Intradevice and Interdevice Agreement Between a Rebound Tonometer, Icare PRO, and the Tonopen XL and Kowa Hand-held Applanation Tonometer When Used in the Sitting and Supine Position

Comparison of intraocular pressure measurements obtained by icare pro tonometer, non-contact tonometer and Goldmann applanation tonometer in healthy individuals

PURPOSE

The goal of this paper was to compare the intraocular pressure (IOP) measurements obtained via iCare Pro rebound (IRT), non-contact tonometry (NCT), and Goldmann applanation (GAT) tonometry in healthy subjects.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

One hundred and twenty-five healthy individuals were included in this study. The participants' IOP measurements were obtained via non-contact tonometry. After routine ophthalmic examination, central corneal thickness (CCT) was measured with a topography device. Intraocular pressure was measured via iCare Pro rebound tonometry. After waiting for 5minutes, three measurements were taken with GAT under topical anaesthesia, and their means were recorded. Interdevice agreement was evaluated with the intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) and Bland-Altman analysis.

RESULTS

The mean IOP measurements for NCT, IRT, and GAT were 15.97±2.99, 17.47±2.86, and 16.46±2.68mmHg, respectively. The mean difference between NCT and GAT was -0.49± 1.89mmHg, the mean difference between IRT and GAT was 1.01±1.90mmHg, and the mean difference between NCT and IRT was -1.50±2.02mmHg. Agreement between devices was found to be >0.8 for each tonometry ICC. There were significant positive correlations between the measurements obtained via these three instruments and CCT.

CONCLUSION

In this study, IOP was measured slightly lower with NCT than GAT, but it was about 1mmHg higher with IRT than GAT on average. All three devices appeared to be affected by CCT, with NCT being the most affected in this regard. The three instruments can be used for routine inspection and screening. However, considering the differences in the measurements obtained by using them, it is clear that following up IOP measurements with GAT measurements is beneficial in advanced glaucoma patients.

Comparison of intraocular pressure measured by iCare tonometers and Goldmann applanation tonometer

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the relationship between the Goldmann applanation tonometer (GAT) and the iCare PRO and iCare IC200 tonometers in measuring intraocular pressure (IOP) in adult eyes with a diagnosis of glaucoma or glaucoma suspect.

PARTICIPANTS AND METHODS

One hundred and one eyes from 101 participants diagnosed with glaucoma or glaucoma suspect were evaluated in this study. IOP was measured by iCare PRO and iCare IC200 tonometers in a randomized sequence followed by IOP measurements by the GAT tonometer and then central corneal thickness measurements. After the IOP measurements, participants scored their comfort level using a visual analog scale with each tonometer. Intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) and Bland-Altman analysis were used to investigate the agreement among tonometers. SPSS and Microsoft Excel programs were used for statistical analysis.

RESULTS

Overall, there was good agreement among the 3 tonometers used in this study. The ICC for the iCare PRO and the iCare IC200 was 0.95 (p < 0.001), and the ICC for the iCare PRO and the GAT and the iCare IC200 and the GAT was >0.80 (p < 0.001). However, both iCare tonometers underestimated IOP by approximately 2 mm Hg compared with the GAT. Furthermore, 84% of iCare readings fall within ±5 mm Hg of GAT measurements. Neither body mass index nor central corneal thickness affected the IOP agreement among the tonometers. Participant response on visual analog scale rated IOP measurements by iCare tonometers to be more comfortable than the GAT.

CONCLUSION

Our results demonstrated a good agreement between iCare tonometers and GAT; but iCare tonometers underestimated IOP compared to the GAT.

[The effect of body position on the results of central and paracentral rebound tonometry]

PURPOSE

This study analyzes the fluctuations of intraocular pressure (IOP) and clarifies the error of paracentral rebound tonometry associated with change in body position.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

The study included 45 healthy volunteers aged 25.4±2.1 years. First we performed rebound tonometry in the sitting position in the center of the cornea and 3-4 mm from the temporal and nasal sides (Icare-c, Icare-n, Icare-t, respectively) and bidirectional applanation tonometry (IOPcc - corneal compensated, IOPg - Goldmann tonometry). Then we measured Icare-c, Icare-n, Icare-t in the supine position, and after 5 minutes repeated Icare-c in the supine position. After this, we measured Icare-c, IOPcc and IOPg in the sitting position.

