Comparison of Automated Titanium Fasteners to Hand-Tied Knots in Open Aortic Valve Replacement

Safety and Effectiveness Outcomes of a Novel Automated Titanium Suture Fastener Device Applied for Heart Valve Surgery in an Ovine Model

Objective

This study was designed to evaluate the operability, effectiveness, and safety of the automated titanium suture fastener in a preclinical ovine model in comparison with manual tying in a mitral valve annuloplasty ring implantation surgery.

Methods

Eighteen adult Small-tailed Han sheep were prepared for the surgery of mitral valve annuloplasty ring implantation through lateral thoracotomy under cardiopulmonary bypass (CBP). A total of 12 stitches were performed to secure an annuloplasty ring, with 6 stitches done with the automated fastener and the other 6 by manual tying. The knotting time for the automated fastener or manual tying was recorded, respectively. The firmness of knots, mitral valve integrity, biocompatibility, thrombosis, local reactions, and other aspects were also compared at follow-up time (Days 30, 60, 90, and 180).

Results

Of the 18 sheep, 16 survived to the designated endpoints and were enrolled for further analysis. Compared with the control group, the knotting time was significantly reduced with the automated fastener (p < 0.01). All the annuloplasty rings were tightly secured by 6 fastener clips and 6 hand-made knots without any disengagement or displacement. All the mitral valves were intact without any defect, stenosis, prolapse, valve insufficiency, or perforation. Endothelialization was comparable between the two groups by Day 60. Small red thrombi formed at the thread end of the suture in both groups. No thrombus was found on the surface of the titanium clip. All the thrombi were within the acceptable range for the antithrombotic property. Thrombosis showed no significant difference by Day 60. No significant differences in the inflammatory response and pathological lesions were observed by Day 60. One case of diffuse renal infarction (area ratio = 20%) and 1 case of small focal renal infarction (area ratio < 5%) were caused by thromboembolism.

Conclusions

The automated fastener significantly shortened the procedure time of tying knots for the implantation of the annuloplasty ring in the ovine model, with comparable safety and effectiveness as manual tying.

Automated Suture Fastener Gaining Complete Commitment: Cumulative Propensity-Matched Comparison with Hand-Tied Knot in Heart Valve Surgery

OBJECTIVE

The COR-KNOT® device is an automated suture fastener in which there is currently no consensus on its role in heart valve surgery. Our aim was thus to conduct a one-to-one comparison of clinical outcomes with a hand-tied control cohort.

METHODS

We performed a single-center, cumulative propensity-matched retrospective cohort study on patients undergoing heart valve surgery from 1 January 2015 to 13 February 2020. Propensity score matching was performed on 693 patients, dividing them into matched COR-KNOT® (n = 124) and hand-tied (n = 124) groups.

RESULTS

Data on baseline demographics, operative details, and clinical outcomes were analyzed and compared between the groups. The patients in both the COR-KNOT® and control groups were well-matched. For the median sternotomy (MS) all procedures subgroup, use of COR-KNOT® was associated with a decrease of around 49 min in CPB time (220.00 [168.00 to 256.00] vs 70.50 [134.00 to 236.75] min, P = 0.006) and around 32 min in ACC time (145.00 [109.00 to 189.00] vs 112.50 [81.00 to 161.75] min, P = 0.008). In the MS valve and CABG subgroup, use of COR-KNOT® was associated with a 70 min reduction in overall operation time (401.00 [354.25 to 468.75] vs 330.50 [288.50 to 370.50] min, P = 0.013), 63 min reduction in CPB time (216.50 [191.75 to 283.25] vs 153.00 [124.75 to 207.50] min, P = 0.004) and 45 min reduction in ACC time (146.00 [134.50 to 205.50] vs 100.50 [71.50 to 150.75] min, P = 0.003).

CONCLUSIONS

In heart valve surgery, use of the automated suture fastener was associated with shorter CPB and ACC times. Additionally, we determined that clinical outcomes are most likely unaffected by the use of COR-KNOT®.

Initial clinical experience with minimally invasive surgical aortic valve replacement

BACKGROUND

The ministernotomy approach is increasingly used in aortic valve surgery. However, the advantages are still a matter of discussion. The aim of this study was to compare the postoperative outcome in patients undergoing elective aortic valve operation, either through mini-sternotomy or conventional sternotomy.

METHODS

We included 317 patients who were treated for their aortic valve, 63 patients underwent a minimally invasive aortic valve replacement (mini-AVR) and 254 patients underwent a full-sternotomy AVR. Patients with endocarditis, those who underwent previous cardiac surgery and those who required a concomitant procedure were excluded from the analysis. The method of matching weights according to propensity score was used to adjust for differences between the two treatment groups, and outcomes were compared.

