Evaluating the Relationship of Intraocular Pressure and Anterior Chamber Volume With Use of Prostaglandin Analogues

Predictive Value of Dynamic Corneal Response Parameters Evaluated with Scheimpflug High-Speed Video (Corvis ST) on the Visual Field Progression in Prostaglandin Treated Ocular Hypertension and Open-Angle Glaucoma Patients

INTRODUCTION

The aim of this work is to compare the Corvis ST stress-strain index (SSI) and highest concavity (HC) parameters at baseline and 1 month after initiating monotherapy with prostaglandin analogues (PGs) in eyes showing visual field (VF) progression or stability.

METHODS

In this prospective, single-center, observational study, newly diagnosed and treatment-naïve OAG patients were examined at baseline and 1 month after beginning monotherapy with topical PGs monotherapy. Goldmann applanation tonometry pressure readings, Corneal Hysteresis (ORA-CH), and the Corvis ST measurements were obtained at both visits. VF progression (Humphrey) was evaluated based on data from 6 years of follow-up after the baseline visit. Stress-strain index (SSI) and HC parameters in progressing (P) and non-progressing (NP) eyes were the main outcome measures.

RESULTS

Sixty-three eyes were analyzed; mean age was 64.63 ± 11.26 years; 47 eyes were NP and 16 eyes were P according to the event analysis performed by the Humphrey device. There were no significant differences in IOP, CCT, or Corvis parameters between NP and P groups at baseline. Nevertheless, at 1 month, the SSI index was 1.60 ± 0.34 vs. 1.80 ± 0.34 (p = 0.003) in NP vs. P eyes, respectively. HC parameters were different between the groups at 1 month (p < 0.05) suggesting an increased scleral rigidity in the P group. There was no significant difference in IOP between groups at 1 month.

CONCLUSIONS

The Corvis ST provides a corneal rigidity index (SSI) that seems to be related to VF progression when measured 1 month after initiating PGs monotherapy. Differences in HC parameters, indicative of increased scleral stiffness, are also evident at 1 month on latanoprost in the P eyes.

Ocular Biomechanics and Glaucoma

Biomechanics is a branch of biophysics that deals with mechanics applied to biology. Corneal biomechanics have an important role in managing patients with glaucoma. While evidence suggests that patients with thin and stiffer corneas have a higher risk of developing glaucoma, it also influences the accurate measurement of intraocular pressure. We reviewed the pertinent literature to help increase our understanding of the biomechanics of the cornea and other ocular structures and how they can help optimize clinical and surgical treatments, taking into consideration individual variabilities, improve the diagnosis of suspected patients, and help monitor the response to treatment.

A Review of Corneal Biomechanics and Scleral Stiffness in Topical Prostaglandin Analog Therapy for Glaucoma

PURPOSE

The mechanism of action underlying prostaglandin analog (PGA) therapy involves changes in the expression of different metalloproteases to increase permeability of the sclera and allow increased aqueous humor outflow through this alternative drainage pathway. This alteration of structure impacts cornea/scleral biomechanics and may introduce artifact into the measurement of intraocular pressure (IOP) in the clinical setting.

METHODS

A literature search reviewing the impact of PGA therapy on corneal and scleral biomechanics was conducted including basic studies, clinical studies with treatment naïve patients, and a clinical study examining the cessation of PGA therapy. Additional literature including engineering texts was added for greater clarity of the concepts underlying ocular biomechanics.

RESULTS

One study with an animal model reported significant corneal stiffening with PGA treatment. Most longitudinal clinical studies examining the effects of initiation of PGA therapy in PGA naïve subjects failed to report biomechanical parameters associated with stiffness using the Corvis ST and only included those parameters strongly influenced by IOP. One study reported a significant reduction in scleral stiffness with IOP as a co-variate, highlighting the need to account for the effects of IOP lowering when assessing clinical biomechanics. The report of cessation of PGA therapy on corneal biomechanics showed no change in corneal compensated IOP after 6 weeks, raising the question of reversibility of the PGA-induced structural alteration.

