Cone-Beam Computed Tomography Evaluation of the Submandibular Fossa in a Group of Dental Implant Patients

Feasibility of implant placement in healed mandibular molar sites: A retrospective cone beam computed tomography study

STATEMENT OF PROBLEM

Implant placement in the mandibular molar sites plays a crucial role in the restoration of edentulous mandibles. However, the evaluation of bone quantity before implant surgery using cone beam computed tomography (CBCT) is lacking.

PURPOSE

The purpose of this clinical study was to evaluate CBCT images of edentulous patients to analyze the feasibility of implant placement in healed mandibular molar sites.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

The CBCT data of 138 patients were analyzed in the sagittal plane for measurements of mandibular bone height (MBH), superior bone height (SBH), inferior bone height (IBH), buccal bone width (BBW), lingual bone width (LBW), and alveolar bone widths (ABWs). The edentulous sites were categorized according to the bone quantity and complexity of the implant surgery. Multivariate analysis of variance (MANOVA) was used to analyze the site, sex, and age-related variations. An independent t test was used to compare the difference of bone dimension in different sites and between sexes. One-way ANOVA followed by post hoc tests were used to analyze the difference between different age groups. Categorical variables were presented as number of events and percentages. The chi-squared test was used to compare categorical variables (α=.05).

RESULTS

A total of 534 sites of interest were recorded, including 274 hemimandibles. A significant difference in BBW was found between the first and second molar sites. Men had higher MBH, SBH, IBH, and BBW than women. The distribution of implant surgical complexity in the conventional group was 63.5%, while the buccolingual tilted implant group accounted for 17.0%, and the complicated group accounted for 19.5%. Of the 274 hemimandibles, an implant could be placed directly at molar sites in 88% of situations.

CONCLUSIONS

The BBW at the mandibular second molar site was greater than that at the first molar site. The amount of available bone in the SBH and BBW was greater in men than in women at the healed molar sites. Age did not significantly affect the complexity of the implant surgery. Implants can be placed directly in healed mandibular molar sites in most patients who require a complete arch mandibular implant-supported restoration.

Relevant factors of posterior mandible lingual plate perforation during immediate implant placement: a virtual implant placement study using CBCT

BACKGROUND

To explore the influence of cross-sectional type and morphological parameters at the mandibular molar sites on lingual plate perforation (LPP) during the immediate implant placement (IIP).

METHODS

181 implants were virtually placed in the mandibular molar sites on the cone beam computed tomography (CBCT). Each cross-section of the implantation site was divided into the Undercut (U)/Parallel (P)/Convex (C) types. Morphologically relevant parameters were measured on the cross-sections, including width of the upper end (Wb), width of the lower end (Wc), vertical height (V), angle between the natural crown axis and the alveolar bone axis (∠β), LC depth (LCD), LC height, and angle between the horizontal line and the line connecting the most prominent point and the most concave point of lingual plate (∠α). Besides, the distance from the end of the virtual implant and the lingual bone plate of the cross-section (D_IL) was calculated. Relationships between all the morphologically relevant parameters and the D_IL were further analyzed.

RESULTS

A total of 77 (42.5%) cross-sections were classified as U-type, which was the most common one, accounting for 63% of the second molar regions. All LPP cases and most of the nearly LPP (87.9%) cases occurred at the U-type cross-sections, and the relationship between the D_IL and the morphological parameters can be expressed by a multivariate linear equation.

CONCLUSIONS

The occurrence rate of U-type cross-sections in the second molar region was very high, and the risk of LPP should be considered during IIP. Except for the U-type, significant large LCD, small Wc, and large ∠β were the important relevant factors. CBCT and multivariate linear equations could help to assess the LPP risk and provide a reference for implant placement design pre-surgery.

Effects of Crest Morphology on Lingual Concavity in Mandibular Molar Region: an Observational Study

Objectives

The aim of this radiological study is to evaluate the lingual concavity dimensions and possible implant length in each posterior tooth region according to posterior crest type classification by using cone-beam computed tomography.

Material and Methods

According to inclusion criteria, 836 molar teeth regions from 209 cone-beam computed tomography images were evaluated. Posterior crest type (concave, parallel, or convex), possible implant length, lingual concavity angle, width, and depth were recorded.

