Allograft for maxillary sinus floor augmentation: a retrospective study of 90 cases

Survival rate of implants following maxillary sinus floor augmentation using freeze-dried allografts vs bovine derived xenografts: A retrospective multicenter study

INTRODUCTION

This study aims to compare the surgical and clinical complications, and the dental implant survival rate after maxillary sinus floor augmentation using demineralized freeze-dried bone allografts (DFDBA) versus bovine derived xenografts.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

A retrospective study enrolled 107 patients (52 males and 55 females, mean age group 1: 54,4 years; group 2: 56,4 years) requiring maxillary bone reconstruction prior to implantation. A total of 141 sinuses were grafted and 191 implants were placed. Data on various variables, including patient characteristics, implant placement details, and outcomes, were collected through medical records and patient questionnaires.

RESULTS

The study found no significant differences in implant survival rates between the two groups (94,0% versus 94,4%; p = 0,919). Overall complications were observed in 19.6% of patients, with a higher incidence in the allograft group (23,6% versus 15,4%; p = 0,283). Multiple logistic regression analysis identified a two-stage surgical protocol (OR= 2,8; p = 0,045), and a preoperative alveolar ridge height of less than 4 mm (OR= 5,3; p = 0,004) as significant predictors of complications. The risk of implant failure was raised by a preoperative alveolar ridge height of less than 4 mm (OR= 6,1; p = 0,038) and smoking (OR= 5,8; p = 0,012).

DISCUSSION

DFDBA is a reliable treatment option for extensive rehabilitation of atrophic maxilla, with a success rate comparable to xenografts used in sinus augmentation. Implant failure was significantly correlated with smoking and a residual ridge height of less than 4 mm.

Maxillary Sinus Floor Augmentation Using Biphasic Calcium Phosphate and a Hydrogel Polyethylene Glycol Covering Membrane: An Histological and Histomorphometric Evaluation

PURPOSE

Maxillary sinus floor augmentation with a lateral approach is usually performed using a bone substitute covered with standard collagen or a synthetic barrier membrane to prevent soft tissue ingrowth within the bone graft. The purpose of this case series was to evaluate a polyethylene glycol (PEG) membrane with a hydrogel consistency, used to protect the lateral sinus anstrotomy, by analyzing the histological quality and histomorphometric quantity of newly formed bone (NB) in a maxillary sinus graft using biphasic calcium phosphate (BCP).

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Fifteen sinuses were grafted from 12 patients. Six months after the maxillary sinus floor augmentation, bone biopsies were harvested from 7 patients during the implant placement second-step surgery.

RESULTS

The histomorphometric evaluation of the 7 grafted sinuses showed mean values of 27.4 ± 4.6% for NB, 26.9 ± 5.4% for remaining BCP particles, and 45.7 ± 6.0% for connective tissue/bone marrow. No implant failure was observed in the 14- to 45-month follow-up period after maxillary sinus floor augmentation procedure and in the 8- to 39-month follow-up period after implant loading.

CONCLUSION

The use of a hydrogel PEG membrane to protect BCP proved to be a valuable grafting procedure to enhance the vital bone formation in the maxillary sinus floor augmentation procedure.

Biodegradable Materials for Bone Repair and Tissue Engineering Applications

This review discusses and summarizes the recent developments and advances in the use of biodegradable materials for bone repair purposes. The choice between using degradable and non-degradable devices for orthopedic and maxillofacial applications must be carefully weighed. Traditional biodegradable devices for osteosynthesis have been successful in low or mild load bearing applications. However, continuing research and recent developments in the field of material science has resulted in development of biomaterials with improved strength and mechanical properties. For this purpose, biodegradable materials, including polymers, ceramics and magnesium alloys have attracted much attention for osteologic repair and applications. The next generation of biodegradable materials would benefit from recent knowledge gained regarding cell material interactions, with better control of interfacing between the material and the surrounding bone tissue. The next generations of biodegradable materials for bone repair and regeneration applications require better control of interfacing between the material and the surrounding bone tissue. Also, the mechanical properties and degradation/resorption profiles of these materials require further improvement to broaden their use and achieve better clinical results.

Bone Replacement Materials and Techniques Used for Achieving Vertical Alveolar Bone Augmentation

Alveolar bone augmentation in vertical dimension remains the holy grail of periodontal tissue engineering. Successful dental implant placement for restoration of edentulous sites depends on the quality and quantity of alveolar bone available in all spatial dimensions. There are several surgical techniques used alone or in combination with natural or synthetic graft materials to achieve vertical alveolar bone augmentation. While continuously improving surgical techniques combined with the use of auto- or allografts provide the most predictable clinical outcomes, their success often depends on the status of recipient tissues. The morbidity associated with donor sites for auto-grafts makes these techniques less appealing to both patients and clinicians. New developments in material sciences offer a range of synthetic replacements for natural grafts to address the shortcoming of a second surgical site and relatively high resorption rates. This narrative review focuses on existing techniques, natural tissues and synthetic biomaterials commonly used to achieve vertical bone height gain in order to successfully restore edentulous ridges with implant-supported prostheses.