Groin Recurrences in Node Negative Vulvar Cancer Patients After Sole Sentinel Lymph Node Dissection

Effect of known pathological risk factors on the incidence of metastatic lymph nodes and survival in early-stage vulvar cancer: SEER analysis

OBJECTIVE

The current study was performed to evaluate the incidence of positive lymph nodes (LNs) in relation to known pathological risk factors, specifically among patients with apparent low-grade, small tumors.

METHODS

We used the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) database to retrospectively identify patients with vulvar squamous cell carcinoma (SCC) diagnosed between January 1, 2000, and December 31, 2019, with known tumor size and regional LN examined. A comparison between patients who had positive and negative LNs was conducted to identify risk factors for LN metastases in relation to survival. Subgroup analysis was conducted in patients with diagnosed grade 1 vulvar SCC and tumor size up to 2 cm according to the status of LNs.

RESULTS

Multivariate analysis found that both grade of disease and tumor size were significant factors in predicting LN status. Among patients with low-grade small tumors up to 2 cm, the odds ratio for positive LNs was 2.5 for those with tumor size larger than 1 cm. In a multivariate survival analysis, older age, larger tumor size, and positive LNs were independently associated with decreased survival.

CONCLUSIONS

The current study confirms that among small tumors, those larger than 1 cm have a significantly increased risk for positive nodes compared with those smaller than 1 cm, and, among this specific group, patients with positive nodes have decreased survival. Future studies are needed to answer the question of whether, in the era of the sentinel node procedure, it is safe to omit LN evaluation altogether.

A study of recurrence, complication and survival rates in patients with early stage vulval cancer undergoing sentinel lymph node sampling: a single-centre experience

PURPOSE

Groin sentinel lymph node (SLN) identification and removal has become a standard of care for women with clinical early stage vulval cancer. There is evidence to support safe detection of the SLN with minimal morbidity. The purpose of this study is to report our experience of managing patients focusing on patient selection, adverse events, quality assurance of the procedure and any benefits and/or disadvantages to patients.

METHODS

This was a retrospective study of patients with clinical early stage vulval cancer in a cancer centre over 5 years. Notes and hospital data were reviewed including admissions to emergency departments. Statistical software was used for the statistical analysis and the Kaplan Meier survival curve was generated to present survival rates.

RESULTS

61 cases were analysed. A total of 156 nodes have been removed and positive nodes were identified in 14 cases. In total, 9 women (14.75%) had disease recurrence within 5 years from primary surgery. Overall, 4 patients (6.5%) developed groin recurrence. In 3 of these patients there was isolated groin recurrence (4.9%). The median length of admission was 3 days and 6 cases were managed as day cases.

CONCLUSIONS

Since the closure of the GROINNS-2 trial we have continued the procedure of SLN identification for women with clinical early stage vulval cancer. We have shown high level of adherence to our protocol and survival and complication rates comparable to other studies on the same field. There were a few patients managed as day-case which was of benefit to the patients.

A comparison of ICG-NIR with blue dye and technetium for the detection of sentinel lymph nodes in vulvar cancer

INTRODUCTION

The sentinel lymph node (SLN) procedure for vulva cancer is a safe alternative to a radical inguino-femoral lymphadenectomy (IFLN) for small unifocal tumours. SLN evaluation through biopsy and ultra-staging has helped gynaecological oncology surgeons improve operative morbidity with no cost to oncologic safety. Established techniques for groin SLN detection and excision in vulvar cancer use ^99mTc-nanocolloid radiotracer and blue dye (BD) for identification of the SLN. Indocyanine green (ICG)-near infrared (ICG-NIR) techniques for SLN mapping have proven utility in other gynaecological cancer sites and is gaining interest as a technique for SLN mapping in vulvar cancer METHODS: Fifty consecutive patients with unifocal vulvar squamous cell cancers of <40 mm lateral diameter and with depth of invasion > 1 mm underwent SLN mapping and excision using a combination of ^99mTc-nanocolloid, BD and ICG. SLN detection results were recorded on a per-patient and per-groin basis. The success rates SLN for detection by individual tracer substance or combinations of tracer were determined by presence of one or more tracer, detectable in the SLN specimen.

RESULTS

92% of patients had a successful SLN procedure. The per-groin detection rate was 84%. All successfully mapped SLN were identified with the combination of ICG-NIR and ^99mTc-nanocolloid compared to 69% with BD ^99mTc-nanocolloid. Success rates for the SLN procedure were not dependent on prior excision of the primary lesion or operator experience.

