1
|
Chan PPM, Larson MD, Dickerson JE, Mercieca K, Koh VTC, Lim R, Leung EHY, Samuelson TW, Larsen CL, Harvey A, Töteberg-Harms M, Meier-Gibbons F, Shu-Wen Chan N, Sy JB, Mansouri K, Zhang X, Lam DSC. Minimally Invasive Glaucoma Surgery: Latest Developments and Future Challenges. Asia Pac J Ophthalmol (Phila) 2023; 12:537-564. [PMID: 38079242 DOI: 10.1097/apo.0000000000000646] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/27/2023] [Accepted: 10/12/2023] [Indexed: 12/21/2023] Open
Abstract
The development of minimally invasive glaucoma surgeries (MIGSs) was intended to provide safe and modestly efficacious modalities for early intervention of mild-to-moderate glaucoma, with minimal trauma and rapid recovery. They were mainly ab interno procedures that reduce intraocular pressure by facilitating the aqueous outflow by bypassing the trabecular meshwork resistance, reinforcing the uveoscleral flow via the supraciliary space, and reducing aqueous production by the ciliary body. While the cumulating evidence helps shape the role of the available MIGS, the exponential new development and advancement in this field has expanded the territory of MIGS. Apart from developing subconjunctival MIGS filtration devices (Xen gel stent and PRESERFLO MicroShunt), there is a tendency to revisit the "traditional" MIGS for alternative use and to modify the procedures with consideration of the fundamental aqueous outflow physiology. Combined MIGS has also been suggested, based on the theory that their different mechanisms may provide additive or synergistic effects. The advancement of laser procedures is also promising and could supplement unmet needs along the glaucoma treatment algorithm. This review examines the broad array of MIGS, updates the recent findings, discusses their potential alternative applications, and explores future challenges.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Poemen P M Chan
- Department of Ophthalmology and Visual Sciences, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong, China
- Department of Ophthalmology and Visual Sciences, Lam Kin Chung. Jet King-Shing Ho Glaucoma Treatment and Research Centre, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong, China
| | | | - Jaime E Dickerson
- Sight Sciences, Menlo Park, CA, USA
- University of North Texas Health Science Center, North Texas Eye Research Institute, Fort Worth, TX, USA
| | | | - Victor Teck Chang Koh
- Department of Ophthalmology, National University Health System, Singapore
- Centre for Innovation and Precision Eye Health, Yong Loo Lin School of Medicine, National University of Singapore, Singapore
| | - Ridia Lim
- Department of Ophthalmology, Sydney Eye Hospital, Sydney, Australia
- Save Sight Institute, Sydney Medical School, The University of Sydney, Sydney, Australia
| | - Enne Hiu Ying Leung
- The C-MER Dennis Lam & Partners Eye Center, C-MER International Eye Care Group, Hong Kong, China
| | - Thomas W Samuelson
- Minnesota Eye Consultants, Bloomington, MN, US
- Department of Ophthalmology, University of Minnesota, MN, US
| | - Christine L Larsen
- Minnesota Eye Consultants, Bloomington, MN, US
- Department of Ophthalmology, University of Minnesota, MN, US
| | | | - Marc Töteberg-Harms
- Department of Ophthalmology, Augusta University, Medical College of Georgia, Augusta, GA, USA
| | | | | | - Jessica Belle Sy
- Department of Ophthalmology, Sydney Eye Hospital, Sydney, Australia
- Baguio General Hospital and Medical Center, Baguil City, Benguet, Philippines
| | - Kaweh Mansouri
- Glaucoma Center, Swiss Visio, Clinique de Montchoisi, Lausanne, Switzerland
| | - Xiulan Zhang
- State Key Laboratory of Ophthalmology, Zhongshan Ophthalmic Center, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangdong Provincial Key Laboratory of Ophthalmology and Visual Science, Guangdong Provincial Clinical Research Center for Ocular Diseases, Guangzhou, China
