Use of a Collagen Matrix Implant as an Adjuvant in Combined Surgery Involving Phacoemulsification and Nonpenetrating Deep Sclerectomy

Expanded Polytetrafluoroethylene Spacer for Nonpenetrating Deep Sclerectomy Combined with Cataract Surgery

Purpose

To compare the outcomes of nonpenetrating deep sclerectomy (NPDS) with and without an expanded polytetrafluoroethylene (e-PTFE) implant combined with phacoemulsification (PE).

Design

Interventional case series with concurrent control group.

Materials and methods

Patients with medically uncontrolled glaucoma underwent PE nonpenetrating deep sclerectomy (NPDS) and were consecutively divided into a study group receiving an e-PTFE implant and a control group undergoing PE-NPDS. Intraocular pressure (IOP), corrected distance visual acuity (CDVA), and the number of glaucoma medications at 1 day, 1 week, 1 month, 3 months, and 6 months were recorded.

Results

A total of 22 eyes of 16 patients underwent PE-NPDS, including 11 eyes receiving an e-PTFE implant and another 11 eyes with no implant. NPDS with spacer achieved successful results in all patients, including eight (72.7%) complete and three (27.3%) qualified success, 6 months, postoperatively. The corresponding values in the control group were 10 (90.9%) and 1 (9.1%), respectively. In the spacer group, mean IOP was decreased from 19.3 ± 2.8 at baseline to 12.1 ± 2.0 mm Hg at month 6 (p < 0.001). Corresponding values for the control group were 18.6 ± 3.4 and 10.6 ± 1.5 mm Hg, respectively (p < 0.001). Mean IOPs were comparable between the study groups at all time points. Implant exposure occurred in one of the patients in the study group. While the implant was extruded, the IOP was medically controlled.

Conclusion

Outcomes of PE-NPDS using an e-PTFE implant were comparable to the same surgery without a spacer in the short term. Larger studies with longer follow-ups are needed to determine the efficacy and safety of this new implant.

How to cite this article

Hajizadeh M, Meshksar A, Hassanpour K, et al. Expanded Polytetrafluoroethylene Spacer for Nonpenetrating Deep Sclerectomy Combined with Cataract Surgery. J Curr Glaucoma Pract 2024;18(2):51-56.

Outcomes of Deep Sclerectomy following Failed XEN Gel Stent Implantation in Open-Angle Glaucoma: A Prospective Study

Background: The purpose of this study is to evaluate the outcome of deep sclerectomy (DS) as a secondary procedure following failed ab-interno XEN gel stent implantation in patients with open-angle glaucoma. Methods: Prospective, single-center, non-randomized, interventional study. Consecutive eyes that underwent mitomycin C (MMC) augmented XEN gel stent surgery, with uncontrolled intraocular pressure (IOP) or signs of disease progression, were included to undergo MMC-augmented DS. Primary efficacy outcome was surgical success, defined as complete when the unmedicated IOP was 12 mmHg or less, or 15 mmHg or less and 20% lower than at the timing of XEN failure and defined as qualified when the IOP fulfilled the same conditions with fewer medications than before deep sclerectomy. Secondary measures were mean reduction in IOP and in the number of medications, and the rates of complications. Results: Seventeen eyes were enrolled with a mean age of 72.1 ± 8.2 years (66.7% women). The mean follow-up was 20.1 ± 4.9 months, with more than 12-month data available from 15 eyes. Following DS, IOP decreased significantly from 22.6 ± 5.3 mmHg to 12.3 ± 5.5 (45.6%; p < 0.001). Antiglaucoma medications dropped from 1.1 ± 0.9 to 0.3 ± 0.7. Complete success was obtained in 40% of eyes using the threshold of 12 mmHg or less and a 20% decrease of IOP, and in 60% using the 15 mmHg or less threshold. Adverse events were observed in 20% of eyes (bleb leakage (13.3%); hypotony (6.7%)). No cases of choroidal detachment or hypotony maculopathy were reported. Conclusions: Failed XEN gel stent implantation does not seem to negatively affect the safety and efficacy of subsequent deep sclerectomy surgery.

iStent Inject (Second-generation Trabecular Microbypass) Versus Nonpenetrating Deep Sclerectomy in Association With Phacoemulsification for the Surgical Treatment of Open-angle Glaucoma and Cataracts: 1-Year Results

PRECIS

Both nonpenetrating deep sclerectomy (NPDS) and iStent inject are safe and effective when combined with phacoemulsification. The NPDS group presented lower final intraocular pressure (IOP); however, more postoperative intervention and longer recovery time was required.

AIM

The aim of this study was to assess the 1-year efficacy and safety of second-generation trabecular microbypass stent implantation (iStent inject) versus NPDS in association with phacoemulsification (Phaco) for the concomitant surgical treatment of open-angle glaucoma and cataracts.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

This was a single-center longitudinal retrospective comparative study of eyes treated with Phaco-NPDS, with adjunctive use of collagen matrix implant and mitomycin C (group 1), or Phaco-iStent inject (group 2). The main outcome measures were success rates [absolute success: proportion of eyes with IOP<18 mm Hg without any glaucoma medication; relative success: proportion of eyes achieving different target IOPs (<18; <15; and <12 mm Hg) with or without medication]; mean reduction (%) in IOP and medication use; number of postoperative reinterventions (goniopuncture, needling, and reoperation); and number of complications.

RESULTS

The mean age (y) was 69.3 in group 1 and 72.7 in group 2. Groups 1 (n=51) and 2 (n=32) achieved absolute success rates of 74.5% and 81.3%, respectively (P=0.333). Concerning relative success rates, no significant difference was found for IOP<18 mm Hg or an IOP<15 mm Hg between the 2 groups. However, significantly more eyes achieved an IOP <12 mm Hg in the Phaco-NPDS group. The mean percentage of IOP reduction from baseline to the end of follow-up was also statistically higher in group 1 (39.9% vs. 24.5%). Both groups achieved similar results in the mean reduction of medications per eye. No significant complications were found in either group, but patients in group 1 required more postoperative intervention than group 2.

CONCLUSIONS

Both techniques are safe and effective for the concomitant surgical treatment of open-angle glaucoma and cataracts and presented comparable relative success rates at different target IOP levels (<18 and <15 mm Hg). A larger proportion of patients in group 1 achieved a target IOP <12 mm Hg; however, more postoperative intervention was required.