CONCLUSIONS

Incorporation of ICG-NIR into standard SLN mapping protocols may allow for the abandonment of routine use of BD and its poor side effect profile.

Sentinel lymph node procedure in patients with recurrent vulvar squamous cell carcinoma: a proposed protocol for a multicentre observational study

Background

Standard groin treatment in recurrent vulvar cancer consists of uni- or bilateral inguinofemoral lymphadenectomy (IFL), whereas in the primary setting women with selected unifocal tumours will undergo a sentinel lymph node (SLN) procedure. The SLN procedure results in fewer short and long-term sequelae compared to IFL, but some concerns must first be considered. Lymph drainage of the vulvar region can be affected by a previous surgery, which might reduce the number of detectable SLN nodes (feasibility) but increase the chance of encountering aberrant lymph drainage patterns such as bilateral SLNs in lateral tumours or SLNs at unexpected locations. Therefore, the SLN procedure potentially carries a higher risk of groin recurrence if a tumour positive node is not retrieved, but may also improve outcomes for women with aberrant drainage patterns. Since the relative benefits and drawbacks of the SLN procedure are still unclear we will investigate the safety of the SLN procedure in women with a first recurrent vulvar cancer. In a simultaneously started registration study we prospectively gather information on women with a first recurrence of vulvar cancer ineligible for the SLN procedure.

Method

In this prospective multicentre observational study all women with a first recurrence of vulvar cancer will be asked to consent to the collection of information on their diagnostics, treatment and outcome, and to complete quality of life and lymph oedema questionnaires. Women with unifocal tumours smaller than 4 cm and unsuspicious groin nodes will be offered the SLN procedure, with follow-up every 3 months together with imaging at 6 and 12 months when the SLN is tumour negative. The primary outcome is groin recurrence within 2 years of initial surgery. A total of 150 women with negative SLNs will be required to demonstrate safety, a stopping rule will apply and an extensive statistical analysis has been designed.

Discussion

Should the SLN procedure prove feasible and safe in recurrent vulvar cancer, it will be available for implementation in clinics worldwide. The inclusion of women ineligible for the SLN procedure in the current prospective study will help to bridge knowledge gaps and define future research questions.

Trial registration

Medical Ethical Committee approval number NL70149.078.19 (trial protocol version 2.0, date March 2nd, 2020). Affiliation: Erasmus Medical Centre. Dutch trial register NL8467. Date of registration 19.03.2020.

The giant steps in surgical downsizing toward a personalized treatment of vulvar cancer

The present article aims to highlight the importance of changes of personalized surgical treatment for vulvar cancer. Current international literature regarding surgical treatment of vulvar cancer was evaluated. This included several studies and systematic reviews. Radical surgery approach, such as en bloc resection, was the first therapeutic option and the standard care for many years, even if burdened with a high complication rate and frequently disfiguring. Taussing and Way introduced radical vulvectomy approach with en bloc bilateral inguinal-femoral lymphadenectomy; modified radical vulvectomy was developed, with a wide radical excision of the primary tumor. The role of inguinofemoral lymphadenectomy (mono or bilateral) changed in the years too, particularly with the advent of SLN biopsy as minimally invasive surgical approach for lymph node staging, in patients with unifocal cancer <4 cm, without suspicious groin nodes. More personalized and conservative surgical approach, consisting of wide local or wide radical excisions, is necessary to reduce complications as lymphedema or sexual disfunction. The optimal surgical management of vulvar cancer needs to consider dimensions, staging, depth of invasion, presence of carcinoma at the surgical margins of resection and grading, with the goal of making the treatment as individualized as possible.

The potential risk of contralateral non-sentinel groin node metastasis in women with early primary vulvar cancer following unilateral sentinel node metastasis: a single center evaluation in University Hospital of Düsseldorf

Background

Since the introduction of sentinel node biopsy (SLNB) in unifocal vulvar cancer (diameter of < 4 cm) and unsuspicious groin lymph nodes, the morbidity rate of patients has significantly decreased globally. In contrast to SLNB, bilateral inguinofemoral lymphadenectomy (IFL) has been associated with increased risk of common morbidities. Current guidelines (NCCN, ESGO, RCOG, and German) recommend that in cases of unilaterally positive sentinel lymph node (SLN), bilateral IFL should be performed. However, two recent publications by Woelber et al. and Nica et al. contradict the current guideline, since a significant rate of positive non sentinel lymph nodes in IFL contralaterally was not observed [Woelber et al. 0% (p = 0/28) and Nica et al. 5.3% (p = 1/19)].

