The Effect of Therapeutic IOP-lowering Interventions on the 24-hour Ocular Dimensional Profile Recorded With a Sensing Contact Lens

The relationship between intraocular pressure and glaucoma: An evolving concept

Intraocular pressure (IOP) is the most important modifiable risk factor for glaucoma and fluctuates considerably within patients over short and long time periods. Our field's understanding of IOP has evolved considerably in recent years, driven by tonometric technologies with increasing accuracy, reproducibility, and temporal resolution that have refined our knowledge regarding the relationship between IOP and glaucoma risk and pathogenesis. The goal of this article is to review the published literature pertinent to the following points: 1) the factors that determine IOP in physiologic and pathologic states; 2) technologies for measuring IOP; 3) scientific and clinical rationale for measuring diverse IOP metrics in patients with glaucoma; 4) the impact and shortcomings of current standard-of-care IOP monitoring approaches; 5) recommendations for approaches to IOP monitoring that could improve patient outcomes; and 6) research questions that must be answered to improve our understanding of how IOP contributes to disease progression. Retrospective and prospective data, including that from landmark clinical trials, document greater IOP fluctuations in glaucomatous than healthy eyes, tendencies for maximal daily IOP to occur outside of office hours, and, in addition to mean and maximal IOP, an association between IOP fluctuation and glaucoma progression that is independent of mean in-office IOP. Ambulatory IOP monitoring, measuring IOP outside of office hours and at different times of day and night, provides clinicians with discrete data that could improve patient outcomes. Eye care clinicians treating glaucoma based on isolated in-office IOP measurements may make treatment decisions without fully capturing the entire IOP profile of an individual. Data linking home blood pressure monitors and home glucose sensors to dramatically improved outcomes for patients with systemic hypertension and diabetes and will be reviewed as they pertain to the question of whether ambulatory tonometry is positioned to do the same for glaucoma management. Prospective randomized controlled studies are warranted to determine whether remote tonometry-based glaucoma management might reduce vision loss and improve patient outcomes.

Home Self-tonometry Trials Compared with Clinic Tonometry in Patients with Glaucoma

PURPOSE

This study examined characteristics of intraocular pressure (IOP) as measured during home tonometry in comparison with in-clinic tonometry in patients with glaucoma.

DESIGN

Retrospective cross-sectional study of glaucoma patients who completed 1 week of self-tonometry at a single academic center.

PARTICIPANTS

Patients with glaucoma who completed home tonometry trials with the iCare HOME tonometer (iCare USA) for any reason.

METHODS

Home IOP measurements were compared with in-clinic tonometry performed during the 5 visits preceding home tonometry. Maximum daily IOP was correlated to time of day. Generalized estimating equations were used to evaluate patient characteristics and clinic-derived variables that predicted differences between home and clinic IOP.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

IOP mean, maximum, minimum, range, standard deviation and coefficient of variation were compared between clinic and home tonometry. IOP mean daily maximum (MDM) and mean daily range were calculated to describe recurrent IOP spiking.

RESULTS

A total of 107 eyes from 61 patients were analyzed. Mean age was 63.2 years (standard deviation [SD], 14.0 years) and 59.0% were women. Mean clinic and home IOPs were 14.5 mmHg (SD, 4.7 mmHg) and 13.6 mmHg (SD, 5.1 mmHg). Home tonometry identified significantly higher maximum IOP, lower minimum IOP, and greater IOP range than clinic tonometry (P < 0.001). Maximum daily IOP occurred outside of clinic hours (8 am-5 pm) on 50% of days assessed and occurred between 4:30 am and 8 am on 24% of days. Mean daily maximum IOP exceeded maximum clinic IOP in 44% of patients and exceeded target IOP by 3 mmHg, 5 mmHg, or 10 mmHg in 31%, 15%, and 6% of patients, respectively. Patient characteristics that predicted significant deviations between MDM and mean clinic IOP or target IOP in multivariate models included younger age, male gender, and absence of prior filtering surgery.

CONCLUSIONS

Self-tonometry provides IOP data that supplements in-clinic tonometry and would not be detectable over daytime in-clinic diurnal curves. A subset of patients in whom home tonometry was ordered by their glaucoma clinician because of suspicion of occult IOP elevation demonstrated reproducible IOP elevation outside of the clinic setting. Such patients tended to be younger and male and not to have undergone previous filtering surgery.

