Salvage Versus Adjuvant Radiation Treatment for Women With Early-Stage Endometrial Carcinoma: A Matched Analysis

Radiotherapy and Chemotherapy Features in the Treatment for Locoregional Recurrence of Endometrial Cancer: A Systematic Review

Radiation therapy (RT) is the standard of care in patients with locoregional or isolated vaginal recurrence who never underwent irradiation. It is often associated with brachytherapy (BT), whereas chemotherapy (CT) is a rare treatment option. We systematically searched the PubMed and Scopus databases in February 2023. We included patients with relapsed endometrial cancer, describing the treatment of locoregional recurrence, and reporting at least one outcome of interest-disease-free survival (DFS), overall survival (OS), recurrence rate (RR), site of recurrence, and major complications. A total of 15 studies fulfilled the inclusion criteria. Overall, 11 evaluated RT only, 3 evaluated CT, and 1 analyzed oncological outcomes after administration with a combination of CT and RT. In total, 4.5-year OS ranged from 16% to 96%, and DFS ranged from 36.3% to 100% at 4.5 years. RR ranged from 3.7% to 98.2% during a median follow-up of 51.5 months. Overall, RT showed a 4.5-year DFS from 40% to 100%. CT revealed 36.3% DFS at 4.5 years. RT showed a 4.5-year OS ranging from 16% to 96%, whereas CT revealed a 27.7% OS rate. It would be appropriate to test multi-modality regimens to evaluate outcomes and toxicity. EBRT and BT are the most employed options to treat vaginal recurrences.

Adjuvant treatment of endometrial cancer today

Endometrial cancer frequently occurs in post-menopausal women, and the endometrium is a well-known site of cancer affecting women. Endometrial cancer is found with genital bleeding and often at an early stage. However, there are some risks of recurrence after hysterectomy. As a medical treatment after the diagnosis of endometrial cancer, appropriate adjuvant therapy is considered to lead to a decrease in the rate of recurrence and improvement of prognosis according to the determination of the cancer stage from the surgical and histopathological results. In this review, we describe post-operative adjuvant therapy administered for endometrial cancer and advanced disease, focusing on chemotherapy, radiation therapy and the combination of both. These treatments are divided according to the risk of recurrence as based primarily on the reported evidence.

Evolution of adjuvant treatment in endometrial cancer-no evidence and new questions?

PURPOSE

For endometrial cancer (EC), clinical and pathological risk factors are taken to triage patients and estimate their prognosis. Lymph node involvement (pN+), lymphovascular space involvement (LSVI), grading, age of the patients, and T classification are internationally accepted parameters for treatment decisions.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Studies on adjuvant radiation, chemotherapy, and chemoradiation are discussed against the background of risk stratification and clinical decision-making in early-to-advanced stage endometrial cancer. Recent publications on adjuvant treatment in high-risk disease and its implications for the patients with regard to expected oncologic benefit and treatment-related toxicity are discussed.

RESULTS

Surgery is the mainstay of treatment of EC patients. Well-differentiated tumors and early disease (FIGO IA) should be followed up without further treatment. In FIGO I stage without risk factors, VBT remains the standard treatment after surgery. FIGO I, II patients with one or more risk factors (MI ≥ 50%, Grading[G]3, age >60 years, LVSI) benefit from external beam radiotherapy (EBRT) in terms of survival. There are no data of acceptable quality demonstrating that chemotherapy is superior to radiation in locally advanced carcinomas. Therefore, even in locally advanced disease (FIGO III, IV), EBRT remains the standard of care after surgery. EBRT contributes to the very low rate of local relapses and better DFS in these patients and should not be replaced by chemotherapy only. Whether and which subgroups of patients benefit from an additional (concomitant and/or adjuvant) chemotherapy in terms of disease-free survival remains a controversial issue. The recently published PORTEC-3 trial could not create clear evidence. With a high rate of isolated tumors cells and micrometastases in the specimens, the increasing use of unvalidated sentinel concepts in endometrial cancer raises more questions with regard to indications for adjuvant treatment. In the future, integrated genomic characterization of tumors might be helpful for treatment individualization in the adjuvant setting.

