A Histopathological Study of Bulbar Conjunctival Flaps Occurring in 2 Contact Lens Wearers

Lens parameter changes under in vitro and ex vivo conditions and their effect on the conjunctiva

PURPOSE

To quantify changes in contact lens parameters induced by lens wear and determine whether these changes are associated with contact lens-induced conjunctival staining (CLICS).

METHODS

In vitro: Lens diameter, sag, edge shape, base curve of six contact lens brands (balafilcon, comfilcon, etafilcon, lotrafilcon B, omafilcon and senofilcon) measured at 21°C and 35°C (eye temperature). Ex vivo: Diameter of lenses collected from a prospective, randomised, contra-lateral, cross-over clinical trial from 36 subjects wearing all lens types for 1 week daily wear, measured in 35°C PBS after removal. Ocular surface was examined for lens-induced conjunctival staining by masked examiner.

RESULTS

In vitro: Changes in diameter and base curve outside ISO tolerance were found with etafilcon A and omafilcon A. Ex vivo: Comfilcon A and etafilcon A had greatest shrinkage in diameter (0.18mm) and base curve (0.11mm steeper) with temperature increase from 21°C to 35°C. Senofilcon A, lotrafilcon B and balafilcon A maintained most stable parameters between 21°C and 35°C. Changes in diameter and base curve from lens wear were not correlated with CLICS (p>0.49). Multivariate analysis showed significantly greater levels of lens induced staining were associated with lens modulus (p<0.001) and knife (p<0.001) and chisel (p<0.001) edge shapes.

CONCLUSIONS

Parameter changes induced by lens wear were associated with increasing temperature, but these changes in lens diameter and base curve did not induce CLICS. Modulus and edge shape were associated with increased CLICS. The susceptibility of etafilcon A and omafilcon A lenses to parameter changes might be related to their high water content.

Morphology of contact lens-induced conjunctival epithelial flaps: a pilot study

PURPOSE

Conjunctival epithelial flap (CEF) is a conjunctival condition most commonly seen in silicone hydrogel contact lens wearers. This study utilized impression cytology to investigate the cellular composition and health of CEFs.

METHODS

Nine (9) subjects were enrolled - 3 non-lens wearers, 3 contact lens wearers without CEF, and 3 contact lens wearers with CEFs wearing 8.4/13.8 lotrafilcon A lenses. Impression cytology samples were collected from the flap or similar locations, if CEF was absent, using rectangular 5 mm × 2 mm Millipore HAWP02500 membrane filters. The filters were gently pressed onto the conjunctiva, subsequently fixed in 95% alcohol, stained with hematoxylin-eosin and evaluated under an Olympus IX70 microscope. Measurements of the longest cell and nucleus dimensions were measured on 40 cells from each filter by utilizing NIH Image 1.63.

RESULTS

CEF consisted of multilayers of epithelial and goblet cells and were devoid of inflammatory cells, basement membrane material and stromal tissue. The cytoplasmic and nuclear dimensions were similar within the groups and the cytoplasm-to-nucleus ratio was not different between the flap group and the non-lens wearing group.

CONCLUSION

The CEF appeared to be formed by healthy epithelial and goblet cells that have been dislocated from their normal location along the conjunctival surface by the lens edge. No inflammatory cells were present in this contact lens induced condition, which is reported to be associated most commonly with the silicone hydrogel material.