A Survey of the Opinion and Experience of UK Dentists Part 3: An Evidence-Based Protocol of Surgical Risk Management Strategies in the Mandible

Is Inferior Alveolar Nerve Block Needed to Perform Implant Surgery in the Posterior Mandible? A Randomized Controlled Trial

PURPOSE

There is no agreement in the literature on whether inferior alveolar nerve block (IANB) or infiltration (INF) is the anesthetic technique of choice for placing implants in the posterior mandible. This study aimed to compare the efficacy of the 2 techniques using articaine 4% with epinephrine 1:100,000.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

The trial was a comparison between 2 parallel groups of patients, who received implants distal to the mental foramen, either with IANB or INF. The anesthetic technique was the predictor variable. The primary outcome was patients' perceived pain by a numerical rating scale (NRS) in incision, osteotomy and suture. The secondary outcome, patients' satisfaction, was equally recorded 12 hours after surgery. The dataset were first analyzed by descriptive statistics. Then, Mann-Whitney test, Spearman's coefficient and regression models were used. This trial followed the recommendations of the Consort Statement for reporting RCTs.

RESULTS

Ninety-six patients (41 men, 55 women, mean age 55.76 years) were randomly assigned to either group, IANB or INF, of 48 patients each. Only 20% of patients reported pain values >0 (range 0-4 of 10). Medians were: 0 (0-0) for both groups (P = .956, .175 and .908, incision, osteotomy and suture, respectively). Mean satisfaction was high in both groups, 9.0 ± 1.0, median 10; and 8.8 ± 1.7, median 9, for IANB and INF (P = .695). Hence, the anesthetic technique did not generate statistically significant differences. Five potential influencing variables that were measured did not significantly affect pain levels or patient satisfaction in either group.

CONCLUSIONS

According to the results, an IANB might not be necessary for standard implant surgery in the posterior mandible, and infiltration of articaine 4% with epinephrine 1:100,000 appears to be sufficient. Further research is needed to check if these results are extensible to other anesthetic drugs.

Quantitative and qualitative sensory testing results are associated with numbness rather than neuropathic pain in patients with post-implant trigeminal neuropathy: a cross-sectional pilot study

Purpose: This study aimed to characterize the sensory profile of patients with post-implant trigeminal neuropathy and identify the association between subjective symptoms and objective signs including psychophysical testing and radiographic imaging. This study further evaluated to the association between quantitative sensory testing (QST)/qualitative sensory testing (QualST) and the severity of nerve injury graded by radiographic imaging. Materials and methods: This retrospective study included 34 patients diagnosed with post-implant trigeminal neuropathy. Data on the neuropathic pain symptom inventory (NPSI), thermal and electric QST, bedside QualST, and cone beam computed tomography (CBCT) was collected and the association between these variables were analysed. Results: Numbness was the most common subjective symptom and evoked pain was the most frequent neuropathic pain. There was no significant correlation between negative and positive symptoms. Spearman's rank correlation analyses indicated that objective findings including QST/QualST correlated with a sensory loss profile rather than a gain of function profile. Moderate positive correlations between some positive symptoms and the score of QualST were observed. The Mann-Whitney U test showed that subjective symptoms did not differ according to the severity of nerve damage according to CBCT, but the electric QST and QualST was discriminative. Conclusions: This study suggests that QST/QualST associated with the severity of nerve damage according to CBCT might be useful in assessing numbness in patients with negative and positive symptoms after implant surgery, but may be of marginal utility in the evaluation of neuropathic pain within the limitation of this cross-sectional study with small sample size.

Imaging in Orofacial Pain

Imaging usefulness in the diagnosis of orofacial pain includes all modalities that cover the soft tissue and bony structures in the region of the head and neck. Imaging techniques may include 2-dimensional and/or 3-dimensional imaging modalities. Both dentists and physicians should be aware of orofacial pain associated with a variety of sources and select the appropriate imaging technique based on the patient's medical and dental history and the clinical examination. The goal of imaging is to provide the clinician with information that will confirm or deny findings of the clinical examination and allow for the selection of an appropriate treatment.

Controversies in Implant Surgery

Dental implants are a mainstream treatment protocol to replace missing teeth. Patient and clinician demands have led to shorter length and narrower diameter implants, immediately placed implants into infected sites, and the use of implants in children. This article reviews some of the controversial topics in implant dentistry, and presents the evidence that supports and challenges these newer techniques. Because long-term studies are often not available, especially for implants in infected sites, mini implants, and implants in the growing patient, the field continues to evolve.