Early Experience With Ahmed Clear Path Glaucoma Drainage Device in Childhood Glaucoma

Ahmed ClearPath vs. Baerveldt Glaucoma Implant: A Retrospective Noninferiority Comparative Study

PURPOSE

To compare the efficacy and safety of 2 nonvalved glaucoma drainage devices (GDDs): Ahmed ClearPath (ACP) vs. Baerveldt glaucoma implant (BGI).

DESIGN

Single-center, retrospective, comparative study.

PARTICIPANTS

Consecutive patients who underwent ACP or BGI surgery for glaucoma (250 mm2 or 350 mm2 models), had ≥ 6 months of follow-up, and no prior GDD implantation.

METHODS

Chart review of ACP or BGI surgery in patients with glaucoma at Wills Eye Hospital (2020-2023).

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

The primary outcome measure was surgical failure at the end of follow-up, defined as intraocular pressure (IOP) > 21 or < 6 mmHg at 2 consecutive visits, progression to no light perception (NLP) vision, glaucoma reoperation, or implant removal. Secondary outcome measures included the rate of postoperative complications and changes in best corrected visual acuity (BCVA), IOP, and glaucoma medications.

RESULTS

A total of 128 eyes of 113 patients (63 ACP, 65 BGI) with similar baseline characteristics and a mean follow-up duration of 19.6 ± 10.8 (median 20.5) months were included. Surgical failure occurred in 12 eyes (9.4%) with no significant difference between ACP and BGI eyes (9.5% vs. 9.2%, respectively; P = 0.810). Reasons for failure included IOP > 21 mmHg (3/12, 25.0%), glaucoma reoperation (5/12, 41.7%), and tube removal (4/12, 33.3%). No eyes progressed to NLP vision. Kaplan-Meier survival analysis showed similar cumulative rate of surgical failure in both groups (P = 0.871). Both groups achieved significant IOP and medication reduction compared to their baseline. Final IOP, BCVA, and complication rates were similar in both groups, but medication number was significantly lower in the ACP group (P = 0.012). Both the 250 mm2 and 350 mm2 models had similar outcomes, but diplopia was significantly associated with the 350 mm2 model of either implant (P = 0.012). Univariate logistic regression analysis did not identify either tube type or plate size as predictors of surgical failure.

CONCLUSIONS

This study compares the recently approved ACP vs. BGI. Both implants had similar surgical failures and complication rates. Final IOP was similar in both groups, but ACP achieved lower medication number. Diplopia was significantly associated with the use of 350 mm2 model of either implant. Neither tube type nor plate size were significant predictors of surgical failure.

FINANCIAL DISCLOSURE(S)

Proprietary or commercial disclosure may be found in the Footnotes and Disclosures at the end of this article.

Early Experience with the Paul Glaucoma Implant in Childhood Glaucoma: A Case Series

Purpose

The Paul glaucoma implant (PGI, Advanced Ophthalmic Innovations, Singapore, Republic of Singapore) is a recently developed novel non-valved glaucoma drainage device (GDD) designed to effectively reduce the intraocular pressure (IOP) in glaucoma patients with a theoretically reduced risk of postoperative complications such as hypotony, endothelial cell loss, strabismus, and diplopia. Limited literature has evaluated its use in adult glaucoma; however, its use in pediatric glaucoma has not been reported to date. We present our early experience with PGI in refractory childhood glaucoma.

Patients and Methods

This study was retrospective single-surgeon case series in a single tertiary center.

Results

Three eyes of 3 patients with childhood glaucoma were enrolled in the study. During nine months of follow-up, postoperative IOP and number of glaucoma medications were significantly lower than preoperative values in all the enrolled patients. None of the patients developed postoperative complications including postoperative hypotony, choroidal detachment, endophthalmitis, or corneal decompensation.

Conclusion

PGI is an efficient and relatively safe surgical treatment option in patients with refractory childhood glaucoma. Further studies with larger number of participants and longer follow-up period are required to confirm our encouraging results.

Current surgical techniques for the management of pediatric glaucoma: A literature review

Pediatric glaucoma surgery is challenging due to its diverse and complex pathophysiology, altered anterior segment anatomy, greater potential for failure, and complications compared to adult patients. Moreover, numerous challenges are associated with long-term postoperative management. Thus, when dealing with childhood glaucoma, it is important to consider the potential complications in addition to the benefits of each intervention. The purpose of this article is to review recently published literature to shed light on the most recent surgical techniques for the safe and effective treatment of childhood glaucoma. Current literature shows that goniotomy and trabeculotomy are the first choices for the management of primary congenital glaucoma. Although older children with phakic eyes seem to benefit from trabeculectomy with adjunctive mitomycin C, it carries a long-term risk of bleb-related endophthalmitis. Glaucoma drainage devices may be preferred for patients with secondary or refractory glaucoma. However, hypotony or tube-related complications are common and encountered more often in children than in adults. Cyclodestructive procedures are also an option for cases in which filtering surgery has failed, but they can also be used as a temporizing measure to reduce the rate of complications in high-risk patients. However, their outcomes can be unpredictable, in terms of efficiency and complications. Finally, minimally invasive glaucoma surgery (MIGS) as the sole alternative treatment or as an adjunctive surgical procedure is a relatively new path for pediatric patients.