Loss of BRCA1 protein expression as indicator of the BRCAness phenotype is associated with favorable overall survival after complete resection of sporadic ovarian cancer

Prognostic Effects of RASSF1A, BRCA1, APC, and p16 Promoter Methylation in Ovarian Cancer: A Meta-Analysis

INTRODUCTION

DNA methylation plays an important role in the carcinogenesis, progression, and prognosis of various human cancers. RASSF1A, BRCA1, APC, and p16 are the frequently methylated genes among patients with ovarian cancer. Therefore, our study aimed to better determine the prognostic and cancer characteristics effects of RASSF1A, BRCA1, APC, and p16 promoter methylation in ovarian cancer patients.

METHODS

Databases such as PubMed, Web of Science, EMBASE, CNKI, and WanFang were searched for published studies up to March 4, 2024. The outcomes are shown as OR and HR with their 95% CIs. Then, the random or fixed-effect model was performed to evaluate the effect sizes.

RESULTS

Finally, 27 articles were included in this meta-analysis. No significant relationships were observed between RASSF1A, BRCA1, and APC promoter methylation and the clinical prognostic (including overall survival and progression-free survival) and cancer characteristics (including ascites, lymph node metastasis, and pelvic peritoneal metastasis) in ovarian cancer. p16 promoter methylation was significantly related to poor progression-free survival (PFS) (HR = 1.52, 95% CI = 1.14-2.04) and overall survival (OS) (HR = 1.39, 95% CI = 1.06, to 1.83) in univariate and poor PFS in multivariate Cox regression models (HR = 1.42, 95% CI = 1.05-1.92). Besides, our results indicated that the clinical stage was associated with inferior OS while there was no significant association between tumor grade and OS.

CONCLUSION

RASSF1A, BRCA1, and APC promoter methylation were not significantly associated with clinical prognostic and cancer characteristics. p16 may be a useful biomarker for predicting PFS in ovarian cancer. Furthermore, the clinical stage was significantly associated with OS. In further research, more prospective and multicenter validation studies remain needed.

BRCA1 Promoter Methylation and Clinical Outcomes in Ovarian Cancer: An Individual Patient Data Meta-Analysis

BACKGROUND

BRCA1 methylation has been associated with homologous recombination deficiency, a biomarker of platinum sensitivity. Studies evaluating BRCA1-methylated tubal and ovarian cancer (OC) do not consistently support improved survival following platinum chemotherapy. We examine the characteristics of BRCA1-methylated OC in a meta-analysis of individual participant data.

METHODS

Data of 2636 participants across 15 studies were analyzed. BRCA1-methylated tumors were defined according to their original study. Associations between BRCA1 methylation and clinicopathological characteristics were evaluated. The effects of methylation on overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS) were examined using mixed-effects models. All statistical tests were 2-sided.

RESULTS

430 (16.3%) tumors were BRCA1-methylated. BRCA1 methylation was associated with younger age and advanced-stage, high-grade serous OC. There were no survival differences between BRCA1-methylated and non-BRCA1-methylated OC (median PFS = 20.0 vs 18.5 months, hazard ratio [HR] = 1.01, 95% CI = 0.87 to 1.16; P = .98; median OS = 46.6 vs 48.0 months, HR = 1.02, 95% CI = 0.87 to 1.18; P = .96). Where BRCA1/2 mutations were evaluated (n = 1248), BRCA1 methylation displayed no survival advantage over BRCA1/2-intact (BRCA1/2 wild-type non-BRCA1-methylated) OC. Studies used different methods to define BRCA1 methylation. Where BRCA1 methylation was determined using methylation-specific polymerase chain reaction and gel electrophoresis (n = 834), it was associated with improved survival (PFS: HR = 0.80, 95% CI = 0.66 to 0.97; P = .02; OS: HR = 0.80, 95% CI = 0.63 to 1.00; P = .05) on mixed-effects modeling.

CONCLUSION

BRCA1-methylated OC displays similar clinicopathological features to BRCA1-mutated OC but is not associated with survival. Heterogeneity within BRCA1 methylation assays influences associations. Refining these assays may better identify cases with silenced BRCA1 function and improved patient outcomes.

