Second Ahmed valve insertion in the same eye

Outcomes of Glaucoma Reoperations in the Primary Tube Versus Trabeculectomy Study

PURPOSE

To describe the incidence and outcomes of reoperations for glaucoma in the Primary Tube Versus Trabeculectomy (PTVT) Study.

DESIGN

Cohort study of patients in a multicenter randomized clinical trial.

PARTICIPANTS

The PTVT Study enrolled 242 patients with medically uncontrolled glaucoma and no previous incisional ocular surgery.

METHODS

Randomization assigned 125 patients to placement of a tube shunt (350-mm2 Baerveldt glaucoma implant) and 117 patients to trabeculectomy with mitomycin C (MMC, 0.4 mg/ml for 2 minutes). Data were analyzed from patients who underwent additional glaucoma surgery.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

Outcome measures included intraocular pressure (IOP), use of glaucoma medications, visual acuity, surgical complications, and failure (IOP > 21 mmHg or reduced by <20%, IOP ≤ 5 mmHg, additional glaucoma surgery, or loss of light perception vision).

RESULTS

Additional glaucoma surgery was performed in 21 patients in the tube group and 12 patients in the trabeculectomy group in the PTVT Study, and the 5-year cumulative reoperation rate for glaucoma was 18.0% in the tube group and 10.4% in the trabeculectomy group (P = 0.15). Follow-up (mean ± standard deviation [SD]) after additional glaucoma surgery was 35.1 ± 17.7 months in the tube group and 30.1 ± 17.6 months in the trabeculectomy group (P = 0.44). At 3 years after glaucoma reoperation, IOP (mean ± SD) was 15.5 ± 4.8 mmHg in the tube group and 16.6 ± 7.3 mmHg in the trabeculectomy group (P = 0.71). The number of glaucoma medications (mean ± SD) after 3 years of follow-up was 2.1 ± 1.7 in the tube group and 1.7 ± 1.0 in the trabeculectomy group (P = 0.58). The cumulative probability of failure at 3 years after a glaucoma reoperation was 37.8% in the tube group and 21.3% in the trabeculectomy group (P = 0.47).

CONCLUSION

No significant difference in the rate of reoperation for glaucoma was observed after tube shunt implantation and trabeculectomy with MMC in the PTVT Study. Similar surgical outcomes were observed after additional glaucoma surgery, irrespective of the initial procedure to which the patient was randomized.

FINANCIAL DISCLOSURE(S)

Proprietary or commercial disclosure may be found after the references.

Ahmed Glaucoma Valve Implantation to Reduce Intraocular Pressure: Updated Perspectives

Trabeculectomy and glaucoma drainage device implantation are the most commonly performed glaucoma surgeries worldwide. Although trabeculectomy is the gold standard, at the present time there is an increase in the use of glaucoma drainage devices. The Ahmed glaucoma valve is one of the most widely used glaucoma drainage devices worldwide. Corneal endothelial cell loss and eventually corneal decompensation is one of the serious complication of glaucoma drainage device implantation. To avoid this, drainage tube can be inserted into the ciliary sulcus instead of the anterior chamber, especially in eyes with high risk for corneal decompensation. Tube/plate exposure, hypertensive phase, endophthalmitis, cataract formation, diplopia and ocular hypotony are the other potential complications that can develop after Ahmed glaucoma valve implantation.

Outcomes of the Second Aqueous Shunt Implant Versus Transscleral Cyclophotocoagulation Treatment Study: A Randomized Comparative Trial

PRCIS

Short-term overall success rates were high with either SGDD or CPC. However, SGDD was associated with more clinic visits and an increased risk of additional glaucoma surgery. Both treatments were reasonable options for eyes with inadequately controlled IOP after a single GDD.

PURPOSE

The purpose of this study is to compare the implantation of a second glaucoma drainage device (SGDD) and transscleral cyclophotocoagulation (CPC) in eyes with inadequately controlled intraocular pressure (IOP), despite the presence of a preexisting glaucoma drainage device.

METHODS

Patients with inadequately controlled IOP, despite the medical therapy and a preexisting glaucoma drainage device, were enrolled at 14 clinical centers and randomly assigned to treatment with a SGDD or CPC.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

Surgical failure was defined as: (1) IOP ≤5 mm Hg or >18 mm Hg or <20% reduction below baseline on maximum tolerated topical ocular hypotensive therapy, (2) reoperation for glaucoma, or (3) loss of light perception. The primary outcome measure was overall success with or without adjunctive medical therapy.

