Clinical Outcomes of Uterine Carcinosarcoma: Results of 94 Patients

The prognostic significance of the heterologous component in uterine carcinosarcomas

OBJECTIVE

Uterine carcinosarcomas are aggressive, rare biphasic tumors with malignant epithelial and malignant sarcomatous components. The prognostic significance of the presence of extrauterine sarcoma (heterologous component) is controversial. Therefore, the aim of this study was to investigate the effect of heterologous components in uterine carcinosarcomas on disease-free survival, overall survival, and other prognostic factors.

METHODS

Clinical and histopathological data from patients treated for uterine carcinosarcoma in a tertiary cancer center in Turkey between July 2000 and January 2020 were collected. Independent risk factors affecting overall survival and disease-free survival were analyzed by univariate and multivariate Cox regression analyses.

RESULTS

A total of 98 patients were identified. The median follow-up was 21.8 (1.2-233.1) months. In the multivariate analysis, the median overall survival and disease-free survival were 23.8 and 20.7 months in those with homologous mesenchymal components and 17.6 and 9.7 months in those with heterologous mesenchymal components, respectively. It was found that the presence of heterologous mesenchymal components significantly reduced both overall survival and disease-free survival (odds ratio [OR], 2.861; 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.196-6.841; p=0.018 and OR, 3.697; 95%CI 1.572-8.695; p=0.003, respectively). In addition, both lymphadenectomy and adjuvant radiotherapy were found to significantly increase overall survival and disease-free survival. Age was found to increase only disease-free survival.

CONCLUSION

The results obtained in this study showed that the presence of heterologous components in uterine carcinosarcoma is a prognostic factor that adversely affects both overall survival and disease-free survival. Lymphadenectomy and adjuvant radiotherapy have beneficial effects on both overall survival and disease-free survival.

Clinico-Pathological Characteristics, Management, and Prognostic Factors of Patients with Uterine Carcinosarcoma: a Retrospective Analysis

Uterine carcinosarcoma is a rare, highly aggressive, rapidly progressing neoplasm associated with a poor prognosis. It comprises 1-5% of all uterine malignancies but accounts for 16.4% of all deaths caused by uterine malignancies. There is a definite paucity of data available from the Indian subcontinent. Hence, we retrospectively conducted this study to analyze the clinical and pathological characteristics and outcomes of women with uterine carcinosarcoma in the past 10 years managed at the tertiary care center. This is a retrospective study of women with histologically proven uterine carcinosarcoma treated at a tertiary cancer center in South India between August 2009 and April 2019. Inpatient and outpatient records were reviewed; clinicopathological data were collected; and follow-up and survival data were ascertained. Over a period of 10 years, 20 patients were diagnosed with uterine carcinosarcoma. The majority of patients were postmenopausal (80%). Post-menopausal bleeding was the main presenting complaint in about 80% of patients. More than two-thirds of patients presented in the early stage (stage I, 55%; stage II, 20%). All patients underwent staging laparotomy. Patients with good performance status (85%) received adjuvant concurrent chemoradiotherapy and chemotherapy. At a median follow-up of 40 months, 7 (35%) patients were alive, out of which 6 are disease-free and 1 had a recurrence. The event-free survival at a median follow-up of 40 months was 40% and the overall survival was 48.5%. The outcome did not significantly differ based on the age, tumor histology (heterologous versus homologous), stage, and depth of myometrial invasion. Uterine carcinosarcoma, though rare, needs to be recognized as a distinct entity, and treated aggressively. Surgery is the cornerstone of therapy. Adjuvant concurrent chemoradiation and chemotherapy improve local control and may delay recurrence, but have shown little survival advantage. The optimal adjuvant treatment for this uncommon disease is yet to be established, highlighting the need for larger multicentric studies on this tumor.

Uterine carcinosarcoma: A 10-year single institution experience

Objective

This study aimed to determine 5-year progression-free and overall survival in patients with uterine carcinosarcoma, to determine clinical and surgical-pathologic features, to recognize patterns of recurrence and to identify prognostic factors influencing progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS).

Design

This was a single institution, retrospective 10-year review of patients treated at Tygerberg Hospital in South Africa with pathologically confirmed uterine carcinosarcoma.

Methods

A total of 61 patients were studied. Demographic, clinicopathological, treatment and outcome information were obtained. Kaplan-Meier survival analysis and Cox proportional hazards models were used to determine the effects of variables on PFS and OS.