BRCA1 Expression by Immunohistochemistry and Prognosis in Ovarian Cancer: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

BACKGROUND

Homologous recombination deficiencies are associated with increased platinum sensitivity and potential response to poly (ADP-ribose) polymerase inhibitors in epithelial ovarian cancer. As an alternative to germline testing or somatic tumor sequencing, BRCA1 deficiency can be detected by immunohistochemistry and might predict homologous recombination deficiencies.

OBJECTIVE

This study aimed to assess the association between BRCA1 expression by immunohistochemistry and the prognosis of patients with epithelial ovarian cancer.

METHODS

We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis following the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic reviews and Meta-Analyses statement. We searched PubMed, EMBASE, Web of Science, and Scopus databases through July 2019. Reference lists of selected articles were screened for further studies. We conducted qualitative synthesis and meta-analyses of hazard ratios for overall survival and progression-free survival.

RESULTS

Of 41 studies of BRCA1 expression using immunohistochemistry, 18 evaluated the association of BRCA1 expression with patient survival (2738 cases). The loss of BRCA1 expression was associated with improved overall survival (hazard ratio = 0.67, 95% confidence interval 0.57-0.77) and progression-free survival (hazard ratio = 0.70, 95% confidence interval 0.58-0.84).

CONCLUSIONS

Negative BRCA1 expression assessed by immunohistochemistry was associated with a better prognosis in epithelial ovarian cancer.

CAMK2N1/RUNX3 methylation is an independent prognostic biomarker for progression-free and overall survival of platinum-sensitive epithelial ovarian cancer patients

BACKGROUND

To date, no predictive or prognostic molecular biomarkers except BRCA mutations are clinically established for epithelial ovarian cancer (EOC) despite being the deadliest gynecological malignancy. Aim of this biomarker study was the analysis of DNA methylation biomarkers for their prognostic value independent from clinical variables in a heterogeneous cohort of 203 EOC patients from two university medical centers.

RESULTS

The marker combination CAMK2N1/RUNX3 exhibited a significant prognostic value for progression-free (PFS) and overall survival (OS) of sporadic platinum-sensitive EOC (n = 188) both in univariate Kaplan-Meier (LogRank p < 0.05) and multivariate Cox regression analysis (p < 0.05; hazard ratio HR = 1.587). KRT86 methylation showed a prognostic value only in univariate analysis because of an association with FIGO staging (Fisher's exact test p < 0.01). Thus, it may represent a marker for EOC staging. Dichotomous prognostic values were observed for KATNAL2 methylation depending on BRCA aberrations. KATNAL2 methylation exhibited a negative prognostic value for PFS in sporadic EOC patients without BRCA1 methylation (HR 1.591, p = 0.012) but positive prognostic value in sporadic EOC with BRCA1 methylation (HR 0.332, p = 0.04) or BRCA-mutated EOC (HR 0.620, n.s.).

CONCLUSION

The retrospective analysis of 188 sporadic platinum-sensitive EOC proved an independent prognostic value of the methylation marker combination CAMK2N1/RUNX3 for PFS and OS. If validated prospectively this combination may identify EOC patients with worse prognosis after standard therapy potentially benefiting from intensive follow-up, maintenance therapies or inclusion in therapeutic studies. The dichotomous prognostic value of KATNAL2 should be validated in larger sample sets of EOC.

Immunohistochemistry for the detection of BRCA1 and BRCA2 proteins in patients with ovarian cancer: a systematic review

BACKGROUND

Loss of function in either breast cancer type 1 susceptibility protein (BRCA1) or breast cancer type 2 susceptibility protein (BRCA2) is a major risk factor for epithelial ovarian cancer (EOC) development. BRCA1 or BRCA2 deficiencies are associated with short-term prognosis and might have importance for the treatment of women with the disease. However, the screening of all possible mechanisms of dysfunction is expensive, time-consuming and difficult to apply in clinical practice. On the other hand, immunohistochemistry (IHC) is a simple and reliable method to access the expression of several proteins in tumour tissues.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

This systematic review aims to evaluate the current usage of IHC to detect BRCA1 and BRCA2 deficiencies in EOC. We searched and evaluated all primary literature on the use of IHC for evaluating BRCA1 and BRCA2 proteins expression in EOC. The main concepts for the search were: ovarian neoplasms, IHC, BRCA1 and BRCA2.

