M2 microkeratome, without significant differences in safety between both procedures.

[Comparison of Lasik with femtosecond laser versus Lasik with mechanical microkeratome: predictability of flap depth, corneal biomechanical effects and optical aberrations]

OBJECTIVES

To compare the predictability of flap thickness, high-order optic aberrations (HOAs), and biomechanical properties of cornea between patients treated by Lasik with mechanical microkeratome versus patients treated by FemtoLasik.

SETTING

Department of ophthalmology, Pellegrin University Hospital, Bordeaux, France.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

We conducted a retrospective study on 53 myopic patients who underwent Lasik with either mechanical microkeratome (MK group) or femtosecond laser (FS group). Refraction, central corneal thickness, high-order optic aberrations (HOAs), corneal hysteresis (CH), and corneal resistance factor (CRF), were analysed pre- and postoperatively in both groups. The central corneal thickness was measured with OCT-Visante(®) (Carl-Zeiss, Meditec), biomechanical parameters with ORA(®) (Reichert), and optical aberrations with the Wave Scan(®) (AMO) aberrometer.

RESULTS

We included 44 eyes of 22 patients in the MK group and 62 eyes of 31 patients in the FS group. Preoperatively, the mean best-corrected visual acuity was 0.95 in both groups. In the MK group, the flap was significantly thicker than expected (162/130 μm), but in the FS group, there was no significant difference (117/120 μm). The biomechanical properties of the cornea were lower in both groups independently of the flap cutting technique. The HOAs increased after Lasik and were not influenced by the flap cutting technique.

CONCLUSION

Neither mechanical microkeratome, nor femtosecond laser for flap creation, increases HOAs and the biomechanical changes of the cornea, according to ORA(®), significantly after Lasik.

Long-term comparison of corneal aberration changes after laser in situ keratomileusis: mechanical microkeratome versus femtosecond laser flap creation

PURPOSE

To compute and compare visual acuity, refractive outcomes, and anterior corneal aberration changes after myopic laser in situ keratomileusis (LASIK) with flap creation by a mechanical microkeratome and by a femtosecond laser.

SETTING

Private practice refractive surgery center, Valencia, Spain.

DESIGN

Comparative case series.

METHODS

Patients were assigned to have LASIK flap creation with a mechanical microkeratome (Carriazo-Barraquer) or a femtosecond laser (IntraLase). The Visx S2 excimer laser was used for myopic ablation in all cases. Main outcome measures included uncorrected and corrected distance visual acuities and the defocus equivalent. Higher-order aberrations (HOAs) were computed from the anterior corneal surface measured with topography for 4.0 mm and 6.0 mm pupil diameters before and 48 months after surgery.

RESULTS

The study evaluated 50 patients (98 eyes). The root mean square of HOAs increased postoperatively by a factor of approximately 1.9 in both groups and with both pupil diameters. There were no statistically significant differences between the 2 groups in the increase in anterior corneal aberrations, mean postoperative visual acuity, or residual refraction. All visual and optical performance metrics remained stable throughout the 4-year follow-up. There were no complications with flap creation and no postoperative complications.

CONCLUSIONS

The increase in anterior corneal aberrations after myopic LASIK was similar after mechanical microkeratome and femtosecond laser flap creation. Visual acuity, refraction, and the optical quality of the cornea after LASIK remained stable through 4 years postoperatively in both groups.

Femtosecond laser in laser in situ keratomileusis

Flap creation is a critical step in laser in situ keratomileusis (LASIK). Efforts to improve the safety and predictability of the lamellar incision have fostered the development of femtosecond lasers. Several advantages of the femtosecond laser over mechanical microkeratomes have been reported in LASIK surgery. In this article, we review common considerations in management and complications of this step in femtosecond laser-LASIK and concentrate primarily on the IntraLase laser because most published studies relate to this instrument.

Refractive outcome of keratoconus treated by combined femtosecond laser and big-bubble deep anterior lamellar keratoplasty

PURPOSE

To report 1-year follow-up in 11 of 13 eyes with keratoconus treated by deep anterior lamellar keratoplasty with a combined femtosecond laser lamellar resection followed by a big-bubble dissection.

METHODS

Thirteen eyes with keratoconus were treated. Recipient and donor were prepared with the 60-kHz IntraLase femtosecond laser (Abbott Medical Optics). In the recipient, the femtosecond laser, after performing a lamellar cut 100 μm above the thinnest corneal point (measured by Pentacam [Oculus Optikgeräte GmbH]), was used to make a mushroom-shaped resection (anterior diameter, 9 mm; posterior diameter, 8 mm) from the same depth. In the donor, the mushroom lamellar thickness was calculated according to an original model based on the recipient preoperative corneal thickness. Upon removal of the recipient lamella, air was injected into the residual stroma to achieve a big bubble. The keratectomy was continued up to Descemet membrane. The donor was fit into place and sutured using interrupted sutures, which were removed by 8 months postoperative. Corrected distance visual acuity (CDVA) and refractive astigmatism were calculated by manifest refraction, whereas topographic astigmatism and corneal thickness were measured by Pentacam.

RESULTS

A big bubble was successfully achieved in 11 eyes. Twelve months after surgery, mean CDVA was 0.52±1.2 (decimal), and refractive sphere and cylinder were -1.50±1.70 diopters (D) and 2.00±2.60 D, respectively. Three (27%) of 11 eyes at 1 year had a manifest refraction spherical equivalent within 1.00 D of emmetropia. Topographic astigmatism was 2.90±1.60 D. The thinnest corneal point was 519±27 μm.