Results

Eighteen patients (29%) presented as FIGO stage I disease, 5 patients (8%) as stage II, 16 patients (26%) as stage III and 22 patients (36%) as stage IV disease. Fifty of the 61 patients (82%) had surgery. Five-year PFS and 5-year OS were 17.3% (CI 8.9%-27.9%) and 19.7% (CI 10.6%-30.8%), respectively. Seventeen patients presented with recurrence of which 5 (29.4%) were local and 12 (70.6%) were outside the pelvis.

In the univariate analysis, tumour diameter ≥ 100mm (HR 4.57; 95% CI 1.59–13.19; p-value 0.005) was associated with 5-year PFS and in univariate analysis of OS, a positive family history (HR 0.42; 95% CI 0.18–0.99; p-value 0.047), receiving a full staging operation (HR 0.37; 95% CI 0.18–0.78; p-value 0.008) and receiving any other modality of treatment, with or without surgery, (HR 0.48; 95% CI 0.27–0.85; p-value 0.012) were associated with better survival. An abnormal cervical smear (HR 2.4; 95% CI 1.03–5.6; p-value 0.041), late-stage disease (HR 3.48; 95% CI 1.79–6.77; p-value < 0.001), presence of residual tumour (HR 3.66; 95% CI 1.90–7.02; p-value < 0.001), myometrial invasion more than 50% (HR 2.29; 95% CI 1.15–4.57; p-value 0.019), cervical involvement (HR 3.38; 95% CI 1.64–6.97; p-value 0.001) and adnexal involvement (HR 3.21; 95% CI 1.56–6.63; p-value 0.002) were associated with a higher risk of death.

In the multivariate analysis, full staging operation was associated with a risk of progression of disease (HR 3.49; 95% CI 1.17–10.41; p-value 0.025). Advanced stage (HR 4.2; 95% CI 2.09–8.44; p-value < 0.001) was associated with a higher risk of death. Any other modality of treatment (HR 0.28; 95% CI 0.15–0.53; p-value < 0.001) and full staging laparotomy (HR 0.27; 95% CI 0.12–0.59; p-value 0.001) was a protective factor for death.

Conclusions

Carcinosarcoma is an aggressive cancer with poorer survival in this specific cohort than has been described in other contemporary cohorts. Biological or genetic factors are a possible explanation for lower overall survival in this population. Although it is also possible that later diagnosis and poor access to health care contribute to poorer survival. Most recurrences occur outside of the pelvis. Full staging surgery (including pelvic lymphadenectomy) and additional use of other modalities (either for radical or palliative intent) improve survival.

Treatment Outcome of Second-Line Chemotherapy for Gynecologic Carcinosarcoma

INTRODUCTION

Carcinosarcoma is a rare cancer, and its prognosis is poor. There are few reports on the prognostic factors of patients with carcinosarcoma who receive second-line chemotherapy.

OBJECTIVE

To investigate the outcome and prognostic factors of patients who received second-line chemotherapy for gynecologic carcinosarcoma.

METHODS

We retrospectively investigated patients with ovarian or uterine carcinosarcoma, who were treated at two institutions from July 2006 to March 2018. All patients who had received second-line chemotherapy for advanced or recurrent disease were eligible. The efficacy of second-line chemotherapy and prognostic factors were evaluated.

RESULTS

Forty-six patients were eligible. Combination chemotherapy was used in approximately half (52.2%) of the patients. The response rate and disease control rate of second-line chemotherapy were 32.6 and 60.9%, respectively. The median follow-up period was 11.0 (range, 8.8-107.5) months. The median progression-free survival and overall survival were 6.3 (95% CI, 3.2-7.5) months and 12.9 (95% CI, 7.8-16.0) months, respectively. In the multivariate analysis of overall survival, a treatment-free interval >180 days was a significant good prognostic factor. The median overall survival was 7.8 (95% CI, 5.1-10.5) months in the <180 days group and 16.4 (95% CI, 13.1-130.6) months in the >180 days group (p = 0.0052; hazard ratio, 0.26; 95% CI, 0.10-0.66), respectively.

CONCLUSION

The outcome of gynecologic carcinosarcoma in the second-line setting is poor, especially in patients with a short treatment-free interval.

Treatment and Outcome of Patients with Uterine Carcinosarcoma in a Comprehensive Cancer Network

Aim

To determine clinical characteristics, treatment modalities and survival of uterine carcinosarcoma (UCS).

