1
|
Katsanevakis E, Addo-Yobo W, Bharathan B, Loona A, Gan C, Nunns D, Gajjar K. Is routine gastrointestinal endoscopy required in every woman with mucinous ovarian cancer? An analysis of survival rates and metastatic tumours in a cancer centre. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol 2024; 294:105-110. [PMID: 38237307 DOI: 10.1016/j.ejogrb.2024.01.012] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/02/2023] [Revised: 12/29/2023] [Accepted: 01/10/2024] [Indexed: 02/21/2024]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Mucinous ovarian cancer (MOC) represents a rare entity of ovarian malignant neoplasms. The true incidence could be as low as 3% of all ovarian cancers. The aim of this study is to compare and understand the clinicopathological characteristics of patients with mucinous ovarian cancer, report on the survival rates and evaluate the role of gastrointestinal (GI) endoscopy as part of the peri-operative investigations and the impact it has on the survival rates. METHODOLOGY This is a retrospective data collection on patients with MOC operated in Nottingham gynaecological oncology centre over a 10-year period. Data were analysed using SPSS software. RESULTS 43 cases were included in the final analysis. The median maximal tumour diameter was 180 mm. 32 (74.5 %) and 11 (25.5 %) women presented with unilateral and bilateral tumours respectively. 30 patients (69.7 %) presented with stage 1 disease, 1 (2.3 %) presented with stage 2 disease, 7 women (16.4 %) had stage 3 disease and 1 woman (11.6 %) had stage 4 disease. 41 women had staging surgical procedures and 2 women had limited surgery due to poor performance status. After final histology, 5 cases found to have metastatic disease to the ovary rather than primary MOC. 14 women had GI endoscopy as part of their investigation. The total estimated cost of the endoscopies that have been performed is £5635. Primary GI cancer was diagnosed in 1 case during the endoscopy (1 case of gastric cancer). The 5-year overall survival of the women included in this study is 62.8 %. The 5-year overall survival of the women in the endoscopy and non-endoscopy groups was 60 % and 64.3 % respectively (p-value: 0.767). CONCLUSION The findings of this study show that the survival rates of patients treated for mucinous ovarian cancer in our centre are similar to other published studies. Our findings do not support the routine use of GI endoscopy in the peri-operative investigations of every patient with MOC due to the non-statistically significant difference in the overall survival.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- E Katsanevakis
- Department of Gynaecological Oncology, Nottingham University Hospitals NHS Trust, Nottingham, UK.
| | - W Addo-Yobo
- Department of Gynaecological Oncology, Nottingham University Hospitals NHS Trust, Nottingham, UK
| | - B Bharathan
- Department of Colorectal Surgery, Nottingham University Hospitals NHS Trust, Nottingham, UK
| | - A Loona
- Department of Pathology, Nottingham University Hospitals NHS Trust, Nottingham, UK
| | - C Gan
- Department of Gynaecological Oncology, Nottingham University Hospitals NHS Trust, Nottingham, UK
| | - D Nunns
- Department of Gynaecological Oncology, Nottingham University Hospitals NHS Trust, Nottingham, UK
| | - K Gajjar
- Department of Gynaecological Oncology, Nottingham University Hospitals NHS Trust, Nottingham, UK
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Dolivet E, Gaichies L, Jeanne C, Bazille C, Briand M, Vernon M, Giffard F, Leprêtre F, Poulain L, Denoyelle C, Vigneron N, Fauvet R. Synergy of the microRNA Ratio as a Promising Diagnosis Biomarker for Mucinous Borderline and Malignant Ovarian Tumors. Int J Mol Sci 2023; 24:16016. [PMID: 37958997 PMCID: PMC10649586 DOI: 10.3390/ijms242116016] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/31/2023] [Revised: 10/27/2023] [Accepted: 10/31/2023] [Indexed: 11/15/2023] Open
Abstract
Epithelial ovarian cancers (EOCs) are a heterogeneous collection of malignancies, each with their own developmental origin, clinical behavior and molecular profile. With less than 5% of EOC cases, mucinous ovarian carcinoma is a rare form with a poor prognosis and a 5-year survival of 11% for advanced stages (III/IV). At the early stages, these malignant forms are clinically difficult to distinguish from borderline (15%) and benign (80%) forms with a better prognosis due to the large size and heterogeneity of mucinous tumors. Improving their diagnosis is therefore a challenge with regard to the risk of under-treating a malignant form or of unnecessarily undertaking radical surgical excision. The involvement of microRNAs (miRNAs) in tumor progression and their potential as biomarkers of diagnosis are becoming increasingly recognized. In this study, the comparison of miRNA microarray expression profiles between malignant and borderline tumor FFPE samples identified 10 down-regulated and 5 up-regulated malignant miRNAs, which were validated by individual RT-qPCR. To overcome normalization issues and to improve the accuracy of the results, a ratio analysis combining paired up-regulated and down-regulated miRNAs was performed. Although 21/50 miRNA expression ratios were significantly different between malignant and borderline tumor samples, any ratio could perfectly discriminate the two groups. However, a combination of 14 pairs of miRNA ratios (double ratio) showed high discriminatory potential, with 100% of accuracy in distinguishing malignant and borderline ovarian tumors, which suggests that miRNAs may hold significant clinical potential as a diagnostic tool. In summary, these ratio miRNA-based signatures may help to improve the precision of histological diagnosis, likely to provide a preoperative diagnosis in order to adapt surgical procedures.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Enora Dolivet
- ANTICIPE UMR (1086) (Interdisciplinary Research Unit for Cancers Prevention and Treatment), BioTICLA Laboratory (Precision Medicine in Ovarian Carcinoma), Federative Structure 4207 Normandie Oncologie, Université de Caen Normandie, Inserm, F-14000 Caen, France; (L.G.); (M.B.); (M.V.); (F.G.); (L.P.); (C.D.); (N.V.); (R.F.)
- Unicancer, Comprehensive Cancer Center F. Baclesse, 3 Avenue Général Harris, F-14000 Caen, France;
| | - Léopold Gaichies
- ANTICIPE UMR (1086) (Interdisciplinary Research Unit for Cancers Prevention and Treatment), BioTICLA Laboratory (Precision Medicine in Ovarian Carcinoma), Federative Structure 4207 Normandie Oncologie, Université de Caen Normandie, Inserm, F-14000 Caen, France; (L.G.); (M.B.); (M.V.); (F.G.); (L.P.); (C.D.); (N.V.); (R.F.)
- Unicancer, Comprehensive Cancer Center F. Baclesse, 3 Avenue Général Harris, F-14000 Caen, France;
| | - Corinne Jeanne
- Unicancer, Comprehensive Cancer Center F. Baclesse, 3 Avenue Général Harris, F-14000 Caen, France;
| | - Céline Bazille
- Department of Pathology, Caen University Hospital, F-14000 Caen, France;
| | - Mélanie Briand
- ANTICIPE UMR (1086) (Interdisciplinary Research Unit for Cancers Prevention and Treatment), BioTICLA Laboratory (Precision Medicine in Ovarian Carcinoma), Federative Structure 4207 Normandie Oncologie, Université de Caen Normandie, Inserm, F-14000 Caen, France; (L.G.); (M.B.); (M.V.); (F.G.); (L.P.); (C.D.); (N.V.); (R.F.)
- Unicancer, Comprehensive Cancer Center F. Baclesse, 3 Avenue Général Harris, F-14000 Caen, France;
- Unicancer, Comprehensive Cancer Center F. Baclesse, Biological Ressources Centre OvaRessouces, F-14000 Caen, France
| | - Mégane Vernon
- ANTICIPE UMR (1086) (Interdisciplinary Research Unit for Cancers Prevention and Treatment), BioTICLA Laboratory (Precision Medicine in Ovarian Carcinoma), Federative Structure 4207 Normandie Oncologie, Université de Caen Normandie, Inserm, F-14000 Caen, France; (L.G.); (M.B.); (M.V.); (F.G.); (L.P.); (C.D.); (N.V.); (R.F.)
- Unicancer, Comprehensive Cancer Center F. Baclesse, 3 Avenue Général Harris, F-14000 Caen, France;
| | - Florence Giffard
- ANTICIPE UMR (1086) (Interdisciplinary Research Unit for Cancers Prevention and Treatment), BioTICLA Laboratory (Precision Medicine in Ovarian Carcinoma), Federative Structure 4207 Normandie Oncologie, Université de Caen Normandie, Inserm, F-14000 Caen, France; (L.G.); (M.B.); (M.V.); (F.G.); (L.P.); (C.D.); (N.V.); (R.F.)
- Unicancer, Comprehensive Cancer Center F. Baclesse, 3 Avenue Général Harris, F-14000 Caen, France;
- Services Unit PLATON, Virtual’his Core Facility, Université de Caen Normandie, F-14000 Caen, France
| | - Frédéric Leprêtre
- CNRS, Inserm, CHU Lille, Institut Pasteur de Lille, US 41—UAR 2014—PLBS, University of Lille, F-59000 Lille, France;
| | - Laurent Poulain
- ANTICIPE UMR (1086) (Interdisciplinary Research Unit for Cancers Prevention and Treatment), BioTICLA Laboratory (Precision Medicine in Ovarian Carcinoma), Federative Structure 4207 Normandie Oncologie, Université de Caen Normandie, Inserm, F-14000 Caen, France; (L.G.); (M.B.); (M.V.); (F.G.); (L.P.); (C.D.); (N.V.); (R.F.)
- Unicancer, Comprehensive Cancer Center F. Baclesse, 3 Avenue Général Harris, F-14000 Caen, France;
- Unicancer, Comprehensive Cancer Center F. Baclesse, Biological Ressources Centre OvaRessouces, F-14000 Caen, France
| | - Christophe Denoyelle
- ANTICIPE UMR (1086) (Interdisciplinary Research Unit for Cancers Prevention and Treatment), BioTICLA Laboratory (Precision Medicine in Ovarian Carcinoma), Federative Structure 4207 Normandie Oncologie, Université de Caen Normandie, Inserm, F-14000 Caen, France; (L.G.); (M.B.); (M.V.); (F.G.); (L.P.); (C.D.); (N.V.); (R.F.)
- Unicancer, Comprehensive Cancer Center F. Baclesse, 3 Avenue Général Harris, F-14000 Caen, France;
| | - Nicolas Vigneron
- ANTICIPE UMR (1086) (Interdisciplinary Research Unit for Cancers Prevention and Treatment), BioTICLA Laboratory (Precision Medicine in Ovarian Carcinoma), Federative Structure 4207 Normandie Oncologie, Université de Caen Normandie, Inserm, F-14000 Caen, France; (L.G.); (M.B.); (M.V.); (F.G.); (L.P.); (C.D.); (N.V.); (R.F.)
- Unicancer, Comprehensive Cancer Center F. Baclesse, 3 Avenue Général Harris, F-14000 Caen, France;
- Unicancer, Comprehensive Cancer Center F. Baclesse, Calvados General Tumor Registry, F-14000 Caen, France
| | - Raffaèle Fauvet
- ANTICIPE UMR (1086) (Interdisciplinary Research Unit for Cancers Prevention and Treatment), BioTICLA Laboratory (Precision Medicine in Ovarian Carcinoma), Federative Structure 4207 Normandie Oncologie, Université de Caen Normandie, Inserm, F-14000 Caen, France; (L.G.); (M.B.); (M.V.); (F.G.); (L.P.); (C.D.); (N.V.); (R.F.)
