The cost of genetic testing for ocular disease: who pays?

Characterizing the Genetic Basis for Inherited Retinal Disease: Lessons Learned From the Foundation Fighting Blindness Clinical Consortium's Gene Poll

Purpose

The Foundation Fighting Blindness (FFB) Consortium is a collaboration of 41 international clinical centers that manage patients affected with inherited retinal diseases (IRDs). The annual Consortium gene poll was initiated in 2020 to capture the genetic cause of disease in patients with IRD and associated clinical practices of Consortium sites. Data from the 2022 gene poll are reported here.

Methods

In 2022, academic, private practice, and government ophthalmology clinics that are members of the Consortium centers were polled to identify per-case IRD genetic causality from a list of 387 syndromic and nonsyndromic IRD genes. The survey also assessed how genetic testing was obtained and clinical practices of the sites.

Results

Thirty centers responded and reported genetic data from 33,834 patients (27,561 families). Disease-causing variants were reported in 293 of 387 genes. The most common genetic etiologies were ABCA4 (17%), USH2A (9%), RPGR (6%), PRPH2 (5%), and RHO (4%). The top 100 genes accounted for the genetic cause of disease in 94.4% of patients. Two-thirds of the centers had at least one genetic counselor. In the 21 US sites, genetic testing was commonly obtained through sponsored programs (95%, FFB-My Retina Tracker Programs or Spark-ID Your IRD), whereas in the 9 non-US sites, genetic testing was commonly obtained using either patient- or public health system-funded testing pipelines. Clinical work-up of patients with IRD most commonly included updating history, eye examination, and optical coherence tomography.

Conclusions

This report provides the largest assessment of genetic causality in the IRD patient population across multiple continents to date.

Streamlined Ophthalmologist-Led Pathway to Diagnosis and Accessibility of Genetics Testing for Patients with Inherited Retinal Dystrophies in Canada

OBJECTIVE

To investigate the ability of a new clinical model to improve accessibility and expedite the pathway to molecular diagnosis for patients with suspected inherited retinal diseases (IRDs).

DESIGN

Retrospective cohort study of electronic patient records.

PARTICIPANTS

All patients referred to general medical genetic clinic between September 2017 and September 2019 and an ophthalmologist-led IRD clinic between October 2021 and July 2023 for suspected IRD were included.

METHODS

The difference in timeliness and accessibility to diagnosis and genetics testing for patients referred for suspected IRDs were compared based on whether they were referred to a general medical genetics clinic or an ophthalmologist-led IRD clinic.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

The primary outcomes were time to consult from referral; time from initial consult to molecular diagnosis; and the time from initial consult to genetics result disclosure and counseling. Secondary outcomes included number of prior providers investigating the chief complaint, the proportion of patients undergoing genetics testing, and the range of diagnostic investigations undertaken.

RESULTS

Four hundred seventy-three patients were included, with 212 cases from a general medical genetics clinic and 261 from a medical retina clinic. The mean time from referral to initial consult was 14 months (±3.33 months) and 4 months (±3.4 months) for the general medical genetics and the ophthalmologist-led IRD clinics, respectively. The mean time from initial consult to genetics disclosure and counseling was 6 months (±3.6 months) and 3.5 months (±1.8 months) for the medical genetics and the ophthalmologist-led models, respectively. The total time from initial referral to genetics disclosure and counseling for the medical geneticist-led clinic model was 20 to 24 months. The total time from initial referral to genetics disclosure and counseling for the ophthalmologist-led retinal clinic was 5 to 8 months. The average number of prior providers seen before presenting to the ophthalmologist-led retina clinic was 2.05 (range, 1-10).

CONCLUSIONS

Shifting from the traditional medical genetics model to the new ophthalmologist-led IRD clinical model may improve accessibility and expedite the pathway to molecular diagnosis and subsequent gene therapy trials for patients with suspected IRDs.

FINANCIAL DISCLOSURE(S)

Proprietary or commercial disclosure may be found in the Footnotes and Disclosures at the end of this article.