Methods

Data on treatment of UCS patients in the Comprehensive Cancer Network south region in the Netherlands between 2004 and 2014 were retrospectively evaluated.

Results

Data of 62 patients with UCS were retrieved. Mean age at diagnosis was 69.2 years (45–95 years). Data of six patients were excluded because they did not receive any treatment. Of the 56 patients included in this study, 57.1% presented with early-stage (FIGO I–II) disease and 42.9% with late-stage (FIGO III–IV) disease. 46.9% of the patients with FIGO early-stage disease received only surgical treatment, whereas 9.4% received adjuvant chemotherapy and 43.8% received adjuvant radiotherapy. Median DFS in patients with early-stage disease was 47.0 months (17.5–72.0). Adjuvant therapy did not seem to alter prognosis (p = 0.261). 16.7% of the patients with late-stage disease received only surgical treatment, 12.5% received only chemotherapy, whereas 50% received adjuvant chemotherapy and 20.8% adjuvant radiotherapy after surgery. Median DFS in late-stage disease was 8.5 months (2.5–23.5). Adjuvant therapy did not seem to alter prognosis (p = 0.30).

Conclusion

UCS with both FIGO stages I–II and III–IV has a dismal prognosis. The addition of adjuvant treatment did not seem to increase survival.

Hypofractionated Accelerated Chemo-radiotherapy (Chemo-HypoAR) With Cisplatin and Liposomal Doxorubicin for the Treatment of Patients With Uterine Sarcomas

BACKGROUND/AIM

Uterine sarcoma is an aggressive tumor associated with poor survival, compared to endometrioid carcinoma. Postoperative local radiotherapy and chemotherapy are controversial.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

We report a retrospective analysis of 14 patients with uterine homologous type carcinosarcoma (9 patients) or leiomyosarcoma (5 patients), treated with postoperative 3D-conformal accelerated hypofractionated radiotherapy (2.7 Gy/fraction for 14 fractions followed by one fraction of 6-8 Gy dose to the vagina). Chemotherapy with cisplatin (50 mg/m2) and liposomal doxorubicin (20 mg/m2), was also administered bi-weekly for two cycles before and for three cycles during radiotherapy.

RESULTS

Chemotherapy induced only grade 1 neutropenia or anemia in 4/14 (28.5%) and 5/14 (35.7%) of patients, respectively. Two patients (2/14, 14.2%) interrupted their radiotherapy for one and two weeks, respectively, due to grade II persistent diarrhea. Within a median of 58 months (range=8-137 months) of follow-up, none of the patients presented with loco-regional relapse. Two patients developed distant metastasis.

CONCLUSION

Concurrent hypofractionated and accelerated chemo-radiotherapy (chemo-HypoAR) is feasible and provides excellent survival figures.

Effect of Adjuvant Therapy on Oncologic Outcomes of Surgically Confirmed Stage I Uterine Carcinosarcoma: a Turkish Gynecologic Oncology Study

Background:

Uterine carcinosarcoma is rare neoplasm that mostly presents as metastatic disease. Stage is one of the most important prognostic factor, however, the management of the early stage uterine carcinosarcoma is still controversial.

Aims:

To evaluate prognostic factors, treatment options, and survival outcomes in patients with surgically approved stage I uterine carcinosarcoma.

Study Design:

Cross-sectional study.

Methods:

Data of 278 patients with uterine carcinosarcoma obtained from four gynecologic oncology centers were reviewed, and 70 patients with approved stage I uterine carcinosarcoma after comprehensive staging surgery were studied.

Results:

The median age of the entire cohort was 65 years (range; 39-82). All patients underwent both pelvic and paraaortic lymphadenectomy. Forty-one patients received adjuvant therapy. The median follow-up time was 24 months (range; 1-129). Nineteen (27.1%) patients had disease failure. The 3-year disease-free survival and cancer-specific survival of the entire cohort was 67% and 86%, respectively. In the univariate analysis, only age was significantly associated with disease-free survival (p=0.022). There was no statistical significance for disease-free survival between observation and receiving any type of adjuvant therapy following staging surgery. Advanced age (<75 vs ≥75 years) was the only independent prognostic factor for recurrence (hazard ratio: 3.8, 95% CI=1.10-13.14, p=0.035) in multivariate analysis. None of the factors were significantly associated with cancer-specific survival.

Conclusion:

Advanced age was the only independent factor for disease-free survival in stage I uterine carcinosarcoma. Performing any adjuvant therapy following comprehensive lymphadenectomy was not related to the improved survival of the stage I disease.