Methods

A retrospective single-center analysis conducted in the University Hospital of Dusseldorf, evaluating vulvar cancer patients treated with SLNB from 2002 to 2018.

Results

22.2% of women (n = 4/18) were found to have contralateral IFL groin metastasis after an initial diagnosis of unilateral SLN metastasis. The depth of tumor infiltrating cells correlated significantly and positively with the rate of incidence of groin metastasis (p = 0.0038).

Conclusion

Current guideline for bilateral IFL should remain as the standard management. Therefore, this depth may be taken into account as an indication for bilateral IFL. The management of VC and SLNB should be performed in a high volume center with an experienced team in marking SLN and performing the adequate surgical procedure. Well conducted counseling of the patients outlining advantages but also potential oncological risks of this technique especially concerning rate of groin recurrence is critical.

Proposal for modified inguinofemoral lymphadenectomy derived from investigation of anatomic distribution of sentinel and metastatic nodes in vulvar cancer

OBJECTIVE

We aimed to develop a less invasive inguinofemoral lymphadenectomy (IFL) approach for vulvar cancer based on the investigation of the anatomic distribution of sentinel and metastatic nodes.

METHODS

Patients with vulvar cancer treated by surgery between 1995 and 2019 were retrospectively reviewed. A seven-field method was adopted to assign the anatomic locations for lymph nodes removed via IFL or sentinel node biopsy. Only patients with nodal metastasis or sentinel nodes were included.

RESULTS

A total of 102 patients with eligible data were analyzed. Nodal metastasis was confirmed in 118 groins undergoing IFL; sentinel node detection succeeded in 46 groins. The medial-inguinal field had the highest rate of nodal metastasis involvement (59.3%, 70/118) and sentinel nodes present (73.9%, 34/46). The inferior-femoral field was involved only in one groin with quadruple-field metastases. The lateral-inguinal field was not involved in any groin. Neither the lateral-inguinal nor the inferior-femoral field presented sentinel nodes.

CONCLUSION

The lateral-inguinal and inferior-femoral fields of the groins have a low risk of developing nodal metastasis. Therefore, a modified IFL preserving these fields can be established to reduce surgical morbidity without sacrificing its therapeutic effect.

Sentinel lymph node biopsy in vulvar cancer: status, level of knowledge, and counseling in outpatient setting

PURPOSE

Evaluating the counseling of patients with vulvar cancer in outpatient setting regarding the application of sentinel lymph node dissection (SLND), the selection of hospitals for further treatment, and level of knowledge.

METHODS

A questionnaire containing 29 questions about SLND in vulvar cancer was sent to gynecologists in Lower Saxony. The questionnaire contained multiple choice questions and open questions. The study was approved by the local ethics committee.

RESULTS

The median age of the 86 respondents was 54 (26-66) years. Most participants (83.1%) reported to only treat one to five patients with vulvar cancer per year. Interestingly, 70.5% of the gynecologists send their patients to university hospitals and 64.1% to hospitals offering maximum care, respectively. Of all, 32.7% replied that SLND was performed rarely or never in their patients. The gynecologists answered that only 36.7% of the patients are well informed about advantages and possible disadvantages of SLND. Most (84%) felt responsible to counsel patients on treatment decisions independently from or additionally to the hospital. Of all, 72% replied that they are not completely sure about the exact recurrence rates after SLND. Of notice, 66% believe that SLND for vulvar cancer is safe if applied in specialized centers and 92% stated that focusing treatment on specialized centers is required for best results.

CONCLUSION

SLND for vulvar cancer is widely accepted and regularly recommended among gynecologists. Outpatient doctors report to send most patients to specialized centers. However, it appears that patients remain uninformed after counseling in the clinics and that there is a lack of detailed knowledge about risks and complication rates of groin treatment in the outpatient setting.

Sentinel lymph node biopsy procedure in squamous vulvar cancer. 10 years follow-up analysis

AIM

Application of sentinel lymph node biopsy (SLNB) procedure in early-stage vulvar cancer and analysis of results, recurrences and complications.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

40 patients with vulvar cancer and SLNB between 2008 and 2018 were retrospectively reviewed. During the surgical procedure the inguinofemoral lymph nodes were checked with a gamma probe to identify the sentinel nodes that were removed and referred for intraoperative pathological assessment. Subsequently, long-term patient follow-up was performed with analysis of complications, relapse and mortality.