Genetic Testing Experiences of People Living with Inherited Retinal Degenerations: Results of a Global Survey

INTRODUCTION

Obtaining a genetic diagnosis via genetic testing (GT) is a fundamental step in determining the eligibility of a patient to be enrolled in emerging clinical trials and research studies. Besides, the knowledge of genetic outcome allows patients to plan for significant life choices. However, critical barriers exist to an equitable access to genetic services globally. The objective of this study was to explore patient experiences while seeking genomic services for inherited retinal degenerations (IRDs).

METHODS

An online survey was designed based on a focus group conducted by Retina International and including people affected by IRDs and their families living in different regions around the world. The survey was then circulated to 43 Retina International member organisations globally via email newsletters and social networks. The survey involved questions in relation to the accessibility, affordability, and timeliness of genomic services for IRDs as well as patient perceived awareness of genomic services for IRDs among healthcare professionals.

RESULTS

A total of 410 respondents (IRD patients and caregivers) from over 30 countries across all continents responded to the survey. A considerable number of the patients had to go through a long and arduous journey to access GT and counselling services, wherein 40% had to visit more than 5 physicians, 27% had to visit more than 5 clinics, and 57% had to wait for more than 3 years before obtaining a genetic diagnosis. Furthermore, 46% of respondents reported not receiving genetic counselling prior to undergoing GT, and 39% reported not receiving genetic counselling after undergoing GT. Over 3/4th of the participants reported that they did not have to pay for their genomic services for IRDs. Thirty-seven percent of the respondents reported that their eye care professionals (ECPs) were either not aware of GT, remained neutral, or did not encourage them to undergo GT.

CONCLUSION

Patients with IRDs do not have equitable access to best practice GT and counselling services. Greater awareness and training regarding IRDs and the benefits of GT and genetic counselling for patients and families are needed among ECPs. A best practice model on access to genomic services for IRDs is required.

Genetics of the anterior segment dysgenesis

The anterior segment dysgeneses are a broad group of heterogeneous disorders characterized by developmental abnormalities of the anterior segment of the eye, including primary congenital aphakia, Peters sequence, aniridia, and Axenfeld-Rieger spectrum. These conditions can have overlapping phenotypes and both genotypic and phenotypic heterogeneity. This article provides a strategy for both phenotyping and then genotyping using a targeted stepwise approach.

Possibility of genetic therapy for inherited retinal conditions

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the possibility of gene therapy in patients with inherited ocular conditions and established genetic diagnosis. The secondary objectives were to determine the genetic diagnostic rate and to update the list of genes for which there are ongoing clinical trials or preclinical studies that could allow for gene therapy.

METHODS

Observational, retrospective, multicentric study of 177 patients with inherited ocular conditions that underwent genetic testing.

RESULTS

Of 177 patients with genetic testing, 146 were enrolled for this study. Disease-causing variants were identified in 117 patients (variant detection rate of 80.1%). Pathogenic variants were found in 47 genes, with ABCA4 being the most common gene (17.9%), followed by CRB1 (11.9%). 64.1% of patients with a genetic diagnosis have a variant in genes for which gene therapy has been studied and only 40.1% have a variant in genes with studies for gene therapy in clinical phase.

CONCLUSIONS

Genetic testing has opened new horizons in the management of patients with hereditary ocular diseases. About two-thirds of the patients had pathogenic variants in genes for which gene therapy has been evaluated. However, many studies are in the pre-clinical phase. The expectations of patients undergoing genetic study and their families should be managed accordingly.

Clinical non-effectiveness of clopidogrel use for peripheral artery disease in patients with CYP2C19 polymorphisms: a systematic review

PURPOSE

To conduct a systematic review to identify studies that assessed the association between CYP2C19 polymorphisms and clinical outcomes in peripheral artery disease (PAD) patients who took clopidogrel.

