Lymphovascular space invasion and the treatment of stage I endometrioid endometrial cancer

Ultrasonography, macroscopy, and frozen section: whıch is better for predicting deep myometrial invasıon in endometrial cancer?

OBJECTIVE

The aim of this study was to compare the power of preoperative transvaginal ultrasonography, intraoperative macroscopic examination, and frozen section for predicting deep myometrial invasion in endometrial cancer.

METHODS

This is a retrospective review involving 68 patients who underwent surgical staging for endometrial cancer from 2014 to 2017. Patients with grade 3 endometrial cancer and non-endometrioid tumors were excluded. The findings related to preoperative transvaginal ultrasonography, intraoperative macroscopic examination, and frozen section were compared with definitive histopathological diagnosis.

RESULTS

The mean age, gravidity, and body mass index of the patients were 58.1±8.9 years (range: 30-80 years), 3.2±2.1 (range: 0-9), and 33.5±6.6 kg/m2 (range: 20-52 kg/m2), respectively. Only 11 (16.2%) patients were in the premenopausal period, while 57 (83.8%) were in the postmenopausal period. Grade 1 endometrial cancer was found in 29 patients (42.6%) and grade 2 tumors were specified in 39 patients (57.4%). Stage IA disease was found in 45 (66.2%) patients, while stage IB disease was observed in 23 (33.8%) patients. The 5-year survival rate was 91.2%. The sensitivity of preoperative transvaginal ultrasonography, intraoperative macroscopic examination, and frozen section were 56, 34, and 52%, respectively, for predicting deep myometrial invasion. In contrast, the specificity of preoperative ultrasonography, intraoperative macroscopic examination, and frozen section were 86, 100, and 100%, respectively.

CONCLUSION

Transvaginal ultrasonography and intraoperative frozen section were found to have similar sensitivity and specificity for predicting deep myometrial invasion. Preoperative transvaginal ultrasonography appears as an efficient approach for predicting endometrial cancers with deep myometrial invasion.

Quantification of recurrence risk based on number of adverse prognostic factors in women with stage I uterine endometrioid carcinoma

Objective

The goal was to develop an updated model to predict the risk of recurrence, based on the number of adverse pathologic features in women with International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics stage I uterine endometrioid carcinoma, who did not undergo any adjuvant treatment.

Material and Methods

Women at a single center who underwent surgical staging without adjuvant therapy between January 1990 and December 2019 were included. Cox proportional hazards model was used to identify independent predictors of relapse free survival (RFS). Prognostic groups were then created based on the number of independent predictors of recurrence that were identified (0, 1, or 2-3 risk factors). Overall survival (OS) and disease specific survival (DSS) were also calculated for each group.

Results

In total 1133 women were eligible for inclusion. Median follow-up was 84 months. Independent prognostic factors of recurrence included: age ≥60; grade 2 or 3 differentiation; and presence of lymphovascular space invasion (LVSI). Due to the small number of patients with either 2 or 3 risk factors, these groups were combined into one (group 2/3). Isolated vaginal cuff recurrence was the most common site of recurrence in all study groups (2%, 7%, and 17% for groups 0, 1, and 2/3, respectively). Five-year RFS rates were 96%, 85%, and 57% for groups 0, 1, and 2/3 (p<0.01), respectively. Five-year DSS rates were 99%, 96%, and 85% and 5-year OS rates were 94%, 85%, and 62% (p<0.01), respectively.

Conclusion

We identified older age, high grade, and presence of LVSI as independent predictors of recurrence for women with stage I uterine endometrioid carcinoma. Using these prognostic factors, recurrence risk can be quantified for individual patients, and these factors can be used in deciding the appropriate adjuvant management course.

Association of Myometrial Invasion With Lymphovascular Space Invasion, Lymph Node Metastasis, Recurrence, and Overall Survival in Endometrial Cancer: A Meta-Analysis of 79 Studies With 68,870 Patients

Background

Myometrial invasion has been demonstrated to correlate to clinicopathological characteristics and prognosis in endometrial cancer. However, not all the studies have the consistent results and no meta-analysis has investigated the association of myometrial invasion with lymphovascular space invasion (LVSI), lymph node metastasis (LNM), recurrence, and overall survival (OS). Therefore, a meta-analysis was performed to evaluate the relationship between myometrial invasion and clinicopathological characteristics or overall survival in endometrial cancer.

Materials and Methods

A search of Pubmed, Embase, and Web of Science was carried out to collect relevant studies from their inception until June 30, 2021. The quality of each included study was evaluated using Newcastle–Ottawa scale (NOS) scale. Review Manager version 5.4 was employed to conduct the meta-analysis.