CONCLUSIONS

Given that the findings in several clinical studies may merely reflect a reduction in IOP, further studies are warranted using Corvis ST parameters associated with corneal and scleral stiffness. The gold standard for IOP measurement in the clinical setting is Goldmann applanation tonometry, a technique previously shown to be affected by corneal stiffness. Since PGA therapy has been reported to alter not only scleral biomechanics, but also corneal biomechanics, it is essential to consider alternative tonometry technologies in the clinic.

Clinical Ocular Biomechanics: Where Are We after 20 Years of Progress?

Purpose: Ocular biomechanics is an assessment of the response of the structures of the eye to forces that may lead to disease development and progression, or influence the response to surgical intervention. The goals of this review are (1) to introduce basic biomechanical principles and terminology, (2) to provide perspective on the progress made in the clinical study and assessment of ocular biomechanics, and (3) to highlight critical studies conducted in keratoconus, laser refractive surgery, and glaucoma in order to aid interpretation of biomechanical parameters in the laboratory and in the clinic.Methods: A literature review was first conducted of basic biomechanical studies related to ocular tissue. The subsequent review of ocular biomechanical studies was limited to those focusing on keratoconus, laser refractive surgery, or glaucoma using the only two commercially available devices that allow rapid assessment of biomechanical response in the clinic.Results: Foundational studies on ocular biomechanics used a combination of computer modeling and destructive forces on ex-vivo tissues. The knowledge gained from these studies could not be directly translated to clinical research and practice until the introduction of non-contact tonometers that quantified the deformation response of the cornea to an air puff, which represents a non-destructive, clinically appropriate load. The corneal response includes a contribution from the sclera which may limit corneal deformation. Two commercial devices are available, the Ocular Response Analyzer which produces viscoelastic parameters with a customized load for each eye, and the Corvis ST which produces elastic parameters with a consistent load for every eye. Neither device produces the classic biomechanical properties reported in basic studies, but rather biomechanical deformation response parameters which require careful interpretation.Conclusions: Research using clinical tools has enriched our understanding of how ocular disease alters ocular biomechanics, as well as how ocular biomechanics may influence the pathophysiology of ocular disease and response to surgical intervention.

Effect of prostaglandin analogues on the biomechanical corneal properties in patients with open-angle glaucoma and ocular hypertension measured with dynamic scheimpflug analyzer

PURPOSE

The aim of the study is to evaluate the effect of topical prostaglandin (PG) treatment on the corneal biomechanical properties in treatment-naïve patients with either primary open-angle glaucoma (POAG) or ocular hypertension (OHT) using the Corvis ST device.

METHODS

This is an observational study. We analyzed the Corvis ST dynamic corneal response parameters of our database using the newest software available. Thirty-four eyes of 34 patients were included. They were all newly diagnosed and treatment-naïve. Patients were evaluated at baseline and after 6 months of treatment with prostaglandin analogues. Ultrasound pachymetry, Optical Coherence Tomography (OCT) and a 24-2 visual field test were performed in baseline visit. Goldman Applanation Tonometry (GAT-IOP) and Corvis ST dynamic corneal response parameters were registered at baseline and at the 6-month visit.

RESULTS

After 6 months of treatment, the IOP decrease (Δ) values obtained with the different tonometers were ΔGAT -6.5 ± 3.7, ΔIOPnct -4.4 ± 5.7 and ΔbIOP -3.8 ± 5.4. The differences between ΔGAT vs ΔIOPnct, ΔGAT vs ΔbIOP, and ΔIOPnct vs ΔbIOP, were statistically significant (p < 0.05 for all comparisons). Statistically significant lower values of the stress-strain index (SSI) (1.77 ± 0.3 at baseline vs 1.54 ± 0.27 at the 6-month visit) were found (p = 0.0002).