METHODS

We systematically searched Ovid EMBASE, PubMed, and Web of Science from November 1997 (inception) to September 2020. We included observational studies evaluating how CYP2C19 polymorphism is associated with clopidogrel's effectiveness and safety among patients with PAD. We extracted relevant information details from eligible studies (e.g., study type, patient population, study outcomes). We used the Risk of Bias in Non-randomized Studies-of Interventions (ROBINS-I) Tool to assess the risk of bias for included observational studies.

RESULTS

The outcomes of interest were the effectiveness and safety of clopidogrel. The effectiveness outcomes included clinical ineffectiveness (e.g., restenosis). The safety outcomes included bleeding and death related to the use of clopidogrel. We identified four observational studies with a sample size ranging from 50 to 278. Outcomes and comparison groups of the studies varied. Three studies (75%) had an overall low risk of bias. All included studies demonstrated that carrying CYP2C19 loss of function (LOF) alleles was significantly associated with reduced clinical effectiveness and safety of clopidogrel.

CONCLUSIONS

Our systematic review showed an association between CYP2C19 LOF alleles and reduced functions of clopidogrel. The use of CYP2C19 testing in PAD patients prescribed clopidogrel may help improve the clinical outcomes. However, based on the limited evidence, there is a need for randomized clinical trials in PAD patients to test both the effectiveness and safety outcomes of clopidogrel.

Genetic counseling in the context of Bangladesh: current scenario, challenges, and a framework for genetic service implementation

With the advancements in genetics and genomics in the twenty-first century, genetic services have become an integral part of medical practices in high-income and upper-middle-income countries. However, people living in low and lower-middle-income countries (LICs and LIMCs), including Bangladesh, are rather underprivileged in receiving genetic services. Consequently, genetic disorders are emerging as a significant public health concern in these countries. Lack of expertise, high expense, the dearth of epidemiological data, insufficiently updated medical education system, poor infrastructure, and the absence of comprehensive health policies are the main factors causing people living in these countries not having access to genetic services. In this article, the authors took benefit from their professional experience of practicing medical genetics in the area and reviewed existing literature to provide their opinions. Particularly, it reviews the current knowledge of genetic disorders' burden and their causative factors in Bangladesh. It focuses on why providing genetic services is challenging in the context of the country's cultural and religious sentiment. Finally, it proposes a physician-academician collaborative framework within the existing facility that aims to tackle the challenges. Such a framework could also be useful for other LICs and LMICs to address the challenges associated with providing genetic services.

Association of No-Cost Genetic Testing Program Implementation and Patient Characteristics With Access to Genetic Testing for Inherited Retinal Degenerations

IMPORTANCE

The benefits of no-cost genetic testing initiatives have not been characterized. The no-cost My Retina Tracker Genetic Testing Study (MRT-GTS) research registry for inherited retinal degenerations (IRDs) was launched in 2017 in the US.

OBJECTIVE

To investigate the associations of MRT-GTS implementation and patient characteristics with access to genetic testing for IRDs.

DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS

In a cross-sectional design, analysis of new patients evaluated 12 months before (July 1, 2016, to June 13, 2017) and 12 months after (June 14, 2017, to June 30, 2018) MRT-GTS implementation at a single academic referral eye center was conducted. Participants included 369 patients with IRD. Data analysis was conducted from February to June 2020.

MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES

Change in rates of successfully obtaining genetic testing, odds ratios (ORs) of association between patient characteristics and obtaining testing, and days elapsed from clinic visit to reporting of results.