Results

A total of 79 articles with 68,870 endometrial cancer patients were eligible including 9 articles for LVSI, 29 articles for LNM, 8 for recurrence, and 37 for OS in this meta-analysis. Myometrial invasion was associated with LVSI (RR 3.07; 95% CI 2.17–4.35; p < 0.00001), lymph node metastasis (LNM) (RR 4.45; 95% CI 3.29–6.01; p < 0.00001), and recurrence (RR 2.06; 95% CI 1.58–2.69; p < 0.00001). Deep myometrial invasion was also significantly related with poor OS via meta-synthesis of HRs in both univariate survival (HR 3.36, 95% CI 2.35–4.79, p < 0.00001) and multivariate survival (HR 2.00, 95% CI 1.59–2.53, p < 0.00001). Funnel plot suggested that there was no significant publication bias in this study.

Conclusion

Deep myometrial invasion correlated to positive LVSI, positive LNM, cancer recurrence, and poor OS for endometrial cancer patients, indicating that myometrial invasion was a useful evaluation criterion to associate with clinical outcomes and prognosis of endometrial cancer since depth of myometrial invasion can be assessed before surgery. The large scale and comprehensive meta-analysis suggested that we should pay more attention to myometrial invasion in clinical practice, and its underlying mechanism also deserves further investigation.

Association of preoperative serum HE4 levels on the survival of patients with endometrial cancer

PURPOSE

To evaluate the association between preoperative serum human epididymis protein 4 (HE4) levels and survival outcomes in endometrial cancer (EC) patients.

METHODS

A retrospective cohort study was conducted of EC patients who were scheduled for surgery between September 2013 and May 2014 at Rajavithi Hospital. Association between preoperative serum HE4 levels and clinicopathological characteristics were evaluated. Cox proportional-hazards model was used to compare overall survival (OS) and recurrence-free survival (RFS) between EC patients who had high serum HE4 levels and those who did not.

RESULTS

A total of 86 EC patients were enrolled. Serum HE4 levels was significantly associated with older age (p < 0.001), postmenopausal women (p = 0.001), large tumor size (p < 0.001), presence of lymphovascular invasion (p = 0.022), deep myometrial invasion (p = 0.001), lymph node metastasis (0.017), high-risk group (p < 0.001), and death status (p = 0.002). With a median follow-up of 53 months, the 3-years OS and PFS of EC patients who had high serum HE4 levels were significantly poorer than those who did not (71% vs 95.8%, and 67.7% vs 91.7%, respectively). A high serum HE4 level was a significant prognostic factor for OS and RFS from the univariate analysis. However, it was not a significant prognostic factor in the multivariate analysis.

CONCLUSION

Preoperative high serum HE4 levels were significantly associated with the worse clinicopathological characteristic of EC patients and decreased OS and RFS. Although there was no strong independent prognostic factor for survival, serum HE4 levels could be used in an algorithm for stratifying high-risk EC patients with more proper management.

Is It Possible to Develop a Prediction Model for Lymphovascular Space Invasion in Endometrioid Endometrial Cancer?

OBJECTIVE

The purpose of this retrospective study was to define a risk index that would serve as a surrogate marker of lymphovascular space invasion (LVSI) in women with endometrioid endometrial cancer (EC).

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Final pathology reports of 498 women who underwent surgery with curative intent for endometrioid EC between January 2008 and June 2018 were retrospectively reviewed. Logistic regression was used to investigate clinicopathologic factors associated with positive LVSI status. Independent risk factors for LVSI were used to build a risk model and "risk of LVSI index" was defined as "tumor grade×primary tumor diameter×percentage of myometrium involved." The scores used in the "risk of LVSI index" were weighted according to the odds ratios assigned for each variable. The risk of LVSI index was noted for each patient. The diagnostic performance of the model was expressed as sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, negative predictive value, positive likelihood ratio, and negative likelihood ratio.

RESULTS

According to the "risk of LVSI index," presence of LVSI was correctly estimated in 89 of 104 LVSI-positive women at a cutoff of 161.0 (sensitivity 85.5%, specificity 79.4%, negative predictive value 95.4%, positive predictive value 52.3%, positive likelihood ratio 4.15, negative likelihood ratio 0.18). The area under curve of the receiver-operating characteristics was 0.90 (95% confidence interval, 0.87-0.93) at this cutoff.

