Fatigue Failure of External Hexagon Connections on Cemented Implant-Supported Crowns

Fractographic analysis of fractured fixation screws in implant-supported restorations

OBJECTIVES

The aim of this study was to fractographically examine clinically fractured fixation screws used to fix implant supported restorations and to estimate stress at failure.

METHODS

20 clinically fractured titanium implant fixation screws were collected and analyzed under scanning electron microscope in order to locate critical crack origin and calculate stress at fracture. Principles of fractographic analysis were applied using relative equations and cause and conditions of screw fracture were calculated. X-rays and patients' records were collected after approval of necessary consent forms.

RESULTS

Fractographic analysis revealed location and dimensions of critical crack size for every fractured screw examined. Two patterns of screw fracture were identified; the first was related to improper seating of fixation screw leading to damage at screw threads and eventual fracture of screw body. The second was related to slow crack growth propagation causing final fracture of screw body. The calculated stress at failure ranged from 755 to 804 MPa. Patients' records revealed that 75% of fractured screws were related to single unit screw retained restorations.

SIGNIFICANCE

Single unit screw retained restorations and improperly seated implant abutments impose high stress concentration on fixation screw which may result in fixation screw fracture.

Probability of survival and stress distribution of narrow diameter implants with different implant-abutment taper angles

This study evaluated the probability of survival, failure mode, and stress distribution of narrow diameter implants (NDIs) with internal implant-abutment conical connection comprised of different taper angles and thread designs. Sixty-three NDIs (Ø 3.5 × 8.5 mm) were divided according to the taper angle (TA), internal diameter (ID), and trapezoidal thread design (TD) (n = 21/group), as follows: (a) 11.5°U (11.5° TA; ID: 2.5 mm; TD: dual threaded); (b) 11.5°S (11.5° TA; ID: 2.5 mm; TD: single threaded); (c) 16°S (16° TA; ID: 2.72 mm; TD: single threaded). They were subjected to step-stress accelerated life testing. The reliability and use-level probability Weibull curves were calculated at 50, 100, and 150 N for a mission of 100,000 cycles and the failure mode was analyzed using a scanning electron microscope. For finite element analysis the von-Mises stress (σ_vM ) was calculated for the abutment and implant. All groups showed high reliability (above 84%) and failures occurred predominantly in the abutment. In the FEA, 11.5°U showed higher σ_vM for the implant. All NDIs showed high reliability at clinically challenging loads. The system with greater taper angle showed lower σ_Vm in the implant, and dual threaded implants showed a higher stress concentration in the implant and cortical bone.

External Connection versus Internal Connection in Dental Implantology. A Mechanical in vitro Study

(1) Background: In today's dentistry, implantology has become a therapeutic resource of choice in certain clinical situations. The design of implants has evolved in several aspects since their inception. Dental implants were initially designed with an external hex connection, although due to force transmission and security in the adjustment of the prosthesis, later implants featured an internal hex connection. This study aims to analyse the mechanical properties of two types of implants (an internal connection and an external connection) from the same manufacturer and their different prosthetic components (union screw between implant and prosthetic abutment, and the abutment itself) when subjected to different types of load. (2) Materials and methods: Intraosseous dental implants of similar shape, design and size, although different in type of connection (external vs. internal), were studied. The specifications of the UNI EN ISO 14801 test standard were used, with all determinations being carried out three times. Finally, the dimensional characterisation of the samples analysed after the dynamic load study was carried out, and the values of both study groups were compared by means of the non-parametric Mann–Whitney U test to find statistically significant differences (p < 0.05). (3) Results: For the static characterisation test, we found between 610.9 N and 986.1 N for the external connection and between 1263.6 N and 1324 N for the internal connection (p = 0.011). All of the dynamic load tests were positive and there was no failure in any of the components studied. (4) Conclusions: After the analysis of the samples studied in vitro, satisfactory results were obtained, demonstrating that both connections can support considerable mechanical loads according to international standards (UNI EN ISO 14801).