RESULTS AND DISCUSSION

Initial IOPcc and IOPg were 4.6±2.8 and 14.8±2.8 mm Hg. Initial Icare-c, Icare-t, and Icare-n measurements amounted to 15.0±1.9, 15.7±1.5 and 16.3±1.3 mm Hg; in the supine position the measurements were 16.4±2.1, 17.2±1.7 and 17.1±1.9 mm Hg. Paracentral measurements differed from Icare-c in both sitting and supine positions; only between Icare-t and Icare-n measured in the supine position there were no significant differences. The results of Icare-c, Icare-t, and Icare-n in body position change were comparable. Icare-c measured after 5 minutes in the supine position increased up to 16.6±2.4 mm Hg. Final IOPcc and IOPg did not differ from the initial measurements. Final Icare-c was lower than the initial result by 0.8±0.2 mm Hg, and lower than both supine Icare-c measurements by 2.1±0.2 and 2.6±0.2 mm Hg.

CONCLUSION

Paracentral rebound tonometry findings exceed those of rebound tonometry in central cornea, but in body position change the alteration of measurements in the same points on the cornea are comparable. In the supine position IOP increases on average by 1.0-1.5 mm Hg compared to the sitting position.

Intraocular Pressure Measurements in Standing, Sitting, and Supine Position: Comparison between Tono-Pen Avia and Icare Pro Tonometers

Background: Intraocular pressure (IOP) is influenced by body position. The purpose of this study is to compare the IOP measurements obtained with two different devices, to investigate IOP changes in standing, sitting, and supine positions. Methods: In this comparative prospective case series, IOP was measured in sitting, supine, prone, and standing (standing 1) positions and again five minutes after standing (standing 2), utilizing an Icare Pro (ICP) and a Tono-Pen Avia (TPA) in the 64 eyes of 32 healthy subjects. Results: Compared to the sitting position, both devices showed an increase in the IOP both in supine and standing 2 positions (p < 0.05). The mean IOP difference between the two devices was: in the sitting position, 0.57 ± 2.10 mmHg (range: −3.80 to 6.60 mmHg) (p < 0.05), in the supine position, 0.93 ± 2.49 mmHg (range: −4.50 to 7.10 mmHg) (p < 0.05), in the standing 1 position, 0.37 ± 1.96 mmHg (range: −5.20 to 5.00 mmHg) (p = 0.102), and in the standing 2 position 0.73 ± 2.03 mmHg (range: −4.5 to 6.4 mmHg) (p < 0.001). Conclusions: The results highlight an agreement between the TPA and ICP, both confirming not only the increase in IOP in the supine position, but also showing an increase in the standing 2 position. Therefore, it is suggested to perform such measurements in patients with glaucoma, to explain its progression in an apparently normal tension or in compensated patients.

The short-term effects of intranasal steroids on intraocular pressure in pediatric population

PURPOSE

To evaluate the effect of intranasal mometasone furoate (INMF) on short-term intraocular pressure (IOP) alterations in children with allergic rhinitis (AR).

METHODS

Children diagnosed with AR and to whom INMF nasal spray had been firstly prescribed were enrolled. Cases with any ocular diseases except for refractive errors were excluded. Complete ophthalmologic examinations including IOP measurements using Tonopen XL were performed before the treatment as well as at the first and sixth weeks of follow-up. Demographics and ophthalmologic findings were noted and statistically analyzed.

