1
|
Grillo-Marín C, Antón-Rodríguez C, Prieto L, Ortega-Pérez G, González-Moreno S. Nephrotoxicity Associated with Cytoreductive Surgery Combined with Cisplatin-Based Hyperthermic Intraperitoneal Chemotherapy for Peritoneal Malignant Disease: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. J Clin Med 2024; 13:3793. [PMID: 38999359 PMCID: PMC11242517 DOI: 10.3390/jcm13133793] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/05/2024] [Revised: 06/14/2024] [Accepted: 06/20/2024] [Indexed: 07/14/2024] Open
Abstract
Background: Cisplatin is employed in hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (HIPEC) after cytoreductive surgery (CRS) for peritoneal surface malignancies (PSMs). The main concern regarding intraperitoneal cisplatin administration is nephrotoxicity. Numerous reports in this context are available. Our objective was to conduct a systematic review and meta-analysis to assess cisplatin-based HIPEC-related nephrotoxicity (CHRN). Methods: A systematic literature review on CHRN after CRS for the treatment of PSMs was performed. The literature search was carried out using Medline, Cochrane, and Embase. The last day of the search was 23 October 2023. PRISMA guidelines were used. A meta-analysis was then conducted. The main endpoint was the incidence of acute and chronic renal impairment after CHRN. Secondary endpoints included the potential impact of several clinical variables on the primary endpoint and a critical appraisal of the different renal impairment scales employed. Results: Our study included 26 articles with a total sample of 1473 patients. The incidence of acute kidney injury (AKI) was 18.6% (95% CI: 13.6-25%, range of true effects 3-59%). For chronic kidney disease, it was 7% (95% CI: 3-15.3%, range of true effects 1-53%). The variables that statistically influenced these results were the scale used to measure renal insufficiency, the use of nephroprotective agents, and the presence of pre-existing renal disease. Conclusions: The reported incidence of renal impairment following cisplatin-based HIPEC is highly variable. The incidence of renal failure obtained in this meta-analysis should be used as a reference for subsequent reports on this topic. Further prospective studies are warranted to establish optimal and standardized management.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Cristián Grillo-Marín
- Department of General Surgery, Hospital Universitario Puerta de Hierro, Calle Joaquín Rodrigo 1, 28222 Majadahonda, Spain;
- Unidad de Apoyo a la Investigación, Facultad de Medicina, Universidad Francisco de Vitoria M-515, km 1, 800, 28223 Pozuelo de Alarcón, Spain; (C.A.-R.); (L.P.)
- MD Anderson Cancer Center, Madrid Spain Foundation, Calle Arturo Soria 270, 28033 Madrid, Spain
| | - Cristina Antón-Rodríguez
- Unidad de Apoyo a la Investigación, Facultad de Medicina, Universidad Francisco de Vitoria M-515, km 1, 800, 28223 Pozuelo de Alarcón, Spain; (C.A.-R.); (L.P.)
| | - Lola Prieto
- Unidad de Apoyo a la Investigación, Facultad de Medicina, Universidad Francisco de Vitoria M-515, km 1, 800, 28223 Pozuelo de Alarcón, Spain; (C.A.-R.); (L.P.)
