1
|
Jo JJ, Pasquale LR. Recent developments of telemedicine in glaucoma. Curr Opin Ophthalmol 2024; 35:116-123. [PMID: 38295153 DOI: 10.1097/icu.0000000000001019] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/02/2024]
Abstract
PURPOSE OF REVIEW Telemedicine has an increasingly significant role in the fields of ophthalmology and glaucoma. This review covers recent advancements in the development and optimization of teleglaucoma techniques and applications. RECENT FINDINGS Glaucoma monitoring and diagnosis via remote tonometry, perimetry, and fundus imaging have become a possibility based on recent developments. Many applications work in combination with smart devices, virtual reality, and artificial intelligence and have been tested in patient populations against conventional "reference-standard" measurement tools, demonstrating promising results. Of note, there is still much progress to be made in teleglaucoma and telemedicine at large, such as accessibility to internet, broadband, and smart devices, application affordability, and reimbursement for remote services. However, continued development and optimization of these applications suggest that the implementation of remote monitoring will be a mainstay for glaucoma patient care. SUMMARY Especially since the beginning of the COVID-19 pandemic, remote patient care has taken on an important role in medicine and ophthalmology. Remote versions of tonometry, perimetry, and fundus imaging may allow for a more patient-centered and accessible future for glaucoma care.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jason J Jo
- Department of Medical Education
- Department of Ophthalmology, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, New York, USA
| | - Louis R Pasquale
- Department of Medical Education
- Department of Ophthalmology, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, New York, USA
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Díez-Álvarez L, Beltrán-Agullo L, Loscos J, Pazos M, Ponte-Zúñiga B, Pinazo-Durán MD, Giménez-Gómez R, Ussa F, Pinilla LM, Jaumandreu L, Rebolleda G, Muñoz-Negrete FJ. Advanced glaucoma. Clinical practice guideline. ARCHIVOS DE LA SOCIEDAD ESPANOLA DE OFTALMOLOGIA 2023; 98:18-39. [PMID: 36088247 DOI: 10.1016/j.oftale.2022.08.005] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/22/2022] [Accepted: 05/24/2022] [Indexed: 01/11/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To present an update clinical practice guideline that serve as a guide for the detection, evaluation and treatment of adults patients with advanced glaucoma. METHODS After defining the objectives and scope of the guide, the working group was formed and structured clinical questions were formulated following the PICO (Patient, Intervention, Comparison, Outcomes) format. Once all the existing clinical evidence had been independently evaluated with the AMSTAR 2 (Assessment of Multiple systematic Rewiews) and Cochrane "Risk of bias" tools by at least two reviewers, recommendations were formulated following the Scottish Intercollegiate methodology. Guideline Network (SIGN). RESULTS Recommendations with their corresponding levels of evidence that may be useful in the diagnosis, monitoring and treatment of adults patients with advanced glaucoma. CONCLUSIONS Despite the fact that for many of the questions the level of scientific evidence available is not very high, this clinical practice guideline offers an updated review of the different existing aspects related to the evaluation and management of advanced glaucoma.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- L Díez-Álvarez
- Departamento de Oftalmología, Hospital Ramón y Cajal, IRYCIS, Universidad de Alcalá, Alcalá de Henares, Madrid, Spain; Red de Oftalmología RETICS OFTARED del Instituto de Salud Carlos III (ISCII), Spain.
