Risk factors for ovarian cancers with and without microsatellite instability

PARP Inhibitor Insensitivity to BRCA1/2 Monoallelic Mutations in Microsatellite Instability-High Cancers

PURPOSE

To examine the overlap of homologous recombination deficiency (HRD) and microsatellite instability high (MSI-H) status, and to dissect driver versus bystander status of BRCA1/2 mutations (BRCAm) in this context.

METHODS

A pan-cancer comprehensive genomic profiling cohort (n = 213,199) was examined for overlap between BRCAm and MSI-H status. BRCA1/2 variant zygosity was examined and correlated with MSI-H status, tumor mutational burden, and genome-wide loss of heterozygosity (gLOH). Clinical histories of two patients with prostate cancer with co-occurring BRCAm and MSI-H are described.

RESULTS

HRD and MSI-H phenotypes were generally mutually exclusive events (P < .001). BRCAm that co-occurred together with high tumor mutational burden or MSI-H were predominantly monoallelic bystander alterations. In breast, ovarian, and pancreatic cancers, very few BRCAm occurred in the context of MSI-H; however, in prostate cancer, 12.8% of BRCA1 and 3.4% of BRCA2 alterations co-occurred with MSI-H. In these BRCA-associated cancers, co-occurring BRCAm were generally monoallelic and were not associated with elevated gLOH. Two patients with prostate cancer with co-occurring BRCAm and MSI-H showed resistance to poly (ADP-ribose) polymerase inhibition but sensitivity to subsequent anti–programmed cell death protein 1 therapy.

CONCLUSION

MSI-H status and HRD are generally mutually exclusive phenomena across cancer types, but may rarely co-occur, especially in prostate cancer. Although MSI-H samples had a higher BRCAm prevalence relative to microsatellite-stable tumors, these BRCA1/2 mutations were generally monoallelic and were not associated with elevated gLOH. Our findings suggest that most BRCAm coexisting with microsatellite instability are likely bystander events that may not result in sensitivity to poly (ADP-ribose) polymerase inhibitors.

Clinicopathologic analysis with immunohistochemistry for DNA mismatch repair protein expression in synchronous primary endometrial and ovarian cancers

OBJECTIVE

Synchronous primary endometrial and ovarian cancers have been an important topic in clinical medicine because it is sometimes difficult to distinguish whether there are 2 primary tumors or a single primary tumor and an associated metastasis. In addition, although these tumors are recommended for either immunohistochemistry for DNA mismatch repair (MMR) proteins or a microsatellite instability test in the Bethesda guidelines as Lynch syndrome-associated cancers, few studies have completed these analyses. In this study, we characterized the clinicopathologic features and the expression pattern of MMR proteins in synchronous primary endometrial and ovarian cancers.

METHODS

Clinicopathologic features and the expression pattern of MMR proteins (MLH1, MSH2, and MSH6) were characterized and analyzed in 32 synchronous primary endometrial and ovarian cancers.

RESULTS

Most synchronous cancers are endometrioid type (endometrioid/endometrioid) (n = 24, 75%), grade 1 (n = 19, 59.4%), and diagnosed as stage I (n = 15, 46.9%) in both endometrium and ovary. It is worth mentioning that 75% of the patients (n = 24) had endometriosis, which was more common (n = 21, 87.5%) in endometrioid/endometrioid cancers, whereas only 3 cases (37.5%) were of different histology (P = 0.018). Loss of expression of at least 1 MMR protein was observed in 17 (53.1%) of the endometrial tumors and in 10 (31.3%) of ovarian tumors. Only 4 cases (12.5%) that had specific MMR protein loss showed the same type of loss for both endometrial and ovarian tumors, in which 3 of the cases were losses in MLH1. One case showed concordant MSH6 protein loss, although the cases did not meet the Amsterdam criteria II.

CONCLUSIONS

These results suggest that most synchronous primary endometrial ovarian cancers are not hereditary cancers caused by germ line mutations but rather sporadic cancers.