- Department of Obstetrics and Reproductive Medicine, Université de Caen Normandie, F-14000 Caen, France
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Wang T, Fu X, Zhang L, Liu S, Tao Z, Wang F. Prognostic Factors and a Predictive Nomogram of Cancer-Specific Survival of Epithelial Ovarian Cancer Patients with Pelvic Exenteration Treatment. Int J Clin Pract 2023; 2023:9219067. [PMID: 37637510 PMCID: PMC10449593 DOI: 10.1155/2023/9219067] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/10/2023] [Revised: 06/16/2023] [Accepted: 08/03/2023] [Indexed: 08/29/2023] Open
Abstract
Objective The aim of this study was to explore prognostic factors, develop and internally validate a prognostic nomogram model, and predict the cancer-specific survival (CCS) of epithelial ovarian cancer (EOC) patients with pelvic exenteration (PE) treatment. Methods A total of 454 EOC patients from the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) database were collected according to the inclusion criteria and randomly divided into the training (n = 317) and validation (n = 137) cohorts. Prognostic factors of EOC patients with PE treatment were explored by univariate and multivariate stepwise Cox regression analyses. A predictive nomogram was constructed based on selected risk factors. The predictive power of the constructed nomogram was assessed by the time-dependent receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve. Kaplan-Meier (KM) curve stratified by patients' nomoscore was also plotted to assess the risk stratification of the established nomogram. In internal validation, the C index, calibration curve, and decision curve analysis (DCA) were employed to assess the discrimination, calibration, and clinical utility of the models, respectively. Results In the training cohort, age, histological type, Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics (FIGO) stage, number of examined lymph nodes, and number of positive lymph nodes were found to be independent prognostic factors of postoperative CSS. A practical nomogram model of EOC patients with PE treatment was constructed based on these selected risk factors. Time-dependent ROC curves and KM curves showed the superior predictive capability and excellent clinical stratification of the nomogram in both training and validation cohorts. In the internal validation, the C index, calibration plots, and DCA in the training and validation cohorts confirmed that the nomogram presents a high level of prediction accuracy and clinical applicability. Conclusion Our nomogram exhibited satisfactory survival prediction and prognostic discrimination. It is a user-friendly tool with high clinical pragmatism for estimating prognosis and guiding the long-term management of EOC patients with PE treatment.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ting Wang
- Department of Laboratory Medicine, The First Affiliated Hospital of Nanjing Medical University, Nanjing 210029, China
- Branch of National Clinical Research Center for Laboratory Medicine, Nanjing 210029, China
- Jiangsu Provincial Medical Key Discipline, Nanjing 210029, China
| | - Xin Fu
- Clinical Laboratory, Baoshan People's Hospital, Baoshan, Yunnan 678000, China
| | - Lei Zhang
- Department of Laboratory Medicine, The First Affiliated Hospital of Nanjing Medical University, Nanjing 210029, China
- Department of Gynecology, The Affiliated Huaian No. 1 People's Hospital of Nanjing Medical University, Huaian 223300, China
| | - Shuna Liu
- Department of Laboratory Medicine, The First Affiliated Hospital of Nanjing Medical University, Nanjing 210029, China
- Branch of National Clinical Research Center for Laboratory Medicine, Nanjing 210029, China
- Jiangsu Provincial Medical Key Discipline, Nanjing 210029, China
| | - Ziqi Tao
- Department of Laboratory Medicine, The First Affiliated Hospital of Nanjing Medical University, Nanjing 210029, China
- Branch of National Clinical Research Center for Laboratory Medicine, Nanjing 210029, China
- Jiangsu Provincial Medical Key Discipline, Nanjing 210029, China
| | - Fang Wang
- Department of Laboratory Medicine, The First Affiliated Hospital of Nanjing Medical University, Nanjing 210029, China
- Branch of National Clinical Research Center for Laboratory Medicine, Nanjing 210029, China
- Jiangsu Provincial Medical Key Discipline, Nanjing 210029, China
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Ma G, Zeng S, Zhao Y, Chi J, Wang L, Li Q, Wang J, Yao S, Zhou Q, Chen Y, Jiao X, Liu X, Yu Y, Huo Y, Li M, Peng Z, Ma D, Hu T, Gao Q. Development and validation of a nomogram to predict cancer-specific survival of mucinous epithelial ovarian cancer after cytoreductive surgery. J Ovarian Res 2023; 16:120. [PMID: 37370173 DOI: 10.1186/s13048-023-01213-2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/06/2022] [Accepted: 06/17/2023] [Indexed: 06/29/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Mucinous epithelial ovarian cancer (mEOC) is a relatively uncommon subtype of ovarian cancer with special prognostic features, but there is insufficient research in this area. This study aimed to develop a nomogram for the cancer-specific survival (CSS) of mEOC based on Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) database and externally validate it in National Union of Real World Gynecological Oncology Research and Patient Management (NUWA) platform from China. METHODS Patients screened from SEER database were allocated into training and internal validation cohort in a ratio of 7: 3, with those from NUWA platform as an external validation cohort. Significant factors selected by Cox proportional hazard regression were applied to establish a nomogram for 3-year and 5-year CSS. The performance of nomogram was assessed by concordance index, calibration curves and Kaplan-Meier (K-M) curves. RESULTS The training cohort (n = 572) and internal validation cohort (n = 246) were filtered out from SEER database. The external validation cohort contained 186 patients. Baseline age, tumor stage, histopathological grade, lymph node metastasis and residual disease after primary surgery were significant risk factors (p < 0.05) and were included to develop the nomogram. The C-index of nomogram in training, internal validation and external validation cohort were 0.869 (95% confidence interval [CI], 0.838-0.900), 0.839 (95% CI, 0.787-0.891) and 0.800 (95% CI, 0.738-0.862), respectively. The calibration curves of 3-year and 5-year CSS in each cohort showed favorable agreement between prediction and observation. K-M curves of different risk groups displayed great discrimination. CONCLUSION The discrimination and goodness of fit of the nomogram indicated its satisfactory predictive value for the CSS of mEOC in SEER database and external validation in China, which implies its potential application in different populations.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Guanchen Ma
- Department of Gynecological Oncology, Tongji Hospital, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, 1095 Jiefang Ave, Wuhan, 430000, China
- National Clinical Research Center for Obstetrics and Gynecology, Cancer Biology Research Center (Key Laboratory of the Ministry of Education), Tongji Hospital, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, China
| | - Shaoqing Zeng
- Department of Gynecological Oncology, Tongji Hospital, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, 1095 Jiefang Ave, Wuhan, 430000, China
- National Clinical Research Center for Obstetrics and Gynecology, Cancer Biology Research Center (Key Laboratory of the Ministry of Education), Tongji Hospital, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, China
| | - Yingjun Zhao
- Department of Gynecological Oncology, Tongji Hospital, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, 1095 Jiefang Ave, Wuhan, 430000, China
- National Clinical Research Center for Obstetrics and Gynecology, Cancer Biology Research Center (Key Laboratory of the Ministry of Education), Tongji Hospital, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, China
| | - Jianhua Chi
- Department of Gynecological Oncology, Tongji Hospital, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, 1095 Jiefang Ave, Wuhan, 430000, China
- National Clinical Research Center for Obstetrics and Gynecology, Cancer Biology Research Center (Key Laboratory of the Ministry of Education), Tongji Hospital, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, China
| | - Li Wang
- Department of Gynecology, Cancer Hospital of Zhengzhou University (Henan Tumor Hospital), Zhengzhou, China
| | - Qingshui Li
- Department of Gynecologic Oncology, Shandong Cancer Hospital & Institute, Shandong, China
| | - Jing Wang
- Department of Gynecological Oncology, Affiliated Tumor Hospital of Xiangya School of Medicine, Central South University, Changsha, China
| | - Shuzhong Yao
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, The First Affiliated Hospital, Sun Yat-sen University, No. 58, the 2nd Zhongshan Road, Yuexiu District, Guangzhou, 510080, China
| | - Qi Zhou
- Department of Gynecologic Oncology, Chongqing Cancer Hospital, Chongqing, 400030, China
| | - Youguo Chen
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Soochow University, Suzhou, 215123, China
| | - Xiaofei Jiao
- Department of Gynecological Oncology, Tongji Hospital, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, 1095 Jiefang Ave, Wuhan, 430000, China
- National Clinical Research Center for Obstetrics and Gynecology, Cancer Biology Research Center (Key Laboratory of the Ministry of Education), Tongji Hospital, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, China
| | - Xingyu Liu
- Department of Gynecological Oncology, Tongji Hospital, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, 1095 Jiefang Ave, Wuhan, 430000, China
- National Clinical Research Center for Obstetrics and Gynecology, Cancer Biology Research Center (Key Laboratory of the Ministry of Education), Tongji Hospital, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, China
| | - Yang Yu
- Department of Gynecological Oncology, Tongji Hospital, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, 1095 Jiefang Ave, Wuhan, 430000, China
- National Clinical Research Center for Obstetrics and Gynecology, Cancer Biology Research Center (Key Laboratory of the Ministry of Education), Tongji Hospital, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, China
| | - Yabing Huo
- Department of Gynecological Oncology, Tongji Hospital, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, 1095 Jiefang Ave, Wuhan, 430000, China
- National Clinical Research Center for Obstetrics and Gynecology, Cancer Biology Research Center (Key Laboratory of the Ministry of Education), Tongji Hospital, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, China
| | - Ming Li
- Department of Gynecological Oncology, Tongji Hospital, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, 1095 Jiefang Ave, Wuhan, 430000, China
- National Clinical Research Center for Obstetrics and Gynecology, Cancer Biology Research Center (Key Laboratory of the Ministry of Education), Tongji Hospital, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, China
| | - Zikun Peng
- Department of Gynecological Oncology, Tongji Hospital, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, 1095 Jiefang Ave, Wuhan, 430000, China
- National Clinical Research Center for Obstetrics and Gynecology, Cancer Biology Research Center (Key Laboratory of the Ministry of Education), Tongji Hospital, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, China
| | - Ding Ma
- Department of Gynecological Oncology, Tongji Hospital, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, 1095 Jiefang Ave, Wuhan, 430000, China
- National Clinical Research Center for Obstetrics and Gynecology, Cancer Biology Research Center (Key Laboratory of the Ministry of Education), Tongji Hospital, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, China
| | - Ting Hu
- Department of Gynecological Oncology, Tongji Hospital, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, 1095 Jiefang Ave, Wuhan, 430000, China.
- National Clinical Research Center for Obstetrics and Gynecology, Cancer Biology Research Center (Key Laboratory of the Ministry of Education), Tongji Hospital, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, China.
| | - Qinglei Gao
- Department of Gynecological Oncology, Tongji Hospital, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, 1095 Jiefang Ave, Wuhan, 430000, China.
- National Clinical Research Center for Obstetrics and Gynecology, Cancer Biology Research Center (Key Laboratory of the Ministry of Education), Tongji Hospital, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, China.