Diagnostic Value of 18F-FDG PET/CT and MRI in the Preoperative Evaluation of Uterine Carcinosarcoma

Purpose

This study aimed to compare the diagnostic value of ¹⁸F-fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography/computed tomography (FDG PET/CT) and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) in the preoperative evaluation of uterine carcinosarcoma.

Methods

Fifty-four women with pathologically confirmed uterine carcinosarcoma who underwent preoperative FDG PET/CT and MRI from June 2006 to November 2016 were included. Pathologic findings from primary tumor lesions, para-aortic and pelvic lymph node (LN) areas, and peritoneal seeding lesions were compared with the FDG PET/CT and MRI findings. The maximum standardized uptake value (SUVmax) of the primary tumor and LN was obtained. The tumor-to-liver ratio (TLR) was calculated by dividing the SUVmax of the primary tumor or LN by the mean SUV of the liver.

Results

For detecting primary tumor lesions (n = 54), the sensitivity and accuracy of FDG PET/CT (53/54) and MRI (53/54) were 98.2%. The sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy of FDG PET/CT versus MRI were as follows: 63.2% (12/19) versus 26.3% (5/19), 100% (35/35) versus 100% (35/35), and 87.0% versus 74.0%, respectively, for pelvic LN areas (p = 0.016); 85.7% (12/14) versus 42.9% (6/14), 90% (36/40) versus 97.5% (39/40), and 88.9% versus 83.3%, respectively, for para-aortic LN areas (p = 0.004); and 59.4% (19/32) versus 50% (16/32), 100% (22/22) versus 100% (22/22), and 75.9% versus 70.4%, respectively, for peritoneal seeding lesions (p = 0.250). For distant metastasis, the sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy of FDG PET/CT were 100 (8/8), 97.8 (45/46), and 98.2%, respectively.

Conclusions

FDG PET/CT showed superior diagnostic accuracy compared to MRI in detecting pelvic and para-aortic LN metastasis in patients with uterine carcinosarcoma. Moreover, FDG PET/CT facilitated the identification of distant metastasis.

Role of Radiation Therapy in the Multidisciplinary Management of Uterine Carcinosarcoma

OBJECTIVES

This study aimed to evaluate the impact of radiation therapy on outcomes for patients with uterine carcinosarcoma (UC).

METHODS/MATERIALS

We retrospectively reviewed the records of 155 women with stage I (98), II (11), or III (46) UC who underwent total abdominal hysterectomy/bilateral salpingo-oophorectomy at our institution between 1990 and 2011. Survival rates were assessed using the Kaplan-Meier method and log-rank test. Univariate and multivariate Cox regression analyses were performed.

RESULTS

Seventy-six patients (49%) received radiation therapy: 38 (50%) had vaginal cuff brachytherapy (VBT) alone and 38 had external beam radiation therapy (EBRT) ± VBT. Seventy patients (45%) received chemotherapy (12 concurrent, 49 adjuvant, 9 both). The 5-year overall survival rate was 48.6% (stage I, 53.8%; II, 30.0%; and III, 42.5%). The disease-specific survival (DSS) rate was 57.2% (stage I, 60.9%; II, 44.4%; and III, 51.8%). Patients treated with EBRT had a higher 5-year pelvic disease control rate (88.3%) than did patients treated with VBT only (67.4%) or no radiation (71.2%; P = 0.04). In stage III patients, EBRT was associated with higher 5-year pelvic disease control (90.0% vs 55.5%, P = 0.046), DSS (64.6% vs 46.4%, P = 0.13), and overall survival (64.6% vs 34.0%, P = 0.04) rates. For all 155 patients, age at least 65 years, cervical involvement, and lymph vascular space invasion were correlated with lower DSS on univariate and multivariate analyses. In addition, treatment with concurrent chemoradiation therapy was independently associated with a higher DSS rate on multivariate analysis.

CONCLUSIONS

Patients with UC have a high rate of relapse in the regional nodes and distant sites. External beam radiation therapy improves locoregional control in all stages and may improve survival in stage III patients who are at the highest risk of pelvic relapse.

Uterine and Ovarian Carcinosarcomas: Do They Behave Similarly?

OBJECTIVE

We aimed to compare the clinicopathologic characteristics, recurrence patterns, and survival of patients with ovarian carcinosarcomas (OCs) and uterine carcinosarcomas (UCs).