| | - Gloria Ortega-Pérez
- Department of Surgical Oncology, Peritoneal Surface Oncology Program, MD Anderson Cancer Center, Calle Arturo Soria 270, 28033 Madrid, Spain;
| | - Santiago González-Moreno
- Department of Surgical Oncology, Peritoneal Surface Oncology Program, MD Anderson Cancer Center, Calle Arturo Soria 270, 28033 Madrid, Spain;
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Navarro Santana B, Garcia-Torralba E, Viveros-Carreño D, Rodriguez J, Pareja R, Martin A, Forte S, Krause KJ, González-Martín JM, Ramirez PT. Complications of HIPEC for ovarian cancer surgery: evaluation over two time periods. Int J Gynecol Cancer 2024; 34:1-9. [PMID: 37669829 DOI: 10.1136/ijgc-2023-004658] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 09/07/2023] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVE Cytoreductive surgery in conjunction with hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (HIPEC) is being explored in the upfront, interval, and recurrent setting in patients with ovarian cancer. The objective of this systematic review was to assess the rate of complications associated with HIPEC in epithelial ovarian cancer surgery over two time periods. METHODS This study was registered in PROSPERO (CRD42022328928). A systematic review was conducted following the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) checklist. Ovid/Medline, Ovid/Embase, Web of Science, Scopus, and Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials were searched from January 2004 to April 2022. We included studies reporting on patients with advanced primary or recurrent epithelial ovarian cancer who underwent cytoreductive surgery and HIPEC. We evaluated two different time periods: 2004-2013 and 2014-2022. A random-effects meta-analysis was used to produce an overall summary. Subgroup analyses were planned according to recruited period for each specific complication type. Heterogeneity was assessed using the I2 statistic. RESULTS A total of 4928 patients were included from 69 studies for this systematic review; 19 published from 2004-2013, and 50 published from 2014-2022. No significant differences were found between the two time periods in terms of blood transfusions (33% vs 51%; p=0.46; I2=95%) overall gastrointestinal complications (15% vs 21%; p=0.36; I2=98%), infectious diseases (16% vs 13%; p=0.62; I2=93%), overall respiratory complications (12% vs 12%; p=0.88; I2=91%), overall urinary complications (6% vs 12%; p=0.06; I2=94%), or thromboembolic events (5% vs 3%; p=0.25; I2=63%). Also, no differences were found in intensive care unit (ICU) admissions (89% vs 28%; p=0.06; I2=99%), reoperations (8% vs 7%; p=0.50; I2=37%), or deaths (3% vs 3%; p=0.77; I2=57%). CONCLUSIONS Our review showed that overall complications have not changed over time for patients undergoing HIPEC in the setting of primary or recurrent ovarian cancer. There was no decrease in the rates of ICU admissions, reoperations, or deaths.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | - David Viveros-Carreño
- Gynecologic Oncology, Instituto Nacional de Cancerologia, Bogota, Colombia
- Gynecologic Oncology, Clínica Universitaria Colombia and Centro de Tratamiento e Investigación sobre Cáncer Luis Carlos Sarmiento Angulo-CTIC, Bogotá, Colombia
| | | | - Rene Pareja
- Gynecologic Oncology, Instituto Nacional de Cancerologia, Bogota, Colombia
| | - Alicia Martin
- Insular University Hospital of Gran Canaria, Las Palmas de Gran Canaria, Canarias, Spain
| | - Sara Forte
- Azienda USL Toscana centro, Prato, Italy
| | - Kate J Krause
- The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center Research Medical Library, Houston, Texas, USA
| | - J M González-Martín
- Insular University Hospital of Gran Canaria, Las Palmas de Gran Canaria, Canarias, Spain
| | - Pedro T Ramirez
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Houston Methodist Hospital, Houston, Texas, USA
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Bienia A, Wiecheć-Cudak O, Murzyn AA, Krzykawska-Serda M. Photodynamic Therapy and Hyperthermia in Combination Treatment-Neglected Forces in the Fight against Cancer. Pharmaceutics 2021; 13:1147. [PMID: 34452108 PMCID: PMC8399393 DOI: 10.3390/pharmaceutics13081147] [Citation(s) in RCA: 17] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/18/2021] [Revised: 06/26/2021] [Accepted: 07/16/2021] [Indexed: 12/24/2022] Open
Abstract
Cancer is one of the leading causes of death in humans. Despite the progress in cancer treatment, and an increase in the effectiveness of diagnostic methods, cancer is still highly lethal and very difficult to treat in many cases. Combination therapy, in the context of cancer treatment, seems to be a promising option that may allow minimizing treatment side effects and may have a significant impact on the cure. It may also increase the effectiveness of anti-cancer therapies. Moreover, combination treatment can significantly increase delivery of drugs to cancerous tissues. Photodynamic therapy and hyperthermia seem to be ideal examples that prove the effectiveness of combination therapy. These two kinds of therapy can kill cancer cells through different mechanisms and activate various signaling pathways. Both PDT and hyperthermia play significant roles in the perfusion of a tumor and the network of blood vessels wrapped around it. The main goal of combination therapy is to combine separate mechanisms of action that will make cancer cells more sensitive to a given therapeutic agent. Such an approach in treatment may contribute toward increasing its effectiveness, optimizing the cancer treatment process in the future.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | | | - Martyna Krzykawska-Serda
- Faculty of Biochemistry, Biophysics and Biotechnology, Jagiellonian University, 30-387 Kraków, Poland; (A.B.); (O.W.-C.); (A.A.M.)