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Wang F, Yang Y, Du X, Zhu X, Hu Y, Lu C, Sui L, Zhao H, Song K, Yao Q. Claudin18.2 as a potential therapeutic target for primary ovarian mucinous carcinomas and metastatic ovarian mucinous carcinomas from upper gastrointestinal primary tumours. BMC Cancer 2023; 23:44. [PMID: 36639622 PMCID: PMC9837907 DOI: 10.1186/s12885-023-10533-x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/12/2022] [Accepted: 01/09/2023] [Indexed: 01/15/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND The vast majority of ovarian mucinous carcinomas are metastatic tumours derived from nonovarian primary cancers, typically gastrointestinal neoplasms. Therapy targeting claudin18.2 might be used in gastric, gastroesophageal junction and pancreatic cancers with high expression of claudin18.2. In this study, we aimed to profile the expression of claudin18.2 in primary ovarian mucinous carcinoma (POMC) and metastatic gastrointestinal mucinous carcinoma (MGMC). METHODS Immunohistochemistry was used to detect claudin 18.2 expression in whole tissue sections of ovarian mucinous carcinomas, including 32 POMCs and 44 MGMCs, 23 of which were derived from upper gastrointestinal primary tumours and 21 of which were derived from lower gastrointestinal primary tumours. Immunohistochemical studies for claudin18.2, SATB2, PAX8, CK7 and CK20 were performed in all 76 cases. RESULTS Among 76 primary and metastatic mucinous carcinomas, claudin18.2 was expressed in 56.6% (43/76) of cases. MGMCs from the upper gastrointestinal tract, including 22 derived from primary stomach tumours and one derived from a pancreas tumour, were positive for claudin 18.2 in 69.5% (16/23) of cases. MGMCs from the lower gastrointestinal tract, including 10 derived from primary appendiceal cancer and 11 derived from colorectal cancers, showed no claudin18.2 expression (0/21). The expression rate of claudin18.2 in primary ovarian mucinous neoplasms, including 22 primary ovarian mucinous carcinomas and 10 primary ovarian borderline mucinous tumours, was 84.4% (27/32). The common immunophenotypic characteristics of POMCs, upper gastrointestinal tract-derived MGMCs, and lower gastrointestinal tract-derived MGMCs were claudin18.2 + /PAX8 + /SATB2- (17/32), claudin18.2 + /PAX8-/SATB2- (16/23) and claudin18.2-/PAX8-/SATB2 + (19/21), respectively. CONCLUSION Claudin18.2 is highly expressed in POMCs and MGMCs derived from upper gastrointestinal tract primary tumours; therefore, claudin18.2-targeted therapy might serve as a potential therapeutic strategy for POMCs and MGMCs from the upper gastrointestinal tract.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Fujun Wang
- grid.412521.10000 0004 1769 1119Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, The Affiliated Hospital of Qingdao University, 16 Jiangsu Road, Qingdao, 266003 Shan Dong China ,Department of Gynecology, Junan County People’s Hospital, Junan, 276600 Shan Dong China
| | - Yao Yang
- grid.415468.a0000 0004 1761 4893Department of Gynecology, Qingdao Municipal Hospital, Qingdao, 266011 Shan Dong China
| | - Xiuzhen Du
- grid.412521.10000 0004 1769 1119Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, The Affiliated Hospital of Qingdao University, 16 Jiangsu Road, Qingdao, 266003 Shan Dong China
| | - Xiaoying Zhu
- grid.412521.10000 0004 1769 1119Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, The Affiliated Hospital of Qingdao University, 16 Jiangsu Road, Qingdao, 266003 Shan Dong China
| | - Yanjiao Hu
- grid.412521.10000 0004 1769 1119Department of Pathology, The Affiliated Hospital of Qingdao University, Qingdao, 266003 Shan Dong China
| | - Changyu Lu
- grid.412521.10000 0004 1769 1119Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, The Affiliated Hospital of Qingdao University, 16 Jiangsu Road, Qingdao, 266003 Shan Dong China
| | - Lei Sui
- grid.412521.10000 0004 1769 1119Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, The Affiliated Hospital of Qingdao University, 16 Jiangsu Road, Qingdao, 266003 Shan Dong China
| | - Han Zhao
- grid.412521.10000 0004 1769 1119Department of Pathology, The Affiliated Hospital of Qingdao University, Qingdao, 266003 Shan Dong China
| | - Kejuan Song
- grid.412521.10000 0004 1769 1119Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, The Affiliated Hospital of Qingdao University, 16 Jiangsu Road, Qingdao, 266003 Shan Dong China
| | - Qin Yao
- grid.412521.10000 0004 1769 1119Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, The Affiliated Hospital of Qingdao University, 16 Jiangsu Road, Qingdao, 266003 Shan Dong China
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Hamdani SAM, Azhar M, Wahab A, Yasmeen T, Siddiqui N. Evaluation of Outcomes of Mucinous Ovarian Cancer Treated at a Tertiary Care Cancer Hospital in Pakistan. South Asian J Cancer 2022; 12:81-86. [PMID: 36860587 PMCID: PMC9970748 DOI: 10.1055/s-0042-1755582] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/15/2022] Open
Abstract
Syed Abdul Mannan HamdaniObjective To evaluate the clinicopathological features and survival outcomes of mucinous ovarian cancer (MOC) patients in an Asian population. Study Design Descriptive observational study. Place and Duration of Study Shaukat Khanum Memorial Cancer Hospital, Lahore, Pakistan, from January 2001 to December 2016. Methods Data of MOC were evaluated for demographics, tumor stage, clinical characteristics, tumor markers, treatment modalities, and outcomes from electronic Hospital Information System. Results Nine-hundred patients with primary ovarian cancer were reviewed, out of which 94 patients (10.4%) had MOC. The median age was 36 ± 12.4 years. The most common presentation was abdominal distension 51 (54.3%), while the rest presented with abdominal pain and irregular menstruation. Using FIGO (The International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics) staging, 72 (76.6%) had stage I, 3 (3.2%) stage II, stage III in 12 (12.8%), and 7 (7.4%) had stage IV disease. The majority of patients 75 (79.8%) had early-stage (stage I/II), while 19 (20.2%) presented with advanced-stage (III & IV). The median follow-up duration was 52 months (range 1-199 months). Among patients with early-stage (I&II), 3- and 5-year progression-free survival (PFS) was 95%, while for advanced stage (III&IV), PFS was 16% and 8%, respectively. The overall survival (OS) in early-stage I&II was 97%, while for advanced stages III & IV, the OS was 26%. Conclusion MOC is a challenging and rare subtype of ovarian cancer requiring special attention and recognition. Most patients treated at our center presented with early stages and had excellent outcomes, while advanced-stage disease had dismal results.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Syed Abdul Mannan Hamdani
- Department of Medical Oncology, Shaukat Khanum Cancer Hospital, Lahore, Pakistan,Address for correspondence Syed Abdul Mannan Hamdani, MBBS, FCPS Department of Medical Oncology, Shaukat Khanum Memorial Cancer Hospital and Research Centre7A, Khayaban-e-Firdousi, Block R3 Block R 3 M.A Johar Town, LahorePunjab
| | - Musa Azhar
- Department of Medical Oncology, Shaukat Khanum Cancer Hospital, Lahore, Pakistan
| | - Abdul Wahab
- Department of Medical Oncology, Shaukat Khanum Cancer Hospital, Lahore, Pakistan
| | - Tahira Yasmeen
- Department of Medical Oncology, Shaukat Khanum Cancer Hospital, Lahore, Pakistan
| | - Neelam Siddiqui
- Department of Medical Oncology, Shaukat Khanum Cancer Hospital, Lahore, Pakistan
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Bullock B, Larkin L, Turker L, Stampler K. Management of the Adnexal Mass: Considerations for the Family Medicine Physician. Front Med (Lausanne) 2022; 9:913549. [PMID: 35865172 PMCID: PMC9294310 DOI: 10.3389/fmed.2022.913549] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/05/2022] [Accepted: 05/19/2022] [Indexed: 01/27/2023] Open
Abstract
Ovarian cancer is the most deadly gynecological cancer, so proper assessment of a pelvic mass is necessary in order to determine which are at high risk for malignancy and should be referred to a gynecologic oncologist. However, in a family medicine setting, evaluation and treatment of these masses can be challenging due to a lack of resources. A number of risk assessment tools are available to family medicine physicians, including imaging techniques, imaging systems, and blood-based biomarker assays each with their respective pros and cons, and varying ability to detect malignancy in pelvic masses. Effective utilization of these assessment tools can inform the care pathway for patients which present with an adnexal mass, such as expectant management for those with a low risk of malignancy, or referral to a gynecologic oncologist for surgery and staging, for those at high risk of malignancy. Triaging patients to the appropriate care pathway improves patient outcomes and satisfaction, and family medicine physicians can play a key role in this decision-making process.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Lisa Larkin
- Lisa Larkin, MD, and Associates, Cincinnati, OH, United States
- Ms. Medicine Healthcare Organization, Cincinnati, OH, United States
- Cincinnati Sexual Health Consortium, Cincinnati, OH, United States
| | | | - Kate Stampler
- Einstein Healthcare Network, Philadelphia, PA, United States
- *Correspondence: Kate Stampler,
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Hada T, Miyamoto M, Ishibashi H, Matsuura H, Kakimoto S, Iwahashi H, Tsuda H, Takano M. Comparison of clinical behavior between mucinous ovarian carcinoma with infiltrative and expansile invasion and high-grade serous ovarian carcinoma: a retrospective analysis. Diagn Pathol 2022; 17:12. [PMID: 35057833 PMCID: PMC8772123 DOI: 10.1186/s13000-022-01195-7] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/09/2021] [Accepted: 01/05/2022] [Indexed: 11/26/2022] Open
Abstract
Background The aim of this study was to evaluate the clinicopathological factors and prognosis of mucinous carcinoma (MC) with infiltrative invasion, MC with expansile invasion, and high-grade serous carcinoma (HGSC). Methods Cases of MC and HGSC between 1984 and 2019 were identified. The clinicopathological factors and prognosis of MC with infiltrative invasion or expansile invasion and HGSC were retrospectively compared. Although our present study included cases in our previous studies, we extended observational period when analysis was performed. Accordingly, our study added increased cases and survival analysis was newly conducted. Results After pathological review, 27 cases of MC with infiltrative invasion, 25 cases of MC with expansile invasion, and 219 cases of HGSC were included. MC had a better prognosis in terms of progression-free survival (PFS, p < 0.01) and overall survival (OS, p < 0.01) than HGSC for all International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics (FIGO) stages; however, multivariate analysis did not show statistical differences in PFS and OS. There were no statistically significant differences in PFS and OS for all FIGO stages between MC with infiltrative invasion and HGSC. However, in cases with FIGO stages II to IV, MC with infiltrative invasion had worse PFS (p < 0.01) and OS (p < 0.01) than HGSC. In univariate analysis, MC with infiltrative invasion was a worse prognostic factor for PFS (hazard ratio [HR] 2.83, p < 0.01) and OS (HR 3.83, p < 0.01) than HGSC. Compared with HGSC, MC with expansile invasion had better PFS (p < 0.01) and OS (p < 0.01). Multivariate analysis demonstrated that MC with expansile invasion was a better prognostic factor for PFS (HR 0.17, p < 0.01) and OS (HR 0.18, p = 0.03) than HGSC. Conclusions Compared to the prognosis of HGSC, that of MC was different according to the invasive pattern and FIGO stage. Therefore, future study may be needed to consider this association.