RESULTS

Forty-four studies from 925 unique titles were included. A total of 4206 tumour samples were evaluated for BRCA1 and 1041 for BRCA2 expression. Twelve BRCA1 primary antibodies were used in 41 studies, and the most common was the MS110 clone (75.6%). Seven BRCA2 primary antibodies were used in ten studies. Using the cut-off of 10%, 47.0% of EOCs are associated with loss of BRCA1 and 34.5% with the loss of BRCA2 expression.

CONCLUSION

IHC was effective to detect loss of BRCA1 protein expression in EOC; however, data on BRCA2 expression were heterogeneous and difficult to interpret.

Global DNA methylation profiling technologies and the ovarian cancer methylome

Cytosine methylation in DNA constitutes an important epigenetic layer of transcriptional and regulatory control in many eukaryotes. Profiling DNA methylation across the genome is critical to understanding the influence of epigenetics in normal biology and disease, such as cancer. Genome-wide analyses such as arrays and next-generation sequencing (NGS) technologies have been used to assess large fractions of the methylome at a single-base-pair resolution. However, the range of DNA methylation profiling techniques can make selecting the appropriate protocol a challenge. This chapter discusses the advantages and disadvantages of various methylome detection approaches to assess which is appropriate for the question at hand. Here, we focus on four prominent genome-wide approaches: whole-genome bisulfite sequencing (WGBS); methyl-binding domain capture sequencing (MBDCap-Seq); reduced-representation-bisulfite-sequencing (RRBS); and Infinium Methylation450 BeadChips (450 K, Illumina). We discuss some of the requirements, merits, and challenges that should be considered when choosing a methylome technology to ensure that it will be informative. In addition, we show how genome-wide methylation detection arrays and high-throughput sequencing have provided immense insight into ovarian cancer-specific methylation signatures that may serve as diagnostic biomarkers or predict patient response to epigenetic therapy.

The performance of BRCA1 immunohistochemistry for detecting germline, somatic, and epigenetic BRCA1 loss in high-grade serous ovarian cancer

BACKGROUND

BRCA1 expression can be lost by a variety of mechanisms including germline or somatic mutation and promotor hypermethylation. Given the potential importance of BRCA1 loss as a predictive and prognostic biomarker in high-grade serous ovarian cancer, we sought to evaluate the utility of BRCA1 immunohistochemistry (IHC) in screening for BRCA1 loss by germline, somatic, and epigenetic mechanisms.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Patients with advanced high-grade serous ovarian cancer who had previously undergone germline BRCA1 testing were identified. Samples from each tumor were stained for BRCA1 and reviewed independently by two pathologists blinded to BRCA status. Tumors with abnormal BRCA1 IHC and wild-type germline testing underwent further evaluation for somatic BRCA1 mutations and promoter hypermethylation. McNemar's test was used to determine the association of BRCA1 IHC with germline BRCA1 mutations and BRCA1 loss through any mechanism. Kaplan-Meier methods were used to estimate overall survival (OS), and the log-rank test was used to assess differences between groups.

RESULTS

Inter-rater reliability between the two pathologists on BRCA IHC interpretation was very good (kappa coefficient 0.865, P = 0.16; McNemar's test). BRCA1 IHC was abnormal in 36% (48/135) of cases. When compared with germline BRCA1 status, BRCA1 IHC had a high negative predictive value (95.4%) but a low positive predictive value (PPV, 52.1%). When accounting for promoter hypermethylation and somatic mutations as alternative methods of BRCA1 loss, the PPV rose to 87.5%. Five-year OS rate was 49.6% [95% confidence interval (CI) 26.3% to 69.3%] for patients with germline BRCA1 mutations, 50.4% (95% CI 27.5% to 69.5%) for germline wild-type BRCA1 and abnormal IHC, and 52.1% (95% CI 38.4% to 64.2%) for germline wild-type BRCA1 and normal IHC (P = 0.92).