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Coccolini F, Fugazzola P, Montori G, Ansaloni L, Chiarugi M. Intraperitoneal chemotherapy for ovarian cancer with peritoneal metastases, systematic review of the literature and focused personal experience. J Gastrointest Oncol 2021; 12:S144-S181. [PMID: 33968435 DOI: 10.21037/jgo-2020-06] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/19/2022] Open
Abstract
Epithelial ovarian cancer (EOC) causes 60% of ovarian cancer cases and is the fourth most common cause of death from cancer in women. The standard of care for EOC includes a combination of surgery followed by intravenous chemotherapy. Intraperitoneal (IP) chemotherapy (CT) has been introduced into the therapeutic algorithm of EOC with positive results. To explore existing results regarding intraperitoneal chemotherapy a systematic review of the literature and an analysis of our own institutional prospective database of patients treated with cytoreductive surgery plus hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (HIPEC) for EOC at different stages were conducted. The focused report concerning our personal experience with advanced EOC treated with cytoreductive surgery and HIPEC produced the following results: In 57 patients cisplatin + paclitaxel as HIPEC was the only significant factor improving overall survival (OS) at multivariate analysis (OR 6.54, 95% CI: 1.24-34.47, P=0.027). Patients treated with HIPEC cisplatin + paclitaxel showed a median OS of 46 months (SD 6.4, 95% CI: 33.4-58.6), while patients treated with other HIPEC regimens showed a median OS of 12 months (SD 3.1, 95% CI: 6.0-18.0). The 2y-OS was 72% and 3y-OS was 68% for cisplatin + paclitaxel as HIPEC, while the 2y- and 3y-OS was 0% for other HIPEC regimens. Patients treated with HIPEC cisplatin + paclitaxel showed a median disease-free survival (DFS) of 13 months (SD 1.6, 95% CI: 9.9-16.1), while patients treated with other HIPEC regimens showed a median DFS of 8 months (SD 3.1, 95% CI: 1.9-14.1). In conclusion, HIPEC cisplatin + paclitaxel in ovarian cancer showed positive results that may be considered semi-definitive according to the level of evidence and should be considered a starting point for further investigations. At present HIPEC cisplatin + paclitaxel should be proposed to patients with advanced ovarian cancer as standard treatment at almost all stages of disease. Platinum + taxane-based intraperitoneal regimens demonstrated superior results compared to other regimens.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Federico Coccolini
- General, Emergency and Trauma Surgery, Pisa University Hospital, Pisa, Italy
| | - Paola Fugazzola
- General, Emergency and Trauma Surgery, Bufalini Hospital, Cesena, Italy
| | | | - Luca Ansaloni
- General, Emergency and Trauma Surgery, Bufalini Hospital, Cesena, Italy
| | - Massimo Chiarugi
- General, Emergency and Trauma Surgery, Pisa University Hospital, Pisa, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Ha HI, Lim MC. How do we perform hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy in ovarian cancer? -a narrative review. Gland Surg 2021; 10:1235-1243. [PMID: 33842270 DOI: 10.21037/gs-20-425] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/06/2022]
Abstract
Ovarian malignancy is a leading cause of death caused by gynecologic cancer worldwide because it is mainly found in the advanced stage and recurs in most patients even after cytoreductive surgery and intravenous (IV) chemotherapy. Prevention of recurrence of primary disease and treatment of recurrent ovarian cancer are still remained as major interest and lots of researchers investigate novel treatment to find optimal method. Even though intraperitoneal (IP) chemotherapy turns out to increase the overall survival, it is not widely used because of adverse event. As an alternative treatment for IP chemotherapy, hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (HIPEC) is emerging a new way. Thanks to much research and use in other cancer species, such as the colorectal cancer cytoreductive surgery followed by HIPEC is becoming a promising treatment. However, randomized controlled trials and unbiased data in ovarian cancer patients are still needed for the establishment of therapy. Moreover, among the current situation in which treatments such as bevacizumab or PARP inhibitor have been found to be effective and have been widely used, it may be necessary to establish the role in the combination of HIPEC. This article is a comprehensive review of the HIPEC in ovarian cancer to introduce techniques, treatment results, and clinical trials of HIPEC.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Hyeong In Ha
