Endometrial Cancers in Mutation Carriers From Hereditary Breast Ovarian Cancer Syndrome Kindreds: Report From the Creighton University Hereditary Cancer Registry With Review of the Implications

BRCA 1/2 mutations and risk of uterine cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis

PURPOSE

In this study, we aim to investigate the association between BRCA1/2 mutation and uterine cancer incidence.

MATERIAL AND METHOD

We systematically searched three databases including PubMed, Scopus, and Google Scholar up to August 2023; and reviewed 23 cohorts and cross-sectional studies to explore the association between BRCA1/2 mutations and uterine cancer incidence.

RESULTS

This systematic review comprised a total of 21 cohort studies and 2 cross-sectional studies after the screening process. According to meta-analysis the prevalence of the BRCA1/2 gene in patients with uterine cancer was 0.02 (95%CI = [0.01,0.03], P < 0.01, I2 = 94.82%) CONCLUSIONS: Our meta-analysis investigates a 2% prevalence of BRCA1/2 mutation in patients with uterine cancer. Patients with BRCA1/2 mutations might be more conscious of uterine malignancies.

Endometrial Cancer Risk Among Germline BRCA1/2 Pathogenic Variant Carriers: Review of Our Current Understanding and Next Steps

PURPOSE

To review the literature exploring endometrial cancer (EC) risk among surgical candidates with germline BRCA1/2 pathogenic variants (PVs) to guide decisions around risk-reducing (rr) hysterectomy in this population.

DESIGN

A comprehensive review was conducted of the current literature that influences clinical practice and informs expert consensus. We present our understanding of EC risk among BRCA1/2 PV carriers, the risk-modifying factors specific to this patient population, and the available research technology that may guide clinical practice in the future. Limitations of the existing literature are outlined.

RESULTS

Patients with BRCA1/2 PVs, those with a personal history of tamoxifen use, those who desire long-term hormone replacement therapy, and/or have an elevated BMI are at higher risk of EC, primarily endometrioid EC and/or uterine papillary serous carcinoma, and may benefit from rr-hysterectomy. Although prescriptive clinical guidelines specific to BRCA1/2 PV carriers could inform decisions around rr-hysterectomy, limitations of the current literature prevent more definitive guidance at this time. A large population-based study of a contemporary cohort of BRCA1/2 PV carriers with lifetime follow-up compared with cancer-gene negative controls would advance this topic and facilitate care decisions.

CONCLUSION

This review validates a potential role for rr-hysterectomy to address EC risk among surgical candidates with BRCA1/2 PVs. Evidence-based clinical guidelines for rr-hysterectomy in BRCA1/2 PV carriers are essential to ensure equitable access to this preventive measure, supporting insurance coverage for patients with either BRCA1 or BRCA2 PVs to pursue rr-hysterectomy. Overall, this review highlights the complexity of EC risk in BRCA1/2 PV carriers and offers a comprehensive framework to shared decision making to inform rr-hysterectomy for BRCA1/2 PV carriers.

Endometrial Cancer and BRCA Mutations: A Systematic Review

This systematic review identifies, evaluates, and summarises the findings of all relevant individual studies on the prevalence of BRCA mutation (BRCAm) in endometrial cancer patients and the incidence of endometrial cancer in BRCAm women patients. Consequently, the benefits and limits of a prophylactic hysterectomy at the time of the risk-reducing salpingo-oophorectomy are analysed and discussed. A systematic literature search was performed in the databases of PubMed, Cochrane, and Web of Science until May 2022; 13 studies met the eligibility criteria. Overall, 1613 endometrial cancer patients from 11 cohorts were tested for BRCA1/2 mutation. BRCA1/2m were identified in 4.3% of women with endometrial cancer (70/1613). BRCA1m was the most represented (71.4%) pathogenic variant. Alongside, a total of 209 BRCAm carriers from 14 studies were diagnosed with endometrial cancer. Only 5 out of 14 studies found a correlation between BRCAm and an increased risk of endometrial cancer. Nevertheless, two studies found a statistical difference only for BRCA1m women. The present systematic review does not provide strong evidence in favour of performing routine hysterectomy at the time of risk-reducing salpingo-oophorectomy; however, it provides epidemiological data that can be useful for counselling patients in order to offer a tailored approach.

Endometrial Cancer in Germline BRCA Mutation Carriers: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis

OBJECTIVE

Risk-reducing salpingo-oophorectomy (RRSO) is standard treatment among women with BRCA mutations. The aim of this meta-analysis is to evaluate the risk of endometrial cancer (EC) in BRCA1 or BRCA2 germline mutation carriers and to examine the justifiability of prophylactic hysterectomy at the time of RRSO.

DATA SOURCES

PubMed, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, BIOSIS, Medline (Ovid), Web of Science, ClinicalTrials.gov, and Google Scholar were searched. Eleven articles were selected and analyzed using the OpenMetaAnalyst 2012 software.

METHODS OF STUDY SELECTION

Randomized controlled studies, cohort studies, and case-control studies evaluating the risk of EC and specifically uterine papillary serous carcinoma (UPSC) in germline BRCA1/2 mutation carriers were included. Articles were excluded if they did not meet the inclusion criteria, or if data were not reported and the authors did not respond to inquiries. We assessed the methodological quality of the included studies on the basis of the Newcastle-Ottawa scale. Dichotomous results from each of the studies eligible for the meta-analysis were expressed as the proportion of patients with EC or UPSC per total number of BRCA mutation carriers, with 95% confidence interval (CI). The Mantel-Haenszel statistical method was used.