MR- versus CT-based high-dose-rate interstitial brachytherapy for vaginal recurrence of endometrial cancer

PURPOSE

To compare clinical outcomes of MR-based versus CT-based high-dose-rate interstitial brachytherapy (ISBT) for vaginal recurrence of endometrioid endometrial cancer (EC).

METHODS AND MATERIALS

We reviewed 66 patients with vaginal recurrent EC; 18 had MR-based ISBT on a prospective clinical trial and 48 had CT-based treatment. Kaplan-Meier survival modeling was used to generate estimates for local control (LC), disease-free interval (DFI), and overall survival (OS), and multivariate Cox modeling was used to assess prognostic factors. Toxicities were evaluated and compared.

RESULTS

Median followup was 33 months (CT 30 months, MR 35 months). Median cumulative equivalent dose in 2-Gy fractions was 75.5 Gy for MR-ISBT and 73.8 Gy for CT-ISBT (p = 0.58). MR patients were older (p = 0.03) and had larger tumor size (>4 cm vs. ≤ 4 cm) compared to CT patients (p = 0.04). For MR-based versus CT-based ISBT, 3-year KM rate for local control was 100% versus 78% (p = 0.04), DFI was 69% versus 55% (p = 0.1), and OS was 63% versus 75% (p = 0.81), respectively. On multivariate analysis, tumor Grade 3 was associated with worse OS (HR 3.57, 95% CI 1.25, 11.36) in a model with MR-ISBT (HR 0.56, 95% CI 0.16, 1.89). Toxicities were not significantly different between the two modalities.

CONCLUSION

Despite worse patient prognostic features, MR-ISBT was associated with a significantly better (100%) 3-year local control, comparable survival, and improved DFI rates compared to CT. Toxicities did not differ compared to CT-ISBT patients. Tumor grade contributed as the most significant predictor for survival. Larger prospective studies are needed to assess the impact of MR-ISBT on survival outcomes.

Predictors of Survival After Recurrence in Women With Early-Stage Endometrial Carcinoma

Objective

Factors predictive of survival after recurrent early-stage endometrial carcinoma have not been thoroughly investigated. The purpose of this study was to explore factors that impact disease-specific survival (DSS) and overall survival (OS) after recurrence in women with early-stage endometrial carcinoma.

Materials and Methods

After institutional review board approval, we identified 104 women with 2009 International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics stage I to II uterine endometrioid carcinoma who developed disease recurrence between January 1990 and December 2014. The Kaplan-Meier approach and Cox regression analysis were used to assess DSS and OS after recurrence and to determine factors influencing these survival end points.

Results

Median age of the study cohort was 65 years with a median follow-up time of 42.8 months after hysterectomy. Median time to recurrence was 15.8 months. Recurrences were diagnosed in 60 patients (57.7%) who were originally managed with observation after hysterectomy and in 44 patients (42.3%) who were initially managed with adjuvant radiation treatment. Fifty-six patients (54%) had pelvic recurrence (vaginal and/or pelvic), whereas 48 (46%) had extrapelvic recurrence. Five-year DSS and OS for the entire study population was 44% and 37%, respectively. Five-year DSS and OS were longer for patients with pelvic recurrence compared with patients with extrapelvic recurrence (66% vs 18% and 55% vs 17%, P < 0.0001). Five-year DSS was also longer for radiation-naive patients than for radiation-treated patients (51% vs 34%, P = 0.023). On multivariate analysis of DSS and OS, pelvic recurrence (P < 0.001) was the only significant predictor of longer DSS and OS.

Conclusions

In women with recurrent early-stage endometrioid carcinoma, our study suggests that site of recurrence (pelvic vs extra pelvic) is the only predictor of survival. In addition, we found that radiation naivete and pelvic recurrence correlated with longer DSS and OS.