RESULTS

Forty-two eyes of 42 participants were randomized to SGDD (n=22) or CPC (n=20). Mean duration of follow-up was 18.6 (±12.1; range: 1.1-38.6) months. The cumulative success rate was 79% for SGDD and 88% for CPC at 1 year ( P =0.63). Although the study was underpowered, no significant differences in IOP, postoperative number of IOP-lowering medications, or adverse events were observed. The number of additional glaucoma surgeries ( P =0.003), office visits during the first 3 months ( P <0.001), and office visits per month after month 3 ( P <0.001) were greater in the SGDD group.

CONCLUSIONS

Short-term overall success rates were high with either SGDD or CPC. However, SGDD was associated with more clinic visits and an increased risk of additional glaucoma surgery.

Reimplantation of a drainage valve device in refractory glaucoma. A clinical case

Background: Implantation of various drainage devices is one of the treatments for refractory glaucoma, resistant to traditional surgical methods. The most commonly used glaucoma drainage device for refractory glaucoma is the Ahmed glaucoma valve. However, the long-term success rate of the surgery may be limited because of the development of complications during the late postoperative period. The complications do not allow the control of the achieved intraocular pressure (IOP) level. In such cases, a repeated implantation of the Ahmed valve may be one of the options for the surgical treatment. Clinical case description: Second Ahmed valves were implanted to two patients with refractory repeatedly operated glaucoma at the Department of surgical glaucoma treatment of the S. Fyodorov Eye Microsurgery Federal State Institution in Moscow. Previously, both patients had the Ahmed valves installed at their places of residence. During the postoperative period, one patient was found to have an encapsulated cyst around the drainage body, and later the revision of the operation area was performed. As a result of the repeated Ahmed valve implantation, the IOP compensation was achieved 9 months after the surgery. Conclusion: A repeated implantation of the Ahmed valve may be an option for the surgical treatment, if the first implant failed to control the IOP, in order to compensate the IOP and preserve the visual functions in patients with refractory repeatedly operated glaucoma.

A Meta-analysis on the Outcome of Sequential Glaucoma Drainage Implantation

PRECIS

A meta-analysis shows that second glaucoma drainage implantation can be effective after a failed drainage implant. There is a need for continued glaucoma medications and the risk of corneal decompensation.

PURPOSE

Studies on second glaucoma drainage implantation are small and exploratory. We performed a meta-analysis on the efficacy of second glaucoma drainage implantation.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

The intraocular pressure (IOP) and the number of glaucoma medications were compared preoperative to postoperative after second drainage implantation. Kaplan-Meier survival curves were aggregated and compared with the survival curve from the Tube versus Trabeculectomy study.

RESULTS

Nine studies, all retrospective, were included in the meta-analysis. Our results showed that second drainage implantation significantly lowered the IOP and reduced the number of medications. Most patients still required medications for adequate IOP control. Second drainage implants tended to fail earlier than first drainage implants in the Tube versus Trabeculectomy study. The most common complication after second drainage implants was corneal decompensation.

CONCLUSIONS

Second glaucoma drainage implantation can be considered a viable approach after a failed drainage implant, but patients should be counseled on the need for continued medical therapy and the risk of corneal decompensation.

Safety and Efficacy of Second Ahmed Valve Implant in Refractory Glaucoma

BACKGROUND

Refractory glaucoma still represents a challenge for ophthalmologists to manage intraocular pressure. The present study aimed to evaluate long term efficacy and safety of a second Ahmed valve implantation after the failure of a first implant in patients with refractory glaucoma and elevated intraocular pressure (IOP).