RESULTS

40 patients (mean age: 72 years [47-86], the overall detection rate per patient was 95% and a total of 129 Sentinel Lymph Nodes (SLNs) were removed (3.22 SLN/patient). In 3 out of 25 patients with lateral tumour lesions drainage was bilateral and in 2 out of 15 with midline lesions drainage was unilateral. On lymphoscintigraphy, 16 out of 40 had bilateral drainage and 24 unilateral. A total of 119 SLN- and 10 SLN+ were obtained, in 8 out of 10 an inguinofemoral lymphadenectomy was performed. In the SLN- group, one case of lymphatic blockage and one false negative were included. In 12 out of 40 patients there were post-surgical complications, 4 of them lymphoedemas. In the median follow-up (40 months), 6 out of 10 with SLN+ (40% mortality) and 7 out of 30 SLN- (16% mortality) had recurrences.

CONCLUSIONS

SLNB in vulvar cancer is the technique of choice for correct staging and locoregional therapy. Correct clinical lymph node staging is important before surgery in order to avoid potential blockage drainages which could induce a false negative SLN.

British Gynaecological Cancer Society (BGCS) vulval cancer guidelines: Recommendations for practice

The purpose of this guideline is to collate evidence and propose evidence-based guidelines for the diagnosis and management of adult patients with vulva carcinoma treated in the UK. Malignant melanoma may present via similar routes and will be discussed. The reader is referred to the Ano-uro-genital Mucosal Melanoma Full Guideline [1] for more detailed recommendations. The management of vulval sarcoma is outside of the scope of this guideline. For further information, including details of guideline development and GRADE of recommendations, please see BGCS website for details (https://www.bgcs.org.uk/professionals/guidelines-for-recent-publications/).

Lymphoscintigraphy and sentinel lymph node biopsy in vulvar carcinoma: update from a European expert panel

PURPOSE

This study aimed to update the clinical practice applications and technical procedures of sentinel lymph node (SLN) biopsy in vulvar cancer from European experts.

METHODS

A systematic data search using PubMed/MEDLINE database was performed up to May 29, 2019. Only original studies focused on SLN biopsy in vulvar cancer, published in the English language and with a minimum of nine patients were selected.

RESULTS

Among 280 citations, 65 studies fulfilled the inclusion criteria. On the basis of the published evidences and consensus of European experts, this study provides an updated overview on clinical applications and technical procedures of SLN biopsy in vulvar cancer.

CONCLUSIONS

SLN biopsy is nowadays the standard treatment for well-selected women with clinically negative lymph nodes. Negative SLN is associated with a low groin recurrence rate and a good 5-year disease-specific survival rate. SLN biopsy is the most cost-effective approach than lymphadenectomy in early-stage vulvar cancer. However, future trials should focus on the safe extension of the indication of SLN biopsy in vulvar cancer. Although radiotracers and optical agents are widely used in the clinical routine, there is an increasing interest for hybrid tracers like indocyanine-^99mTc-nanocolloid. Finally, it is essential to standardise the acquisition protocol including SPECT/CT images, and due to the low incidence of this type of malignancy to centralise this procedure in experienced centres for personalised approach.

[Cancer of the vulva: Diagnostic stages, treatment and survival in a country with limited resources (Burkina Faso)]

INTRODUCTION

Vulvar cancer is rare and belatedly diagnosed in Africa. We describe its diagnostic stages, therapeutic and evolution features in a country with limited resources.

METHODOLOGY

Forty-seven cases of vulvar cancer diagnosed between 2013 and 2018 in Burkina Faso, were analyzed retrospectively. The diagnostic stages, therapeutic and evolution terms were considered. Survival was calculated through the Kaplan Meier Method and compared using the Logrank technique.

RESULTS

Stages IA and IB accounted for 10.6%. Radiotherapy was not available and chemotherapy was done in 9 cases. Full vulvectomy with bilateral inguino-femoral dissection was performed in 11 cases. Average survival was 41 months with a median of 52 months. The difference in survival according to the diagnostic stages were highly significant statistically (P=0.000).

DISCUSSION

Cancer of the vulva is rare and raises major therapeutic difficulties in countries with limited resources. Surgery is the only affordable weapon. Evolution would be better if radiochemotherapy was possible.