RESULTS

Study population consisted of 62 right eyes of 62 children with a mean age of 8.55 ± 3.14 years. Of them, 29 were female (46.8%) and 33 were male (53.2%). Dilated fundoscopy revealed an enlarged Cup/Disc ratio in 12 eyes (19.4%). Family history of glaucoma was positive in 13 cases (21.0%). Mean best corrected visual acuity was found as 0.05 ± 0.08 logMAR. Initial IOP was 17.1 ± 2.3 mmHg; whereas it was measured as 18.2 ± 2.0 mmHg and 17.3 ± 2.1 mmHg at the first and sixth weeks of follow-up, respectively (p < 0.001). Both at the first and sixth weeks of follow-up, significant IOP rise was present in children with a positive family history of glaucoma (p < 0.001 and p = 0.003, respectively). Besides, increased IOP was found in participants with cupping revealed on fundoscopy at the first week of follow-up (p = 0.044).

CONCLUSION

Since children have greater risk for steroid-induced ocular hypertensive response than adults, ophthalmologic evaluation must be recommended in children receiving intranasal steroids.

TonoVet Plus®: Higher reliability and repeatability compared with Tono-Pen XL™ and TonoVet® in rabbits

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the accuracy and repeatability of the Tono-Pen XL™, TonoVet® and TonoVet Plus® tonometers by manometric evaluation, and to establish adjustment equations for intraocular pressure (IOP) estimates in rabbits.

ANIMAL STUDIED

Rabbits.

PROCEDURES

A postmortem study was conducted on seven rabbit eyes to verify the correlation between manometry and tonometry with an artificial incremental increase in IOP from 5 and 60 mmHg. A clinical study was conducted to evaluate accuracy and to establish reference values for the species, with measurement of IOP in 17 animals, for 2 consecutive days, with the same tonometers and calibrations used in the postmortem evaluations.

RESULTS

There were strong linear trends for all evaluated tonometers. In the in-vivo evaluation, the mean IOP values were: 14.23 ± 1.75 (Tono-Pen XL™); 13.89 ± 2.07 (TonoVet® calibration mode 'd'); 8.88 ± 1.24 (TonoVet calibration mode 'p'); 18.59 ± 1.94 (Tonovet Plus®). There was a significant difference in the two evaluation times for the two TonoVet® calibration modes. The adjustment equations generated from the manometry for the evaluated tonometers were: Y = 0.2570X + 2.219 (Tono-Pen XL™), Y = 0.2289X + 2.389 (TonoVet® 'd'), Y = 0.4043X + 4.062 (TonoVet® 'p'), Y = 0.1233X + 0.3644 (TonoVet Plus®) (X is device-estimated IOP).

CONCLUSIONS

All evaluated tonometers were well correlated with the manometry, with an underestimation of IOP by all devices. Applying adjustment formulas may compensate for systematic errors. TonoVet Plus® was well tolerated, and showed better repeatability and reliability in successive evaluations.

Effects of Corneal Biomechanical Properties on Rebound Tonometry (Icare200) and Applanation Tonometry (Perkins) Readings in Patients With Primary Congenital Glaucoma

OBJECTIVE

The aim was to assess the influence of corneal biomechanics on intraocular pressure (IOP) measurements made with the Icare200 (IC200) rebound tonometer and the Perkins handheld applanation tonometer in patients with primary congenital glaucoma (PCG).

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A total of 40 PCG patients and 40 healthy controls, age, and sex-matched, were recruited. IOP was measured with the Ocular Response Analyzer (IOPc, IOPg), IC200 and Perkins. The variables age, IOP, corneal hysteresis (CH), corneal resistance factor (CRF), central corneal thickness (CCT), best-corrected visual acuity, spherical equivalent, medications, and glaucoma surgeries were recorded for each subject. Univariate and multivariate analysis were used to detect effects of variables on IOP measurements.

RESULTS

Mean CCT was 545.65±71.88 μm in PCG versus 558.78±27.58 μm in controls (P=0.284). CH and CRF were significantly lower in PCG group than in control group: mean CH 8.11±1.69 versus 11.15±1.63 mm Hg (P<0.001), and mean CRF 9.27±2.35 versus 10.71±1.75 mm Hg (P=0.002). Mean differences between IOP IC200-Perkins were 0.79±0.53 mm Hg in PCG versus 0.80±0.23 mm Hg in controls (P<0.001) and mean differences IC200-IOPc were -0.89±5.15 mm Hg in PCG (P<0.001) versus 1.60±3.03 mm Hg in controls (all P<0.009). Through multivariate analysis, CRF showed positive association and CH negative association with IOP measured with Perkins or IC200 in both subject groups. No association was detected for CCT, age, or sex.

