1
|
Bruno M, Ludovisi M, Ronsini C, Capanna G, Stabile G, Guido M. Tertiary Cytoreduction for Isolated Lymphnode Recurrence (ILNR) Ovarian Cancer in a BRCA2 Mutated Patient: Our Experience and Prevalence of BRCA 1 or 2 Genes Mutational Status in ILNR. Medicina (B Aires) 2023; 59:medicina59030606. [PMID: 36984607 PMCID: PMC10056081 DOI: 10.3390/medicina59030606] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/28/2023] [Revised: 03/11/2023] [Accepted: 03/17/2023] [Indexed: 03/22/2023] Open
Abstract
We report the case of a tertiary cytoreductive surgery for isolated lymph-node recurrence (ILNR) in a 54-years old Brest cancer 2 (BRCA 2) mutated patients, with a personal history of ovarian cancer previously treated elsewhere. She was admitted to our department for a suspected isolated lymph-nodal pelvic recurrence. A positron emission tomography acquisition with contrast enhanced computed tomography (PET-CT) scan revealed an increased node at the level of the right external iliac (SUV 6.9) in correspondence with the obturator nerve, which was confirmed by transvaginal ultrasound. Since the recurrence was in a single site and the patient had previously undergone three lines of chemotherapy and maintenance with Poly(ADP-ribose) polymerase (PARP) inhibitors, we decided to perform tertiary cytoreductive surgery by minimally invasive laparoscopic approach. After gradual and careful isolation of the obturator nerve, lumbo-sacral trunk and venous vessels afferent to the external and internal iliac vein, the suspected node has been removed. No intra- and postoperative complications occurred. The patient was discharged three days after procedure. We decided to quarterly follow-up; actually, after 16 months no recurrence was detected. Several studies have reported ILNR as a unique clinical disease with low growth rate and less chemosensitivity; this can lead to considered ILNR more susceptible to take advantage of surgical treatment, even in case of second or third recurrence. The BRCA mutational status seems to play a role in the decision-making process in the approach to patients with platinum sensitive relapse of ovarian cancer or in specific isolated forms of recurrence such as the hepatic one. However, data on frequency and prognostic impact of BRCA gene mutation in ILNR are very limited. In this article we investigated the role of BRCA 1 or 2 mutational status in this rare pattern of recurrence according to more recent advances in literature.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Matteo Bruno
- Obstetrics and Gynaecology Unit, San Salvatore Hospital, 67100 L’Aquila, Italy
| | - Manuela Ludovisi
- Department of Life, Health and Environmental Sciences, University of L’Aquila, 67100 L’Aquila, Italy
| | - Carlo Ronsini
- Department of Woman, Child and General and Specialized Surgery, Obstetrics and Gynecology Unit, University of Campania “Luigi Vanvitelli”, 80138 Naples, Italy
| | - Giulia Capanna
- Department of Life, Health and Environmental Sciences, University of L’Aquila, 67100 L’Aquila, Italy
| | - Guglielmo Stabile
- Institute for Maternal and Child Health-IRCCS “Burlo Garofolo”, Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, 34137 Trieste, Italy
- Correspondence:
| | - Maurizio Guido
- Department of Life, Health and Environmental Sciences, University of L’Aquila, 67100 L’Aquila, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Isolated lymph node recurrence in epithelial ovarian cancer: Recurrence with better prognosis? Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol 2020; 249:64-69. [PMID: 32381349 DOI: 10.1016/j.ejogrb.2020.04.049] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/16/2019] [Revised: 04/14/2020] [Accepted: 04/20/2020] [Indexed: 12/24/2022]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION The aim of this study was to compare overall survival (OS) between women with isolated lymph node recurrence (ILNR) and those with isolated peritoneal localization of recurrence (ICR), in patients managed for epithelial ovarian cancer. METHODS Data from 1508 patients with ovarian cancer were collected retrospectively from1 January 2000 to 31 December 2016, from the FRANCOGYN database, pooling data from 11 centres specialized in ovary treatment. Median overall survival was determined using the Kaplan-Meier method. Univariate and multivariate analyses were performed to define prognostic factors of overall survival. Patients included had a first recurrence defined as ILNR or ICR during their follow up. RESULTS 79 patients (5.2 %) presented with ILNR, and 247 (16.4 %) patients had isolated carcinomatosis recurrence. Complete lymphadenectomy was performed more frequently in the ILNR group vs. the ICR group (67.1 % vs. 53.4 %, p = 0.004) and the number of pelvic lymph nodes involved was higher (2.4 vs. 1.1, p = 0.008). The number of involved pelvic LN was an independent predictor of ILNR (OR = 1.231, 95 % CI [1.074-1.412], p = 0.0024). The 3-year and 5-year OS rates in the ILNR group were 85.2 % and 53.7 % respectively, compared to 68.1 % and 46.8 % in patients with ICR. There was no significant difference in terms of OS after initial diagnosis (p = 0.18). 3- year and 5-year OS rates after diagnosis of recurrence were 62.6 % and 15.6 % in the ILNR group, and 44 % and 15.7 % in patients with ICR (p = 0.21). CONCLUSION ILNR does not seem to be associated with a better prognosis in terms of OS.