CONCLUSIONS

This combination of a femtosecond laser lamellar dissection with a big-bubble technique can improve the standardization of deep anterior lamellar keratoplasty for keratoconus.

Corneal aberrations and visual acuity after laser in situ keratomileusis: femtosecond laser versus mechanical microkeratome

PURPOSE

To compare corneal high-order aberrations and visual acuity after laser in situ keratomileusis (LASIK) with the flap created by a femtosecond laser (bladeless) to LASIK with the flap created by a mechanical microkeratome.

DESIGN

Prospective, randomized, paired-eye study.

METHODS

Fellow eyes of 21 patients with myopia or myopic astigmatism were randomized by ocular dominance. Corneal topography and visual acuity were measured before and at 1, 3, 6, 12, and 36 months after LASIK. Wavefront errors from the anterior corneal surface were calculated from the topography data over 4- and 6-mm-diameter pupils and decomposed into Zernike polynomials to the 6th order.

RESULTS

There were no differences in corneal total high-order aberrations, spherical aberration, coma, or trefoil between methods of flap creation at any examination over 4- and 6-mm-diameter pupils. Over a 6-mm pupil, total high-order aberrations increased by 1 month after LASIK with both treatments (P <or= .001) and remained increased through 36 months (P <or= .001). Uncorrected and best-corrected visual acuity did not differ between methods at any examination and remained stable postoperatively through 3 years; the minimum detectable difference in visual acuity between treatments was <or=0.1 logMAR (<or=1 line of vision, alpha = 0.05/6, beta = 0.20, n = 21).

CONCLUSIONS

The planar configuration of the femtosecond laser flap did not offer any advantage in corneal high-order aberrations or visual acuity through 3 years after LASIK. Corneal high-order aberrations remain stable through 3 years after LASIK.

Comparison of custom ablation and conventional laser in situ keratomileusis for myopia and myopic astigmatism using the Alcon excimer laser

PURPOSE

To compare the refractive outcomes, higher order aberrations, and contrast sensitivity after laser in situ keratomileusis (LASIK) using wavefront ablation and conventional ablation.

SETTING

Private practice in Córdoba, Spain and a free-standing outpatient surgery center.

METHODS

This was a prospective, nonrandomized, observational case series comparing outcomes of 239 eyes that underwent LASIK for myopia and myopic astigmatism with either wavefront or conventional ablation using the LADARVISION excimer laser. Manifest refractive sphere ranged from 0.50 D to -8.00 D with astigmatism up to -4.00 D. Eighty-nine eyes underwent conventional LASIK (conventional group), and 150 eyes underwent custom ablation (custom group). Refractive outcomes, ocular higher order root mean square (HOA-RMS), and contrast sensitivity were tested for statistically significant differences between groups. A P-value less than 0.05 was considered statistically significant. Six month postoperative data are reported here.

RESULTS

Postoperatively, the mean SE was -0.03 D +/- 0.19 D for the custom group, and -0.14 D +/- 0.35 D for the conventional group (P = 0.003). Ninety-nine percent of the eyes in the custom group, and 92% of the eyes in the conventional group were within 0.50 D of the intended correction (P > 0.05). The HOA-RMS was 0.16 mum lower in the custom group (P < 0.001). Contrast sensitivity was statistically significantly better at 3 cycles per degree (cpd) (P < 0.001) and 6 cpd (P = 0.009) in the custom group.

CONCLUSION

There was a statistically significant lower induction of HOA-RMS and better predictability and contrast sensitivity in eyes that underwent custom ablation with the LADARVISION excimer laser.

Comparison between femtosecond laser-assisted sub-Bowman keratomileusis vs laser subepithelial keratectomy to correct myopia

PURPOSE

To compare femtosecond laser sub-Bowman keratomileusis (FSBK) vs laser subepithelial keratectomy (LASEK) to correct myopia.

DESIGN

Retrospective, nonrandomized, interventional, comparative case series.

METHODS

Two thousand one hundred and eight eyes were included in the study. We compared 1,072 eyes treated with FSBK vs 1,036 eyes treated with LASEK with or without mitomycin C (MMC). Visual and refractive results were evaluated 1 day, 1 week, and 1 and 3 months postoperatively.

RESULTS

Preoperative mean sphere and best spectacle-corrected visual acuity (BSCVA) were -3.93 diopters (D) vs -3.87 D (P = .5) and 1.12 vs 1.12 (P = .8) in FSBK and LASEK, respectively. Uncorrected visual acuity (UCVA) was 0.92 vs 0.62, 0.98 vs 0.78, 0.96 vs 0.91, and 1.06 vs 1.03 in FSBK and LASEK, respectively, at 1 day, 1 week, and 1 and 3 months after surgery (P < .01 for all comparisons). Three months postoperatively, BSCVA was 1.13 and 1.10, respectively (P = .001). At that moment, 20 eyes (1.93%) in the LASEK group vs 9 eyes (0.84%) in the FSBK group had lost 2 or more lines of BSCVA. Ten eyes (0.96%) in the LASEK group gained 2 or more lines of BSCVA, whereas 3 eyes (0.28%) in the FSBK group gained 2 lines. Six months postoperatively, only 2 LASEK eyes (0.19%) showed loss of 2 or more lines of BSCVA, compared to 3 FSBK-treated eyes (0.28%).

CONCLUSION

Both FSBK and LASEK are safe and effective procedures to correct myopia. Slightly better visual and refractive results were observed in FSBK-treated eyes in a 3-month follow-up.