CONCLUSION

CH and CRF were identified as the main factors interfering with IOP measurements made with both tonometers in patients with PCG and healthy controls.

Intraocular Pressure Changes during Hemodiafiltration with Two different Concentrations of Sodium in the Dialysate

Simple Summary

An increase in intraocular pressure during chronic hemodialysis is linked to ocular complications, such as glaucoma. The behavior of intraocular pressure during hemodiafiltration is unknown. Changes in intraocular pressure with a sodium dialysate concentration fixed at 138 mmol/L and an individualized concentration were studied in 13 patients with end-stage renal disease treated with hemodiafiltration. Up to 31% patients presented an episode of intraocular hypertension without differences between sodium profiles. A large variability in intraocular pressure within patients and a high prevalence of transient intraocular hypertension were found.

Abstract

Ocular complications are common among end-stage renal disease patients and some complications had been linked to increments of intraocular pressure (IOP) during hemodialysis. The changes of IOP during hemodiafiltration (HDF) have been scarcely investigated and the potential influence of the sodium dialysate concentration is unknown. The aim of this study was to compare the IOP changes during HDF with sodium dialysate concentration, either fixed or individualized. Thirteen end-stage renal disease patients participated in the study; they were treated with HDF using a dialysate sodium profile fixed at 138 mmol and another session with an individualized sodium profile. The intraocular pressure was measured before and after each session and every 30 min during HDF. Both groups had a similar HDF prescription, blood pressure, and biochemical parameters. At the end of hemodiafiltration, sodium concentration decreased only in the fixed sodium profile group. The number of patients with at least an episode of intraocular hypertension during HDF ranged from 5 (19%) to 8 (31%) without significant differences between right and left eye nor between dialysate sodium concentration. During HDF, there is a large variability of IOP; transient events of intraocular hypertension are highly prevalent in this sample, and they are not related to the sodium dialysate concentration.

Agreement between rebound (Icare ic200) and applanation tonometry (Perkins) in patients with primary congenital glaucoma

PURPOSE

To examine agreement between intraocular pressure (IOP) measurements made using the rebound tonometer Icare ic200 (RT200) and the Perkins handheld applanation tonometer (PAT) in patients with primary congenital glaucoma (PCG). The impacts of several covariables on measurements using the two devices were also assessed.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Intraocular pressure measurements were made in a single session in 86 eyes of 86 patients with PCG (46 under anaesthesia, 40 in the office). The order was RT200 then PAT. The variables age, central corneal thickness (CCT), corneal state and anaesthesia were recorded in each patient. Data were compared by determining interclass correlation coefficients (ICC) for each tonometer and representing the differences detected as Bland-Altman plots. Effects of covariables were assessed through univariate and multivariate regression.

RESULTS

Mean IOP difference between tonometers (RT200 minus PAT) was 1.26 mmHg (95%: 0.22-2.31). Absolute agreement (ICC) was 0.73 (95% CI: 0.62-0.82). Lower and upper limits of agreement (95%) were -8.06 mmHg (95% CI: -9.87 to -6.25) and 10.59 mmHg (95% CI: 8.77-12.40), respectively. The tonometers showed systematic differences (a = -4.63 mmHg; 95% CI: -9.11 to -1.44) and proportional differences; for each mmHg increase in PAT-IOP, the RT200 reading increased by 1.28 mmHg (b = 1.28; 95% CI: 1.12-1.53). None of the variables tested as predictors were able to explain differences between the tonometers.

CONCLUSIONS

Despite the good overall agreement between both tonometers, caution should be taken in high values of IOP, considering the interchangeability of its readings as systematic and proportional differences appear to exist between both methods.

Evaluation of rebound tonometer iCare IC200 as compared with IcarePRO and Goldmann applanation tonometer in patients with glaucoma

Background

This study investigated the agreement between a new rebound tonometer, IC200, and IcarePRO and Goldmann applanation tonometry (GAT).