CONCLUSIONS

BRCA1 IHC interpretation was a highly reproducible and accurate modality for detecting germline, somatic, or epigenetic mechanisms of BRCA1 loss. These results support further development of BRCA1 IHC as a potential biomarker for BRCA1 loss in high-grade serous ovarian cancer.

The role of BRCA status on the prognosis of patients with epithelial ovarian cancer: a systematic review of the literature with a meta-analysis

Objective

The role of BRCA dysfunction on the prognosis of patients with epithelial ovarian cancer (EOCs) remains controversial. This systematic review tried to assess the role of BRCA dysfunction, including BRCA1/2 germline, somatic mutations, low BRCA1 protein/mRNA expression or BRCA1 promoter methylation, as prognostic factor in EOCs.

Methods

Studies were selected for analysis if they provided an independent assessment of BRCA status and prognosis in EOC. To make it possible to aggregate survival results of the published studies, their methodology was assessed using a modified quality scale.

Results

Of 35 evaluable studies, 23 identified BRCA dysfucntion status as a favourable prognostic factor. No significant differences were detected in the global score of quality assessment. The aggregated hazard ratio (HR) of overall survival (OS) of 34 evaluable studies suggested that BRCA dysfunction status had a favourable impact on OS (HR = 0.69, 95% CI 0.61–0.79), and when these studies were categorised into BRCA1/2 mutation and low protein/mRNA expression of BRCA1 subgroups, all of them demonstrated positive results (HR = 0.67, 95% CI: 0.57–0.78; HR = 0.62, 95% CI: 0.51–0.75; and HR = 0.51, 95% CI: 0.33–0.78, respectively), except for the subgroup of BRCA1 promoter methylation (HR = 1.59, 95% CI: 0.72–3.50). The meta-analysis of progression-free survival (PFS), which included 18 evaluable studies, demonstrated that BRCA dysfunction status was associated with a longer PFS in EOC (HR = 0.69, 95% CI: 0.63–0.76).

Conclusions

Patients with BRCA dysfunction status tend to have a better outcome, but further prospective clinical studies comparing the different BRCA statuses in EOC is urgently needed to specifically define the most effective treatment for the separate patient groups.

miR-9 regulation of BRCA1 and ovarian cancer sensitivity to cisplatin and PARP inhibition

BACKGROUND

Expression of BRCA1 is commonly decreased in sporadic ovarian cancer, and this is associated with platinum sensitivity and favorable prognosis. However, multiple mechanisms underlying low BRCA1 expression are not fully understood.

METHODS

A bioinformatics-driven microRNA (miR) library screening was used to identify miRs that regulate BRCA1 expression. The effects of miR-9 on cisplatin (cDDP) and PARP inhibitor sensitivity were measured in ovarian cancer cells and C13* xenograft mice (n = 6 per group). The roles of miR-9 on prognosis were assessed in a cohort of ovarian cancer patients (n = 113) with Kaplan-Meier and Cox proportional hazards analyses. All statistical tests were two-sided.

RESULTS

Reverse miR library screening revealed that miR-9 reduced the normalized luciferase activity to 60.3% (95% confidence interval [CI] = 52.0% to 68.5%; P < .001). miR-9 bound directly to the 3'-UTR of BRCA1 and downregulated BRCA1 expression in ovarian cancer cells. Treatment with miR-9 agomiR sensitized BRCA1-proficient C13* xenograft tumors to cisplatin and AG014699. In serous ovarian cancer, higher levels of miR-9 were inversely correlated with BRCA1 expression (Spearman rank correlation: R (2) = 0.379; P = .003). Patients with higher levels of miR-9 had better chemotherapy response, platinum sensitivity, and longer progression-free survival (PFS) (high vs low miR-9 expression: median PFS = 26.4 months, 95% CI = 13.8 to 39.0 months vs median PFS = 15.4 months, 95% CI = 6.8 to 23.9 months, P = .01).

CONCLUSIONS

miR-9 mediates the downregulation of BRCA1 and impedes DNA damage repair in ovarian cancer. miR-9 may improve chemotherapeutic efficacy by increasing the sensitivity of cancer cells to DNA damage and may impact ovarian cancer therapy.