CONCLUSION

Radiochemotherapy cannot be done due to the lack of a radiotherapy unit and the high cost of cytotoxics. Surgery is largely palliative and/or mutilating. Survival is modest. An early diagnosis could help promote conserving treatments.

Long term outcomes in patients with sentinel lymph nodes (SLNs) identified by injecting remaining scar after previously excised vulvar cancer

BACKGROUND

Lymph node metastasis is the most important prognostic factor in patients with vulvar squamous cell carcinoma (SCC). Previous excision of the vulvar tumor may disrupt lymphatic channels and alter the accuracy of the sentinel lymph node (SLN) biopsy. The purpose of this study was to measure outcomes after SLN biopsy in patients with and without previous excision of the vulvar tumor.

METHODS

Retrospective study of patients at a single institution with primary vulvar cancer, clinically negative nodes, and vulvar tumors < 4 cm treated with surgical excision who had SLN biopsy (2008-2015).

RESULTS

There were 106 cases of concomitant wide local excision (WLE) and SLN biopsy and 24 additional cases of patients who had previous vulvar surgery and no visible tumor; these patients underwent scar re-excision and SLN biopsy. Median follow-up was 31 months. Patients who had previous tumor excision were more likely to be of younger age (p = 0.0001), have a smaller tumor (p = 0.002), and less depth of invasion (p = 0.02). In the wide local excision of the scar specimen, 11 patients (46%) had no residual disease left, 8 patients (33%) had only vulvar intraepithelial neoplasia (VINIII), 4 patients (17%) had carcinoma in situ with focal invasion and 1 patient (4%) had invasive carcinoma within the second specimen, resected with clear margins. There were no groin recurrences in patients who underwent scar re-excision and who had a negative SLN biopsy.

CONCLUSION

SLN biopsy is feasible and safe in patients who have had previous excision of the vulvar tumor and present with a scar. When a SLN is detected by injecting the remaining scar, this accurately reflects the nodal status and does not negatively impact oncologic outcomes.

Sentinel lymph nodes in vulvar cancer: Management dilemmas in patients with positive nodes and larger tumors

BACKGROUND

Although sentinel lymph node (SLN) biopsy has been routinely used in the treatment of invasive squamous cell carcinoma (SCC), questions still remain regarding the management of patients with positive nodes, as well as its use in patients with larger tumors.

METHODS

Retrospective study of all patients at a single institution with primary vulvar cancer who had SLN biopsy (2008-2015). Patient and tumor characteristics were collected from hospital records. For patients with positive SLN and for those with tumors ≥40 mm, recurrence rates and location were specifically recorded.

RESULTS

SLN biopsy was successful in 159 patients (245 groins). Median follow-up was 31 months. 120 patients (187 groins) had a negative SLN without an inguinofemoral lymph node dissection (IFL); there were 6 ipsilateral groin recurrences (5%). 7 patients had micrometastasis (≤2 mm) in the SLN and were treated by radiotherapy. There were no recurrences in the irradiated groins. 19 patients with a positive unilateral SLN had bilateral IFL. One (5.3%) had a positive node in the contralateral groin. 9 patients with positive unilateral SLN had subsequent ipsilateral IFL; there were no groin recurrences in the contralateral groin. 20 patients had tumor size ≥40 mm. 11 patients had a negative SLN biopsy, and thus no IFL; of these patients, 1 had an isolated groin recurrence (9%).

CONCLUSION

These data suggest it is reasonable to omit a full groin dissection for micrometastatic disease in the SLN, and to perform a unilateral groin dissection in patients with unilateral SLN metastasis. SLN alone in larger tumors may have a higher groin recurrence rate.

Long-term oncological outcomes of patients with negative sentinel lymph node in vulvar cancer. Comparative study with conventional lymphadenectomy

INTRODUCTION

The aim of this study was to compare oncological outcomes and morbidity in patients with early-stage vulvar cancer with negative sentinel lymph node (SLN) biopsy vs negative inguinofemoral lymphadenectomy (IFL).

MATERIAL AND METHODS

Study with retrospectively collected data in patients with squamous cell vulvar carcinomas ≤ 4 cm without suspected inguinofemoral lymph node metastases. Only patients with negative nodes after histopathology procedure were followed. Patients who underwent only SLN were compared with patients who underwent IFL ± SLN to compare recurrences, survival rates and morbidity.