| | | | - J Loscos
- Red de Oftalmología RETICS OFTARED del Instituto de Salud Carlos III (ISCII), Spain; Servicio de Oftalmología, Hospital Universitari Germans Trias i Pujol, Universitat Autonoma de Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain
| | - M Pazos
- Red de Oftalmología RETICS OFTARED del Instituto de Salud Carlos III (ISCII), Spain; Institut Clínic d'Oftalmologia, Hospital Clínic de Barcelona, Institut d'Investigacions Biomèdiques Pi i Sunyer (IDIBAPS), Universitat de Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain
| | - B Ponte-Zúñiga
- Red de Oftalmología RETICS OFTARED del Instituto de Salud Carlos III (ISCII), Spain; Servicio de Oftalmología, Hospital Universitario Virgen Macarena, Sevilla, Spain
| | - M D Pinazo-Durán
- Red de Oftalmología RETICS OFTARED del Instituto de Salud Carlos III (ISCII), Spain; Unidad Investigación Oftalmológica Santiago Grisolía/FISABIO; Unidad de Oftalmobiología Celular y Molecular, Universidad de Valencia, Valencia, Spain
| | - R Giménez-Gómez
- Red de Oftalmología RETICS OFTARED del Instituto de Salud Carlos III (ISCII), Spain; Servicio de Oftalmología, Hospital Universitario Reina Sofía, Córdoba, Spain
| | - F Ussa
- Red de Oftalmología RETICS OFTARED del Instituto de Salud Carlos III (ISCII), Spain; Instituto de Oftalmobiología Aplicada (IOBA), Universidad de Valladolid, Valladolid, Spain; Department of Ophthalmology, The James Cook University Hospital, Middlesbrough, United Kingdom
| | - L M Pinilla
- Institut Català de la Retina (ICR), Barcelona, Spain
| | - L Jaumandreu
- Departamento de Oftalmología, Hospital Ramón y Cajal, IRYCIS, Universidad de Alcalá, Alcalá de Henares, Madrid, Spain; Red de Oftalmología RETICS OFTARED del Instituto de Salud Carlos III (ISCII), Spain; Department of Ophthalmology, The James Cook University Hospital, Middlesbrough, United Kingdom
| | - G Rebolleda
- Departamento de Oftalmología, Hospital Ramón y Cajal, IRYCIS, Universidad de Alcalá, Alcalá de Henares, Madrid, Spain; Red de Oftalmología RETICS OFTARED del Instituto de Salud Carlos III (ISCII), Spain
| | - F J Muñoz-Negrete
- Departamento de Oftalmología, Hospital Ramón y Cajal, IRYCIS, Universidad de Alcalá, Alcalá de Henares, Madrid, Spain; Red de Oftalmología RETICS OFTARED del Instituto de Salud Carlos III (ISCII), Spain
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Snider MJE, Maa AY, Guyton AC, Park H, Hunt KJ, Pope C. Stakeholder perceptions affecting the implementation of teleophthalmology. BMC Health Serv Res 2022; 22:1086. [PMID: 36008809 PMCID: PMC9403222 DOI: 10.1186/s12913-022-08386-4] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/21/2021] [Accepted: 07/28/2022] [Indexed: 11/10/2022] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE Teleophthalmology has become the subject of heightened interest and scrutiny in the wake of the SARS-CoV-2 global pandemic. A streamlined implementation framework becomes increasingly important as demand grows. This study identified obstacles to teleophthalmology implementation through summative content analysis of key stakeholders' perceptions. DESIGN Summative content analysis of transcribed interviews with key stakeholders (including patients, technicians, ophthalmic readers, staff, nurses, and administrators at two teleophthalmology clinic sites). METHODS Keyword Were counted and compared to examine underlying meaning. Two analysts coded text independently using MAXQDA for summative qualitative content analysis to derive themes and hierarchical relationships as a basis for future refinement of TECS implementation. xMind ZEN was used to map conceptual relationships and overarching themes that emerged to identify perceived facilitators and barriers to implementation RESULTS: Analysis revealed two themes common to perceptions: (1) benefits of care, and (2) ease of implementation. Perceived benefits included efficiency, accessibility, and earlier intervention in disease course. The quality and quantity of training was heavily weighted in its influence on stakeholders' commitment to and confidence in the program, as were transparent organizational structure, clear bidirectional communication, and the availability of support staff. CONCLUSION Using a determinant framework of implementation science, this report highlighted potential hindrances to teleophthalmology implementation and offered solutions in order to increase access to screening, improve the quality of care provided, and facilitate sustainability of the innovation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Molly J E Snider
- Cleveland Clinic Cole Eye Institute, 2022 E 105th St I Bldg, Cleveland, OH, 44106, USA. .,Emory University, Atlanta, USA.
| | - April Y Maa
- Emory University, Atlanta, USA. .,VISN 7, Regional Telehealth Services, Atlanta Veterans Affairs Medical Center, Atlanta, USA. .,Atlanta VAMC CVNR, 1670 Clairmont Road, MC150R, Decatur, GA, 30033, USA.
| | | | | | - Kelly J Hunt
- Department of Public Health Sciences, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, USA
| | - Charlene Pope
- Ralph H. Johnson Veterans Affairs Medical Center, Charleston, SC; and, Department of Pediatrics, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, USA
| |
Collapse
|