Methods

This was a prospective cross-sectional study. We measured the intraocular pressure (IOP) in 145 eyes of 145 glaucoma patients in the sitting position using GAT, IcarePRO, and IC200. IcarePRO and IC200 measurements were also obtained in the supine position. IC200 measurement was performed using two modes: single six (IC200-single) and automatic (IC200-continuous) six-measurements mode.

Results

All tonometers provided high reproducibility in both positions (all intraclass correlation coefficients > 0.90), although it was highest with GAT, followed by IC200-continuous and IC200-single and then IcarePRO. In the sitting position, the mean (± SD) IOPs of GAT, IcarePRO, IC200-single, and IC200-continuous were 14.5 ± 2.9 mmHg, 13.3 ± 3.2 mmHg, 11.6 ± 3.2 mmHg, and 11.5 ± 3.2 mmHg, respectively. IOPs measured with IcarePRO or IC200 were significantly lower than those with GAT, particularly in patients with low IOP. IOPs measured with all tonometers were significantly elevated in the supine position as compared with the sitting position, but this difference was significantly greater with IC200-single and IC200-continuous compared with IcarePRO. IOP elevation was significant in eyes without bleb versus those with bleb, but this finding was not observed when IOP was measured with IcarePRO. The IOPs of the single and continuous modes of IC200 were interchangeable in both positions.

Conclusions

GAT, IcarePRO, and IC200 had sufficiently high reproducibility, but measurements with IcarePRO may not be accurate in the supine position. Elevation of IOP in the supine position, especially in eyes with bleb, was more sensitively captured with IC200 than with IcarePRO.

Trial registration

Japan Clinical Trials Register, No. UMIN000039982.

Supplementary Information

The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s40662-021-00249-z.

Correlation of iCare ic100 tonometry with iCare TA01i in screening of unselected population in Northern Finland Birth Cohort Eye study

PURPOSE

iCare tonometers are easy-to-use and portable devices for measuring the intraocular pressure (IOP). Purpose was to evaluate the IOP values measured by both novel iCare ic100 and conventional model TA01i devices in unselected population.

METHODS

IOP was measured with iCare ic100 and TA01i tonometers in 149 participants aged 32-33 years (born in 1985 or 1986) of the Northern Finland Birth Cohort Eye 2 study. The right eye of each participant was selected for analysis. We also collected data on axial length, corneal curvature and central corneal thickness (CCT). Bland-Altman plot was used for comparing the values obtained by these devices.

RESULTS

Mean IOP measured with the ic100 device was 13.8 (3.4) mmHg, with TA01i it was 12.5 (3.0) mmHg. The mean difference between these devices was 1.30 mmHg (p < 0.001) and R2 was 0.694. In Bland-Altman analysis, the agreement between the two tonometers ic100 and TA01i was constantly good (mean difference -1.30, ic100 device showing higher measures). There was a correlation between IOP and CCT (r = 0.269, p < 0.001 for ic100 and r = 0.255, p = 0.002 for TA01i), but not with IOP and corneal curvature or IOP and axial length.

CONCLUSION

In summary, we found ic100 rebound tonometry to be both reliable and effective, although CCT may influence IOP measurements with ic100 and TA01i. Therefore, iCare ic100 is suitable for IOP measurement in large cohort studies.

24-h intraocular pressure patterns measured by Icare PRO rebound in habitual position of open-angle glaucoma eyes

PURPOSE

To measure the 24-h intraocular pressure (IOP) by Icare PRO rebound in healthy and primary open-angle glaucoma (POAG) eyes and compare it with non-contact tonometry (NCT).

METHODS

Thirty POAG patients, who were under IOP-lowering treatment, and 30 healthy subjects were included. Participants were hospitalized overnight for the 24-h IOP measurement. IOPs were measured by Icare PRO and NCT according to a standard protocol every 2 h during 24 h. The 24-h IOP curve and IOP-related parameters were compared between Icare PRO and NCT groups in POAG and healthy eyes.