Collapse
|
9
|
Ahn T, Kim K, Kim H, Kim S, Park S, Lee K. A transcriptome-Based Deep Neural Network Classifier for Identifying the Site of Origin in Mucinous Cancer. Cancer Inform 2022; 21:11769351221135141. [DOI: 10.1177/11769351221135141] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/23/2022] [Accepted: 09/30/2022] [Indexed: 11/16/2022] Open
Abstract
Purpose: There is a lack of tools for identifying the site of origin in mucinous cancer. This study aimed to evaluate the performance of a transcriptome-based classifier for identifying the site of origin in mucinous cancer. Materials And Methods: Transcriptomic data of 1878 non-mucinous and 82 mucinous cancer specimens, with 7 sites of origin, namely, the uterine cervix (CESC), colon (COAD), pancreas (PAAD), stomach (STAD), uterine endometrium (UCEC), uterine carcinosarcoma (UCS), and ovary (OV), obtained from The Cancer Genome Atlas, were used as the training and validation sets, respectively. Transcriptomic data of 14 mucinous cancer specimens from a tissue archive were used as the test set. For identifying the site of origin, a set of 100 differentially expressed genes for each site of origin was selected. After removing multiple iterations of the same gene, 427 genes were chosen, and their RNA expression profiles, at each site of origin, were used to train the deep neural network classifier. The performance of the classifier was estimated using the training, validation, and test sets. Results: The accuracy of the model in the training set was 0.998, while that in the validation set was 0.939 (77/82). In the test set which is newly sequenced from a tissue archive, the model showed an accuracy of 0.857 (12/14). t-SNE analysis revealed that samples in the test set were part of the clusters obtained for the training set. Conclusion: Although limited by small sample size, we showed that a transcriptome-based classifier could correctly identify the site of origin of mucinous cancer.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Taejin Ahn
- Department of Life Science, Handong Global University, Pohang, Republic of Korea
| | - Kidong Kim
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Seoul National University Bundang Hospital, Seongnam, Republic of Korea
| | - Hyojin Kim
- Department of Pathology, Seoul National University Bundang Hospital, Seongnam, Republic of Korea
| | - Sarah Kim
- Department of Life Science, Handong Global University, Pohang, Republic of Korea
| | - Sangick Park
- Department of Life Science, Handong Global University, Pohang, Republic of Korea
| | - Kyoungbun Lee
- Department of Pathology, Seoul National University Hospital, Seoul, Republic of Korea
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Wang Q, Niu XY, Feng H, Wu J, Gao W, Zhang ZX, Zou YW, Zhang BY, Wang HJ. Gastrointestinal-type chemotherapy prolongs survival in an atypical primary ovarian mucinous carcinoma: A case report. World J Clin Cases 2021; 9:2533-2541. [PMID: 33889618 PMCID: PMC8040163 DOI: 10.12998/wjcc.v9.i11.2533] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/14/2020] [Revised: 12/16/2020] [Accepted: 02/11/2021] [Indexed: 02/06/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Primary ovarian mucinous carcinoma is a rare histologic subtype of epithelial ovarian carcinoma and exhibits considerable morphologic overlap with secondary tumour. It is hard to differentiate primary from metastatic ovarian mucinous carcinoma by morphological and immunohistochemical features. Because of the histologic similarity between primary ovarian mucinous carcinoma and metastatic gastrointestinal carcinoma, it has been hypothesized that ovarian mucinous carcinomas might respond better to non-gynecologic regimens. However, the standard treatment of advanced ovarian mucinous carcinoma has not reached a consensus.
CASE SUMMARY A 56-year-old postmenopausal woman presented with repeated pain attacks in the right lower quadrant abdomen, accompanied by diarrhoea, anorexia, and weight loss for about 3 mo. The patient initially misdiagnosed as having gastrointestinal carcinoma because of similar pathological features. Based on the physical examination, tumour markers, imaging tests, and genetic tests, the patient was clinically diagnosed with ovary mucinous adenocarcinoma. Whether gastrointestinal-type chemotherapy or gynecologic chemotherapy was a favourable choice for patients with advanced ovarian mucinous cancer had not been determined. The patient received a chemotherapy regimen based on the histologic characteristics rather than the tumour origin. The patient received nine cycles of FOLFOX and bevacizumab. This was followed by seven cycles of bevacizumab maintenance therapy for 9 mo. Satisfactory therapeutic efficacy was achieved.
CONCLUSION The genetic analysis might be used in the differential diagnosis of primary ovarian mucinous carcinoma and non-gynecologic mucinous carcinoma. Moreover, primary ovarian mucinous carcinoma patients could benefit from gastrointestinal-type chemotherapy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Qi Wang
- Department of Radiation Oncology, The Affiliated Hospital of Qingdao University, Qingdao 266000, Shandong Province, China
| | - Xiao-Yan Niu
- Department of Ultrasound, The Affiliated Hospital of Qingdao University, Qingdao 266000, Shandong Province, China
| | - Hui Feng
- Department of Radiation Oncology, The Affiliated Hospital of Qingdao University, Qingdao 266000, Shandong Province, China
| | - Jie Wu
- Department of Pathology, The Affiliated Hospital of Qingdao University, Qingdao 266000, Shandong Province, China
| | - Wen Gao
- Department of Radiation Oncology, The Affiliated Hospital of Qingdao University, Qingdao 266000, Shandong Province, China
| | - Zai-Xian Zhang
- Department of Radiology, The Affiliated Hospital of Qingdao University, Qingdao 266000, Shandong Province, China
| | - Yu-Wei Zou
- Department of Pathology, The Affiliated Hospital of Qingdao University, Qingdao 266000, Shandong Province, China
| | - Bi-Yuan Zhang
- Department of Radiation Oncology, The Affiliated Hospital of Qingdao University, Qingdao 266000, Shandong Province, China
| | - Hai-Ji Wang
- Department of Radiation Oncology, The Affiliated Hospital of Qingdao University, Qingdao 266000, Shandong Province, China
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Hada T, Miyamoto M, Ishibashi H, Matsuura H, Sakamoto T, Kakimoto S, Iwahashi H, Tsuda H, Takano M. Survival and biomarker analysis for ovarian mucinous carcinoma according to invasive patterns: retrospective analysis and review literature. J Ovarian Res 2021; 14:33. [PMID: 33583413 PMCID: PMC7883414 DOI: 10.1186/s13048-021-00783-3] [Citation(s) in RCA: 14] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/08/2020] [Accepted: 02/08/2021] [Indexed: 01/19/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND In ovarian mucinous carcinoma, invasive pattern is the important factor but there were less reposts to investigate it. The aim of this study was to examine the association between prognosis and invasive patterns of ovarian mucinous carcinoma and to investigate the biomarkers of the diagnosis and prognosis immunochemically. Patients with ovarian mucinous carcinoma at our institution between 1984 and 2018 were identified. A pathological review was conducted using the 2020 World Health Organization criteria. The prognosis of infiltrative invasion and expansile invasion of ovarian mucinous carcinoma were retrospectively compared. In addition, immunohistochemical staining was conducted for all cases, and the immunohistochemical differences between the two invasive patterns were compared. RESULTS After the pathological review, 25 cases with infiltrative invasion and 24 cases with expansile invasion were included. Ovarian mucinous carcinoma with infiltrative invasion showed significantly worse progression-free survival (PFS, p < 0.01) and overall survival (OS, p < 0.01) than those with expansile invasion. Multivariate analysis demonstrated that the pattern of infiltrative invasion was a worse prognostic factor for PFS (hazard ratio 9.01, p < 0.01) and OS (hazard ratio 17.56, p < 0.01). Immunohistochemically, cytokeratin (CK) 5/6 (p = 0.01), cluster of differentiation (CD) 24 (p = 0.02), and epithelial growth factor receptor (EGFR) (p < 0.01) were statistically related to infiltrative invasion. The PFS (p = 0.04) and OS (p = 0.02) of cases with EGFR-positive OMC were worse than those with negative OMC. CONCLUSIONS Infiltrative invasion was observed to be a prognostic factor showing worse outcomes for ovarian mucinous carcinoma compared to expansile infiltration. CK5/6, CD24, and EGFR might be biomarkers of the diagnosis.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Taira Hada
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, National Defense Medical College Hospital, 3-2, Namiki, Saitama, 359-8513, Tokorozawa, Japan
| | - Morikazu Miyamoto
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, National Defense Medical College Hospital, 3-2, Namiki, Saitama, 359-8513, Tokorozawa, Japan.
| | - Hiroki Ishibashi
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, National Defense Medical College Hospital, 3-2, Namiki, Saitama, 359-8513, Tokorozawa, Japan
| | - Hiroko Matsuura
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, National Defense Medical College Hospital, 3-2, Namiki, Saitama, 359-8513, Tokorozawa, Japan
| | - Takahiro Sakamoto
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, National Defense Medical College Hospital, 3-2, Namiki, Saitama, 359-8513, Tokorozawa, Japan
| | - Soichiro Kakimoto
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, National Defense Medical College Hospital, 3-2, Namiki, Saitama, 359-8513, Tokorozawa, Japan
| | - Hideki Iwahashi
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, National Defense Medical College Hospital, 3-2, Namiki, Saitama, 359-8513, Tokorozawa, Japan
| | - Hitoshi Tsuda
- Department of Pathology, National Defense Medical College Hospital, 359-8513, Tokorozawa, Saitama, Japan
| | - Masashi Takano
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, National Defense Medical College Hospital, 3-2, Namiki, Saitama, 359-8513, Tokorozawa, Japan
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Nasioudis D, Albright BB, Ko EM, Haggerty AF, Giuntoli RL, Burger RA, Morgan MA, Latif NA. Advanced stage primary mucinous ovarian carcinoma. Where do we stand ? Arch Gynecol Obstet 2020; 301:1047-1054. [PMID: 32185553 DOI: 10.1007/s00404-020-05489-3] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/21/2019] [Accepted: 02/28/2020] [Indexed: 11/27/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To evaluate factors associated with survival of patients with advanced stage mucinous ovarian carcinoma (MOC) using a large multi-institutional database. METHODS Patients diagnosed between 2004 and 2014 with advanced stage (III-IV) MOC were identified within the National Cancer Database. Those without a personal history of another primary tumor who received cancer-directed surgery with a curative intent were selected for further analysis. Overall survival (OS) was evaluated with Kaplan-Meier curves, and compared with the log-rank test. Multivariate Cox analysis was performed to identify independent predictors of survival. RESULTS A total of 1509 patients with a median age of 59 years (IQR 20) met the inclusion criteria: stage III (n = 1045, 69.3%) and stage IV disease (n = 464, 30.7%). Patients who received chemotherapy (n = 1065, 70.6%) had better OS compared to those who did not (n = 385, 25.5%), (median OS 15.44 vs 5.06 months, p < 0.001). The type of reporting facility (p = 0.65) and the year of diagnosis (p = 0.27) were not associated with OS. Presence of residual disease was strongly associated with OS (p < 0.001). After controlling for confounders, the administration of chemotherapy (HR 0.63, 95% CI 0.55, 0.72) was associated with better survival. CONCLUSION Advanced stage MOC has an extremely poor prognosis. Patients who received chemotherapy had a small improvement in survival. Every effort to achieve complete gross resection should be performed. Given no improvement in survival outcomes over time, there is an eminent need for novel treatment options.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Dimitrios Nasioudis
- Division of Gynecologic Oncology, University of Pennsylvania Health System, Philadelphia, PA, USA.
- Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Hospital of the University of Pennsylvania, 3400 Spruce Street, 1 West Gates, Philadelphia, PA, 19104, USA.
| | - Benjamin B Albright
- Division of Gynecologic Oncology, University of Pennsylvania Health System, Philadelphia, PA, USA
| | - Emily M Ko
- Division of Gynecologic Oncology, University of Pennsylvania Health System, Philadelphia, PA, USA
| | - Ashley F Haggerty
- Division of Gynecologic Oncology, University of Pennsylvania Health System, Philadelphia, PA, USA
| | - Robert L Giuntoli
- Division of Gynecologic Oncology, University of Pennsylvania Health System, Philadelphia, PA, USA
| | - Robert A Burger
- Division of Gynecologic Oncology, University of Pennsylvania Health System, Philadelphia, PA, USA
| | - Mark A Morgan
- Division of Gynecologic Oncology, University of Pennsylvania Health System, Philadelphia, PA, USA
| | - Nawar A Latif
- Division of Gynecologic Oncology, University of Pennsylvania Health System, Philadelphia, PA, USA
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
Cui Y, Shen G, Zhou D, Wu F. CASC11 Overexpression Predicts Poor Prognosis and Regulates Cell Proliferation and Apoptosis in Ovarian Carcinoma. Cancer Manag Res 2020; 12:523-529. [PMID: 32158258 PMCID: PMC6985985 DOI: 10.2147/cmar.s226801] [Citation(s) in RCA: 11] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/11/2019] [Accepted: 11/28/2019] [Indexed: 01/01/2023] Open
Abstract
Introduction It is known that CASC11 can promote colorectal cancer. However, the function of CASC11 in ovarian carcinoma (OC) remains elusive. Methods In this study, we measured the expression levels of CASC11 and miR-182 in both OC and healthy control samples by performing qPCR. The interaction between CASC11 and miR-182 was analyzed by the overexpression experiment and qPCR. Cell apoptosis was analyzed by cell apoptosis assay, and the prognostic value of CASC11 for OC was analyzed by survival curve analysis. Results We found that CASC11 and microRNA-182 (miRNA-182) were upregulated in OC. Plasma CASC11 was upregulated in OC patients and predicted early-stage OC. Follow-up study revealed that high plasma levels of CASC11 were closely correlated with poor survival conditions of OC patients. CASC11 and miRNA-182 were positively correlated in OC. Overexpression of CASC11 mediated the upregulation of miRNA-182 in cells of OC cell lines, while miRNA-182 overexpression did not significantly affect CASC11 expression. Overexpression of CASC11 and miRNA-182 promoted cancer cell proliferation and inhibited cancer cell apoptosis. Conclusion Therefore, CASC11 overexpression predicts poor prognosis and CASC11 regulates cell proliferation and apoptosis as well as microRNA-182 expression in ovarian carcinoma.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ying Cui
- Department of Gynecology, Beijing Hospital, National Center of Gerontology, Institute of Geriatric Medicine, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences, Beijing City 100730, People's Republic of China
| | - Guihua Shen
- Department of Gynecology, Beijing Hospital, National Center of Gerontology, Institute of Geriatric Medicine, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences, Beijing City 100730, People's Republic of China
| | - Dan Zhou
- Department of Gynecology, Beijing Hospital, National Center of Gerontology, Institute of Geriatric Medicine, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences, Beijing City 100730, People's Republic of China
| | - Fengli Wu
- Department of Gynecology, Beijing Hospital, National Center of Gerontology, Institute of Geriatric Medicine, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences, Beijing City 100730, People's Republic of China
| |
Collapse
|
14
|
Kurnit KC, Sinno AK, Fellman BM, Varghese A, Stone R, Sood AK, Gershenson DM, Schmeler KM, Malpica A, Fader AN, Frumovitz M. Effects of Gastrointestinal-Type Chemotherapy in Women With Ovarian Mucinous Carcinoma. Obstet Gynecol 2019; 134:1253-1259. [PMID: 31764736 PMCID: PMC7100606 DOI: 10.1097/aog.0000000000003579] [Citation(s) in RCA: 12] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/16/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To estimate whether gastrointestinal-type chemotherapy was associated with improved survival compared with standard gynecologic regimens for women with ovarian mucinous carcinoma. METHODS We conducted a retrospective cohort study of patients with ovarian mucinous carcinoma who received postoperative adjuvant chemotherapy at two academic centers. Demographic and clinical information was abstracted from the medical records. Gastrointestinal-type chemotherapy contained 5-fluorouracil, capecitabine, irinotecan, or oxaliplatin. Gynecologic regimens included standard carboplatin or cisplatin. Bevacizumab treatment was allowed in both groups. Summary statistics were used to compare baseline characteristics; Kaplan-Meier product-limit estimator was used to compare survival outcomes. RESULTS Fifty-two patients received either gastrointestinal-type chemotherapy (n=26; 50%) or a standard gynecologic regimen (n=26; 50%). Three-quarters of tumors were early-stage (I or II), 68% grade 1 or 2 and 88% of patients had no gross residual disease after surgery. Patients receiving gastrointestinal-type chemotherapy were more likely to receive bevacizumab (50% vs 4%; P<.001), but there were no other differences in clinical or demographic characteristics. Unadjusted overall survival analyses showed that gastrointestinal-type chemotherapy was associated with better overall survival (hazard ratio 0.2, 95% CI 0.1-0.8), as were early stage tumors and having no gross residual disease. CONCLUSION Gastrointestinal-type chemotherapy with or without bevacizumab was associated with improved survival and should be considered in patients with ovarian mucinous carcinoma requiring adjuvant therapy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Katherine C. Kurnit
- Department of Gynecologic Oncology and Reproductive Medicine, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Abdulrahman K. Sinno
- Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Olive View/UCLA Medical Center, Los Angeles, CA, USA
| | - Bryan M. Fellman
- Department of Biostatistics, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Aaron Varghese
- The Kelly Gynecologic Oncology Service, Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Johns Hopkins Hospital, Baltimore, MD, USA
| | - Rebecca Stone
- The Kelly Gynecologic Oncology Service, Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Johns Hopkins Hospital, Baltimore, MD, USA
| | - Anil K. Sood
- Department of Gynecologic Oncology and Reproductive Medicine, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - David M. Gershenson
- Department of Gynecologic Oncology and Reproductive Medicine, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Kathleen M. Schmeler
- Department of Gynecologic Oncology and Reproductive Medicine, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Anais Malpica
- Department of Pathology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Amanda N. Fader
- The Kelly Gynecologic Oncology Service, Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Johns Hopkins Hospital, Baltimore, MD, USA
| | - Michael Frumovitz
- Department of Gynecologic Oncology and Reproductive Medicine, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| |
Collapse
|
15
|
Moioli M, Barra F, Maramai M, Valenzano Menada M, Vellone VG, Costantini S, Ferrero S. Mucinous ovarian cancer: current therapeutic targets, preclinical progress, and experimental drugs. Expert Opin Investig Drugs 2019; 28:1025-1029. [DOI: 10.1080/13543784.2019.1693999] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/06/2023]
Affiliation(s)
- Melita Moioli
- Academic Unit of Obstetrics and Gynecology, IRCCS Ospedale Policlinico San Martino, Genoa, Italy
- Department of Neurosciences, Rehabilitation, Ophthalmology, Genetics, Maternal and Child Health (DiNOGMI), University of Genoa, Genoa, Italy
| | - Fabio Barra
- Academic Unit of Obstetrics and Gynecology, IRCCS Ospedale Policlinico San Martino, Genoa, Italy
- Department of Neurosciences, Rehabilitation, Ophthalmology, Genetics, Maternal and Child Health (DiNOGMI), University of Genoa, Genoa, Italy
| | - Mattia Maramai
- Academic Unit of Obstetrics and Gynecology, IRCCS Ospedale Policlinico San Martino, Genoa, Italy
- Department of Neurosciences, Rehabilitation, Ophthalmology, Genetics, Maternal and Child Health (DiNOGMI), University of Genoa, Genoa, Italy
| | - Mario Valenzano Menada
- Academic Unit of Obstetrics and Gynecology, IRCCS Ospedale Policlinico San Martino, Genoa, Italy
- Department of Neurosciences, Rehabilitation, Ophthalmology, Genetics, Maternal and Child Health (DiNOGMI), University of Genoa, Genoa, Italy
| | - Valerio Gaetano Vellone
- Department of Surgical and Diagnostic Sciences, Ospedale Policlinico San Martino, University of Genoa, Genoa, Italy
| | - Sergio Costantini
- Academic Unit of Obstetrics and Gynecology, IRCCS Ospedale Policlinico San Martino, Genoa, Italy
- Department of Neurosciences, Rehabilitation, Ophthalmology, Genetics, Maternal and Child Health (DiNOGMI), University of Genoa, Genoa, Italy
| | - Simone Ferrero
- Academic Unit of Obstetrics and Gynecology, IRCCS Ospedale Policlinico San Martino, Genoa, Italy
- Department of Neurosciences, Rehabilitation, Ophthalmology, Genetics, Maternal and Child Health (DiNOGMI), University of Genoa, Genoa, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
16
|
Gore M, Hackshaw A, Brady WE, Penson RT, Zaino R, McCluggage WG, Ganesan R, Wilkinson N, Perren T, Montes A, Summers J, Lord R, Dark G, Rustin G, Mackean M, Reed N, Kehoe S, Frumovitz M, Christensen H, Feeney A, Ledermann J, Gershenson DM. An international, phase III randomized trial in patients with mucinous epithelial ovarian cancer (mEOC/GOG 0241) with long-term follow-up: and experience of conducting a clinical trial in a rare gynecological tumor. Gynecol Oncol 2019; 153:541-548. [PMID: 31005287 PMCID: PMC6559214 DOI: 10.1016/j.ygyno.2019.03.256] [Citation(s) in RCA: 55] [Impact Index Per Article: 9.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/07/2019] [Accepted: 03/26/2019] [Indexed: 12/18/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES We evaluated four different treatment regimens for advanced-stage mucinous epithelial ovarian cancer. METHODS We conducted a multicenter randomized factorial trial (UK and US). Patients were diagnosed with primary mEOC: FIGO stage II-IV or recurrence after stage I disease. Treatment arms were paclitaxel-carboplatin, oxaliplatin-capecitabine, paclitaxel-carboplatin-bevacizumab, or oxaliplatin-capecitabine-bevacizumab. Chemotherapy was given 3-weekly for 6 cycles, and bevacizumab (3-weekly) was continued as maintenance (for 12 cycles). Endpoints included overall-survival (OS), progression-free survival (PFS), toxicity and quality of life (QoL). RESULTS The trial stopped after 50 patients were recruited due to slow accrual. Median follow-up was 59 months. OS hazard ratios (HR) for the two main comparisons were: 0.78 (p = 0.48) for Oxal-Cape vs. Pac-Carbo (each with/without bevacizumab), and 1.04 (p = 0.92) for bevacizumab vs. no bevacizumab. Corresponding PFS HRs were: 0.84 and 0.80. Retrospective central pathology review revealed only 45% (18/40) cases with available material had confirmed primary mEOC. Among these, OS HR for Oxal-Cape vs. Pac-Carbo was 0.36 (p = 0.14); PFS HR = 0.62 (p = 0.40). Grade 3-4 toxicity was seen in 61% Pac-Carbo, 61% Oxal-Cape, 54% Pac-Carbo-Bev, and 85% Oxal-Cape-Bev. QoL was similar between the four arms. CONCLUSION mEOC/GOG0241 represents an example of a randomized rare tumor trial. Logistical challenges led to early termination, including difficulties in local histopathological diagnosis and accessing drugs outside their labelled indication. There was misalignment between central funders who support clinical trials in rare cancers and the deprioritisation of such work by those managing and funding research at a local level. Rare cancer trials should include centralised pathology review before treatment. Clinical trial registry number: ISRCTN83438782.