METHODS

Retrospective, multicenter non-comparative case series. Twenty-eight patients were retrospectively recruited between January 2011 and December 2017. Demographic data, glaucoma type, visual acuity, intraocular pressure, medical therapy, and complications were registered. Three criteria of success were established: Type 1 surgical success: IOP ≤ 15 mmHg and a reduction of IOP ≥ 40% from baseline; Type 2 surgical success: IOP ≤ 18 mmHg and a reduction of IOP ≥ 30% from baseline; and Type 3 surgical success: IOP ≤ 21 mmHg and a reduction of IOP ≥ 20% from baseline. Surgical failure has been established as IOP less than 5 mmHg or over 21 mmHg and less than a 20% reduction of IOP from baseline despite medications in two consecutive visits, light perception loss referable to glaucoma, and the necessity for further glaucoma surgery. Failure was observed in six (21%) patients. (3) Results: Mean IOP and mean glaucoma medication number significantly reduced from baseline after the second implantation, and the surgical success rate at 72 months ranged from 10% to 78% based on the different criteria of success. Failure was observed in six (21%) patients.

CONCLUSIONS

This study confirmed the safety and efficacy of a second Ahmed valve implantation in patients with refractory glaucoma and elevated IOP at baseline.

Surgical Outcomes of a Second Ahmed Glaucoma Valve Implant for the Treatment of Refractory Glaucoma

PRéCIS:: In this article, the authors concluded that an additional Ahmed glaucoma valve (AGV) implantation after the failure of an initial AGV, even with the addition of glaucoma medications, maybe a good surgical treatment option for refractory glaucoma.

PURPOSE

To evaluate the surgical outcomes of a second AGV implant in Hispanic patients with refractory glaucoma.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

The medical records of patients who underwent a second AGV implant were reviewed retrospectively. Clinical outcome measures including intraocular pressure (IOP), visual acuity, and glaucoma medication use were collected from the preoperative visit and all follow-up visits up to 18 months after surgery. Failure was defined as one of the following: loss of light perception, sustained IOP >21 or <6 mm Hg, an IOP reduction of <20% from baseline, need for additional glaucoma surgery, including needling revision with subconjunctival adjuvant therapy, or valve extrusion.

RESULTS

A total of 48 patients were included. In all cases, an S-2 model was implanted in the superonasal quadrant. Mean preoperative IOP was 24.3±7.9 mm Hg and was significantly reduced to 13.9±4.8 at 6 months (P<0.05), 15.4±7.2 at 12 months (P<0.05), and 12.9±2.0 at 18 months (P<0.05). Mean glaucoma medications were reduced from 2.8±1.1 preoperatively to 1.9±1.2 at 6 months (P<0.05), 2.4±1.2 at 12 months, and 2.2±1.1 at 18 months; however, the difference was no longer statistically significant after 6 months, and the success rate was 60% at the mean for survival time of 15 months (13.7 to 16.5).

CONCLUSION

The findings of this study demonstrate that a second AGV can achieve a significant reduction in IOP for up to 18 months postoperatively.

Surgical Outcomes of a Second Ahmed Glaucoma Valve Implantation in Asian Eyes with Refractory Glaucoma

Results

The cumulative failure rates were 9.5%, 20.0%, 32.5%, and 46.0% at six months, one year, two years, and three years of follow-up. At final follow-up, complete success and qualified success rates were 23.8% and 33.3%, respectively; mean IOP and number of medications decreased by 5.6 mmHg (23.9%) and 1.7 mmHg (54.8%), respectively, from preoperative baseline (P < 0.01). More common postoperative complications included hypertensive phase (38.1%), corneal decompensation (23.8%), and tube exposure (14.3%).

Conclusion

An additional AGV implant had good short and modest long-term effectiveness in reducing IOP following a failed glaucoma tube shunt in Asian eyes, with the mentioned common postoperative complications to be actively monitored and managed.

Evaluation of success after second Ahmed glaucoma valve implantation

Purpose:

To evaluate the outcome of the second Ahmed glaucoma valve (AGV) surgery in eyes with failed previous AGV surgery.

Design:

Retrospective case series.

Patients and Methods:

Following chart review, 36 eyes of 34 patients with second AGV implantation were enrolled in this study. The primary outcome measure was surgical success defined in terms of intraocular pressure (IOP) control using two criteria: Success was defined as IOP ≤21 mmHg (criterion 1) and IOP ≤16 mmHg (criterion 2), with at least 20% reduction in IOP, either with no medication (complete success) or with no more than two medications (qualified success). Kaplan–Meier survival analysis was used to determine the probability of surgical success.