RESULTS

The IOPs measured by Icare PRO in habitual position increased notably at 22:00 in the normal group and at 20:00 in the POAG group, reached peak at 0:00, stayed high until 4:00, and then decreased in both groups (all p < 0.05). The POAG patients had higher mean 24-h IOP, peak IOP, IOP fluctuation, and greater IOP change from supine to sitting position in the nocturnal period than those in the normal subjects even after adjusting for eyes, age, gender, CCT, and axial length (all p < 0.05).

CONCLUSIONS

The Icare PRO provides a well-tolerated approach for 24-h IOP monitoring in habitual position. Twenty-four-hour IOP in habitual position is more sensitive for detecting high nocturnal IOP peaks and greater IOP fluctuation for POAG patients.

Repeatability, reproducibility, agreement, and safety of Tono-Pen tip cover for intraocular measurement using latex and polyethylene wrap

PURPOSE

To evaluate repeatability, reproducibility, and agreement of intraocular pressure measurement with Tono-Pen using Ocufilm and polyethylene wrap tip cover in human eyes.

METHODS

This is a cross-sectional, experimental study. A gas-sterilized, polyethylene wrap was used as an alternative for Tono-Pen tip cover. For the right eye, 4 measurements using polyethylene wrap tip cover were done by two examiners (A and B) in random order to assess intra-observer repeatability and inter-observer reproducibility. For the left eye, 4 measurements were done by examiner A using both polyethylene wrap tip cover and Ocufilm in random order to assess intra-observer repeatability and agreement. Bland-Altman plot and intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) were used in all analyses. Cost minimization analysis was evaluated.

RESULTS

For examiner A, the repeatability of polyethylene wrap tip cover was -0.34, 95% limits of agreement (LOA) were -3.04 to 2.36, and ICC was 0.93 in the right eyes. As for the left eyes, the repeatability of polyethylene wrap tip cover was -0.33, 95% LOA were -3.01 to 2.36, and ICC was 0.93. For examiner B, the repeatability of polyethylene wrap tip cover was -0.02, 95% LOA were -2.88 to 2.83, and ICC was 0.92. The inter-observer reproducibility of polyethylene wrap tip cover was 0.36, 95% LOA were -3.34 to 4.07, and ICC was 0.90. The repeatability of Ocufilm was -0.42, 95% LOA were -2.75 to 1.91, and ICC was 0.95. The agreement of polyethylene wrap tip cover and Ocufilm was -0.71, 95% LOA were -5.18 to 3.76, and ICC was 0.83. There were no allergic reactions or serious complications. From the cost minimization analysis, the local cost for polyethylene tip cover was approximately 8 times lower compared to Ocufilm.

CONCLUSIONS

Tono-pen with Ocufilm and polyethylene wrap tip cover were used to measure the intraocular pressure. The polyethylene wrap tip cover demonstrated acceptable repeatability, reproducibility, and agreement with Ocufilm in normotensive eyes, and had a good safety profile.

Comparison of Three Different Tonometers in Eyes with Angle Closure

SIGNIFICANCE

Precise measurement of intraocular pressure (IOP) is essential when diagnosing and managing glaucoma. We compared the IOP readings of three different tonometers and analyzed agreement among tonometers in eyes with high IOPs.

PURPOSE

The purpose of this study was to compare the IOP readings obtained using a Goldmann applanation tonometer (GAT), a rebound tonometer (RT), and a Tono-Pen (TP) in angle-closure eyes with elevated IOP before and after medical IOP-lowering therapy.

METHODS

Twenty-five eyes of 25 patients with angle closure and IOPs of greater than 30 mmHg were enrolled. Intraocular pressure was measured using RT (iCare Pro), TP (Tono-Pen XL), and GAT before and after medical treatment. The mean IOP readings of the tonometers were compared before and after treatment. The agreement among the tonometers was assessed via Bland-Altman analysis.

