Switching within glaucoma medication class

Microwave-Assisted Synthesis of 3-Hydroxy-2-oxindoles and Pilot Evaluation of Their Antiglaucomic Activity

Glaucoma is a widespread neurodegenerative disease for which increased intraocular pressure (IOP) is a primary modifiable risk factor. Recently, we have observed that compounds with oxindole scaffolds are involved in the regulation of intraocular pressure and therefore have potential antiglaucomic activity. In this article, we present an efficient method for obtaining novel 2-oxindole derivatives via microwave-assisted (MW) decarboxylative condensation of substituted isatins with malonic and cyanoacetic acids. Various 3-hydroxy-2-oxindoles were synthesized using MW activation for 5–10 min with high yields (up to 98%). The influence of novel compounds applied in instillations on IOP was studied in vivo on normotensive rabbits. The lead compound was found to reduce the IOP by 5.6 Torr (ΔIOP for the widely used antiglaucomatousic drug timolol 3.5 Torr and for melatonin 2.7 Torr).

Comparison of preserved bimatoprost 0.01% with preservative-free tafluprost: A randomised, investigator-masked, 3-month crossover, multicentre trial, SPORT II

IMPORTANCE

This study compares the efficacy and tolerability of a preservative-free prostaglandin analogue (tafluprost 15 mg/ml) to a prostaglandin analogue that uses 0.02% of benzalkonium chloride (bimatoprost 0.1 mg/ml).

BACKGROUND

Different prostaglandin analogues have been commercially approved, with differences in tolerability.

DESIGN

Prospective, randomised, investigator-masked, 3-month crossover, multicentre trial.

PARTICIPANTS

Sixty-four patients with ocular hypertension or open-angle glaucoma were randomised to two groups, after a 4-week washout period from their current topical drop regimen.

METHODS

Participants were randomised to tafluprost (Group 1; n = 33) or bimatoprost (Group 2; n = 31). At month 3, each group switched to the opposite treatment. IOP was evaluated at multiple timepoints.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

The primary outcome was difference in mean IOP between the two groups at the final visit. Secondary outcomes included change from baseline IOP at month 3 and month 6, difference in mean IOP at month 3 and difference in IOP at all timepoints. Safety outcomes included best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA), adverse events, ocular tolerability, optic nerve assessment and slit lamp biomicroscopy.

RESULTS

Both medications significantly lowered IOP at month 6 compared to baseline: 5.4 mmHg (27%) for tafluprost and 6.8 mmHg (33%) for bimatoprost (p < 0.0001). No significant differences in any of the safety measures (including conjunctival hypearemia) were detected.

CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE

Bimatoprost produced a statistically significant greater IOP reduction compared to tafluprost with minimal to no difference in side effects. This should be borne in mind when weighing up the pros and cons of preserved versus preservative-free prostaglandin analogue therapy.

CLINICALTRIALS.GOV IDENTIFIER

NCT02471105.

[Original preparations versus generics--latanoprost: how similar is different?]

BACKGROUND

To test the interchangeability of the commercially available (in Germany) latanoprost drugs and their generics respectively, the concentration of the active substance was tested. Guidelines of the European Medicines Agency postulate a sufficient bioequivalence, if the range of the agent is within 80-125% of the original drug.

METHODS

All compounds of latanoprost were procured registered. The concentration of latanoprost and benzalkoniumchloride was measured by high-performance liquid chromatography (HPLC) in a validated reference labroratory for 23 generics. In addition, the mean volume of drops and the pH of the formulation were measured. The packaging label and the readability of the enclosed information leaflet were checked.

RESULTS

All products contained less than 50 μg/ml latanoprost. The deviating reduction of the active substance (mean: - 7.39%, ± 2.8%) was accompanied by fluctions of the eyedrops' mass (mean: 0.03 g, ± 0.002 g). The concentration of benzalkonium chloride was mostly increased (median: 5.45%, min: - 2.5%, max: 11.5%). The pH of the original drug and the generics (median 6.78, min: 6.62, max: 6.81) was similar to the original drug, but was significantly different from an unpreserved formulation (pH 7.18). Due to type size, the packaging leaflet was illegible for humans with impaired vision.

CONCLUSIONS

Before prescribing generics in ophthalmology, different factors have to be considered, which might influence the amount of IOP lowering in effect. In the absence of healthcare research it is still unclear, how different bottle forms of eyedrops--such as appearance (e.g. Cyrillic characters) or pressure point (administration)--reduce the adherence of glaucoma patients.

Intraocular pressure reduction with a fixed treatment protocol in the Early Manifest Glaucoma Trial

PURPOSE

To evaluate: (i) the relationship between intraocular pressure (IOP) reduction attained with a fixed treatment protocol and the untreated IOP level; (ii) the consistency of IOP reduction over time; and (iii) whether there is a threshold pretreatment IOP level below which IOP reduction might be less effective. Results are based on 128 patients with glaucoma with field defects, who were randomized to the treatment arm of the Early Manifest Glaucoma Trial (EMGT).

METHODS

The EMGT fixed treatment protocol consisted of 360° laser trabeculoplasty and topical betaxolol eye drops B.I.D. Treatment was unchanged as long as progression did not occur. Analyses assessed the initial IOP reduction after 3 months and also the mean reduction based on all follow-up values; IOP changes over time were evaluated with linear regression analysis. Factors influencing initial and mean IOP reduction were also explored using linear models.

RESULTS

Mean age at baseline was 68 years, and untreated baseline IOP ranged from 13 to 30.5 mmHg. On average, eyes with higher baseline IOP experienced larger pressure reductions than eyes with lower baseline IOP, whether expressed in mmHg or as percentages. Each mmHg of higher baseline IOP was associated with approximately 0.6 mmHg larger IOP reduction. IOP changed little over time, with 66% of patients changing less than 0.5 mmHg/year, and only 13% (17/128) changing >1.0 mmHg/year. The treatment protocol did not achieve any average IOP reduction in eyes with baseline pressures ≤ 15 mmHg. Factors related to more IOP reduction at 3 months were higher baseline IOP and positive refractive error, while higher baseline IOP and male gender (more reduction) and cardiovascular disease history (less reduction) were associated with mean IOP on treatment.

CONCLUSION

With a fixed treatment protocol, the IOP reduction achieved depended very strongly on baseline untreated IOP levels. There seemed to be a lower threshold around 15 mmHg, where therapy did not result in any reduction of IOP. Our results suggest that when effects of IOP-lowering treatment are reported, whether expressed in mmHg or as a percentage of untreated pressure levels, the baseline IOP levels should be specified as well.