RESULTS

Among 369 patients (mean [SD] age, 39.5 [20.8] years; 193 [52.3%] women), 144 were evaluated in the pre-MRT-GTS period and 225 in the post-MRT-GTS period. The baseline rate of successfully obtaining testing was 51.4% (95% CI, 42.6%-60.2%). The initiation of MRT-GTS was associated with a 28.9-percentage point increase in testing rate (95% CI, 16.7%-41.1%; P < .001). Patient characteristics that increased the odds of obtaining testing were eligibility for MRT-GTS (OR, 14.15; 95% CI, 7.36-27.24; P < .001) and worse visual acuity (logMAR +1.0; Snellen equivalent decrease from 20/20 to 20/200) in the better-seeing eye (OR, 1.92; 95% CI, 1.27-2.91; P < .01). Patients had decreased odds when identifying as Black or African American (OR, 0.10; 95% CI, 0.04-0.24; P < .001) or other race (OR, 0.37; 95% CI, 0.15-0.91; P = .03) compared with White race, and when the primary language was not English (OR, 0.13; 95% CI, 0.03-0.55; P < .01). The proportion of test results reported within 90 days was 81.5% (95% CI, 74.8%-86.4%) when eligible for MRT-GTS compared with 48.1% (95% CI, 35.6%-58.1%) when not eligible (P < .001).

CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE

In this study, the implementation of MRT-GTS was associated with an increase in the proportion of patients who successfully obtained testing, suggesting the potential clinical value of this approach. Patient-level demographic and clinical factors appear to be associated with decisions to pursue testing.

Gene editing technology: Towards precision medicine in inherited retinal diseases

Purpose: To review preclinical and clinical advances in gene therapy, with a focus on gene editing technologies, and application to inherited retinal disease.Methods: A narrative overview of the literature, summarizing the state-of-the-art in clinical gene therapy for inherited retinal disease, as well as the science and application of new gene editing technology.Results: The last three years has seen the first FDA approval of an in vivo gene replacement therapy for a hereditary blinding eye disease and, recently, the first clinical application of an in vivo gene editing technique. Limitations and challenges in this evolving field are highlighted, as well as new technologies developed to address the multitude of molecular mechanisms of disease.Conclusion: Genetic therapy for the treatment of inherited retinal disease is a rapidly expanding area of ophthalmology. New technologies have revolutionized the field of genome engineering and rekindled an interest in precision medicines for these conditions.

Molecular diagnostic challenges for non-retinal developmental eye disorders in the United Kingdom

Overall, approximately one‐quarter of patients with genetic eye diseases will receive a molecular diagnosis. Patients with developmental eye disorders face a number of diagnostic challenges including phenotypic heterogeneity with significant asymmetry, coexisting ocular and systemic disease, limited understanding of human eye development and the associated genetic repertoire, and lack of access to next generation sequencing as regarded not to impact on patient outcomes/management with cost implications. Herein, we report our real world experience from a pediatric ocular genetics service over a 12 month period with 72 consecutive patients from 62 families, and that from a cohort of 322 patients undergoing whole genome sequencing (WGS) through the Genomics England 100,000 Genomes Project; encompassing microphthalmia, anophthalmia, ocular coloboma (MAC), anterior segment dysgenesis anomalies (ASDA), primary congenital glaucoma, congenital cataract, infantile nystagmus, and albinism. Overall molecular diagnostic rates reached 24.9% for those recruited to the 100,000 Genomes Project (73/293 families were solved), but up to 33.9% in the clinic setting (20/59 families). WGS was able to improve genetic diagnosis for MAC patients (15.7%), but not for ASDA (15.0%) and congenital cataracts (44.7%). Increased sample sizes and accurate human phenotype ontology (HPO) terms are required to improve diagnostic accuracy. The significant mixed complex ocular phenotypes distort these rates and lead to missed variants if the correct gene panel is not applied. Increased molecular diagnoses will help to explain the genotype–phenotype relationships of these developmental eye disorders. In turn, this will lead to improved integrated care pathways, understanding of disease, and future therapeutic development.

Advancing Clinical Trials for Inherited Retinal Diseases: Recommendations from the Second Monaciano Symposium

Major advances in the study of inherited retinal diseases (IRDs) have placed efforts to develop treatments for these blinding conditions at the forefront of the emerging field of precision medicine. As a result, the growth of clinical trials for IRDs has increased rapidly over the past decade and is expected to further accelerate as more therapeutic possibilities emerge and qualified participants are identified. Although guided by established principles, these specialized trials, requiring analysis of novel outcome measures and endpoints in small patient populations, present multiple challenges relative to study design and ethical considerations. This position paper reviews recent accomplishments and existing challenges in clinical trials for IRDs and presents a set of recommendations aimed at rapidly advancing future progress. The goal is to stimulate discussions among researchers, funding agencies, industry, and policy makers that will further the design, conduct, and analysis of clinical trials needed to accelerate the approval of effective treatments for IRDs, while promoting advocacy and ensuring patient safety.