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Pusan National University Yangsan Hospital, Pusan National University School of Medicine, Yangsan, Korea
| | - Myong Cheol Lim
- Research Institute and Hospital, National Cancer Center, Goyang, Korea
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Asmar AE, Bendavides M, Moreau M, Hendlisz A, Deleporte A, Khalife M, Donckier V, Liberale G. Postoperative C-reactive protein kinetics predict postoperative complications in patients treated with cytoreductive surgery and hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy for peritoneal carcinomatosis. World J Surg Oncol 2020; 18:311. [PMID: 33243287 PMCID: PMC7694318 DOI: 10.1186/s12957-020-02081-6] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/09/2020] [Accepted: 11/09/2020] [Indexed: 03/31/2024] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Relatively high morbidity rates are reported after cytoreductive surgery (CRS) with hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (HIPEC). However, early predictors of complications after CRS plus HIPEC have not been identified. The aim of this study was to evaluate the predictive role of early postoperative serum C-reactive protein (CRP) level (Day 2-4) for the detection of post-operative complications. PATIENTS AND METHODS We performed a retrospective study including 94 patients treated with complete CRS (R1) and HIPEC for PC from various primary origins (2011-2016). Post-operative complications were recorded. The values for postoperative inflammatory markers (white blood cells [WBC] and platelet counts, CRP) were compared between the different groups. RESULTS CRP on post-operative days 2-4 was significantly higher in patients with than without complications (124 mg/L vs 46 mg/L; p < 0.0001) and higher in those with more major complications (162 mg/L vs 80 mg/L; p < 0.0012). WBC and platelet counts showed no difference within 5 days postoperatively. CONCLUSION CRP levels, and kinetics mainly, between post-operative day 2 and 4, are decisive predictive markers of early and late post-operative complications after CRS plus HIPEC. The presence of post-operative complications should be suspected in patients with a high CRP mean, and a plateau level (days 2-4).
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Antoine El Asmar
- Department of Surgical Oncology, Institut Jules Bordet, Université Libre de Bruxelles, 121, Blvd. de Waterloo, 1000, Brussels, Belgium.
| | - Melissa Bendavides
- Department of Surgical Oncology, Institut Jules Bordet, Université Libre de Bruxelles, 121, Blvd. de Waterloo, 1000, Brussels, Belgium
| | - Michel Moreau
- Department of Statistics, Institut Jules Bordet, Université Libre de Bruxelles, Brussels, Belgium
| | - Alain Hendlisz
- Department of Medical Oncology, Institut Jules Bordet, Université Libre de Bruxelles, Brussels, Belgium
| | - Amélie Deleporte
- Department of Medical Oncology, Institut Jules Bordet, Université Libre de Bruxelles, Brussels, Belgium
| | - Maher Khalife
- Department of Anesthesiology, Institut Jules Bordet, Université Libre de Bruxelles, Brussels, Belgium
| | - Vincent Donckier
- Department of Surgical Oncology, Institut Jules Bordet, Université Libre de Bruxelles, 121, Blvd. de Waterloo, 1000, Brussels, Belgium
| | - Gabriel Liberale
- Department of Surgical Oncology, Institut Jules Bordet, Université Libre de Bruxelles, 121, Blvd. de Waterloo, 1000, Brussels, Belgium
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Bouchard-Fortier G, Cusimano MC, Fazelzad R, Sajewycz K, Lu L, Espin-Garcia O, May T, Bouchard-Fortier A, Ferguson SE. Oncologic outcomes and morbidity following heated intraperitoneal chemotherapy at cytoreductive surgery for primary epithelial ovarian cancer: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Gynecol Oncol 2020; 158:218-228. [PMID: 32387131 DOI: 10.1016/j.ygyno.2020.03.034] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/11/2020] [Accepted: 03/31/2020] [Indexed: 12/11/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES Heated intraperitoneal chemotherapy (HIPEC) has not been universally adopted at the time of interval cytoreductive surgery for primary epithelial ovarian cancer (EOC) despite evidence of a 12-month overall survival (OS) benefit in a recent landmark randomized trial. We performed a systematic review and meta-analysis to assess oncologic outcomes and perioperative morbidity