BRCA1 immunohistochemistry in a molecularly characterized cohort of ovarian high-grade serous carcinomas

BRCA1 and BRCA2 dysfunction, frequently seen in high-grade serous ovarian carcinomas, often results from germline mutations, somatic mutations, and promoter methylation. Identification of tumors with BRCA defects has therapeutic and prognostic implications. Identifying germline BRCA mutations is also important given the increased risk for hereditary breast and ovarian carcinoma. Our goal was to assess whether immunohistochemical analysis (IHC) for BRCA1 is an effective method for the detection of BRCA1 dysfunction in molecularly characterized high-grade ovarian serous carcinoma. We identified 43 high-grade ovarian serous carcinomas with known events in BRCA1 and BRCA2 included in The Cancer Genome Atlas Project. BRCA1 stain was first assessed without knowledge of the BRCA status, and a semiquantitative assessment for intensity and amount of staining was performed. The stains were reevaluated and divided into 3 categories (retained, loss, and equivocal) on the basis of correlation with genotyping data. Presence of retained BRCA staining was considered normal, whereas the other patterns, including equivocal staining or loss of staining, were considered abnormal. Two pathologists, blinded to the BRCA status, then scored 2 sets of validation cases selected on the basis of available molecular data-1 with only germline mutation status available (n=31) and 1 with comprehensive genomic data (n=39). The pathologists agreed 88% of the time in the training set and 91% in the validation sets. In the training set, abnormal BRCA staining was seen in 24 cases, of which 21 (87%) showed BRCA1 genetic abnormalities, 1 showed BRCA2 mutations, and 2 showed no BRCA abnormalities. Abnormal BRCA1 staining was noted in all 5 cases with BRCA1 germline mutations, in 3 (60%) of 5 with BRCA1 somatic mutations, and in 13 (93%) of 14 with BRCA1 promoter methylation. The 2 validation sets included 70 additional patients, and all cases with germline BRCA1 mutations (n=11) showed abnormal BRCA1 staining. Tumors with BRCA1 promoter methylation also showed abnormal staining in 6 (86%) of 7 cases. In the entire study, no cases with BRCA1 germline mutation showed intact immunostaining (negative predictive value=100%). This study shows that BRCA1 IHC is well correlated with molecular events in ovarian carcinoma. Considering the high negative predictive value for germline mutations, BRCA1 IHC appears to be an effective approach to stratify patients for germline genetic testing and to detect other mechanisms of BRCA1 dysfunction in high-grade serous ovarian carcinomas.

Expression analysis of MIR182 and its associated target genes in advanced ovarian carcinoma

BRCA1/BRCA2 mutations are common and the hallmarks of high-grade serous ovarian carcinoma. We found that MIR182, a negative BRCA1 regulator, is significantly overexpressed in high-grade serous ovarian carcinoma. To examine whether overexpression of MIR182 and its target genes, including BRCA1, HMGA2 (high-mobility group A2), FOXO3 and MTSS1, are associated with high-grade serous ovarian carcinoma tumor types and clinical outcome, we studied MIR182 by in situ hybridization and its target gene expression by immunohistochemistry in 117 cases of advanced ovarian cancer. We found that high-grade serous ovarian carcinoma had significantly higher MIR182 (P=0.0003) and HMGA2 (P=0.04) expression, and significantly lower BRCA1 (P<0.0001) and FOXO3 (P<0.001) expression than normal controls. MIR182 is significantly correlated with MTSS1 expression (r=0.31; P<0.001), whereas other target genes did not show a significant correlation with MIR182, indicating a complicated regulatory mechanisms of these genes in high-grade serous ovarian carcinoma. Among the examined MIR182 target genes, only HMGA2 was significantly associated with serous type carcinomas (P<0.01), ascites (P<0.01) and high death rate (P=0.02). FOXO3 expression was associated with lower-stage disease (P=0.04) and solid growth pattern (P=0.03). MIR182 expression is significantly higher in high-grade serous ovarian carcinoma than in fallopian tubes.