TABULATION, INTEGRATION, AND RESULTS

Eleven studies reported the outcome of interest and were included in the final meta-analysis. In total, 13 871 carriers of BRCA1 and BRCA2 mutations were identified. The pooled prevalence rates of EC and UPSC in BRCA1/2 mutation carriers were 82/13 827 (0.59%) and 19/11 582 (0.16%), respectively. The EC prevalence was 46/7429 (0.62%) in BRCA1 mutation carriers and 17/3546 (0.47%) in BRCA2 mutation carriers, with relative risk of 1.18 (95% CI, 0.7-2.0). For UPSC, the prevalence was 15/7429 (0.2%) and 3/3546 (0.08%) among BRCA1 and BRCA2 mutation carriers, respectively, (relative risk 1.39; 95% CI, 0.5-3.7).

CONCLUSION

Most studies in this meta-analysis suggest a slightly increased risk of EC in BRCA mutation carriers, mainly for BRCA1. The decision regarding concurrent hysterectomy should be tailored individually to each patient on the basis of the patient's age, type of mutation, future need for hormone replacement treatment, history of breast cancer, tamoxifen use, and personal operative risks.

Reducing the Risk of Gynecologic Cancer in Hereditary Breast Ovarian Cancer Syndrome Mutation Carriers: Moral Dilemmas and the Principle of Double Effect

Hereditary breast ovarian cancer (HBOC) syndrome is an autosomal dominant disease linked to mutations in the BRCA1 and BRCA2 genes in 90 percent of affected families. Female mutation carriers are highly susceptible to aggressive, often disseminated, usually fatal pelvic-abdominal carcinomatosis. This cancer risk can be markedly reduced by surgical removal of the internal gynecologic organs before the end of the fourth decade of life and by using estrogen-progestin formulations marketed for many years as combined oral contraceptives (COCs). Both risk-reducing methods are associated with unfavorable effects. Relying on the principle of double effect, this essay argues for the ethical justification of prophylactic surgery and the use of COC to reduce the risk of gynecologic cancer in HBOC syndrome mutation carriers. Summary: Hereditary breast ovarian cancer syndrome is an autosomal dominant disease linked to mutations in the BRCA1 and BRCA2 genes in most affected families. Female mutation carriers are highly susceptible to aggressive, often disseminated, usually fatal pelvic-abdominal carcinomatosis. This cancer risk can be markedly reduced by surgical removal of the internal gynecologic organs before the end of the fourth decade of life and by using estrogen-progestin formulations marketed for many years as combined oral contraceptives. Both risk-reducing methods are associated with unfavorable effects. Relying on the principle of double effect, this essay argues for the ethical justification for those unfavorable effects.

Endometrial cancer gene panels: clinical diagnostic vs research germline DNA testing

Endometrial cancer is the most common gynecological cancer, but is nevertheless uncommon enough to have value as a signature cancer for some hereditary cancer syndromes. Commercial multigene testing panels include up to 13 different genes annotated for germline DNA testing of patients with endometrial cancer. Many other genes have been reported as relevant to familial endometrial cancer from directed genome-wide sequencing studies or multigene panel testing, or research. This review assesses the evidence supporting association with endometrial cancer risk for 32 genes implicated in hereditary endometrial cancer, and presents a summary of rare germline variants in these 32 genes detected by analysis of quasi-population-based endometrial cancer patients from The Cancer Genome Atlas project. This comprehensive investigation has led to the conclusion that convincing evidence currently exists to support clinical testing of only six of these genes for diagnosis of hereditary endometrial cancer. Testing of endometrial cancer patients for the remaining genes should be considered in the context of research studies, as a means to better establish the level of endometrial cancer risk, if any, associated with genetic variants that are deleterious to gene or protein function. It is acknowledged that clinical testing of endometrial cancer patients for several genes included on commercial panels may provide actionable findings in relation to risk of other cancers, but these should be considered secondary or incidental findings and not conclusive evidence for diagnosis of inherited endometrial cancer. In summary, this review and analysis provides a comprehensive report of current evidence to guide the selection of genes for clinical and research gene testing of germline DNA from endometrial cancer patients.

Müllerian intra-abdominal carcinomatosis in hereditary breast ovarian cancer syndrome: implications for risk-reducing surgery

More than 40 years ago Lynch et al. described several multigenerational breast cancer family pedigrees which demonstrated autosomal dominant inheritance of a trait(s) that increased risks for both breast and ovarian cancers. Mutation carriers in at least 90 % of these hereditary breast ovarian cancer (HBOC) syndrome families have been linked to cancer-associated mutations in the genes BRCA1 and BRCA2. This review focuses on the contributions of Lynch, colleagues and collaborators and pertinent literature, toward defining the HBOC syndrome, the cancer risks that the inherited adverse mutations convey, the gynecologic tissues and organs from which the malignancy may arise to disseminate throughout the pelvic and abdominal organs and peritoneum and how this information can be used to reduce the risk and morbidities of intra-abdominal carcinomatosis in effected individuals.