following HIPEC among primary EOC patients. METHODS We searched MEDLINE, EMBASE, the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, and the Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, from inception to August 2019, for observational and randomized studies of primary EOC patients undergoing HIPEC. We assessed risk of bias using the Institute of Health Economics Quality Appraisal Checklist for single-arm cohort studies, Newcastle-Ottawa Scale for comparative cohort studies, and Cochrane Collaboration's Tool for randomized trials. We qualitatively summarized survival outcomes and calculated the pooled proportion of 30-day grade III-IV morbidity and postoperative death. RESULTS We identified 35 articles including 2252 primary EOC patients; one study was a randomized trial, and only six studies included a comparator group of surgery alone. The timing, temperature, and chemotherapeutic agents used for HIPEC differed across studies. Reported OS was highly variable (3-year OS range: 46-77%); three comparative cohort studies and the sole randomized trial reported statistically significant survival benefits for HIPEC over surgery alone, while two comparative cohort studies did not. The pooled proportions for grade III-IV morbidity and postoperative death at 30 days were 34% (95% CI 20-52) and 0% (95% CI 0-5) respectively. CONCLUSION One randomized trial suggests that HIPEC at time of interval cytoreductive surgery should be considered in patients with primary EOC. However, there is significant heterogeneity in literature with respect to an appropriate HIPEC regimen, short- and long-term outcomes. High-quality prospective randomized trials are urgently needed to clarify the role of HIPEC in the first-line treatment of primary EOC.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Genevieve Bouchard-Fortier
- Department of Obstetrics & Gynecology, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada; Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, Toronto, ON, Canada.
| | - Maria C Cusimano
- Department of Obstetrics & Gynecology, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - Rouhi Fazelzad
- Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, University Health Network Library and Information Services, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - Katrina Sajewycz
- Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - Lin Lu
- Department of Biostatistics, Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, University Health Network, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - Osvaldo Espin-Garcia
- Department of Biostatistics, Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, University Health Network, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - Taymaa May
- Department of Obstetrics & Gynecology, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada; Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | | | - Sarah E Ferguson
- Department of Obstetrics & Gynecology, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada; Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, Toronto, ON, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Review of the Outcomes of Ovarian Cancer Treated with Cytoreductive Surgery and Heated Intraperitoneal Chemotherapy. INDIAN JOURNAL OF GYNECOLOGIC ONCOLOGY 2019. [DOI: 10.1007/s40944-019-0342-x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/25/2022]
|
9
|
Kireeva GS, Gafton GI, Guseynov KD, Senchik KY, Belyaeva OA, Bespalov VG, Panchenko AV, Maydin MA, Belyaev AM. HIPEC in patients with primary advanced ovarian cancer: Is there a role? A systematic review of short- and long-term outcomes. Surg Oncol 2018; 27:251-258. [PMID: 29937179 DOI: 10.1016/j.suronc.2018.05.006] [Citation(s) in RCA: 12] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/19/2017] [Revised: 02/13/2018] [Accepted: 05/02/2018] [Indexed: 12/12/2022]
Abstract
A systematic review of the studies where HIPEC combined with cytoreductive surgery was used in patients with primary advanced ovarian cancer was performed to understand is there a role for this treatment modality not only in recurrent but in primary advanced ovarian cancer. The results are controversial but there is a strong trend for improvement of the long-term outcomes of patients with primary advanced ovarian cancer after HIPEC.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- G S Kireeva
- N.N. Petrov National Medical Research Center of Oncology of the Russian Ministry of Health, 68, Leningradskaya Str., Pesochny, Saint-Petersburg, Russia, 197758.