Identifying and exploiting defects in the Fanconi anemia/BRCA pathway in oncology

Defects in components of DNA repair pathways are responsible for numerous hereditary cancer syndromes and are also common in many sporadic malignancies. Inherited mutations in the breast cancer susceptibility genes BRCA1 and BRCA2 or components of the Fanconi anemia (FA) complex incite genomic instability and predispose to malignancy. The products of the BRCA and FA genes participate in a conserved DNA damage repair pathway that is responsible for repairing interstrand crosslinks and double-strand DNA breaks by homologous recombination. While the genetic instability resulting from FA/BRCA dysfunction contributes to cancer pathogenesis, deficiency of these genes also lends to therapeutic exploitation. Crosslinking agents and ionizing radiation induce damage in cancer cells that requires the FA/BRCA pathway to be resolved; thus cancers that are deficient in BRCA1, BRCA2, or any other component of the FA/BRCA pathway are hypersensitive to these agents. Moreover, emerging synthetic lethal strategies offer opportunities to selectively target cancer cells with defects in homologous recombination. Conversely, enhanced activity of the FA/BRCA pathway is responsible for acquired resistance to specific therapeutic agents, suggesting that both dysfunction and hyperfunction of the FA/BRCA repair machinery are rational targets for cancer therapy. Selection of specific cytotoxic agents based on repair capacity may improve responses and enable personalized cytotoxic chemotherapy. This article reviews the FA/BRCA pathway and current approaches to identify deficiencies within it, discusses synthetic lethality and enhanced repair capacity as causes of therapeutic hypersensitivity and resistance, respectively, and highlights recent studies that have linked FA/BRCA pathway function with therapeutic efficacy.

New insights on the pathogenesis of ovarian carcinoma: molecular basis and clinical implications

Ovarian carcinoma can be subdivided into two categories termed type I and type II. Type I tumours, usually having an indolent clinical behaviour, are often detected in early stage, and rarely harbour p53 gene mutations. Each histological type has a distinct molecular profile with mutations of genes involved in different signalling transduction pathways, such as KRAS, BRAF, CTNNB1, PTEN, PIK3CA and ARID1A. Type II tumours, accounting for 75% of the cases, have a very aggressive biological behaviour, are usually in advanced stage at presentation, harbour p53 gene mutations in 80% of the cases, and sometimes have alterations of homologous recombination (HR). Both type I and type II tumours arise from extra-ovarian precursors. Serous carcinomas derive from tubal epithelium, endometrioid and clear cell carcinomas from endometrial tissue, and mucinous and Brenner tumours from transitional epithelial cells located near the tubo-peritoneal junction. These new concepts on the pathogenesis of ovarian carcinoma could deeply modify both the preventive approach in women with germ-line BRCA₁ or BRCA₂ mutations and the treatment of patients with advanced or recurrent disease. For instance, BRAF inhibitors could be used in low-grade serous carcinomas, PIK3CA inhibitors could be employed in clear cell carcinoma, and poly (ADP-ribose) polymerase inhibitors could be used not only in hereditary ovarian carcinoma but also in non-hereditary, high-grade serous ovarian carcinoma which sometimes shows defective HR.

Targeted molecular therapies for ovarian cancer: an update and future perspectives (Review)

Identification of the potential gene expression profiles of epithelial ovarian cancer and the arrival of newly targeted therapies have advanced the strategies used for treatment of this disease. This review focuses on the design of ongoing and planned clinical trials and offers a synopsis of the English-language literature for preclinical and clinical targeted therapies for epithelial ovarian cancer. Among many targeted agents, a promising, novel class of targeted drugs for special patient populations expected to improve the effectiveness of current therapy include inhibitors of angiogenesis, poly (ADP ribose) polymerase (PARP) and DNA repair mechanisms. Inhibition of PARP or homologous recombination (HR) repair mediated by Chk1 (checkpoint kinase 1) would selectively sensitize p53 mutation, BRCAness phenotype (serous type ovarian cancer) or HNF (hepatocyte nuclear factor)-1β-overexpressing tumor cells (clear cell type ovarian cancer) to chemotherapeutic agents. The therapeutic response is likely to be limited to a targeted patient, but not to the broad population. This review discusses some of the key current developments and existing challenges.