Non-invasive detection of intracranial pressure related to the optic nerve

Intracranial pressure (ICP) is associated with a variety of diseases. Early diagnosis and the timely intervention of elevated ICP are effective means to clinically reduce the morbidity and mortality of some diseases. The detection and judgment of reduced ICP are beneficial to glaucoma doctor and neuro ophthalmologist to diagnose optic nerve disease earlier. It is important to evaluate and monitor ICP clinically. Although invasive ICP detection is the gold standard, it can have complications. Most non-invasive ICP tests are related to the optic nerve and surrounding tissues due to their anatomical characteristics. Ultrasound, magnetic resonance imaging, transcranial Doppler, papilledema on optical coherence tomography, visual evoked potential, ophthalmodynamometry, the assessment of spontaneous retinal venous pulsations, and eye-tracking have potential for application. Although none of these methods can completely replace invasive technology; however, its repeatable, low risk, high accuracy, gradually attracted people's attention. This review summarizes the non-invasive ICP detection methods related to the optic nerve and the role of the diagnosis and prognosis of neurological disorders and glaucoma. We discuss the advantages and challenges and predict possible areas of development in the future.

24-h intraocular pressure patterns measured by Icare PRO rebound in habitual position of open-angle glaucoma eyes

PURPOSE

To measure the 24-h intraocular pressure (IOP) by Icare PRO rebound in healthy and primary open-angle glaucoma (POAG) eyes and compare it with non-contact tonometry (NCT).

METHODS

Thirty POAG patients, who were under IOP-lowering treatment, and 30 healthy subjects were included. Participants were hospitalized overnight for the 24-h IOP measurement. IOPs were measured by Icare PRO and NCT according to a standard protocol every 2 h during 24 h. The 24-h IOP curve and IOP-related parameters were compared between Icare PRO and NCT groups in POAG and healthy eyes.

RESULTS

The IOPs measured by Icare PRO in habitual position increased notably at 22:00 in the normal group and at 20:00 in the POAG group, reached peak at 0:00, stayed high until 4:00, and then decreased in both groups (all p < 0.05). The POAG patients had higher mean 24-h IOP, peak IOP, IOP fluctuation, and greater IOP change from supine to sitting position in the nocturnal period than those in the normal subjects even after adjusting for eyes, age, gender, CCT, and axial length (all p < 0.05).

CONCLUSIONS

The Icare PRO provides a well-tolerated approach for 24-h IOP monitoring in habitual position. Twenty-four-hour IOP in habitual position is more sensitive for detecting high nocturnal IOP peaks and greater IOP fluctuation for POAG patients.

CLEAR - Contact lens technologies of the future

Contact lenses in the future will likely have functions other than correction of refractive error. Lenses designed to control the development of myopia are already commercially available. Contact lenses as drug delivery devices and powered through advancements in nanotechnology will open up further opportunities for unique uses of contact lenses. This review examines the use, or potential use, of contact lenses aside from their role to correct refractive error. Contact lenses can be used to detect systemic and ocular surface diseases, treat and manage various ocular conditions and as devices that can correct presbyopia, control the development of myopia or be used for augmented vision. There is also discussion of new developments in contact lens packaging and storage cases. The use of contact lenses as devices to detect systemic disease has mostly focussed on detecting changes to glucose levels in tears for monitoring diabetic control. Glucose can be detected using changes in colour, fluorescence or generation of electric signals by embedded sensors such as boronic acid, concanavalin A or glucose oxidase. Contact lenses that have gained regulatory approval can measure changes in intraocular pressure to monitor glaucoma by measuring small changes in corneal shape. Challenges include integrating sensors into contact lenses and detecting the signals generated. Various techniques are used to optimise uptake and release of the drugs to the ocular surface to treat diseases such as dry eye, glaucoma, infection and allergy. Contact lenses that either mechanically or electronically change their shape are being investigated for the management of presbyopia. Contact lenses that slow the development of myopia are based upon incorporating concentric rings of plus power, peripheral optical zone(s) with add power or non-monotonic variations in power. Various forms of these lenses have shown a reduction in myopia in clinical trials and are available in various markets.