Rates of diagnostic genetic testing in a tertiary ocular genetics clinic

BACKGROUND

Clinical genetics has evolved significantly to become an efficient and effective means of diagnosing disease. Genetic treatments are now being developed which are showing promising results. However, ophthalmic patients are not utilizing genetic testing as part of their diagnostic workups. This paper explores the patient experience at the Ocular Genetics Clinic (OGC) at the University of Arkansas for Medical Sciences (UAMS) Jones Eye Institute and discusses reasons why patients continue to not pursue genetic testing.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

We performed a retrospective chart review to understand the main reasons why patients were referred to the OGC between 2009 and 2018, with a detailed analysis of why patients did not pursue genetic testing.

RESULTS

Patients mainly did not undergo testing due to the cost of testing. However, patient availability, patient interest, and diagnostic workup also drove a significant amount of this lack of testing.

CONCLUSIONS

Ocular genetic testing is becoming an increasingly beneficial tool for diagnosing ocular disease. However, to date, patients do not utilize this service fully. At the OGC, there are several main drivers for this lack of testing, namely finances, interest/availability, and diagnostic workup. As more ocular genetics clinics are established, it will be imperative to address reasons for forgoing genetic testing and to develop strategies to encourage patients to pursue this testing.

Understanding Implementation Challenges to Genetic Testing for Familial Hypercholesterolemia in the United States

Cardiovascular disease (CVD) is the leading cause of death in the United States (US), with familial hypercholesterolemia (FH) being a major inherited and genetic risk factor for premature CVD and atherosclerosis. Genetic testing has helped patients and providers confirm the presence of known pathogenic and likely pathogenic variations in FH-associated genes. Key organizations, such as the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC), American Heart Association (AHA), FH Foundation, and National Lipid Association (NLA), have recognized the clinical utility of FH genetic testing. However, FH genetic testing is underutilized in clinical practice in the US for reasons that are underexplored through the lens of implementation science. In this commentary, we discuss seven key implementation challenges that must be overcome to strengthen the clinical adoption of FH genetic testing in the US. These implementation challenges center on evidence of cost-effectiveness, navigating patient and provider preferences and concerns, gender and ethnic diversity and representation in genetic testing, and establishing clinical consensus around FH genetic testing based on the latest and most relevant research findings. Overcoming these implementation challenges is imperative to the mission of reducing CVD risk in the US.

Development of a Streamlined Work Flow for Handling Patients' Genetic Testing Insurance Authorizations

Obtaining genetic testing insurance authorizations for patients is a complex, time-involved process often requiring genetic counselor (GC) and physician involvement. In an effort to mitigate this complexity and meet the increasing number of genetic testing insurance authorization requests, GCs formed a novel partnership with an industrial engineer (IE) and a patient services associate (PSA) to develop a streamlined work flow. Eight genetics clinics and five specialty clinics at the University of Michigan were surveyed to obtain benchmarking data. Tasks needed for genetic testing insurance authorization were outlined and time-saving work flow changes were introduced including 1) creation of an Excel password-protected shared database between GCs and PSAs, used for initiating insurance authorization requests, tracking and follow-up 2) instituting the PSAs sending GCs a pre-clinic email noting each patients' genetic testing insurance coverage 3) inclusion of test medical necessity documentation in the clinic visit summary note instead of writing a separate insurance letter and 4) PSAs development of a manual with insurance providers and genetic testing laboratories information. These work flow changes made it more efficient to request and track genetic testing insurance authorizations for patients, enhanced GCs and PSAs communication, and reduced tasks done by clinicians.