RESULTS

The measurements from 22 eyes of 22 patients were suitable for statistical analyses. Before medical treatment, the mean TP-IOP was significantly lower than the mean GAT-IOP (44.0 ± 10.3 vs. 50.4 ± 8.9 mmHg, respectively; P < .001), but no significant difference was evident between the RT-IOP and the GAT-IOP (50.8 ± 10.9 vs. 50.4 ± 8.9 mmHg, respectively; P = .79). After IOP-lowering treatment, the mean GAT-IOP (14.9 ± 4.7 mmHg) did not differ from either the mean RT-IOP (15.6 ± 4.4 mmHg) or the mean TP-IOP (15.4 ± 5.0 mmHg; P = .05 and P = .18, respectively). The random measurement error among tonometers was greater for high IOP readings.

CONCLUSIONS

Compared with RT or GAT, TP underestimated IOP in angle-closure eyes with a GAT-IOP of greater than 30 mmHg. Intraocular pressure reading agreement among the three tonometers was lower in eyes with high IOP.

Error in measurement of intraocular pressure with the Icare and IcarePRO

PURPOSE

We sought to determine whether changes in the measurement angle of the Icare TA01i and IcarePRO tonometers led to errors in the measurement of intraocular pressure (IOP).

METHODS

In this prospective, single-facility study, we analyzed 77 patients from November 2017 to September 2019. We measured IOP with the Icare TA01i and IcarePRO while changing the angle of the device with the cornea center and analyzed the associated changes in the measurement.

RESULTS

IOP measured with the Icare tilted - 30°, - 15° vertically was significantly higher than that measured with the Icare tilted horizontally (p < 0.0001, p < 0.0001). The IOP measured with a + 10° vertical tilt was significantly lower than that measured horizontally (p < 0.0001). When the IcarePRO was tilted + 90° vertically, the IOP was significantly lower with the patient in the supine position than in the lateral position (p = 0.00058).

CONCLUSIONS

IOP measured with the Icare and IcarePRO is affected by the measurement angle. The study results will direct the clinicians to exercise extra precautions in determining the measurement angle while measuring IOP.

A comparison of Icare PRO and Perkins tonometers in anesthetized children

AIM

To compare intraocular pressure (IOP) measurements obtained with the Perkins applanation tonometer and Icare PRO (ICP) rebound tonometer in anesthetized aphakic or strabismus children. Furthermore, intra-operator correlation and inter-operator correlation have been evaluated, along with the effects of central corneal thickness (CCT) on IOP measurements.

METHODS

Seventy children undergoing examination under anesthesia with sevoflurane for aphakic patients and for surgery for strabismus were included. IOP have been measured twice immediately after anesthesia induction with both Perkins applanation tonometer (PAT) and ICP in one eye and by two different operators with both devices in the fellow eye. Furthermore, CCT was measured with ultrasound pachymetry Pacline (Optikon). Agreement between the device measurements has been evaluated using Bland-Altman analyses. Repeatability and reproducibility of the device have been evaluated with intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) with a value > 0.75 associated with excellent reliability. The relationship between IOP and CCT has been evaluated with Spearman's correlation coefficient r and determination coefficient r².

RESULTS

Mean difference in IOP measurements between ICP and PAT was 1.97 mmHg ± 1.23 mmHg (p < 0.05). This difference appeared to be higher in aphakic patients (mean difference 2.15 ± 1.35) than in patients undergoing strabismus surgery (mean difference 1.83 mmHg ± 1.12). Intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) is used to evaluate repeatability and reproducibility, which are both high for PAT (repeatability 0.96, reproducibility 0.76) compared with ICP (repeatability 0.81, reproducibility 0.70). Correlation coefficient between CCT and IOP is 0.66 for both ICP and PAT.

CONCLUSION

ICP tends to overestimate IOP compared to PAT. Repeatability and reproducibility are both high for PAT as compared to ICP. A significant correlation between IOP and CCT for both instruments has been demonstrated.

Icare® rebound tonometers: review of their characteristics and ease of use

The rebound tonometer has a unique mechanism for measuring intraocular pressure (IOP) and has become popular worldwide due to its ease of use. The most notable advantages are the lack of an air-puff and need for topical anesthesia, ease of operation and transport, and the ability to use it with children. Four rebound tonometers (Icare® TA01i, Icare PRO, Icare HOME, and Icare ic100) are currently available for clinical examination. It is important to understand the characteristics of each tonometer and select the most appropriate one because the IOP values and the purpose of measurement are different. In this review, with the goal of improving the understanding of a range of tonometers, the issues with each device are discussed.