Results:

The average age of the patients was 32.7 years (range 4–65), and the mean duration of follow-up was 21.4 months (range 6–96). Preoperatively, the mean IOP was 26.94 mmHg (standard deviation [SD] 7.03), and the patients were using 2.8 glaucoma medications on average (SD 0.9). The mean IOP decreased significantly to 13.28 mmHg (SD 3.59) at the last postoperative visit (P = 0.00) while the patients needed even fewer glaucoma medications on average (1.4 ± 1.1, P = 0.00). Surgical success of second glaucoma drainage devices (Kaplan–Meier analysis), according to criterion 1, at 6, 12, 18, and 42 months was 94%, 85%, 80%, and 53% respectively, and according to criterion 2, was 94%, 85%, 75%, and 45%, respectively.

Conclusion:

Repeated AGV implantation seems to be a safe modality of treatment with acceptable success rate in cases with failed previous AGV surgery.

Outcomes of Sequential Glaucoma Drainage Implants in Refractory Glaucoma

PURPOSE

To describe the outcomes of eyes that have undergone a second glaucoma drainage implant (GDI) surgery.

METHODS

A retrospective review of eyes that underwent a second GDI surgery from 2006 to 2013 was conducted. Primary outcome measures included intraocular pressure (IOP) reduction and success rates. Secondary outcome measures included glaucoma medication use, visual acuity, and number of reoperations. Success was defined as 6 ≤ IOP ≤ 21 with at least 20% IOP reduction, and no increase in the number of glaucoma medications from baseline at 3 months of follow-up or more.

RESULTS

Sixty-five eyes (63 patients) had a mean follow-up of 22.4 ± 19.9 months. The most frequently placed second GDIs were an Ahmed FP7 (49%) or a Baerveldt 250 (26%) in the inferotemporal (46%) or inferonasal (35%) quadrant. At 3-year follow-up, IOP was reduced from 25.8 ± 7.7 to 17.4 ± 9.9 mm Hg (P = 0.004) and the number of glaucoma medications decreased from 3.6 ± 1.2 to 2.5 ± 1.4 (P = 0.01) compared with baseline. The median time to failure was 24.7 ± 5.8 months. There was no significant difference in failure rates for type of sequential GDI (P = 0.80) or plate location (P = 0.34). There was no significant difference in visual acuity between baseline and 3-year follow-up (P = 1.0). The most common postoperative complication was corneal edema (n = 9, 14%).

CONCLUSIONS

Most eyes undergoing a second GDI achieve adequate IOP control with fewer antiglaucoma medications. Failure rates were similar regardless of quadrant selection or GDI type.

Intraocular pressure control after the implantation of a second Ahmed glaucoma valve

The objective of this study is to evaluate the efficacy and safety of a second Ahmed glaucoma valve (AGV) in eyes with refractory glaucoma that had undergone prior Ahmed device implantation. This multicenter, retrospective study evaluated 58 eyes (58 patients) that underwent a second AGV (model S2-n = 50, model FP7-n = 8) due to uncontrolled IOP under maximal medical therapy. Outcome measures included IOP, visual acuity, number of glaucoma medications, and postoperative complications. Success was defined as IOP <21 mmHg (criterion 1) or 30 % reduction of IOP (criterion 2) with or without hypotensive medications. Persistent hypotony (IOP <5 mmHg after 3 months of follow-up), loss of light perception, and reintervention for IOP control were defined as failure. Mean preoperative IOP and mean IOPs at 12 and 30 months were 27.55 ± 1.16 mmHg (n = 58), 14.45 ± 0.83 mmHg (n = 42), and 14.81 ± 0.87 mmHg (n = 16), respectively. The mean numbers of glaucoma medications preoperatively at 12 and 30 months were 3.17 ± 0.16 (n = 58), 1.81 ± 0.2 (n = 42), and 1.83 ± 0.35 (n = 18), respectively. The reductions in mean IOP and number of medications were statistically significant at all time intervals (P < 0.001). According to criterion 1, Kaplan-Meier survival curves disclosed success rates of 62.9 % at 12 months and 56.6 % at 30 months. According to criterion 2, Kaplan-Meier survival curves disclosed success rates of 43.9 % at 12 months and 32.9 % at 30 months. The most frequent early complication was hypertensive phase (10.3 %) and the most frequent late complication was corneal edema (17.2 %). Second AGV implantation may effectively reduce IOP in eyes with uncontrolled glaucoma, and is associated with relatively few complications.