Collapse
MESH Headings
- Adult
- Aged
- Aged, 80 and over
- Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols/adverse effects
- Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols/therapeutic use
- Bevacizumab/administration & dosage
- Capecitabine/administration & dosage
- Carboplatin/administration & dosage
- Carcinoma, Ovarian Epithelial/drug therapy
- Carcinoma, Ovarian Epithelial/secondary
- Female
- Follow-Up Studies
- Humans
- Internationality
- Middle Aged
- Neoplasm Recurrence, Local/drug therapy
- Neoplasms, Cystic, Mucinous, and Serous/drug therapy
- Neoplasms, Cystic, Mucinous, and Serous/secondary
- Ovarian Neoplasms/drug therapy
- Ovarian Neoplasms/pathology
- Oxaliplatin/administration & dosage
- Paclitaxel/administration & dosage
- Progression-Free Survival
- Quality of Life
- Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors
- Survival Rate
- Young Adult
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Martin Gore
- Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
| | - Allan Hackshaw
- Cancer Research UK & UCL Cancer Trials Centre, London, UK.
| | | | | | - Richard Zaino
- Penn State Health Milton S. Hershey Medical Centre, PA, USA
| | | | | | - Nafisa Wilkinson
- University College London Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
| | | | - Ana Montes
- Guy's and St Thomas' NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
| | - Jeffrey Summers
- Maidstone and Tunbridge Wells NHS Foundation Trust, Kent, UK
| | - Rosemary Lord
- Clatterbridge Cancer Centre NHS Foundation Trust, Liverpool, UK
| | - Graham Dark
- Newcastle upon Tyne Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK
| | | | | | | | - Sean Kehoe
- Institute of Cancer and Genomics, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK
| | | | | | - Amanda Feeney
- Cancer Research UK & UCL Cancer Trials Centre, London, UK
| | | | | |
Collapse
|
17
|
Affiliation(s)
- Philippe Morice
- From the Departments of Gynecological Surgery and Medical Oncology (P.M., S.G., A.L.), INSERM Unit 981 (A.L.), and INSERM Unit 10-30 (P.M.), Gustave Roussy Cancer Campus, Villejuif, and University Paris-Sud (Paris XI), Le Kremlin Bicêtre (P.M.) - both in France
| | - Sebastien Gouy
- From the Departments of Gynecological Surgery and Medical Oncology (P.M., S.G., A.L.), INSERM Unit 981 (A.L.), and INSERM Unit 10-30 (P.M.), Gustave Roussy Cancer Campus, Villejuif, and University Paris-Sud (Paris XI), Le Kremlin Bicêtre (P.M.) - both in France
| | - Alexandra Leary
- From the Departments of Gynecological Surgery and Medical Oncology (P.M., S.G., A.L.), INSERM Unit 981 (A.L.), and INSERM Unit 10-30 (P.M.), Gustave Roussy Cancer Campus, Villejuif, and University Paris-Sud (Paris XI), Le Kremlin Bicêtre (P.M.) - both in France
| |
Collapse
|
18
|
Farrell R. Peritonectomy and hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy for advanced epithelial ovarian cancer: What gynaecological oncologists really think. Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol 2019; 59:457-462. [DOI: 10.1111/ajo.12972] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/19/2018] [Accepted: 02/17/2019] [Indexed: 12/18/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- Rhonda Farrell
- Prince of Wales Private Hospital Sydney New South Wales Australia
- Department of SurgerySt George Hospital, UNSW Sydney New South Wales Australia
- Chris O’Brien LifehouseSydney New South Wales Australia
| |
Collapse
|
19
|
Mortalin is a distinct bio-marker and prognostic factor in serous ovarian carcinoma. Gene 2019; 696:63-71. [PMID: 30776464 DOI: 10.1016/j.gene.2019.02.033] [Citation(s) in RCA: 24] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/05/2018] [Revised: 12/30/2018] [Accepted: 02/01/2019] [Indexed: 01/15/2023]
Abstract
This study focused on mortalin expression and its relevance to the prognosis in serous ovarian carcinoma, mortalin modulated cell malignant proliferation and EMT progression via Wnt/β-Catenin signaling pathway. In this study, data obtained from Oncomine database, Cancer Cell Line Encyclopedia (CCLE) analysis and Immunohistochemical (IHC) staining was used to assess the expression of mortalin in serous ovarian carcinoma. The prognostic value of mortalin was analyzed using Meier plotter database and Kaplan-Meier. MTT (3-(4,5-dimethyl-2-thiazolyl)-2,5-diphenyl-2-H-tetrazolium bromide) assay, immunofluorescence (IF) staining, and colony formation assay were used to detect cell reproductive capacity. SK-OV-3 cell motility and epithelial-mesenchymal transition (EMT) were measured by wound-healing, migration and western-blot assays. Data from Oncomine showed that mortalin was highly expressed in serous ovarian carcinomas compared with corresponding normal controls. Similar results were found in CCLE analysis and in clinical specimens. High mortalin expression was associated with high histological grade and worse overall survival (OS) rate. The results of MTT analyses, IF staining, and colony formation assay indicated that MKT-077 (1-Ethyl-2-[[3-ethyl-5-(3-methyl-2(3H)-benzothiazolylidene)-4-oxo-2-thiazolidinylidene] methyl]-pyridinium chloride) suppressed the viability of SK-OV-3 cells. Besides, mortalin suppression restrained cell EMT progression by Wnt/β-Catenin signaling pathway. Taken together, mortalin is over-expressed in serous ovarian carcinoma. High mortalin expression could be a candidate for the prognostic indicator and a biomarker in serous ovarian carcinoma.
Collapse
|
20
|
Simons M, Bolhuis T, De Haan AF, Bruggink AH, Bulten J, Massuger LF, Nagtegaal ID. A novel algorithm for better distinction of primary mucinous ovarian carcinomas and mucinous carcinomas metastatic to the ovary. Virchows Arch 2019; 474:289-296. [PMID: 30631934 PMCID: PMC6515884 DOI: 10.1007/s00428-018-2504-0] [Citation(s) in RCA: 18] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/16/2018] [Revised: 11/21/2018] [Accepted: 12/03/2018] [Indexed: 01/13/2023]
Abstract
Primary mucinous ovarian carcinomas (MOC) are notoriously difficult to distinguish from mucinous carcinomas metastatic to the ovary (mMC). Studies performed on small cohorts reported algorithms based on tumor size and laterality to aid in distinguishing MOC from mMC. We evaluated and improved these by performing a large-scale, nationwide search in the Dutch Pathology Registry. All registered pathology reports fulfilling our search criteria concerning MOC in the Netherlands from 2000 to 2011 were collected. Age, histology, laterality, and size were extracted. An existing database covering the same timeline containing tumors metastatic to the ovary was used, extracting all mMC, age, size, laterality, and primary tumor location. Existing algorithms were applied to our cohort. Subsequently, an algorithm based on tumor histology, laterality, and a nomogram based on age and size was created for differentiating MOC and mMC. We identified 735 MOC and 1018 mMC. Patients with MOC were significantly younger and MOC were significantly larger and more often unilateral than mMC. Signet ring cell carcinomas were rarely primary. Our algorithm used signet ring cell histology, bilaterality, and a nomogram integrating patient age and tumor size to diagnose mMC. Sensitivity and specificity for mMC was 90.1% and 59.0%, respectively. Applying existing algorithms on our cohort yielded a far lower sensitivity. The algorithm described here using tumor histology, laterality, size, and patient age has higher sensitivity but lower specificity compared to earlier algorithms and aids in indicating tumor origin, but for conclusive diagnosis, careful integration of morphology, immunohistochemistry, and clinical and imaging data is recommended.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Michiel Simons
- Department of Pathology, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, 6525, GA, The Netherlands.
| | - Thomas Bolhuis
- Department of Pathology, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, 6525, GA, The Netherlands
| | - Anton F De Haan
- Department for Health Evidence, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, 6525, GA, The Netherlands
| | - Annette H Bruggink
- PALGA, The Nationwide Network and Registry of Histo- and Cytopathology in the Netherlands, 3995, GA, Houten, The Netherlands
| | - Johan Bulten
- Department of Pathology, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, 6525, GA, The Netherlands
| | - Leon F Massuger
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, 6525, GA, The Netherlands
| | - Iris D Nagtegaal
- Department of Pathology, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, 6525, GA, The Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
21
|
Lin W, Cao D, Shen K. Prognostic significance of preoperative serum CEA in primary mucinous ovarian carcinoma: a retrospective cohort study. Cancer Manag Res 2018; 10:6913-6920. [PMID: 30588097 PMCID: PMC6300373 DOI: 10.2147/cmar.s186258] [Citation(s) in RCA: 13] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/14/2022] Open
Abstract
Purpose The purpose of this study was to evaluate the prognostic significance of preoperative serum carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA) in primary mucinous ovarian carcinoma (MOC). Patients and methods We reviewed 57 patients with primary MOC, in whom preoperative serum CEA had been measured. All patients were treated at Peking Union Medical College Hospital between June 1996 and September 2016. Results Preoperative serum CEA was elevated (>5.0 ng/mL) in 10 patients (17.5%), with a median serum CEA of 9.6 ng/mL (5.4–111.7 ng/mL). CEA was significantly associated with preoperative serum cancer antigen 125 (P=0.002), surgical debulking status (P=0.015), and tumor stage (P=0.001). Univariate analysis showed that patients with elevated CEA had significantly worse overall survival (OS) than patients with normal CEA (5-year OS: 50.8% vs 91.9%, respectively; P=0.013), but there was no significant difference in progression-free survival between the two groups (P=0.307). Multivariate analysis further demonstrated that advanced stage was an independent prognostic predictor for OS (P=0.002, HR: 15.925, 95% CI: 2.745–92.404). Conclusion Elevated preoperative serum CEA was strongly correlated with advanced stage in primary MOC, which may indicate a poorer prognosis. Further investigation of the intrinsic relationship between CEA and primary MOC is now required.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Wei Lin
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Peking Union Medical College Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, People's Republic of China,
| | - Dongyan Cao
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Peking Union Medical College Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, People's Republic of China,
| | - Keng Shen
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Peking Union Medical College Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, People's Republic of China,
| |
Collapse
|
22
|
Meagher NS, Schuster K, Voss A, Budden T, Pang CNI, deFazio A, Ramus SJ, Friedlander ML. Does the primary site really matter? Profiling mucinous ovarian cancers of uncertain primary origin (MO-CUP) to personalise treatment and inform the design of clinical trials. Gynecol Oncol 2018; 150:527-533. [DOI: 10.1016/j.ygyno.2018.07.013] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/20/2018] [Revised: 07/09/2018] [Accepted: 07/16/2018] [Indexed: 01/09/2023]
|
23
|
Massively parallel sequencing analysis of mucinous ovarian carcinomas: genomic profiling and differential diagnoses. Gynecol Oncol 2018; 150:127-135. [PMID: 29793804 DOI: 10.1016/j.ygyno.2018.05.008] [Citation(s) in RCA: 37] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/01/2018] [Revised: 04/30/2018] [Accepted: 05/07/2018] [Indexed: 12/13/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE Mucinous ovarian cancer (MOC) is a rare type of epithelial ovarian cancer resistant to standard chemotherapy regimens. We sought to characterize the repertoire of somatic mutations in MOCs and to define the contribution of massively parallel sequencing to the classification of tumors diagnosed as primary MOCs. METHODS Following gynecologic pathology and chart review, DNA samples obtained from primary MOCs and matched normal tissues/blood were subjected to whole-exome (n = 9) or massively parallel sequencing targeting 341 cancer genes (n = 15). Immunohistochemical analysis of estrogen receptor, progesterone receptor, PTEN, ARID1A/BAF250a, and the DNA mismatch (MMR) proteins MSH6 and PMS2 was performed for all cases. Mutational frequencies of MOCs were compared to those of high-grade serous ovarian cancers (HGSOCs) and mucinous tumors from other sites. RESULTS MOCs were heterogeneous at the genetic level, frequently harboring TP53 (75%) mutations, KRAS (71%) mutations and/or CDKN2A/B homozygous deletions/mutations (33%). Although established criteria for diagnosis were employed, four cases harbored mutational and immunohistochemical profiles similar to those of endometrioid carcinomas, and one case for colorectal or endometrioid carcinoma. Significant differences in the frequencies of KRAS, TP53, CDKN2A, FBXW7, PIK3CA and/or APC mutations between the confirmed primary MOCs (n = 19) and HGSOCs, mucinous gastric and/or mucinous colorectal carcinomas were found, whereas no differences in the 341 genes studied between MOCs and mucinous pancreatic carcinomas were identified. CONCLUSIONS Our findings suggest that the assessment of mutations affecting TP53, KRAS, PIK3CA, ARID1A and POLE, and DNA MMR protein expression may be used to further aid the diagnosis and treatment decision-making of primary MOC.