Genetic Testing in Dermatology: A Survey Analyzing Obstacles to Appropriate Care

BACKGROUND/OBJECTIVES

The past several decades have witnessed unprecedented advances in genomic technology, bringing genetic testing to the forefront of medical practice and moving us towards the practice of personalized medicine. Genetic testing has become an important aspect in preempting and successfully treating diseases in dermatology, yet difficulty remains in regards to obtaining genetic testing for patients. We conducted a survey for pediatric dermatologists in order to try to gauge and understand where difficulties lie in obtaining genetic testing and to analyze how best these issues can be resolved.

METHODS

An 18-question survey was emailed to 480 dermatologists who have attended at least one of the last three annual Society for Pediatric Dermatology (SPD) meetings.

RESULTS

Virtually all providers encountered at least one situation in which they required genetic testing for a patient (97.3% [n = 108]) and 37.4% indicated needing genetic testing more than six times per year. Of the respondents who had attempted to obtain genetic testing, half were unsuccessful in obtaining coverage more than 75% of the time (45% [n = 32]) and only 7.0% (n = 5) achieved success 75% to 100% of the time. The most common reasons for obtaining genetic testing included the need to provide an accurate diagnosis, followed by the need to provide prognostic information and appropriate medical management.

CONCLUSION

The role of genetic testing in the practice of dermatology is expanding, yet obtaining coverage for genetic testing remains a challenge. We propose several solutions as to how this can be remedied.

Communicating the promise for ocular gene therapies: challenges and recommendations

PURPOSE

To identify challenges and pose solutions for communications about ocular gene therapy between patients and clinicians as clinical research progresses.

DESIGN

Literature review with recommendations.

METHODS

Literature review of science communication best practices to inform recommendations for patient-clinician discussions about ocular gene therapy.

RESULTS

Clinicians need to employ communications about ocular gene therapy that are both attentive to patient priorities and concerns and responsive to other sources of information, including overly positive news media and the Internet. Coverage often conflates research with therapy-clinical trials are experimental and are not risk free. If proven safe and efficacious, gene therapy may present a treatment but not a cure for patients who have already experienced vision loss. Clinicians can assist patients by providing realistic estimates for lengthy clinical development timelines and positioning current research within models of clinical translation. This enables patients to weigh future therapeutic options when making current disease management decisions.

CONCLUSIONS

Ocular gene therapy clinical trials are raising hopes for treating a myriad of hereditary retinopathies, but most such therapies are many years in the future. Clinicians should be prepared to counter overly positive messaging, found in news media and on the Internet, with optimism tempered by evidence to support the ethical translation of gene therapy and other novel biotherapeutics.

Progress and prospects of next-generation sequencing testing for inherited retinal dystrophy

Next-generation sequencing, also known as massively paralleled sequencing, offers an unprecedented opportunity to study disease mechanisms of inherited retinal dystrophies: a dramatic change from a few years ago. The specific involvement of the retina and the manageable number of genes to sequence make inherited retinal dystrophies an attractive model to study genotype-phenotype correlations. Costs are reducing rapidly and the current overall mutation detection rate of approximately 60% offers real potential for personalized medicine and treatments. This report addresses the challenges ahead, which include: better understanding of the mutation mechanisms of syndromic genes in apparent non-syndromic patients; finding mutations in patients who have tested negative or inconclusive; better variant calling, especially for intronic and synonymous variants; more precise genotype-phenotype correlations and making genetic testing more broadly accessible.

Keratoconus in an adult with 22q11.2 deletion syndrome

22q11.2 Deletion syndrome is one of the most common microdeletional syndromes, with an incidence of 1:4000 live-births, and potentially affects every organ in the body. More than 180 associated clinical features have been reported and not one phenotypic feature is present in 100% of cases. Ocular manifestations reported based on early childhood examinations include eyelid hooding, strabismus, posterior embryotoxon, retinal vessel tortuosity and refractive errors. Keratoconus has been reported once before in association with 22q11.2 deletion syndrome in a young adult. We report the second case of keratoconus in association with 22q11.2 deletion syndrome.