Surgical Outcomes of Additional Ahmed Glaucoma Valve Implantation in Refractory Glaucoma

PURPOSE

To evaluate the surgical outcomes of the implantation of an additional Ahmed glaucoma valve (AGV) into the eyes of patients with refractory glaucoma following previous AGV implantation.

METHODS

This study is a retrospective review of the clinical histories of 23 patients who had undergone a second AGV implantation after a failed initial implantation. Age, sex, prior surgery, glaucoma type, number of medications, intraocular pressure (IOP), visual acuity, and surgical complications were analyzed. Surgical success was defined as IOP maintained below 21 mm Hg, with at least a 20% overall reduction in IOP, regardless of the use of IOP-lowering medications.

RESULTS

Following the implantation of a second AGV, the mean IOP decreased from 39.3 to 18.5 mm Hg (52.9% reduction, P<0.001). The mean number of postoperative IOP-lowering medications administered decreased from 2.8 to 1.7 after the second AGV implantation (P<0.001). The cumulative probability of success for the procedure was 87% after 1 year and 52% after 3 years. Three patients (13.0%) experienced bullous keratopathy after the second AGV implantation. None of the patients showed any evidence of diplopia or ocular movement limitation as a result of the presence of 2 AGVs in the same eye. Prior trabeculectomy was found to be a significant risk factor for failure (P=0.027).

CONCLUSIONS

A second AGV implantation can be a good choice of surgical treatment when the first AGV has failed to control IOP.

Outcomes of glaucoma reoperations in the Tube Versus Trabeculectomy (TVT) Study

PURPOSE

To describe the incidence and outcomes of reoperations for glaucoma in the Tube Versus Trabeculectomy (TVT) Study.

DESIGN

Cohort study of patients in a multicenter randomized clinical trial.

METHODS

The TVT Study enrolled 212 patients with medically uncontrolled glaucoma who had previous cataract and/or glaucoma surgery. Randomization assigned 107 patients to surgery with a tube shunt (350 mm(2) Baerveldt glaucoma implant) and 105 patients to trabeculectomy with mitomycin C (0.4 mg/mL for 4 minutes). Data were analyzed from patients who failed their assigned treatment and had additional glaucoma surgery. Outcome measures included intraocular pressure (IOP), use of glaucoma medications, visual acuity, surgical complications, and failure (IOP >21 mm Hg or not reduced by 20%, IOP ≤5 mm Hg, additional glaucoma surgery, or loss of light perception vision).

RESULTS

Additional glaucoma surgery was performed in 8 patients in the tube group and 18 patients in the trabeculectomy group in the TVT Study, and the 5-year cumulative reoperation rate was 9% in the tube group and 29% in the trabeculectomy group (P = .025). Follow-up (mean ± SD) after additional glaucoma surgery was 28.0 ± 16.0 months in the tube group and 30.5 ± 20.4 months in the trabeculectomy group (P = .76). At 2 years after a glaucoma reoperation, IOP (mean ± SD) was 15.0 ± 5.5 mm Hg in the tube group and 14.4 ± 6.6 mm Hg in the trabeculectomy group (P = .84). The number of glaucoma medications (mean ± SD) after 2 years of follow-up was 1.1 ± 1.3 in the tube group and 1.4 ± 1.4 in the trabeculectomy group (P = .71). The cumulative probability of failure at 1, 2, 3, and 4 years after additional glaucoma surgery was 0%, 43%, 43%, and 43%, respectively, in the tube group, and 0%, 9%, 20%, and 47% in the trabeculectomy group (P = .28). Reoperations to manage complications were required in 1 patient in the tube group and 5 patients in the trabeculectomy group (P = .63).

CONCLUSIONS

The rate of reoperation for glaucoma was higher following trabeculectomy with mitomycin C than tube shunt surgery in the TVT Study. Similar surgical outcomes were observed after additional glaucoma surgery, irrespective of initial randomized treatment in the study.

Simultaneous placement of 2 glaucoma drainage devices for uncontrolled glaucoma

OBJECTIVE

To report baseline characteristics and surgical outcomes of placement of simultaneous glaucoma drainage devices (GDDs) in eyes with considerably elevated intraocular pressure (IOP) despite maximal medical therapy.