CONCLUSIONS

It seems possible to predict the presence of LVSI in women with endometrioid EC when the "risk of LVSI index" is calculated. However, external validation of this model is warranted.

Adjuvant therapy for early stage, endometrial cancer with lymphovascular space invasion: Is there a role for chemotherapy?

OBJECTIVES

Lymphovascular space invasion (LVSI) is an independent risk factor for recurrence and poor survival in early-stage endometrioid endometrial cancer (EEC), but optimal adjuvant treatment is unknown. We aimed to compare the survival of women with early-stage EEC with LVSI treated postoperatively with observation (OBS), radiation (RAD, external beam and/or vaginal brachytherapy), or chemotherapy (CHEMO)+/-RAD.

METHODS

This was a multi-institutional, retrospective cohort study of women with stage I or II EEC with LVSI who underwent hysterectomy+/-lymphadenectomy from 2005 to 2015 and received OBS, RAD, or CHEMO+/-RAD postoperatively. Progression-free survival and overall survival were evaluated using Kaplan-Meier estimates and Cox proportional hazards models.

RESULTS

In total, 478 women were included; median age was 64 years, median follow-up was 50.3 months. After surgery, 143 (30%) underwent OBS, 232 (48.5%) received RAD, and 103(21.5%) received CHEMO+/-RAD (95% of whom received RAD). Demographics were similar among groups, but those undergoing OBS had lower stage and grade. A total of 101 (21%) women recurred. Progression-free survival (PFS) was improved in both CHEMO+/-RAD (HR = 0.18, 95% CI: 0.09-0.39) and RAD (HR = 0.31, 95% CI: 0.18-0.54) groups compared to OBS, though neither adjuvant therapy was superior to the other. However, in grade 3 tumors, the CHEMO+/-RAD group had superior PFS compared to both RAD (HR 0.25; 95% CI: 0.12-0.52) and OBS cohorts (HR = 0.10, 95% CI: 0.03-0.32). Overall survival did not differ by treatment.

CONCLUSIONS

In early-stage EEC with LVSI, adjuvant therapy improved PFS compared to observation alone. In those with grade 3 EEC, adjuvant chemotherapy with or without radiation improved PFS compared to observation or radiation alone.

Factors predicting recurrence in patients with stage IA endometrioid endometrial cancer: what is the importance of LVSI?

PURPOSE

The aim of this study is to define the clinical and pathological prognostic factors for recurrence and to evaluate the recurrence patterns and adjuvant therapies used in this group of patients with stage IA endometrioid type endometrial cancer (FIGO 2009-International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics).

METHODS

Among the patients with epithelial endometrial cancer operated between January 1993 and May 2013 in a single institution, 720 patients with stage IA endometrioid endometrial cancer were included. Patients with a tumor type of serous, clear cell, mucinous, undifferentiated, and mixed type and with a tumor containing sarcomatous component and the patients with a secondary primer cancer were excluded from the study.

RESULTS

Lympho-vascular space invasion (LVSI) was present in 60 (8.3%) patients. Pelvic and para-aortic lymphadenectomy was performed in 266 (36.9%) patients. Median follow-up time was 48 months (range 3-240). Recurrence occurred in 23 (3.4%) patients and 6 (0.9%) died of disease. The median time-to recurrence (TTR) was 24 months (range 4-52 months) in the patients with recurrence. LVSI was associated with recurrence in the univariate analysis. Five-year disease-free survival (DFS) decreased from 96.8 to 80.1% in the presence of LVSI (p < 0.001). This association could not be shown in patients who had had lymphadenectomy (p = 0.136). Extra-pelvic recurrence occurred in 6.7% and 1% of the patients with and without LVSI, respectively, (p = 0.001). Any independent prognostic factor could not be detected in the multivariate analysis.

CONCLUSIONS

Only LVSI and tumor grade were associated with DFS and disease-specific survival (DSS), respectively, in the 686 patients with stage IA endometrial cancer in the univariate analysis, since these associations could not be shown in multivariate analysis.

Prognostic significance of lymphovascular space invasion in low-risk endometrial cancer

Objective

The purpose of this study was to assess the prognostic significance of lymphovascular space invasion in women with low-risk endometrial cancer.

Methods

A dual-institutional, retrospective department database review was performed to identify patients with ‘low-risk endometrial cancer’ (patients having <50% myometrial invasion with grade 1 or 2 endometrioid endometrial cancer according to their final pathology reports) at two gynecologic oncology centers in Ankara, Turkey. Demographic, clinicopathological and survival data were collected.