RESULTS

Ninety-three patients were eligible for follow up: 42 with negative SLN and 51 with negative IFL ± SLN. The median follow-up period was 60.4 months (range 6.7-160.7). The rate of isolated first groin recurrence was 4.8% in patients with negative SLN and 2.0% in patients with negative IFL ± SLN (P = 0.587) and the rates of first isolated local recurrence were 28.6% and 31.4%, respectively (P = 0.823). Only 1 patient (2.4%) in the group of negative SLN had distant recurrence. The disease-specific survival rate at 5 years was 83.3% in the negative SLN group and 92.2% in the negative IFL ± SLN group (P = 0.214). We observed a higher rate of wound breakdown and infection after IFL than SLN biopsy (17.6% vs 10.6%; P = 0.020) and lymphedema (33.3% vs 0%; P < 0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

We report in the same population of patients with early-stage vulvar cancer that SLN biopsy does not have significantly higher rates of groin recurrences or lower survival rates compared with IFL. Moreover, the SLN procedure has less morbidity, which should encourage gynecologists to abandon IFL.

Adjuvant Radiotherapy in High-Risk Squamous Cell Carcinoma of the Vulva: A Two-Institutional Italian Experience

BACKGROUND

The aim of this study was to assess the treatment benefit and patterns of recurrence for patients with high-risk vulvar squamous cell carcinoma treated with surgery followed by adjuvant radiotherapy (RT).

PATIENTS AND METHODS

From January 1999 to June 2016, 51 patients underwent total or partial deep vulvectomy with inguinofemoral lymphadenectomy followed by adjuvant RT with 45-50 Gy in 25 fractions +/- a 4-10 Gy boost. 17 (33.3%) women received concomitant chemotherapy.

RESULTS

Median overall survival was 81 months. The 5-year disease-free survival and overall survival rates were 52 and 63%, respectively. In univariate and multivariate analysis, patients aged ≤ 76 years and those receiving an RT total dose of > 54 Gy had a significantly lower risk of progression (p = 0.044 and 0.045; p = 0.012 and 0.018, respectively) and death (p = 0.015 and 0.011; p = 0.015 and 0.026, respectively). There was a trend towards a lower risk of progression for patients with tumor size ≤ 4 (p = 0.098) and negative lymphovascular space involvement (p = 0.080). Also, there was a trend towards a higher risk of death (p = 0.075) for grade 3 tumors. Concomitant chemotherapy provided no significant benefit.

CONCLUSION

Only age and RT total dose are significant prognostic variables for squamous cell carcinoma of the vulva treated with primary surgery and adjuvant RT to improve local and locoregional control.

Sentinel Lymphadenectomy in Vulvar Cancer Using Near-Infrared Fluorescence From Indocyanine Green Compared With Technetium 99m Nanocolloid

Objective

Nowadays, sentinel diagnostic is performed using technetium 99m (99mTc) nanocolloid as a radioactive marker and sometimes patent blue. In the last years, indocyanine green has been evaluated for sentinel diagnostic in different tumor entities. Indocyanine green is a fluorescent molecule that emits a light signal in the near-infrared band after excitation. Our study aimed to evaluate indocyanine green compared with the criterion-standard 99mTc-nanocolloid.

Methods

We included patients with primary, unifocal vulvar cancer of less than 4 cm with clinically node-negative groins in this prospective trial. Sentinel diagnostic was carried out using 99mTc-nanocolloid, indocyanine green, and patent blue. We examined each groin for light signals from the near-infrared band, for radioactivity, and for blue staining. A sentinel lymph node was defined as a 99mTc-nanocolloid–positive lymph node. All sentinel lymph nodes and all additional blue or fluorescent lymph nodes were excised and tested and then sent for histologic examination.

Results

In all, 27 patients were included in whom we found 91 sentinel lymph nodes in 52 groins. All these lymph nodes were positive for indocyanine green, also giving a sensitivity of 100% (95% confidence interval [CI], 96.0%–100%) compared with 99mTc-nanocolloid. Eight additional lymph nodes showed indocyanine green fluorescence but no 99mTc positivity, so that the positive predictive value was 91.9% (95% confidence interval, 84.6%–96.5%). In 1 patient, a false-negative sentinel missed by all 3 modalities was found.

Conclusions

Our results show that indocyanine green is a promising approach for inguinal sentinel identification in vulvar cancer with a similar sensitivity as radioactive 99mTc-nanocolloid and worth to be evaluated in further studies.