1
|
Miller EM, Samec TM, Alexander-Bryant AA. Nanoparticle delivery systems to combat drug resistance in ovarian cancer. NANOMEDICINE-NANOTECHNOLOGY BIOLOGY AND MEDICINE 2020; 31:102309. [PMID: 32992019 DOI: 10.1016/j.nano.2020.102309] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/15/2020] [Revised: 09/04/2020] [Accepted: 09/17/2020] [Indexed: 12/17/2022]
Abstract
Due to the lack of early symptoms and difficulty of accurate diagnosis, ovarian cancer is the most lethal gynecological cancer faced by women. First-line therapy includes a combination of tumor resection surgery and chemotherapy regimen. However, treatment becomes more complex upon recurrence due to development of drug resistance. Drug resistance has been linked to many mechanisms, including efflux transporters, apoptosis dysregulation, autophagy, cancer stem cells, epigenetics, and the epithelial-mesenchymal transition. Thus, developing and choosing effective therapies is exceptionally complex. There is a need for increased specificity and efficacy in therapies for drug-resistant ovarian cancer, and research in targeted nanoparticle delivery systems aims to fulfill this challenge. Although recent research has focused on targeted nanoparticle-based therapies, few of these therapies have been clinically translated. In this review, non-viral nanoparticle delivery systems developed to overcome drug-resistance in ovarian cancer were analyzed, including their structural components, surface modifications, and drug-resistance targeted mechanisms.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Emily M Miller
- Nanobiotechnology Laboratory, Department of Bioengineering, Clemson University, Clemson, SC
| | - Timothy M Samec
- Nanobiotechnology Laboratory, Department of Bioengineering, Clemson University, Clemson, SC
| | | |
Collapse
|
2
|
Lorusso D, Hilpert F, González Martin A, Rau J, Ottevanger P, Greimel E, Lück HJ, Selle F, Colombo N, Kroep JR, Mirza MR, Berger R, Pardo B, Grischke EM, Berton-Rigaud D, Martinez-Garcia J, Vergote I, Redondo A, Cardona A, Bastière-Truchot L, du Bois A, Kurzeder C. Patient-reported outcomes and final overall survival results from the randomized phase 3 PENELOPE trial evaluating pertuzumab in low tumor human epidermal growth factor receptor 3 (HER3) mRNA-expressing platinum-resistant ovarian cancer. Int J Gynecol Cancer 2019; 29:1141-1147. [PMID: 31420414 DOI: 10.1136/ijgc-2019-000370] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/23/2019] [Revised: 05/15/2019] [Accepted: 05/29/2019] [Indexed: 11/04/2022] Open
Abstract
INTRODUCTION The PENELOPE trial evaluated pertuzumab added to chemotherapy for biomarker-selected platinum-resistant ovarian cancer. As previously reported, pertuzumab did not statistically significantly improve progression-free survival (primary end point: HR 0.74, 95% CI 0.50 to 1.11), although results in the paclitaxel and gemcitabine cohorts suggested activity. Here, we report final overall survival and patient-reported outcomes. PATIENTS AND METHODS Eligible patients had ovarian carcinoma that progressed during/within 6 months of completing ≥4 platinum cycles, low tumor human epidermal growth factor receptor 3 (HER3) mRNA expression, and ≤2 prior chemotherapy lines. Investigators selected single-agent topotecan, gemcitabine or weekly paclitaxel before patients were randomized to either placebo or pertuzumab (840→420 mg every 3 weeks), stratified by selected chemotherapy, prior anti-angiogenic therapy, and platinum-free interval. Final overall survival analysis (key secondary end point) was pre-specified after 129 deaths. Patient-reported outcomes (secondary end point) were assessed at baseline and every 9 weeks until disease progression. RESULTS At database lock (June 9, 2016), 130 (83%) of 156 randomized patients had died. Median follow-up was 27 months in the pertuzumab arm versus 26 months in the control arm. In the intent-to-treat population there was no overall survival difference between treatment arms (stratified HR 0.90, 95% CI 0.61 to 1.32; p=0.60). Results in subgroups defined by stratification factors indicated heterogeneity similar to previous progression-free survival results. Updated safety was similar to previously published results. Compliance with patient-reported outcomes questionnaire completion was >75% for all validated patient-reported outcomes measures. Pertuzumab demonstrated neither beneficial nor detrimental effects on patient-reported outcomes compared with placebo, except for increased diarrhea symptoms. DISCUSSION Consistent with the primary results, adding pertuzumab to chemotherapy for low tumor HER3 mRNA-expressing platinum-resistant ovarian cancer did not improve overall survival, but showed trends in some cohorts. Except for increased diarrhea symptoms, pertuzumab had no impact on patient-reported outcomes. ClinicalTrials.gov: ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT01684878.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Domenica Lorusso