Endometriosis and ovarian cancer: links, risks, and challenges faced

Endometriosis is a benign gynecological condition characterized by specific histological, molecular, and clinical findings. It affects 5%-10% of premenopausal women, is a cause of infertility, and has been implicated as a precursor for certain types of ovarian cancer. Advances in technology, primarily the ability for whole genome sequencing, have led to the discovery of new mutations and a better understanding of the function of previously identified genes and pathways associated with endometriosis associated ovarian cancers (EAOCs) that include PTEN, CTNNB1 (β-catenin), KRAS, microsatellite instability, ARID1A, and the unique role of inflammation in the development of EAOC. Clinically, EAOCs are associated with a younger age at diagnosis, lower stage and grade of tumor, and are more likely to occur in premenopausal women when compared with other ovarian cancers. A shift from screening strategies adopted to prevent EAOCs has resulted in new recommendations for clinical practice by national and international governing bodies. In this paper, we review the common histologic and molecular characteristics of endometriosis and ovarian cancer, risks associated with EAOCs, clinical challenges and give recommendations for providers.

Ovarian and endometrial endometrioid adenocarcinomas have distinct profiles of microsatellite instability, PTEN expression, and ARID1A expression

AIMS

To understand the role of and differences in molecular alterations between endometrial and ovarian endometrioid adenocarcinomas.

METHODS AND RESULTS

We investigated the microsatellite status of 26 ovarian endometrioid adenocarcinomas (OVEMs), 42 endometrial endometrioid adenocarcinomas (EMCAs), and 19 concurrent (endometrial and ovarian) endometrioid adenocarcinomas. We evaluated the expression of the mismatch repair proteins, PTEN and ARID1A, and mutations of PTEN, KRAS, CTNNB1, and PIK3CA. High levels of microsatellite instability (MSI-H) were present in one of 26 OVEMs, 12 of 42 EMCAs, and four of 19 concurrent endometrioid adenocarcinomas. Only four of 19 concurrent endometrioid adenocarcinomas showed identical molecular alterations in their endometrial and ovarian components. Loss of ARID1A or loss of PTEN expression, and MSI-H, were more common in EMCAs than OVEMs (P = 0.044, P = 0.004, and P = 0.012, respectively). MSI-H in endometrial endometrioid adenocarcinomas was also related to loss of ARID1A expression (P < 0.001). In the cohort of MSI-H endometrioid adenocarcinomas involving the endometrium (n = 16), MSH6-deficient cases showed higher frequencies of CTNNB1 and PIK3CA mutations (P = 0.008 and P = 0.036, respectively), but lower frequencies of KRAS mutation (P = 0.011), than PMS2-deficient cases.

CONCLUSIONS

The different frequencies of molecular genetic alterations between endometrial endometrioid adenocarcinomas and ovarian endometrioid adenocarcinomas imply that distinct processes may be involved in their tumorigenesis or tumour progression.

Ovarian cancer in endometriosis: clinical and molecular aspects

Endometriosis is a gynecological condition characterized by specific histological, molecular and clinical findings, that affects 5-10% of premenopausal women and has been implicated as a precursor for certain types of ovarian cancer. Clinical studies of endometriosis associated ovarian cancer (EAOC) suggest that patients present at a young age with a lower stage and grade of tumor, and are more likely to be premenopausal than women with other ovarian cancers. However, when overall survival is compared between these types of ovarian cancers, there is no difference noted. In addition, EAOC tumors are more likely to be found with a concurrent diagnosis of cancer, most commonly endometrial. Advances in technology, primarily the ability for whole genome sequencing, have led to the discovery of new mutations and further understanding of previously identified genes and pathways associated with EAOCs including PTEN, CTNNB1 (beta-catenin), KRAS, microsatellite instability and ARID1A. This paper will review the most recent clinical and molecular advances in the association of endometriosis and ovarian cancer.