| | - Dennis S C Lam
- The C-MER Dennis Lam & Partners Eye Center, C-MER International Eye Care Group, Hong Kong, China
- The International Eye Research Institute of The Chinese University of Hong Kong (Shenzhen), Shenzhen, China
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Geffen N, Kumar DA, Barayev E, Gershoni A, Rotenberg M, Zahavi A, Glovinsky Y, Agarwal A. Minimally Invasive Micro Sclerostomy (MIMS) Procedure: A Novel Glaucoma Filtration Procedure. J Glaucoma 2022; 31:191-200. [PMID: 34731867 DOI: 10.1097/ijg.0000000000001955] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/13/2021] [Accepted: 10/11/2021] [Indexed: 11/27/2022]
Abstract
PRCIS Intermediate-term results suggest that ab interno Minimally Invasive Micro Sclerostomy (MIMS) stent-less subconjunctival filtration procedure is a promising treatment option for patients with open-angle glaucoma (OAG). PURPOSE MIMS is a novel ab interno, stent-less, subconjunctival filtration procedure. This study set to investigate the safety, performance, and efficacy of MIMS in OAG patients. METHODS Prospective, open-label, single arm clinical trial with intrasubject comparisons. Study participants were adults with OAG who were candidates for a filtration procedure. Patients were operated by a single surgeon (A.A.) in Chennai, India. Following mitomycin-C pretreatment, ab interno MIMS procedure was performed alone or combined with phacoemulsification surgery. Procedure-related complications and adverse events were assessed. Primary outcomes: patients (%) achieving an intraocular pressure (IOP) ≥5 mm Hg and ≤18 mm Hg, and an IOP reduction of >20% as compared with baseline, with or without hypotensive medications, with no need for recurrent surgery. RESULTS Twenty-one phacoemulsification-MIMS and 10 standalone MIMS procedures were performed. Mean age was 63.94±6.33 years. Mean duration of MIMS was 1:58±0:25 (min:s). Scleral tunnels were achieved in all cases. No device malfunctions, intraoperative complications, or serious adverse events were reported. Five (16.12%) patients presented with iris clogging 1 to 24 weeks following procedure. Two were treated with laser and 3 required trabeculectomy. Mean IOP change from baseline at 24 weeks was 47.4% (31.2 to 16.4 mm Hg, P<0.0001, n=23). The mean difference was -14.8 mm Hg (95% confidence interval: -17.6, -11.9) with no statistically significant differences between groups. Qualified success was achieved in 21 (84%), 17 (74%), and 13 (93%) after 12, 24, and 52 weeks, respectively. Complete success was achieved in 17 (68%), 13 (57%), and 8 (57%) after 12, 24, and 52 weeks, respectively. CONCLUSIONS The interim results suggest that MIMS procedure may be a simple and effective surgical option for early OAG patients requiring target IOP in high teens although iris clogging of incision site is the major concern with this procedure.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Noa Geffen
- Department of Ophthalmology, Rabin Medical Center, Petach Tikva
- Sackler School of Medicine, Tel Aviv University, Tel Aviv
| | - Dhivya A Kumar
- Dr Agarwal's Eye Hospital and Eye Research Centre, Chennai, Tamil Nadu, India
| | - Edward Barayev
- Department of Ophthalmology, Rabin Medical Center, Petach Tikva
- Sackler School of Medicine, Tel Aviv University, Tel Aviv
| | - Assaf Gershoni
- Department of Ophthalmology, Rabin Medical Center, Petach Tikva
- Sackler School of Medicine, Tel Aviv University, Tel Aviv
| | | | - Alon Zahavi
- Department of Ophthalmology, Rabin Medical Center, Petach Tikva
- Sackler School of Medicine, Tel Aviv University, Tel Aviv
| | - Yoseph Glovinsky
- Goldschleger Eye Institute, Sheba Medical Center, Ramat Gan, Israel
| | - Amar Agarwal
- Dr Agarwal's Eye Hospital and Eye Research Centre, Chennai, Tamil Nadu, India
| |
Collapse
|