Collapse
|
3
|
Gallotta V, Bruno M, Conte C, Giudice MT, Davià F, Moro F, Zannoni GF, Fagotti A, De Bonis M, Capoluongo E, Scambia G, Ferrandina G. Salvage lymphadenectomy in recurrent ovarian cancer patients: Analysis of clinical outcome and BRCA1/2 gene mutational status. Eur J Surg Oncol 2020; 46:1327-1333. [PMID: 32085925 DOI: 10.1016/j.ejso.2020.01.035] [Citation(s) in RCA: 24] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/26/2019] [Revised: 12/28/2019] [Accepted: 01/31/2020] [Indexed: 02/07/2023] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVE This study is aimed to analyze the clinical outcome of recurrent ovarian cancer patients bearing isolated lymph-node recurrence (ILNR) who underwent salvage lymphadenectomy (SL). The prognostic role of clinicopathological variables and the mutational status of BRCA1/2 have also been investigated. METHODS This retrospective, single-institutional study included women with platinum-sensitive lymph node recurrence underwent to SL between June 2008 and June 2018. Univariate and multivariate analysis was performed to evaluate the impact of clinical parameters, and BRCA1/2 mutational status on post salvage lymphadenectomy progression-free survival (PSL-PFS). RESULTS As of June 2019, the median follow-up after SL was 30 months, and the relapse has been documented in 48 (56.5%) patients. In the whole series, the median PSL-PFS was 21 months, and the 3-year PSL-PFS was 36.7%. The median PSL-PFS, according to patients with ILNR (N = 71) versus patients with lymph-nodes and other sites of disease (N = 14), was 27 months versus 12 months, respectively. Univariate analysis of variables conditioning PSL-PFS showed that platinum-free interval (PFI) ≥12 months, normal Ca125 serum levels, and number of metastatic lymph-nodes ≤3 played a statistically significant favorable role. In multivariate analysis, PFI duration ≥12 months and the number of metastatic lymph nodes ≤3 were shown to keep their favorable, independent prognostic value on PSL-PFS. CONCLUSIONS In the context of SL, the patients with long PFI and low metastatic lymph node numbers at ILNR diagnosis have the best outcome. The BRCA mutational status seems not associated with clinical variables and PSL-PFS, differently from other sites of disease in ROC patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- V Gallotta
- Fondazione Policlinico Universitario A. Gemelli IRCCS, Dipartimento Scienze della Salute della Donna, del Bambino e di Sanità Pubblica, UOC di Ginecologia Oncologica, Roma, Italy.
| | - M Bruno
- Fondazione Policlinico Universitario A. Gemelli IRCCS, Dipartimento Scienze della Salute della Donna, del Bambino e di Sanità Pubblica, UOC di Ginecologia Oncologica, Roma, Italy; Università Cattolica Del Sacro Cuore, Roma, Italy
| | - C Conte
- Fondazione Policlinico Universitario A. Gemelli IRCCS, Dipartimento Scienze della Salute della Donna, del Bambino e di Sanità Pubblica, UOC di Ginecologia Oncologica, Roma, Italy
| | - M T Giudice
- Fondazione Policlinico Universitario A. Gemelli IRCCS, Dipartimento Scienze della Salute della Donna, del Bambino e di Sanità Pubblica, UOC di Ginecologia Oncologica, Roma, Italy; Università Cattolica Del Sacro Cuore, Roma, Italy
| | - F Davià
- Fondazione Policlinico Universitario A. Gemelli IRCCS, Dipartimento Scienze della Salute della Donna, del Bambino e di Sanità Pubblica, UOC di Ginecologia Oncologica, Roma, Italy; Università Cattolica Del Sacro Cuore, Roma, Italy
| | - F Moro
- Fondazione Policlinico Universitario A. Gemelli IRCCS, Dipartimento Scienze della Salute della Donna, del Bambino e di Sanità Pubblica, UOC di Ginecologia Oncologica, Roma, Italy
| | - G F Zannoni
- Università Cattolica Del Sacro Cuore, Roma, Italy; Fondazione Policlinico Universitario A. Gemelli IRCCS, UOC di Gineco-patologia e Patologia Mammaria, Roma, Italy
| | - A Fagotti
- Fondazione Policlinico Universitario A. Gemelli IRCCS, Dipartimento Scienze della Salute della Donna, del Bambino e di Sanità Pubblica, UOC di Ginecologia Oncologica, Roma, Italy; Università Cattolica Del Sacro Cuore, Roma, Italy
| | - M De Bonis
- Fondazione Policlinico Universitario A. Gemelli IRCCS, Polo Scienze per Immagini, di Laboratorio e Infettivologiche, Roma, Italy
| | - E Capoluongo
- Università Federico II-CEINGE, Biotecnologie Avanzate, Napoli, Italy
| | - G Scambia
- Fondazione Policlinico Universitario A. Gemelli IRCCS, Dipartimento Scienze della Salute della Donna, del Bambino e di Sanità Pubblica, UOC di Ginecologia Oncologica, Roma, Italy; Università Cattolica Del Sacro Cuore, Roma, Italy
| | - G Ferrandina