Results

We identified 912 women with low-risk endometrial cancer; 53 patients (5.8%) had lymphovascular space invasion. When compared with lymphovascular space invasion-negative patients, lymphovascular space invasion-positive patients were more likely to have post-operative grade 2 disease (p<0.001), deeper myometrial invasion (p=0.003), and larger tumor size (p=0.005). Patients with lymphovascular space invasion were more likely to receive adjuvant therapy when compared with lymphovascular space invasion-negative women (11/53 vs 12/859, respectively; p<0.001). The 5-year recurrence-free survival rate for lymphovascular space invasion-positive women was 85.5% compared with 97.0% for lymphovascular space invasion-negative women (p<0.001). The 5-year overall survival rate for lymphovascular space invasion-positive women was significantly lower than that of lymphovascular space invasion-negative women (88.2% vs 98.5%, respectively; p<0.001). Age ≥60 years (HR 3.13, 95% CI 1.13 to 8.63; p=0.02) and positive lymphovascular space invasion status (HR 6.68, 95% CI 1.60 to 27.88; p=0.009) were identified as independent prognostic factors for decreased overall survival.

Conclusions

Age ≥60 years and positive lymphovascular space invasion status appear to be important prognostic parameters in patients with low-risk endometrial cancer who have undergone complete surgical staging procedures including pelvic and para-aortic lymphadenectomy. Lymphovascular space invasion seems to be associated with an adverse prognosis in women with low-risk endometrial cancer; this merits further assessment on a larger scale with standardization of the lymphovascular space invasion in terms of presence/absence and quantity.

Adjuvant chemoradiotherapy versus radiotherapy alone in high-risk endometrial cancer: A systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

The benefits of adjuvant chemoradiotherapy (CRT) for high-risk endometrial cancer (HREC) in International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics (FIGO) stages I-III remain controversial. A systematic review and meta-analysis was conducted to evaluate the clinical effectiveness and safety of postoperative CRT over radiotherapy (RT) alone, exclusively for patients with HREC for the following key endpoints: overall survival (OS), progression-free survival (PFS), the local recurrence rate, the distant metastasis rate, cancer-specific survival (CSS), grade III/IV acute and late toxicities, and the small bowel obstruction rate.

METHODS

Five databases, namely, PubMed, EMBASE, Cochrane Library, Web of Science and ClinicalTrials.gov, were systematically explored and supplemented by manual searching to identify relevant studies published before Dec 9, 2017. Only prospective randomized controlled trials (RCTs) conducted for HREC comparing CRT and RT alone after surgery were included. All statistical analyses were performed using RevMan Version 5.3 software.

RESULTS

Six eligible trials involving 2105 patients were identified for the final meta-analysis (CRT: n = 1064; RT: n = 1041). No statistically significant differences were evident between the CRT and RT groups regarding OS (n = 2105, RR = 1.02, 95% CI 0.98-1.06, P = 0.40). Additionally, no differences were apparent in terms of the local recurrence rate (n = 690, RR = 0.48, 95% CI 0.19-1.18, P = 0.11) or distant metastasis rate (n = 1445, RR = 0.94, 95% CI 0.72-1.23, P = 0.67). However, CRT significantly prolonged overall five-year PFS (80.2% vs. 74.5%, +5.7%; RR = 1.08, P = 0.005) and five-year CSS (86.1% vs. 79.0%, +7.1%; RR = 1.09, P = 0.03). A higher incidence of grade III/IV toxicities (P < 0.00001) was evident with CRT, while grade III/IV late toxicities and the small bowel obstruction rate were not significantly different between the two groups.

CONCLUSIONS

For patients with endometrial cancers with stage I-III risk factors, adjuvant CRT can significantly improve PFS and CSS compared with RT. With the exception of increased acute toxicities, CRT is well accepted and tolerated in HREC patients.

Lymphovascular Space Invasion for Endometrial Cancer: Undertreatment and Overtreatment Risks: A Survey of the Spanish Gynecologic Oncology Group

OBJECTIVE

The purpose of this study is to asses the impact of lymphovascular space invasion (LVSI) present in early-stage endometrial cancer, regarding its therapeutic management and prognosis knowledge, based on a survey among Spanish oncologic gynecologist.

METHODS/MATERIALS

Between October and November 2014, the Young Spanish Onco-gynecologist Group carried out a survey to perform a cross-sectional study about the management of LVSI. All active members in the oncology field of the Spanish Society of Gynecology and Obstetrics were invited to participate in the survey.