| | - G I Gafton
- N.N. Petrov National Medical Research Center of Oncology of the Russian Ministry of Health, 68, Leningradskaya Str., Pesochny, Saint-Petersburg, Russia, 197758
| | - K D Guseynov
- N.N. Petrov National Medical Research Center of Oncology of the Russian Ministry of Health, 68, Leningradskaya Str., Pesochny, Saint-Petersburg, Russia, 197758
| | - K Y Senchik
- N.N. Petrov National Medical Research Center of Oncology of the Russian Ministry of Health, 68, Leningradskaya Str., Pesochny, Saint-Petersburg, Russia, 197758
| | - O A Belyaeva
- N.N. Petrov National Medical Research Center of Oncology of the Russian Ministry of Health, 68, Leningradskaya Str., Pesochny, Saint-Petersburg, Russia, 197758
| | - V G Bespalov
- N.N. Petrov National Medical Research Center of Oncology of the Russian Ministry of Health, 68, Leningradskaya Str., Pesochny, Saint-Petersburg, Russia, 197758
| | - A V Panchenko
- N.N. Petrov National Medical Research Center of Oncology of the Russian Ministry of Health, 68, Leningradskaya Str., Pesochny, Saint-Petersburg, Russia, 197758
| | - M A Maydin
- N.N. Petrov National Medical Research Center of Oncology of the Russian Ministry of Health, 68, Leningradskaya Str., Pesochny, Saint-Petersburg, Russia, 197758
| | - A M Belyaev
- N.N. Petrov National Medical Research Center of Oncology of the Russian Ministry of Health, 68, Leningradskaya Str., Pesochny, Saint-Petersburg, Russia, 197758
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Batista TP, Carneiro VCG, Tancredi R, Teles ALB, Badiglian-Filho L, Leão CS. Neoadjuvant chemotherapy followed by fast-track cytoreductive surgery plus short-course hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (HIPEC) in advanced ovarian cancer: preliminary results of a promising all-in-one approach. Cancer Manag Res 2017; 9:869-878. [PMID: 29263704 PMCID: PMC5732565 DOI: 10.2147/cmar.s153327] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/23/2022] Open
Abstract
Purpose Hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (HIPEC) has been considered a promising treatment option for advanced or recurrent ovarian cancer, but there is no clear evidence based on randomized controlled trials to advocate this approach as a standard therapy. In this study, we aim to present the early outcomes and insights after an interim analysis of a pioneering clinical trial in Brazil. Methods This study was a cross-sectional analysis of early data from our ongoing clinical trial – an open-label, double-center, single-arm trial on the safety and efficacy of using HIPEC for advanced ovarian cancer (ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT02249013). A fast-track recovery strategy was also applied to improve patient outcomes. Results Nine patients with stage IIIB (n=1) or IIIC (n=8) epithelial malignancies were enrolled until February 2017. The median (range) serum CA125 level at diagnosis was 692 (223.7–6550) U/mL. The median number of preoperative cycles of intravenous (i.v.) chemotherapy was 3 (2–4), resulting in peritoneal cancer index scores of 9 (3–18) at the time of HIPEC. Time of restarting i.v. chemotherapy was 37 (33–50) days with all patients completing 6 cycles as planned. The median operation time was 395 (235–760) minutes, the length of hospital stay was 4 (3–10) days, and all the patients left the ICU on the morning after the procedure. Two patients experienced no postoperative complications, whereas 91% of the complications were minor G1/G2 events. Preliminary assessment also suggested no impairment of the patient’s quality of life. Conclusion Our comprehensive protocol might represent a promising all-in-one approach for advanced ovarian cancer. The patient recruitment for this trial is ongoing.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Thales Paulo Batista
- Department of Surgery/Oncology, IMIP - Instituto de Medicina Integral Professor Fernando Figueira.,Department of Surgery, UFPE - Universidade Federal de Pernambuco
| | - Vandré Cabral G Carneiro
- Department of Surgery/Oncology, IMIP - Instituto de Medicina Integral Professor Fernando Figueira.,Department of Gynecology, HCP - Hospital de Câncer de Pernambuco
| | - Rodrigo Tancredi