- Fondazione Policlinico Universitario A. Gemelli IRCCS, Dipartimento Scienze della Salute della Donna, del Bambino e di Sanità Pubblica, UOC di Ginecologia Oncologica, Roma, Italy; Università Cattolica Del Sacro Cuore, Roma, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Komura N, Mabuchi S, Isohashi F, Yokoi E, Shimura K, Matsumoto Y, Kodama M, Tomimatsu T, Ogawa K, Kimura T. Radiotherapy for isolated recurrent epithelial ovarian cancer: A single institutional experience. J Obstet Gynaecol Res 2019; 45:1173-1182. [PMID: 30843318 DOI: 10.1111/jog.13947] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/19/2018] [Accepted: 02/11/2019] [Indexed: 12/17/2022]
Abstract
AIM To evaluate the efficacy and toxicity of external beam radiotherapy (RT) for isolated recurrent epithelial ovarian cancer (EOC). METHODS Twenty-four isolated recurrent EOC patients treated with RT at Osaka University Hospital between January 2000 and January 2017 were included in the current study. Data regarding the primary or recurrent diseases, follow-up findings, and efficacy or toxicities of RT were collected and retrospectively analyzed. Survival rates were calculated using the Kaplan-Meier method and compared using the log-rank test. RESULTS Their median age was 59 years. Most patients had International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics stage III-IV diseases at the initial diagnosis. Histologically, serous adenocarcinoma was predominant, followed by clear cell adenocarcinoma. All patients had received at least one regimen of platinum-based chemotherapy; 8 were platinum-sensitive relapse and the others were platinum-resistant. Lymph nodes were the most common sites of recurrence, and the median tumor size was 25.5 mm. The median total dose of RT administered was 54 Gy, with a median daily dose of 2 Gy. RT was well-tolerated, and no patients experienced Grade 3/4 toxicities. The in-field overall response rate was 58.3% (14/24), the median regression rate was -40.2% (range: -100 to 0) and the median survival period after RT was 17 months. The 1-year survival and local progression-free survival rates after RT were 66.7% and 45.8%, respectively. CONCLUSION RT showed significant antitumor effect against isolated recurrent EOC without causing severe toxicities. Prospective studies with sufficient statistical power are warranted to further evaluate the role of RT in this patient population.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Naoko Komura
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Osaka University Graduate School of Medicine, Osaka, Japan
| | - Seiji Mabuchi
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Osaka University Graduate School of Medicine, Osaka, Japan
| | - Fumiaki Isohashi
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Osaka University Graduate School of Medicine, Osaka, Japan
| | - Eriko Yokoi
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Osaka University Graduate School of Medicine, Osaka, Japan
| | - Kotaro Shimura
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Osaka University Graduate School of Medicine, Osaka, Japan
| | - Yuri Matsumoto
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Osaka University Graduate School of Medicine, Osaka, Japan
| | - Michiko Kodama
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Osaka University Graduate School of Medicine, Osaka, Japan
| | - Takuji Tomimatsu
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Osaka University Graduate School of Medicine, Osaka, Japan
| | - Kazuhiko Ogawa
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Osaka University Graduate School of Medicine, Osaka, Japan
| | - Tadashi Kimura
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Osaka University Graduate School of Medicine, Osaka, Japan
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Bogani G, Leone Roberti Maggiore U, Chiappa V, Ditto A, Martinelli F, Sabatucci I, Mosca L, Lorusso D, Raspagliesi F. The addition of lymphadenectomy to secondary cytoreductive surgery in comparison with bulky node resection in patients with recurrent ovarian cancer. Int J Gynaecol Obstet 2018; 143:319-324. [DOI: 10.1002/ijgo.12667] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/14/2018] [Revised: 07/07/2018] [Accepted: 09/06/2018] [Indexed: 11/10/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- Giorgio Bogani
- Gynecologic Oncology; IRCCS National Cancer Institute; Milan Italy
| | - Umberto Leone Roberti Maggiore
- Gynecologic Oncology; IRCCS National Cancer Institute; Milan Italy
- Obstetrics and Gynecology; IRCCS AOU San Martino; Italy/Neurosciences, Rehabilitation, Ophthalmology, Genetics, Maternal and Child Health (DiNOGMI); University of Genoa; Genoa Italy
| | | | - Antonino Ditto
- Gynecologic Oncology; IRCCS National Cancer Institute; Milan Italy
| | - Fabio Martinelli
- Gynecologic Oncology; IRCCS National Cancer Institute; Milan Italy
| | - Ilaria Sabatucci
- Gynecologic Oncology; IRCCS National Cancer Institute; Milan Italy
| | - Lavinia Mosca
- Gynecologic Oncology; IRCCS National Cancer Institute; Milan Italy
| | - Domenica Lorusso
- Gynecologic Oncology; IRCCS National Cancer Institute; Milan Italy
| | | |
Collapse
|