METHODS

Patients who were diagnosed with UCs or OCs on the basis of final pathology reports and who underwent surgery between January 1993 and January 2015 were included in the study. Data of patients were obtained from Gynecological Oncology Clinic electronic database and patient files.

RESULTS

The study included 101 and 21 patients who underwent surgery for UCs and OCs, respectively. Forty percent and 67% of patients who had UCs and OCs, respectively, experienced lymph node metastasis (P = 0.051). Median follow-up time was 12 months (range, 1-158 months) for patients with UCs and 24 months (range 1-154 months) for patients with OCs. Recurrence developed outside the abdomen in 58% of patients with UCs and in 10% of patients with OCs (P = 0.005). Median time to recurrence was 9 months (range 3-58 months) in patients with UCs, whereas it was 18 months (range 11-72 months) in patients with OCs (P = 0.002). Five-year disease-free survival was 34% and 19% for patients with UCs and OCs, respectively (P = 0.90). Five-year overall survival was 56% for patients with UCs and 54% for patients with OCs (P = 0.51).

CONCLUSION

We found that UCs recurred earlier and extra-abdominally. Recurrence pattern should be kept in mind during the planning of adjuvant therapies for these patients.

Review of Recommended Treatment of Uterine Carcinosarcoma

Surgery is the primary treatment for uterine carcinosarcoma (UCS). Lymphadenectomy should be performed for staging purposes in tumors apparently confined to the uterus. Most studies found that lymphadenectomy is of therapeutic value. The therapeutic value of cytoreduction to no residual macroscopic disease in advanced UCS is based mostly on small retrospective uncontrolled studies. Postoperative adjuvant therapy should be considered for all stages of UCS. Adjuvant pelvic radiotherapy may reduce locoregional recurrences. However, this does not translate into improved overall survival since most recurrences are distant outside the irradiated field, and the survival rates remain poor, the 5-year overall survival being about 50%. Several adjuvant platin-based combination chemotherapy schedules such as cisplatin/ifosfamide, ifosfamide/paclitaxel, and paclitaxel/carboplatin have been found to be an effective mode of adjuvant treatment. Multimodal therapy (i.e., adjuvant chemotherapy plus radiotherapy) has also been shown to be effective. Most studies dealing with adjuvant treatment are retrospective and prospective randomized controlled trials (i.e., phase III studies) comparing that between the various adjuvant chemotherapy schedules and between them and multimodal treatment are lacking. Quality of life with the various treatment modalities needs also to be assessed. An effective targeted therapy has so far not been found. In spite of the multiple studies with regard to the treatment of UCS published during the last 15 years, the optimal management of UCS is still not established.

ESMO-ESGO-ESTRO Consensus Conference on Endometrial Cancer: Diagnosis, Treatment and Follow-up

The first joint European Society for Medical Oncology (ESMO), European SocieTy for Radiotherapy & Oncology (ESTRO) and European Society of Gynaecological Oncology (ESGO) consensus conference on endometrial cancer was held on 11-13 December 2014 in Milan, Italy, and comprised a multidisciplinary panel of 40 leading experts in the management of endometrial cancer. Before the conference, the expert panel prepared three clinically-relevant questions about endometrial cancer relating to the following four areas: prevention and screening, surgery, adjuvant treatment and advanced and recurrent disease. All relevant scientific literature, as identified by the experts, was reviewed in advance. During the consensus conference, the panel developed recommendations for each specific question and a consensus was reached. Results of this consensus conference, together with a summary of evidence supporting each recommendation, are detailed in this article. All participants have approved this final article.

ESMO-ESGO-ESTRO Consensus Conference on Endometrial Cancer: diagnosis, treatment and follow-up

The first joint European Society for Medical Oncology (ESMO), European SocieTy for Radiotherapy & Oncology (ESTRO) and European Society of Gynaecological Oncology (ESGO) consensus conference on endometrial cancer was held on 11-13 December 2014 in Milan, Italy, and comprised a multidisciplinary panel of 40 leading experts in the management of endometrial cancer. Before the conference, the expert panel prepared three clinically relevant questions about endometrial cancer relating to the following four areas: prevention and screening, surgery, adjuvant treatment and advanced and recurrent disease. All relevant scientific literature, as identified by the experts, was reviewed in advance. During the consensus conference, the panel developed recommendations for each specific question and a consensus was reached. Results of this consensus conference, together with a summary of evidence supporting each recommendation, are detailed in this article. All participants have approved this final article.