RESULTS

Most respondents consider LVSI a bad prognosis factor for endometrial cancer (66%) and also consider that it should be included in the International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics classification (56%). Seventy-five percent of all gynecologists did not modify their surgical treatment. Regarding follow-up, 38% of the respondents do not change their surveillance, 28% modify it, and 31% reported any change only with additional factors. Forty-seven percent of respondents advise systemic treatment with chemotherapy.Data were dichotomized between less than or equal to 20 versus greater than 20 years of OB-GYN specialist and less than or equal to 5 versus greater than 5 years of main dedication to gynecology oncology, but it was not possible to show any significant differences among the groups. The response rate (34 individuals) was too low to expect any significant differences.

CONCLUSIONS

Results suggest that LVSI remains a controversial issue in the management of patients with endometrial cancer. Acquiring a deeper knowledge and uniform criteria could avoid the risk of undertreatment and overtreatment in this group of patients with early-stage endometrial cancer. The identification of vascular pseudoinvasion is recommended, although the clinical and prognostic implications still need to be determined.

Improved Outcome of High-Grade, Early 1-Stage Endometrioid Endometrial Carcinoma With Adjuvant Chemotherapy and Radiotherapy: Comparison of 2 Treatment Strategies

OBJECTIVE

Patients with high-grade endometrioid endometrial carcinoma have a high risk of recurrence, even in early stage. To determine the benefit of a more aggressive adjuvant treatment approach, different treatment strategies of 2 referral centers were compared.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Outcome of all patients with International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics IB and II high-grade endometrioid endometrial carcinoma treated between 2008 and 2012, at the Gynecological Oncology Center South (GOCS) were compared with patients treated at the British Columbia Cancer Agency (BCCA). All patients underwent primary surgical treatment. Adjuvant treatment consisted of radiotherapy dependent on final pathology (GOCS), or adjuvant chemotherapy and pelvic radiotherapy (BCCA).

RESULTS

A total of 116 patients were treated at the GOCS (n = 61) and BCCA (n = 55). Patient cohorts were comparable for clinicopathological factors, except for age at diagnosis and lymphadenectomy. Radiotherapy was applied in 70.5% at the GOCS compared with 100% at the BCCA. All BCCA patients received chemotherapy compared with 3.3% at GOCS. The BCCA treatment strategy resulted in a significant reduced recurrence rate when compared with GOCS, 10.9% and 36.1%, respectively. There was no significant difference in the recurrence rate between patients with (n = 48) and without a lymphadenectomy (n = 68). Yet, numbers are relatively low. Because most recurrences were distant 78.6% (22/28), adjuvant chemotherapy resulted in reduced disease-related mortality.

CONCLUSIONS

Adjuvant chemotherapy and radiotherapy in early-stage high-grade endometrioid endometrial carcinoma results in improved disease-specific and overall survival compared to radiotherapy alone. Yet, due to the relatively low numbers, validation of these findings is needed in large prospective trials.

Are preoperative histology and MRI useful for classification of endometrial cancer risk?

Background

The 2010 guidelines of the French National Cancer Institute (INCa) classify patients with endometrial cancer into three risk groups for lymph node invasion and recurrence on the basis of MRI and histological analysis of an endometrial specimen obtained preoperatively. The classification guides therapeutic choices, which may include pelvic and/or para-aortic lymphadenectomy. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the diagnostic performance of preoperative assessment to help identify intermediate- or high-risk patients requiring lymphadenectomy.

Methods

The study included all patients who underwent surgery for endometrial cancer between January 2010 and December 2013 at either Rennes University Hospital or Vannes Regional Hospital. The criteria for eligibility included a preoperative assessment with MRI and histological examination of an endometrial sample. A histological comparison was made between the preoperative and surgical specimens.

Results

Among the 91 patients who underwent a full preoperative assessment, the diagnosis of intermediate- or high-risk endometrial cancer was established by MRI and histology with a sensitivity of 70 %, specificity of 82 %, positive predictive value (PPV) of 87 %, negative predictive value (NPV) of 61 %, positive likelihood ratio (LR+) of 3.8 and negative likelihood ratio (LR-) of 0.3. The risk group was underestimated in 32 % of patients and overestimated in 7 % of patients. MRI underestimated endometrial cancer stage in 20 % of cases, while endometrial sampling underestimated the histological type in 4 % of cases and the grade in 9 % of cases.

Conclusion

The preoperative assessment overestimated or underestimated the risk of recurrence in nearly 40 % of cases, with errors in lesion type, grade or stage. Erroneous preoperative risk assessment leads to suboptimal initial surgical management of patients with endometrial cancer.