Collapse
|
24
|
Relatively Poor Survival of Mucinous Ovarian Carcinoma in Advanced Stage: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis. Int J Gynecol Cancer 2018; 27:651-658. [PMID: 28399027 DOI: 10.1097/igc.0000000000000932] [Citation(s) in RCA: 18] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/17/2023] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVE Overall, patients with mucinous ovarian carcinoma (MOC) are considered to have a better prognosis compared with the whole group of nonmucinous carcinomas. However, some studies indicate that patients with advanced-stage MOC might have a worse prognosis than those with advanced-stage serous ovarian carcinoma (SOC). We carried out a systematic review and meta-analysis of the current literature. MATERIALS AND METHODS A comprehensive literature search was carried out identifying 19 articles that compare survival of patients with MOC and patients with SOC. Meta-analyses were performed for risk ratio (RR) and hazard ratio (HR) for all International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics stages together, as well as for early- and advanced-stage diseases separately. RESULTS Overall, patients with MOC showed a lower risk of dying within 5 years (RR, 0.67; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.64-0.69; n = 45 333) and a longer survival (HR, 0.66; 95% CI, 0.58-0.75; HR, 0.88; 95% CI, 0.78-0.98, for univariate and multivariate analyses, respectively; n = 5540) compared with those with SOC. In contrast, in advanced-stage (International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics stages III and IV) disease, patients with MOC have a higher risk of dying within 5 years (RR, 1.15; 95% CI, 1.13-1.17; n = 36 113) and a shorter survival (HR, 1.82; 95% CI, 1.71-1.94; n = 19 907). CONCLUSIONS Patients with advanced-stage MOC have a significantly worse prognosis compared with patients with SOC, whereas in early stage, the prognosis of patients with MOC is better.
Collapse
|
25
|
Cuellar-Partida G, Lu Y, Dixon SC, Fasching PA, Hein A, Burghaus S, Beckmann MW, Lambrechts D, Van Nieuwenhuysen E, Vergote I, Vanderstichele A, Doherty JA, Rossing MA, Chang-Claude J, Rudolph A, Wang-Gohrke S, Goodman MT, Bogdanova N, Dörk T, Dürst M, Hillemanns P, Runnebaum IB, Antonenkova N, Butzow R, Leminen A, Nevanlinna H, Pelttari LM, Edwards RP, Kelley JL, Modugno F, Moysich KB, Ness RB, Cannioto R, Høgdall E, Høgdall C, Jensen A, Giles GG, Bruinsma F, Kjaer SK, Hildebrandt MAT, Liang D, Lu KH, Wu X, Bisogna M, Dao F, Levine DA, Cramer DW, Terry KL, Tworoger SS, Stampfer M, Missmer S, Bjorge L, Salvesen HB, Kopperud RK, Bischof K, Aben KKH, Kiemeney LA, Massuger LFAG, Brooks-Wilson A, Olson SH, McGuire V, Rothstein JH, Sieh W, Whittemore AS, Cook LS, Le ND, Blake Gilks C, Gronwald J, Jakubowska A, Lubiński J, Kluz T, Song H, Tyrer JP, Wentzensen N, Brinton L, Trabert B, Lissowska J, McLaughlin JR, Narod SA, Phelan C, Anton-Culver H, Ziogas A, Eccles D, Campbell I, Gayther SA, Gentry-Maharaj A, Menon U, Ramus SJ, Wu AH, Dansonka-Mieszkowska A, Kupryjanczyk J, Timorek A, Szafron L, Cunningham JM, Fridley BL, Winham SJ, Bandera EV, Poole EM, Morgan TK, Goode EL, Schildkraut JM, Pearce CL, Berchuck A, Pharoah PDP, Webb PM, Chenevix-Trench G, Risch HA, MacGregor S. Assessing the genetic architecture of epithelial ovarian cancer histological subtypes. Hum Genet 2016; 135:741-56. [PMID: 27075448 PMCID: PMC4976079 DOI: 10.1007/s00439-016-1663-9] [Citation(s) in RCA: 18] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/17/2016] [Accepted: 03/24/2016] [Indexed: 10/22/2022]
Abstract
Epithelial ovarian cancer (EOC) is one of the deadliest common cancers. The five most common types of disease are high-grade and low-grade serous, endometrioid, mucinous and clear cell carcinoma. Each of these subtypes present distinct molecular pathogeneses and sensitivities to treatments. Recent studies show that certain genetic variants confer susceptibility to all subtypes while other variants are subtype-specific. Here, we perform an extensive analysis of the genetic architecture of EOC subtypes. To this end, we used data of 10,014 invasive EOC patients and 21,233 controls from the Ovarian Cancer Association Consortium genotyped in the iCOGS array (211,155 SNPs). We estimate the array heritability (attributable to variants tagged on arrays) of each subtype and their genetic correlations. We also look for genetic overlaps with factors such as obesity, smoking behaviors, diabetes, age at menarche and height. We estimated the array heritabilities of high-grade serous disease ([Formula: see text] = 8.8 ± 1.1 %), endometrioid ([Formula: see text] = 3.2 ± 1.6 %), clear cell ([Formula: see text] = 6.7 ± 3.3 %) and all EOC ([Formula: see text] = 5.6 ± 0.6 %). Known associated loci contributed approximately 40 % of the total array heritability for each subtype. The contribution of each chromosome to the total heritability was not proportional to chromosome size. Through bivariate and cross-trait LD score regression, we found evidence of shared genetic backgrounds between the three high-grade subtypes: serous, endometrioid and undifferentiated. Finally, we found significant genetic correlations of all EOC with diabetes and obesity using a polygenic prediction approach.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Gabriel Cuellar-Partida
- Statistical Genetics, QIMR Berghofer Medical Research Institute, 300 Herston Road, Herston, QLD, 4006, Australia.
- School of Medicine, University of Queensland, St Lucia, QLD, 4072, Australia.
| | - Yi Lu
- Statistical Genetics, QIMR Berghofer Medical Research Institute, 300 Herston Road, Herston, QLD, 4006, Australia
| | - Suzanne C Dixon
- Gynaecological Cancers Group, QIMR Berghofer Medical Research Institute, 300 Herston Road, Herston, QLD, 4006, Australia
- School of Public Health, University of Queensland, Herston, QLD 4006, Australia
| | - Peter A Fasching
- Division of Hematology and Oncology, Department of Medicine, University of California at Los Angeles, David Geffen School of Medicine, Los Angeles, USA
- Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Friedrich-Alexander-University Erlangen-Nuremberg, Comprehensive Cancer Center Erlangen-EMN, University Hospital Erlangen, Universitaetsstrasse 21-23, 91054, Erlangen, Germany
| | - Alexander Hein
- Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Friedrich-Alexander-University Erlangen-Nuremberg, Comprehensive Cancer Center Erlangen-EMN, University Hospital Erlangen, Universitaetsstrasse 21-23, 91054, Erlangen, Germany
| | - Stefanie Burghaus
- Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Friedrich-Alexander-University Erlangen-Nuremberg, Comprehensive Cancer Center Erlangen-EMN, University Hospital Erlangen, Universitaetsstrasse 21-23, 91054, Erlangen, Germany
| | - Matthias W Beckmann
- Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Friedrich-Alexander-University Erlangen-Nuremberg, Comprehensive Cancer Center Erlangen-EMN, University Hospital Erlangen, Universitaetsstrasse 21-23, 91054, Erlangen, Germany
| | - Diether Lambrechts
- Laboratory for Translational Genetics, Department of Oncology, University of Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
- Vesalius Research Center, VIB, Louvain, Belgium
| | - Els Van Nieuwenhuysen
- Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology and Leuven Cancer Institute, University Hospitals Leuven, Louvain, Belgium
| | - Ignace Vergote
- Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology and Leuven Cancer Institute, University Hospitals Leuven, Louvain, Belgium
| | - Adriaan Vanderstichele
- Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology and Leuven Cancer Institute, University Hospitals Leuven, Louvain, Belgium
| | - Jennifer Anne Doherty
- Section of Biostatistics and Epidemiology, Department of Community and Family Medicine, Geisel School of Medicine, Dartmouth College, Hanover, NH, USA
| | - Mary Anne Rossing
- Department of Epidemiology, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA
- Program in Epidemiology, Division of Public Health Sciences, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center, Seattle, WA, USA
| | - Jenny Chang-Claude
- Division of Cancer Epidemiology, German Cancer Research Center, Heidelberg, Germany
- University Cancer Center Hamburg (UCCH), University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany
| | - Anja Rudolph
- Division of Cancer Epidemiology, German Cancer Research Center, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Shan Wang-Gohrke
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Ulm, Ulm, Germany
| | - Marc T Goodman
- Cancer Prevention and Control, Samuel Oschin Comprehensive Cancer Institute, Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, CA, USA
- Department of Biomedical Sciences, Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Community and Population Health Research Institute, Los Angeles, CA, USA
| | - Natalia Bogdanova
- Radiation Oncology Research Unit, Hannover Medical School, Hannover, Germany
| | - Thilo Dörk
- Gynaecology Research Unit, Hannover Medical School, Hannover, Germany
| | - Matthias Dürst
- Department of Gynecology, Jena-University Hospital-Friedrich Schiller University, Jena, Germany
| | - Peter Hillemanns
- Clinics of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Hannover Medical School, Hannover, Germany
| | - Ingo B Runnebaum
- Department of Gynecology, Jena-University Hospital-Friedrich Schiller University, Jena, Germany
| | | | - Ralf Butzow
- Department of Pathology, University of Helsinki and Helsinki University Hospital, Helsinki, Finland
| | - Arto Leminen
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Helsinki and Helsinki University Hospital, Helsinki, Finland
| | - Heli Nevanlinna
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Helsinki and Helsinki University Hospital, Helsinki, Finland
| | - Liisa M Pelttari
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Helsinki and Helsinki University Hospital, Helsinki, Finland
| | - Robert P Edwards
- Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Department of Obstetrics, Gynecology and Reproductive Sciences, University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine, Pittsburgh, PA, USA
- Womens Cancer Research Program, Magee-Womens Research Institute and University of Pittsburgh Cancer Institute, Pittsburgh, PA, USA
| | - Joseph L Kelley
- Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Department of Obstetrics, Gynecology and Reproductive Sciences, University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine, Pittsburgh, PA, USA
| | - Francesmary Modugno
- Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Department of Obstetrics, Gynecology and Reproductive Sciences, University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine, Pittsburgh, PA, USA
- Womens Cancer Research Program, Magee-Womens Research Institute and University of Pittsburgh Cancer Institute, Pittsburgh, PA, USA
- Department of Epidemiology, University of Pittsburgh Graduate School of Public Health, Pittsburgh, PA, USA
| | - Kirsten B Moysich
- Department of Cancer Prevention and Control, Roswell Park Cancer Institute, Buffalo, NY, USA
| | - Roberta B Ness
- The University of Texas School of Public Health, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Rikki Cannioto
- Department of Cancer Prevention and Control, Roswell Park Cancer Institute, Buffalo, NY, USA