- Department of Clinical Oncology, IMIP - Instituto de Medicina Integral Professor Fernando Figueira.,Department of Clinical Oncology, HCP - Hospital de Câncer de Pernambuco
| | - Ana Ligia Bezerra Teles
- Department of Anaesthesiology, IMIP - Instituto de Medicina Integral Professor Fernando Figueira, Recife
| | | | - Cristiano Souza Leão
- Department of Surgery, IMIP - Instituto de Medicina Integral Professor Fernando Figueira, Recife, Brazil
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Wang TY, Chen CY, Lu CH, Chen MC, Lee LW, Huang TH, Hsieh MC, Chen CJ, Yu CM, Chuang HC, Liao TT, Tseng CW, Huang WS. Cytoreductive surgery with hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy for peritoneal malignancy: preliminary results of a multi-disciplinary teamwork model in Asia. Int J Hyperthermia 2017; 34:328-335. [PMID: 28562119 DOI: 10.1080/02656736.2017.1337238] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/17/2023] Open
Affiliation(s)
- Ting-Yao Wang
- Department of Hematology and Oncology, Chang Gung Memorial Hospital, Chiayi, Taiwan
- Peritoneal Malignancy Program of Cancer Centre, Chang-Gung Memorial Hospital, Chiayi, Taiwan
- College of Medicine, Chang Gung University, Taoyuan, Taiwan
| | - Chao-Yu Chen
- Peritoneal Malignancy Program of Cancer Centre, Chang-Gung Memorial Hospital, Chiayi, Taiwan
- College of Medicine, Chang Gung University, Taoyuan, Taiwan
- Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Chang Gung Memorial Hospital, Chiayi, Taiwan
- Department of Nursing, Chang Gung University of Science and Technology, Taiwan
| | - Chang-Hsien Lu
- Department of Hematology and Oncology, Chang Gung Memorial Hospital, Chiayi, Taiwan
- Peritoneal Malignancy Program of Cancer Centre, Chang-Gung Memorial Hospital, Chiayi, Taiwan
| | - Min-Chi Chen
- Department of Hematology and Oncology, Chang Gung Memorial Hospital, Chiayi, Taiwan
- Biostatistics Consulting Centre and Department of Public Health, College of Medicine, Chang Gung University, Taoyuan, Taiwan
| | - Li-Wen Lee
- Peritoneal Malignancy Program of Cancer Centre, Chang-Gung Memorial Hospital, Chiayi, Taiwan
- College of Medicine, Chang Gung University, Taoyuan, Taiwan
- Department of Nursing, Chang Gung University of Science and Technology, Taiwan
- Department of Diagnostic Radiology, Chang Gung Memorial Hospital, Chiayi, Taiwan
| | - Tzu-Hao Huang
- Peritoneal Malignancy Program of Cancer Centre, Chang-Gung Memorial Hospital, Chiayi, Taiwan
- College of Medicine, Chang Gung University, Taoyuan, Taiwan
- Division of General Surgery, Department of Surgery, Chang Gung Memorial Hospital, Chiayi, Taiwan
| | - Meng-Chiao Hsieh
- Peritoneal Malignancy Program of Cancer Centre, Chang-Gung Memorial Hospital, Chiayi, Taiwan
- College of Medicine, Chang Gung University, Taoyuan, Taiwan
- Division of Colorectal Surgery, Department of Surgery, Chang Gung Memorial Hospital, Chiayi, Taiwan
| | - Chih-Jung Chen
- Peritoneal Malignancy Program of Cancer Centre, Chang-Gung Memorial Hospital, Chiayi, Taiwan
- College of Medicine, Chang Gung University, Taoyuan, Taiwan
- Division of Colorectal Surgery, Department of Surgery, Chang Gung Memorial Hospital, Chiayi, Taiwan
| | - Chung-Ming Yu
- Peritoneal Malignancy Program of Cancer Centre, Chang-Gung Memorial Hospital, Chiayi, Taiwan
- College of Medicine, Chang Gung University, Taoyuan, Taiwan
- Department of Anesthesia, Chang Gung Memorial Hospital, Chiayi, Taiwan
| | - Huei-Chieh Chuang
- College of Medicine, Chang Gung University, Taoyuan, Taiwan
- Department of Pathology, Chang Gung Memorial Hospital, Chiayi, Taiwan
| | - Tzu-Ting Liao
- Peritoneal Malignancy Program of Cancer Centre, Chang-Gung Memorial Hospital, Chiayi, Taiwan
- Department of Cancer Centre, Chang Gung Memorial Hospital, Chiayi, Taiwan
| | - Chih-Wen Tseng
- Department of Hematology and Oncology, Chang Gung Memorial Hospital, Chiayi, Taiwan
- Peritoneal Malignancy Program of Cancer Centre, Chang-Gung Memorial Hospital, Chiayi, Taiwan
| | - Wen-Shih Huang
- Peritoneal Malignancy Program of Cancer Centre, Chang-Gung Memorial Hospital, Chiayi, Taiwan
- College of Medicine, Chang Gung University, Taoyuan, Taiwan
- Division of Colorectal Surgery, Department of Surgery, Chang Gung Memorial Hospital, Chiayi, Taiwan
| |
Collapse
|