Results

In each posterior tooth region, concave (U-type) crest was detected most frequently while convex (C-type) was the lowest. Possible implant length values were higher in second molar regions than first molars. Lingual concavity width and depth were decreasing from second molars to first molars for both sides. Additionally, lingual concavity angle showed higher values in second molar sites than first molars. In all molar teeth regions, lingual concavity width values were the highest in concave (U-type) crest type while they were the lowest in convex (C-type) crest type (P < 0.05). Lingual concavity angle values were recorded as the highest in concave (U-type) and the lowest in convex (C-type) crest type at the left first molar and right molars (P < 0.05).

Conclusions

The lingual concavity dimensions and possible implant length may vary according to crest type and edentulous tooth region. Due to this effect, the surgeons should examine crest type clinically and radiologically. All parameters in the present study are decreasing while moving from anterior to posterior as well as from concave (U-type) to convex (C-type) morphologies.

Biomechanical evaluation of stress distributions at the implant-abutment complex and peri-implant bone around mandibular dental implants with different neck geometries and inclinations

This study aimed to investigate the effects of the different dental implant neck designs, diameters, and inclinations, on the stress distributions at the mandibular crestal bone and implant-abutment complex, using three-dimensional (3D) finite element stress analysis (FEA) method. Finite element models of three-unit fixed partial dentures supported with two same length implants (10 mm), placed on the second premolar and second molar regions, were designed. Eight different models were designed according to the implants' neck designs (platform switching/traditional), diameters (4.1 mm/4.8 mm) and the tilting angles of the posterior implants (0°/15°). The anterior implants' widths were 4.1 mm and the neck design of the anterior implants matched the posterior implants. Two types of 100-N loads in vertical and 30° oblique directions were applied separately onto each central fossae and functional cusps of the fixed partial dentures crowns. Algor Fempro Software was used for the simulation and evaluation of the stress levels at the implant-abutment complex and the crestal bone. Stress levels measured at the crestal bone were found to be lower for the platform switching models. However, the platform switching design generated higher stress magnitudes within the implant-abutment complex. Inclined placement of posterior implants increased the amount of stress at the crestal bone around both implants. Biomechanically, selection of the largest diameter possible when using tilted platform switched implants may be recommended at the posterior mandible.

Association between ridge morphology and complexity of implant placement planning in the posterior mandible

STATEMENT OF PROBLEM

Uncertainties regarding the 3D ridge morphology of the posterior mandible can greatly increase the risk of surgical complications during dental implant placement. By using cone beam computed tomography (CBCT) imaging and a computer-guided implant treatment software program before any invasive procedure, it is possible to assess ridge morphology and understand the surgical complexity and risk level.

PURPOSE

The purpose of this radiological clinical study was to evaluate a large series of CBCT images to evaluate ridge shape variations along posterior mandibular edentulous regions and to clarify their associations with the level of implant planning complexity.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

One hundred and twenty CBCT files were analyzed retrospectively for a total 240 hemimandibular sites. Images of each edentulous region of the mandibular first and second premolar and first and second molar sites were evaluated in the sagittal plane. Ridge morphology and implant planning complexity per site were assessed. Categorical variables were presented as number of events and percentages. The chi-square test was used to compare the categorical variables (P=.05).

RESULTS

Of 491 partially edentulous mandibular sites, 235 were on the right, and 256 were on the left. Forty-two sites had a distal adjacent tooth, while 266 sites had no distal adjacent tooth. The sagittal bone sections demonstrated oblique (40.53%), straight (31.77%), S-shape (24.24%), hourglass (2.44%), and basal bone (1.02%) ridge morphologies. Implant complexity was deemed straightforward in 66.19% of sites, while 31.6% were identified as advanced and 2.54% as complex. When ridge morphology was evaluated from straight to basal-round bone shape, the implant complexity followed the same trend of change from a straightforward to complex procedure (P=.001) for edentulous second and first molar regions. No significant differences were noted at edentulous second premolar sites (P=.063). The missing second molar sites with oblique morphology were predicted to have 60.9% straightforward complexity, and first molar sites with oblique morphology had 55.8% straightforward implant complexity. Second premolars with straight ridge morphology had 71.7% straightforward complexity, whereas first premolars with the same shape had 92.5% straightforward implant complexity.

CONCLUSIONS

Careful evaluation of sagittal CBCT images can provide significant clinical information regarding ridge shape and anticipated surgical complexity before and at the time of implant placement. Surgical complexity is greatest at the most posterior mandibular edentulous sites, and extra attention and caution should be exercised during the surgical planning phases of implant surgery.