Agreement among Goldmann applanation tonometer, iCare, and Icare PRO rebound tonometers; non-contact tonometer; and Tonopen XL in healthy elderly subjects

PURPOSE

To evaluate the inter-device agreement among the Goldmann applanation tonometer (GAT), iCare and Icare PRO rebound tonometers, non-contact tonometer (NCT), and Tonopen XL tonometer.

METHODS

Sixty healthy elderly subjects were enrolled. The intraocular pressure (IOP) in each subject's right eye was measured thrice using each of the five tonometers. Intra-device agreement was evaluated by calculating intraclass correlation coefficients (ICCs). Inter-device agreement was evaluated by ICC and Bland-Altman analyses.

RESULTS

ICCs for intra-device agreement for each tonometer were >0.8. IOP as measured by iCare (mean ± SD, 11.6 ± 2.5 mmHg) was significantly lower (p < 0.05) than that measured by GAT (14.0 ± 2.8 mmHg), NCT (13.6 ± 2.5 mmHg), Tonopen XL (13.7 ± 4.1 mmHg), and Icare PRO (12.6 ± 2.2 mmHg; Bonferroni test). There was no significant difference in mean IOP among GAT, NCT, and Tonopen XL. Regarding inter-device agreement, ICC was lower between Tonopen XL and other tonometers (all ICCs < 0.4). However, ICCs of GAT, iCare, Icare PRO, and NCT showed good agreement (0.576-0.700). The Bland-Altman analysis revealed that the width of the 95% limits of agreement was larger between the Tonopen XL and the other tonometers ranged from 14.94 to 16.47 mmHg. Among the other tonometers, however, the widths of 95% limits of agreement ranged from 7.91 to 9.24 mmHg.

CONCLUSION

There was good inter-device agreement among GAT, rebound tonometers, and NCT. Tonopen XL shows the worst agreement with the other tonometers; therefore, we should pay attention to its' respective IOP.

CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION

Japan Clinical Trials Register; number: UMIN000011544.

Intraocular pressure in children: the effect of body position as assessed by Icare and Tono-Pen tonometers

PURPOSE

To explore the effect of body position (sitting vs supine) on intraocular pressure (IOP) in children, as assessed by the Icare PRO and the Tono-Pen.

DESIGN

Prospective clinical study.

METHODS

Children with known or suspected glaucoma and those without glaucoma were recruited from the Duke Eye Center pediatric clinic. Subjects underwent tonometry in both eyes while upright (sitting), after instillation of topical anesthetic, with either the Icare PRO or the Tono-Pen first, and then the second instrument (order randomized). Goldmann applanation tonometry (GAT) was then performed by a clinician masked to the previous measurements. The subjects were then placed in the supine position for 5 minutes, and tonometry using the Icare PRO and the Tono-Pen was obtained, in the same order used when they were the sitting position.

RESULTS

Enrolled were 47 children (94 eyes). Mean seated IOP for GAT, Icare PRO and Tono-Pen were 16.4 ± 4.2, 17.5 ± 3.5, and 18.0 ± 3.9 mm Hg, respectively. The mean supine IOP for the Icare PRO and Tono-Pen were 18.4 ± 4.5 and 18.8 ± 4.2 mm Hg, respectively. This rise was +0.9 ± 2.3 mm Hg for Icare PRO (P = 0.01) and +0.7 ± 1.8 mm Hg for Tono-Pen (P = 0.009), respectively.

CONCLUSION

In children, Icare PRO tonometry correlates well with GAT in the sitting position, and with the Tono-Pen in both the sitting and supine positions. IOP rises when a child changes position from sitting to supine when measured by the Icare PRO or the Tono-Pen. However, the increase, which is less than 1 mm Hg, seems clinically insignificant and is unlikely to alter glaucoma management in children.