| | - Estrid Høgdall
- Department of Virus, Lifestyle and Genes, Danish Cancer Society Research Center, Copenhagen, Denmark
- Molecular Unit, Department of Pathology, Herlev Hospital, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark
| | - Claus Høgdall
- Department of Gynaecology, Rigshospitalet, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark
| | - Allan Jensen
- Department of Virus, Lifestyle and Genes, Danish Cancer Society Research Center, Copenhagen, Denmark
| | - Graham G Giles
- Department of Epidemiology and Preventive Medicine, Monash University, Melbourne, VIC, Australia
- Centre for Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Melbourne School of Population and Global Health, The University of Melbourne, Melbourne, VIC, Australia
- Cancer Epidemiology Centre, Cancer Council Victoria, Melbourne, Australia
| | - Fiona Bruinsma
- Cancer Epidemiology Centre, Cancer Council Victoria, Melbourne, Australia
| | - Susanne K Kjaer
- Department of Virus, Lifestyle and Genes, Danish Cancer Society Research Center, Copenhagen, Denmark
- Department of Gynaecology, Rigshospitalet, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark
| | | | - Dong Liang
- College of Pharmacy and Health Sciences, Texas Southern University, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Karen H Lu
- Department of Gynecologic Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Xifeng Wu
- Department of Epidemiology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Maria Bisogna
- Gynecology Service, Department of Surgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
| | - Fanny Dao
- Gynecology Service, Department of Surgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
| | - Douglas A Levine
- Gynecology Service, Department of Surgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
| | - Daniel W Cramer
- Obstetrics and Gynecology Epidemiology Center, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Kathryn L Terry
- Obstetrics and Gynecology Epidemiology Center, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, MA, USA
- Department of Epidemiology, Harvard TH Chan School of Public Health, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Shelley S Tworoger
- Department of Epidemiology, Harvard TH Chan School of Public Health, Boston, MA, USA
- Channing Division of Network Medicine, Brigham and Women's Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Meir Stampfer
- Department of Epidemiology, Harvard TH Chan School of Public Health, Boston, MA, USA
- Channing Division of Network Medicine, Brigham and Women's Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Stacey Missmer
- Obstetrics and Gynecology Epidemiology Center, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, MA, USA
- Department of Epidemiology, Harvard TH Chan School of Public Health, Boston, MA, USA
- Channing Division of Network Medicine, Brigham and Women's Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Line Bjorge
- Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Haukeland University Hospital, Bergen, Norway
- Department of Clinical Science, Centre for Cancer Biomarkers, University of Bergen, Bergen, Norway
| | - Helga B Salvesen
- Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Haukeland University Hospital, Bergen, Norway
- Department of Clinical Science, Centre for Cancer Biomarkers, University of Bergen, Bergen, Norway
| | - Reidun K Kopperud
- Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Haukeland University Hospital, Bergen, Norway
- Department of Clinical Science, Centre for Cancer Biomarkers, University of Bergen, Bergen, Norway
| | - Katharina Bischof
- Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Haukeland University Hospital, Bergen, Norway
- Department of Clinical Science, Centre for Cancer Biomarkers, University of Bergen, Bergen, Norway
| | - Katja K H Aben
- Radboud University Medical Centre, RADBOUD Institute for Health Sciences, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
- Netherlands Comprehensive Cancer Organisation, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - Lambertus A Kiemeney
- Radboud University Medical Centre, RADBOUD Institute for Health Sciences, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
| | - Leon F A G Massuger
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Radboud University Medical Center, Radboud Institute for Molecular Life Sciences, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
| | - Angela Brooks-Wilson
- Canada's Michael Smith Genome Sciences Centre, BC Cancer Agency, Vancouver, BC, Canada
- Department of Biomedical Physiology and Kinesiology, Simon Fraser University, Burnaby, BC, Canada
| | - Sara H Olson
- Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
| | - Valerie McGuire
- Department of Health Research and Policy-Epidemiology, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, CA, USA
| | - Joseph H Rothstein
- Department of Health Research and Policy-Epidemiology, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, CA, USA
| | - Weiva Sieh
- Department of Health Research and Policy-Epidemiology, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, CA, USA
| | - Alice S Whittemore
- Department of Health Research and Policy-Epidemiology, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, CA, USA
| | - Linda S Cook
- Division of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Department of Internal Medicine, University of New Mexico, Albuquerque, NM, USA
| | - Nhu D Le
- Cancer Control Research, BC Cancer Agency, Vancouver, BC, Canada
| | - C Blake Gilks
- Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada
| | - Jacek Gronwald
- Department of Genetics and Pathology, International Hereditary Cancer Center, Pomeranian Medical University, Szczecin, Poland
| | - Anna Jakubowska
- Department of Genetics and Pathology, International Hereditary Cancer Center, Pomeranian Medical University, Szczecin, Poland
| | - Jan Lubiński
- Department of Genetics and Pathology, International Hereditary Cancer Center, Pomeranian Medical University, Szczecin, Poland
| | - Tomasz Kluz
- Faculty of Medicine, Institute of Midwifery and Emergency Medicine, Clinic of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Frederick Chopin Clinical Provincial Hospital No 1, University of Rzeszów, Rzeszow, Poland
| | - Honglin Song
- Department of Oncology, The Centre for Cancer Genetic Epidemiology, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK
| | - Jonathan P Tyrer
- Department of Oncology, The Centre for Cancer Genetic Epidemiology, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK
| | - Nicolas Wentzensen
- Division of Cancer Epidemiology and Genetics, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, MD, USA
| | - Louise Brinton
- Division of Cancer Epidemiology and Genetics, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, MD, USA
| | - Britton Trabert
- Division of Cancer Epidemiology and Genetics, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, MD, USA
| | - Jolanta Lissowska
- Department of Cancer Epidemiology and Prevention, The Maria Sklodowska-Curie Memorial Cancer Center and Institute of Oncology, Warsaw, Poland
| | | | - Steven A Narod
- Women's College Research Institute, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - Catherine Phelan
- Department of Cancer Epidemiology, Moffitt Cancer Center, Tampa, FL, USA
| | - Hoda Anton-Culver
- Department of Epidemiology, University of California Irvine, Irvine, CA, USA
- Center for Cancer Genetics Research and Prevention, School of Medicine, University of California Irvine, Irvine, CA, USA
| | - Argyrios Ziogas
- Department of Epidemiology, University of California Irvine, Irvine, CA, USA
| | - Diana Eccles
- Faculty of Medicine, University of Southampton, Southampton, UK
| | - Ian Campbell
- Research Division, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, St Andrews Place, East Melbourne, Australia
| | - Simon A Gayther
- Department of Preventive Medicine, Keck School of Medicine, University of Southern California Norris Comprehensive Cancer Center, Los Angeles, CA, USA
| | | | - Usha Menon
- Women's Cancer, Institute for Women's Health, University College London, London, UK
| | - Susan J Ramus
- Department of Preventive Medicine, Keck School of Medicine, University of Southern California Norris Comprehensive Cancer Center, Los Angeles, CA, USA
| | - Anna H Wu
- Department of Preventive Medicine, Keck School of Medicine, University of Southern California Norris Comprehensive Cancer Center, Los Angeles, CA, USA
| | - Agnieszka Dansonka-Mieszkowska
- Department of Pathology and Laboratory Diagnostics, The Maria Sklodowska-Curie Memorial Cancer Center and Institute of Oncology, Warsaw, Poland
| | - Jolanta Kupryjanczyk
- Department of Pathology and Laboratory Diagnostics, The Maria Sklodowska-Curie Memorial Cancer Center and Institute of Oncology, Warsaw, Poland
| | - Agnieszka Timorek
- Department of Obstetrics, Gynaecology and Oncology, IInd Faculty of Medicine, Warsaw Medical University and Brodnowski Hospital, Warsaw, Poland
| | - Lukasz Szafron
- Department of Pathology and Laboratory Diagnostics, The Maria Sklodowska-Curie Memorial Cancer Center and Institute of Oncology, Warsaw, Poland
| | - Julie M Cunningham
- Division of Experimental Pathology, Department of Laboratory Medicine and Pathology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA
| | - Brooke L Fridley
- Department of Biostatistics, University of Kansas, Kansas City, KS, USA
| | - Stacey J Winham
- Division of Biomedical Statistics and Informatics, Department of Health Sciences Research, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA
| | - Elisa V Bandera
- Rutgers Cancer Institute of New Jersey, New Brunswick, NJ, USA
| | - Elizabeth M Poole
- Channing Division of Network Medicine, Brigham and Women's Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Terry K Morgan
- Department of Pathology and Obstetrics, OHSU, Portland, OR, USA
- Department of Gynaecology, OHSU, Portland, OR, USA
| | - Ellen L Goode
- Division of Epidemiology, Department of Health Science Research, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA
| | | | - Celeste L Pearce
- Department of Preventive Medicine, Keck School of Medicine, University of Southern California Norris Comprehensive Cancer Center, Los Angeles, CA, USA
- Department of Epidemiology, University of Michigan School of Public Health, Ann Arbor, MI, USA
| | - Andrew Berchuck
- Duke Cancer Institute, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC, USA
| | - Paul D P Pharoah
- Department of Public Health and Primary Care, The Centre for Cancer Genetic Epidemiology, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK
- Department of Oncology, The Centre for Cancer Genetic Epidemiology, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK
| | - Penelope M Webb
- Gynaecological Cancers Group, QIMR Berghofer Medical Research Institute, 300 Herston Road, Herston, QLD, 4006, Australia
- School of Public Health, University of Queensland, Herston, QLD 4006, Australia
| | - Georgia Chenevix-Trench
- Cancer Genetics, QIMR Berghofer Medical Research Institute, 300 Herston Road, Herston, QLD, 4006, Australia
| | - Harvey A Risch
- Department of Chronic Disease Epidemiology, Yale School of Public Health, New Haven, CT, USA
| | - Stuart MacGregor
- Statistical Genetics, QIMR Berghofer Medical Research Institute, 300 Herston Road, Herston, QLD, 4006, Australia.
| |
Collapse
|