1
|
Chan PPM, Larson MD, Dickerson JE, Mercieca K, Koh VTC, Lim R, Leung EHY, Samuelson TW, Larsen CL, Harvey A, Töteberg-Harms M, Meier-Gibbons F, Shu-Wen Chan N, Sy JB, Mansouri K, Zhang X, Lam DSC. Minimally Invasive Glaucoma Surgery: Latest Developments and Future Challenges. Asia Pac J Ophthalmol (Phila) 2023; 12:537-564. [PMID: 38079242 DOI: 10.1097/apo.0000000000000646] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/27/2023] [Accepted: 10/12/2023] [Indexed: 12/21/2023] Open
Abstract
The development of minimally invasive glaucoma surgeries (MIGSs) was intended to provide safe and modestly efficacious modalities for early intervention of mild-to-moderate glaucoma, with minimal trauma and rapid recovery. They were mainly ab interno procedures that reduce intraocular pressure by facilitating the aqueous outflow by bypassing the trabecular meshwork resistance, reinforcing the uveoscleral flow via the supraciliary space, and reducing aqueous production by the ciliary body. While the cumulating evidence helps shape the role of the available MIGS, the exponential new development and advancement in this field has expanded the territory of MIGS. Apart from developing subconjunctival MIGS filtration devices (Xen gel stent and PRESERFLO MicroShunt), there is a tendency to revisit the "traditional" MIGS for alternative use and to modify the procedures with consideration of the fundamental aqueous outflow physiology. Combined MIGS has also been suggested, based on the theory that their different mechanisms may provide additive or synergistic effects. The advancement of laser procedures is also promising and could supplement unmet needs along the glaucoma treatment algorithm. This review examines the broad array of MIGS, updates the recent findings, discusses their potential alternative applications, and explores future challenges.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Poemen P M Chan
- Department of Ophthalmology and Visual Sciences, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong, China
- Department of Ophthalmology and Visual Sciences, Lam Kin Chung. Jet King-Shing Ho Glaucoma Treatment and Research Centre, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong, China
| | | | - Jaime E Dickerson
- Sight Sciences, Menlo Park, CA, USA
- University of North Texas Health Science Center, North Texas Eye Research Institute, Fort Worth, TX, USA
| | | | - Victor Teck Chang Koh
- Department of Ophthalmology, National University Health System, Singapore
- Centre for Innovation and Precision Eye Health, Yong Loo Lin School of Medicine, National University of Singapore, Singapore
| | - Ridia Lim
- Department of Ophthalmology, Sydney Eye Hospital, Sydney, Australia
- Save Sight Institute, Sydney Medical School, The University of Sydney, Sydney, Australia
| | - Enne Hiu Ying Leung
- The C-MER Dennis Lam & Partners Eye Center, C-MER International Eye Care Group, Hong Kong, China
| | - Thomas W Samuelson
- Minnesota Eye Consultants, Bloomington, MN, US
- Department of Ophthalmology, University of Minnesota, MN, US
| | - Christine L Larsen
- Minnesota Eye Consultants, Bloomington, MN, US
- Department of Ophthalmology, University of Minnesota, MN, US
| | | | - Marc Töteberg-Harms
- Department of Ophthalmology, Augusta University, Medical College of Georgia, Augusta, GA, USA
| | | | | | - Jessica Belle Sy
- Department of Ophthalmology, Sydney Eye Hospital, Sydney, Australia
- Baguio General Hospital and Medical Center, Baguil City, Benguet, Philippines
| | - Kaweh Mansouri
- Glaucoma Center, Swiss Visio, Clinique de Montchoisi, Lausanne, Switzerland
| | - Xiulan Zhang
- State Key Laboratory of Ophthalmology, Zhongshan Ophthalmic Center, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangdong Provincial Key Laboratory of Ophthalmology and Visual Science, Guangdong Provincial Clinical Research Center for Ocular Diseases, Guangzhou, China
| | - Dennis S C Lam
- The C-MER Dennis Lam & Partners Eye Center, C-MER International Eye Care Group, Hong Kong, China
- The International Eye Research Institute of The Chinese University of Hong Kong (Shenzhen), Shenzhen, China
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Gao Y, Zhao Q, Li H, Li J, Li P. Peripheral iridectomy for glaucoma is more effective than compound trabeculectomy and significantly reduces Hcy and hs-CRP levels. Am J Transl Res 2022; 14:7451-7458. [PMID: 36398238 PMCID: PMC9641481] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/27/2022] [Accepted: 09/06/2022] [Indexed: 06/16/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To investigate the efficacy of peripheral iridectomy and compound trabeculectomy for glaucoma and the changes in homocysteine (Hcy) and hypersensitivity C-reactive protein (hs-CRP) levels before and after treatment. METHODS Altogether 104 patients with primary angle-closure glaucoma who were admitted from February 2020 to January 2022 were enrolled in this study for a retrospective analysis. Among them, 49 cases treated by peripheral iridectomy were considered as the research group, and 55 treated by compound trabeculectomy were seen as the control group. The intraocular pressure (IOP), vision, anterior chamber depth (ACD), surgical efficiency and complications before and after surgery was compared between the two groups of patients. Patients' venous blood was collected before and after treatment to test the Hcy and hs-CRP levels, and the relationship between the levels and treatments was analyzed. The ROC curves of Hcy and hs-CRP diagnostic efficacy after treatment were also plotted, and the relationship between Hcy and hs-CRP and patient outcomes was tested by Pearson correlation coefficient. RESULTS There were no marked differences in IOP, vision and ACD between the two groups before surgery (P>0.05). After surgery, the IOP was dramatically lower, and ACD and vision were dramatically higher in the research group than those in the control group (P<0.01). Compared to the control group, the treatment success rate in the research group was markedly higher, and the incidence of adverse reactions was lower. There was no difference in Hcy and hs-CRP levels before surgery between the two groups (P>0.05). After surgery both Hcy and hs-CRP levels decreased (P<0.05), and levels in the research group were lower than in the control group (P<0.05). Patients with better outcomes had lower postoperative Hcy and hs-CRP levels (P<0.05). ROC curves of the diagnostic efficacy of Hcy and hs-CRP after treatment manifested that the areas under the curve were >0.7. Both Hcy and hs-CRP levels were found to be negatively correlated with patient outcomes by Pearson correlation coefficient (P<0.001). CONCLUSION The efficacy of peripheral iridotomy for glaucoma is better than that of compound trabeculectomy. Monitoring Hcy and hs-CRP levels in patients before and after surgery can effectively assess clinical outcomes as well as the safety of the procedure.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yanlin Gao
- Tianjin Eye Hospital, Tianjin Key Laboratory of Ophthalmology and Vision Science, Clinical College of Ophthalmology, Tianjin Medical University, Nankai University Eye HospitalTianjin, China
| | - Qi Zhao
- Department of Ophthalmology, The Second Hospital of Dalian Medical UniversityDalian, China
| | - Haoqing Li
- Tianjin Eye Hospital, Tianjin Key Laboratory of Ophthalmology and Vision Science, Clinical College of Ophthalmology, Tianjin Medical University, Nankai University Eye HospitalTianjin, China
| | - Jingmin Li
- Department of Ophthalmology, The Second Hospital of Dalian Medical UniversityDalian, China
| | - Peiyu Li
- Department of Ophthalmology, The Second Hospital of Dalian Medical UniversityDalian, China
| |
Collapse
|