Effects of Ab Interno XEN Gel Implantation on Postural Intraocular Pressure Elevations

Purpose: The aim of this study was to analyze the postural intraocular pressure (IOP) changes in open-angle glaucoma after ab interno XEN gel implant surgery and to compare them with the changes observed with trabeculectomy and medical treatment.Patients and Methods: The study sample included 18 patients with XEN gel implants, 30 patients who had trabeculectomy, and 30 medically managed glaucoma patients. All patients in XEN gel implant and trabeculectomy groups had at least 11 months of follow-up and had successful surgeries that resulted in medication-free control of IOP. A rebound tonometer (Icare, Finland Oy, Helsinki, Finland) was used to measure the IOP levels at the sitting, supine, and dependent lateral decubitus (DLDP) positions after a 5-minute rest at each position.Results: In all the groups, the mean IOP values in the DLDP and supine positions were significantly higher than the sitting position. The IOP elevation after moving from sitting to supine position was significantly reduced in XEN gel implant and trabeculectomy groups compared to medical treatment group (p = .001 and p = .002, respectively). The IOP elevation after a moving from sitting to DLDP was also significantly reduced in XEN gel implant and trabeculectomy groups compared to the medical treatment group (p = .003 and p = .01, respectively). However, there was no significant difference in IOP change after moving from sitting to supine or DLDP positions between XEN gel implant and trabeculectomy groups (p = .74 and p = .98, respectively).Conclusion: This study demonstrated that XEN gel implant could reduce postural elevations in IOP to the same degree as trabeculectomy and provide significantly better postural IOP control than medical treatment. This surgery can be an effective minimally invasive alternative for patients with significant positional IOP elevations.

Outcome, influence factor and development of CLS measurement in continuous IOP monitoring: A narrative review

A large fluctuation in intraocular pressure (IOP) and a high peak IOP remain the risk factors for progressive visual field loss in patients with glaucoma, which is a leading cause of irreversible blindness. However, IOP measurements during working time cannot provide sufficient information on IOP to guide clinicians in setting IOP target values. Contact lenses are extensively used in ophthalmology to correct the refractive error, and recently, they are serving as platforms for detection and drug delivery. Contact lens sensor (CLS) is a feasible and promising approach to continuously monitor IOP, with superior tolerance, non-invasiveness, and without sleep disturbance. The present work reviewed the associations between progressive course and Triggerfish® CLS outputs as well as the relationship between treatments and Triggerfish® CLS outputs. Moreover, it further summarized state-of-the-art CLS devices of the past decade.

Mean amplitude of intraocular pressure excursions: a new assessment parameter for 24-h pressure fluctuations in glaucoma patients

Background

Intraocular pressure (IOP) is important in the pathogenesis of glaucoma and its circadian fluctuations are important in the disease management; however, there are no adequate parameters to describe the fluctuations. This study investigates a new parameter, mean amplitude of intraocular pressure excursion (MAPE), and compares its ability in assessing 24-h IOP fluctuations with other ocular parameters.

Methods

Only the right eye was evaluated in each of the 79 healthy people and 164 untreated patients with primary open angle glaucoma (POAG). Each participant underwent 24-h IOP monitoring by measuring IOP every 2 h. IOP fluctuations were expressed as MAPE calculations and currently used parameters included mean IOP, standard deviation of IOP, max difference and area under the circadian IOP curve. Comprehensive ophthalmologic examinations were also performed. Associations between visual field deficits and IOP fluctuation parameters were investigated via partial least squares (PLS) regression. Diagnostic performance was evaluated with area under the receiver operating characteristic curves (ROC).

Results

Compared with healthy volunteers, the MAPE values in POAG patients were higher (4.16 ± 1.90 versus 2.45 ± 0.89, p < 0.01). In PLS regressions where visual field deficits were as dependent variable, MAPE had the highest score regarding variable importance in projection, and its standard regression coefficient was larger than other parameters. Diagnostic performance analysis showed the area under ROC of MAPE for glaucoma detection was 0.822 (0.768–0.868, p < 0.001).

Conclusions

MAPE might be an effective parameter in clinic to characterise IOP circadian fluctuations.