CONCLUSION

The SSI provided by the Corvis ST seems to decrease significantly after topical prostaglandin therapy. We believe that our results support the hypothesis that topical PG therapy does decrease the corneal stiffness and thus, that the ocular hypotensive effect of these drugs is overestimated if GAT is used for IOP measurement.

Effect of Prostaglandin Analogues on Corneal Biomechanical Parameters Measured With a Dynamic Scheimpflug Analyzer

PRCIS

Treatment with topical prostaglandin analogues (PGAs) induces increased corneal compliance in glaucoma eyes measured with a dynamic Scheimpflug analyzer.

PURPOSE

The purpose of this study was to evaluate the effect of topical PGAs on the corneal biomechanical properties.

METHODS

We retrospectively studied the biomechanical parameters of 31 eyes of 19 consecutive patients with glaucoma measured using a dynamic Scheimpflug analyzer (Corvis ST) before and after initiation of treatment with topical PGAs. No patients had a history of glaucoma treatment before the study and no other antiglaucoma medication was used during the study period. Nine biomechanical parameters were evaluated before and 61.6±28.5 days (range: 21 to 105 d) after initiation of the treatment. The changes in the corneal biomechanical parameters before and after treatment were analyzed using multivariable models adjusting for intraocular pressure and central corneal thickness. The Benjamini-Hochberg method was used to correct for multiple comparison.

RESULTS

In multivariable models, PGA treatment resulted in shorter inward applanation time (P=0.016, coefficient=-0.151) and larger deflection amplitude (P=0.023, coefficient=0.055), peak distance (P=0.042, coefficient=0.131), and deformation amplitude ratio at 1 mm (P=0.018, coefficient=0.028). These associations consistently indicated increased corneal compliance (deformability) after PGA treatment.

CONCLUSION

Topical PGAs resulted in greater corneal compliance, suggesting that the changes in the corneal biomechanical properties may lead to overestimation of the intraocular pressure-lowering effects.

Non-invasive Clinical Measurement of Ocular Rigidity and Comparison to Biomechanical and Morphological Parameters in Glaucomatous and Healthy Subjects

Purpose: To assess ocular rigidity using dynamic optical coherence tomography (OCT) videos in glaucomatous and healthy subjects, and to evaluate how ocular rigidity correlates with biomechanical and morphological characteristics of the human eye.

Methods: Ocular rigidity was calculated using Friedenwald's empirical equation which estimates the change in intraocular pressure (IOP) produced by volumetric changes of the eye due to choroidal pulsations with each heartbeat. High-speed OCT video was utilized to non-invasively measure changes in choroidal volume through time-series analysis. A control-case study design was based on 23 healthy controls and 6 glaucoma cases. Multiple diagnostic modalities were performed during the same visit including Spectralis OCT for nerve head video, Pascal Dynamic Contour Tonometry for IOP and ocular pulse amplitude (OPA) measurement, Corvis ST for measuring dynamic biomechanical response, and Pentacam for morphological characterization.

Results: Combining glaucoma and healthy cohorts (n = 29), there were negative correlations between ocular rigidity and axial length (Pearson R = −0.53, p = 0.003), and between ocular rigidity and anterior chamber volume (R = −0.64, p = 0.0002). There was a stronger positive correlation of ocular rigidity and scleral stiffness (i.e., stiffness parameter at the highest concavity [SP-HC]) (R = 0.62, p = 0.0005) compared to ocular rigidity and corneal stiffness (i.e., stiffness parameter at the first applanation [SP-A1]) (R = 0.41, p = 0.033). In addition, there was a positive correlation between ocular rigidity and the static pressure-volume ratio (P/V ratio) (R = 0.72, p < 0.0001).

Conclusions: Ocular rigidity was non-invasively assessed using OCT video and OPA in a clinic setting. The significant correlation of ocular rigidity with biomechanical parameters, SP-HC and P/V ratio, demonstrated the validity of the ocular rigidity measurement. Ocular rigidity is driven to a greater extent by scleral stiffness than corneal stiffness. These in vivo methods offer an important approach to investigate the role of ocular biomechanics in glaucoma.