- Fondazione Policlinico Universitario A Gemelli IRCCS, Rome, Italy
| | - Felix Hilpert
- Arbeitsgemeinschaft Gynäkologische Onkologie (AGO) and Klinik für Gynäkologie und Geburtshilfe, Kiel, Germany (affiliation when work was performed).,Mammazentrum am Krankenhaus Jerusalem, Hamburg, Germany
| | - Antonio González Martin
- Grupo Español de Investigación en Cáncer de Ovario (GEICO) and MD Anderson Cancer Center Spain, Madrid, Spain (affiliation when work was performed).,Clínica Universidad de Navarra, Madrid, Spain
| | - Joern Rau
- Coordinating Center for Clinical Trials, Philipps-University of Marburg, Marburg, Germany
| | - Petronella Ottevanger
- Dutch Gynaecological Oncology Group (DGOG) and Department of Medical Oncology, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, Netherlands
| | | | - Hans-Joachim Lück
- AGO and Gynäkologisch-Onkologische Praxis am Pelikanplatz, Hannover, Germany
| | - Frédéric Selle
- Groupe d'Investigateurs Nationaux pour l'Etude des Cancers Ovariens (GINECO), Groupe Hospitalier Diaconesses Croix Saint-Simon and Alliance Pour la Recherche en Cancérologie, Paris, France
| | - Nicoletta Colombo
- Mario Negri Gynecologic Oncology (MaNGO) group, IEO, European Institute of Oncology IRCCS, and University of Milan-Bicocca, Milan, Italy
| | - Judith R Kroep
- DGOG and Department of Medical Oncology, Leids Universitair Medisch Centrum, Leiden, Netherlands
| | - Mansoor R Mirza
- Nordic Society of Gynaecological Oncology (NSGO) and Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen University Hospital, Copenhagen, Denmark
| | - Regina Berger
- AGO-Austria and University Hospital for Gynaecology and Obstetrics, Medical University of Innsbruck, Innsbruck, Austria
| | - Beatriz Pardo
- GEICO and Medical Oncology Department, Institut Català d'Oncologia, Hospital Duran i Reynals, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Eva-Maria Grischke
- AGO and University Hospital of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Tübingen, Germany
| | | | - Jeronimo Martinez-Garcia
- GEICO and Medical Oncology Service, Hospital Clínico Universitario Virgen de la Arrixaca, El Palmar, Spain
| | - Ignace Vergote
- AGO and Leuven Cancer Institute, University Hospital Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
| | - Andrés Redondo
- GEICO and Medical Oncology Department, Hospital Universitario La Paz-IdiPAZ, Madrid, Spain
| | | | | | | | - Christian Kurzeder
- AGO and Kliniken Essen Mitte, Essen, Germany.,Department of Gynecology and Gynecological Oncology, University Hospital Basel, University of Basel, Basel, Switzerland
| | | |
Collapse
|
3
|
Evolution of anti-HER2 therapies for cancer treatment. Cancer Treat Rev 2017; 59:1-21. [PMID: 28715775 DOI: 10.1016/j.ctrv.2017.06.005] [Citation(s) in RCA: 62] [Impact Index Per Article: 8.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/23/2017] [Revised: 06/21/2017] [Accepted: 06/23/2017] [Indexed: 01/13/2023]
Abstract
The development of HER2-directed monoclonal antibodies and tyrosine kinase inhibitors have provided benefits to cancer patients, as well as produced many insights into the biology of the ErbB receptor family. Current therapies based on ErbB family members have resulted in improved overall survival with associated improvements in quality of life for the cancer patients that respond to treatment. Compared to monotherapy using either two antibodies to block the HER2 receptor blockade or combinatorial approaches with HER2 antibodies and standard therapies has provided additional benefits. Despite the therapeutic success of existing HER2 therapies, personalising treatment and overcoming resistance to these therapies remains a significant challenge. The heterogeneous intra-tumoural HER2 expression and lack of fully predictive and prognostic biomarkers remain significant barriers to improving the use of HER2 antibodies. Imaging modalities using radiolabelled pertuzumab and trastuzumab allow quantitative assessment of intra-tumoural HER2 expression, HER2 antibody saturation and the success of different drug delivery systems to be assessed. Molecular imaging with HER2 antibodies has the potential to be a non-invasive, predictive and prognostic technique capable of influencing therapeutic decisions, predicting response and failure of treatments as well as providing insights into receptor recycling and signalling. Similarly, conjugating HER2 antibodies with novel toxic payloads or combining HER2 antibodies with cellular immunotherapy provide exciting new opportunities for the management of tumours overexpressing HER2. Future research will lead to higher therapeutic responses, lower toxicities and providing insight into the mechanisms of resistance to HER2-targeted treatments.
Collapse
|