DESIGN

Retrospective case series.

PARTICIPANTS

Twelve eyes of 12 patients underwent simultaneous placement of a Baerveldt 350 GDD and an Ahmed S3 GDD in the same eye.

METHODS

The medical records were reviewed of consecutive patients who underwent simultaneous placement of a Baerveldt 350 GDD and an Ahmed S3 GDD in the same eye at the University of Michigan Kellogg Eye Center from 2006 to 2009. Baseline characteristics, preoperative and postoperative IOP, number of glaucoma medications, visual acuity, and complications were recorded.

RESULTS

Mean follow-up time was 28.6 ± 22.8 months. The mean baseline cup/disc ratio was recorded at 0.94 ± 0.07 horizontally and 0.92 ± 0.09 vertically. The mean baseline IOP of 38.8 ± 6.2 mm Hg was significantly reduced at all time points postoperatively, and the mean IOP at last follow-up was 15.1 ± 4.9 mm Hg (p ≤ 0.0001). Mean number of glaucoma medications was significantly lower at last follow-up than preoperatively (1.4 ± 1.3 vs 3.2 ± 0.8; p = 0.001). There was no difference in mean logMAR visual acuity from before surgery to last follow-up (1.14 vs 1.12; p = 0.933).

CONCLUSIONS

Simultaneous placement of 2 GDDs effectively reduces IOP in the immediate postoperative period and long-term, and may be useful in glaucomatous eyes with advanced disease and considerably elevated preoperative IOP.

Efficacy of Additional Glaucoma Drainage Device Insertion in Refractory Glaucoma: Case Series with a Systematic Literature Review and Meta-Analysis

PURPOSE

To report the efficacy of additional glaucoma drainage device (GDD) insertion in eyes with refractory glaucoma and which have a failed primary GDD.

METHODS

We conducted a non-comparative, retrospective study on eight eyes of eight patients who had a failed primary GDD and received an additional GDD in the same eye. Intraocular pressure (IOP), visual acuity (VA), the number of anti-glaucomatous medications, and complications were analyzed during the most recent office visit. Success was defined as an IOP between 6 and 21 mmHg and a 20% decrease in IOP after additional GDD insertion, with or without anti-glaucomatous medication.

RESULTS

The mean decrease in IOP at the final follow-up was 19.3 mmHg (56.1%). The mean number of anti-glaucomatous medications used at the final follow-up (2.38) was significantly less than the preoperative mean (3.50). Seven patients achieved the criteria for success, whereas one patient had an unsuccessful outcome because of corneal graft failure after additional GDD insertion.

CONCLUSIONS

We showed that after the failure of a primary GDD, an additional GDD offered favorable IOP control and stable VA. In agreement with a review of previous literature, GDD insertion is the best option for treating refractory glaucoma, even in patients with a failed primary GDD.

Long-term success of ahmed glaucoma valve in refractory glaucoma

AIM

To evaluate the long-term results and complications of ahmed glaucoma valve (AGV) implantation in refractory glaucoma.

METHODS

A retrospective review of 13 patients (13 eyes) with refractory glaucoma who underwent AGV implantation and had a minimum follow-up of 18 months was performed. All patients underwent a complete ophthalmologic examination and intraocular pressure (IOP) measurement before surgery and at 1 month, 3 months, 6 months, 1 year after surgery and yearly afterwards. Complications and the number of antiglaucoma medications needed were recorded.

RESULTS

Mean age was 27.3±16.0 years. All eyes (100%) had at least one prior incisional surgery. Mean follow-up was 61.3±30.8 months. IOP was reduced from a mean of 35.0 ±7.0mmHg to 18.2±7.9mmHg at 12 months and to 17.0±4.1mmHg at 96 months (P<0.05) with a lower number of medications from baseline, 76.9% patients required additional procedures to achieve the success criteria set by previously published series. The most common complications were encapculated cyst formation in eight eyes (61.5 %) and tube exposure in four eyes (30.8%).

CONCLUSION

Encapsulated cyst formation was the most common complication which hindered succesful IOP control after AGV implant insertion for refractory glaucoma. Despite cyst excision with anti-fibrotic agents, successful IOP reduction was not achieved in 76.9% of the patients without antiglaucoma medication.