Early expression of tumor necrosis factor α and nuclear factor kappa B after Descemet stripping endothelial keratoplasty in rabbits

Inhibition of corneal neovascularization by topical application of nintedanib in rabbit models

AIM

To evaluate the potential efficacy and mechanisms of nintedanib in corneal neovascularization (NV) in rabbit models.

METHODS

Corneal NV was induced using 1 mol/L NaOH. Rabbits (n=21) were randomized to 3 groups: Group 1 were treated with 0.9% NaCl, Group 2 with Avastin (5 mg/mL), and Group 3 with nintedanib (1 mg/mL). All treatments started 1d after alkaline burns and were topically performed 3 times a day for 2wk. Photographs were taken on a slit lamp microscope on day 7 and 14. The NV area, the length of the vascularization and angiogenesis index (AI) were used to evaluate the corneal NV. On day 14, the immunohistochemical (IHC) studies of the cornea were examined. Western blot was performed to test the expression levels of vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF), Akt, p-Akt, P38, p-P38, MMP-2 and MMP-9.

RESULTS

The corneal NV area, vessel length and AI in Group 3 were significantly lower than Group 2, with both being lower than Group 1. IHC staining showed that VEGF was significantly overexpressed in the epithelium and stroma of cornea following alkaline burns. In contrast, the level of VEGF was significantly suppressed in both Group 2 and Group 3. Western blot results further confirmed that, compared with Group 1, Group 3 had significantly reduced expressions of VEGF, Akt, p-Akt, p-P38, MMP-2, and MMP-9 in corneal tissues. Trends of lower levels of MMP-2, AKT, and p-AKT in Group 3 than Group 2 were identified.

CONCLUSION

Nintedanib and Avastin can effectively inhibit corneal NV, with P38 MAPK and AKT signaling pathways being possibly involved. Nintedanib seems more effective than Avastin and has the potential to be a novel therapy for preventing corneal NV.

Comparative outcomes of penetrating and component endothelial cell corneal allografts in outbred sheep

Lamellar (component cell) corneal transplantation is replacing penetrating keratoplasty for some corneal disorders in humans, but the relative risks of immunological graft rejection for the two procedures remain uncertain. A model of component endothelial cell keratoplasty (endokeratoplasty) was developed in outbred sheep. Clinical and histological graft outcomes after endokeratoplasty were then compared with contemporaneous penetrating corneal allografts. No topical or systemic immunosuppression was administered to any recipient sheep. Endothelial cell allografts (n = 10) took significantly longer to achieve perfect transparency following surgery than did penetrating corneal grafts (n = 7) (day 10 vs. day 4; p = 0.003; two-tailed Mann-Whitney U test). The median day to rejection of penetrating grafts was postoperative day 18; for endothelial cell grafts, it was day 48 (p = 0.04; two-tailed Mann-Whitney U test). The clinical courses of the two procedures were therefore quite different. Penetrating grafts gained clarity quickly but exhibited rapid graft neovascularization. Clinical rejection was preceded by inflammation in the anterior segment. Endothelial cell grafts exhibited a fluctuating, more indolent course of opacification, although all did eventually fail. Histological analysis confirmed immunological rejection in all failed grafts, but with different patterns of leukocytic infiltration in endokeratoplasties compared with penetrating keratoplasties. Inflammatory cells in endothelial cell grafts were generally fewer in number and were more often found in the posterior stroma. We conclude that, in the absence of immunosuppression, all endothelial cell allografts do undergo immunological rejection, albeit at a slower rate than penetrating grafts.