RESULTS

The mediastinal drainage was significantly lower at 6, 24 hours and total after mini-AVR procedure than after full-sternotomy AVR (median: 373 vs. 499 mL, P<0.001). However, the number of patients receiving packed red blood cells transfusion was similar. Overall, the hospital mortality was lower in the full-sternotomy group, 0% vs. 3.2%, P=0.039. No difference was found in the median hospital length of stay, perioperative myocardial infarction, postoperative incidence of new pacemaker implantation, stroke, prolonged mechanical ventilation and mediastinitis. No patients in the mini-AVR group experienced paravalvular leakage. Midterm survival resulted in no difference between the treatment groups at 4-year (90.5% vs. 95.2%), P=0.75.

CONCLUSIONS

Although the minimally invasive surgery for AVR may increasingly be applied, our initial experience calls for a careful approach of adapting this procedure.

Automated Fastener vs Hand-tied Knots in Heart Valve Surgery: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

Although several studies revealed that the Cor-knot automated fastener (LSI Solutions, Victor, NY) reduces aortic cross-clamp and cardiopulmonary bypass times, the influence of the device on postoperative morbidity and mortality still needs to be evaluated. The aim of this study was to verify the hypothesis that the use of the Cor-knot device for heart valve surgery reduces aortic cross-clamp and cardiopulmonary bypass times, and this time saving translates into reduced morbidity and mortality.

METHODS

Retrospective cohort studies and randomized controlled trials reporting on the use of the automated fastener vs hand-tied knots were reviewed. The following end points were compared: aortic cross-clamp and cardiopulmonary bypass times, postoperative valvular regurgitation, postoperative ejection fraction, prolonged ventilator support, renal failure, and mortality.

RESULTS

Eight studies reporting data on 942 patients were included in the final analysis. The Cor-knot device was associated with shorter cardiopulmonary bypass (mean difference [MD], -11.74; 95% confidence interval [CI], -14.54 to -8.93; P < .00001) and aortic cross-clamp times (MD, -14.36; 95% CI, -19.63 to -9.09; P < .00001) in minimally invasive heart valve procedures. Overall, lower rates of postoperative valvular regurgitation (risk ratio [RR], 0.40; 95% CI, 0.26 to 0.62; P < .0001) and prolonged ventilator support (RR, 0.29; 95% CI, 0.13 to 0.65; P = .003) were observed. No difference was observed in postoperative atrial fibrillation, ejection fraction, renal failure, and mortality.

CONCLUSIONS

The use of the Cor-knot device in heart valve surgery reduced aortic cross-clamp and cardiopulmonary bypass times. Furthermore, as compared with hand-tie methods, the automated fastener may lead to decreased rates of prolonged ventilator support and valvular regurgitation while being noninferior in terms of other postoperative outcomes and mortality.

Scar quality examination comparing titanium-coated suture material and non-coated suture material on flap donor sites in reconstructive surgery

Background

Wound healing and scar quality after trauma are subject to impairment through excessive wound healing, chronic wound or even surgical site infections. Optimizing the process of scar formation and skin healing is crucial in virtually all fields of medicine. In this regard, we tested the possible usage and advantages of titanium coated suture material.

Methods

We performed a prospective observational cohort study including 30 patients who underwent soft tissue reconstruction. One half of the donor flap site was sutured with titanium coated suture material, while the other half was closed with non-coated sutures. Scar quality of the donor flap site was assessed by photographs and POSAS scores on days 2–5, 14, 42, 72 and 180 postoperatively.

Results

No difference between the titanium coated sutures and non-coated sutures was seen in the POSAS assessment, neither for the patient scale at 14, 42, 72 and 180 days, nor for the observer scale on the same dates. Comorbidities like diabetes, chronic renal failure and smoking as well as the BMI of each patient affected the wound healing process to an equal degree on both sides of the suture.

Conclusions

No difference between the titanium coated and non-titanium-coated suture material was seen in the POSAS assessment in regard to scar quality and wound healing. The titanium-coated suture material can be considered to be equally as effective and safe in all qualities as the non-titanium-coated suture material, even in patients with comorbidities.

Clinical trial register This study is registered at the German Clinical Trials Register (DRKS) under the registration number DRKS00021767. (https://www.drks.de/drks_web/navigate.do?navigationId=trial.HTML&TRIAL_ID=DRKS00021767)

A Rare Etiology for Bioprosthetic Aortic Valve Regurgitation

•

COR-KNOT, an automatic knot fastener device can cause traumatic bioprosthetic valve perforation.

•

Multiple eccentric jets in prosthetic valves is suspicious for valve perforation.

•

Meticulous surgical techniques are essential to prevent this complication.

What is the safety and efficacy of the use of automated fastener in heart valve surgery?

INTRODUCTION

Cor-Knot automated fastener has been used as an adjunct in heart valve surgery to eliminate the need for manual tying during valve implantation. Although reduced operative time and facilitation for minimally invasive surgery are clear benefits, whether their use translates to improved patient outcome remains debatable. This study aims to review the safety and efficacy of automated fasteners in heart valve surgeries.

METHOD

Specific searches were conducted via online medical databases (Pubmed, Embase, Ovid) between 1950 and June 2019. Longitudinal studies were included that provided operative parameters.

RESULTS

The initial literature search identified 3773 articles, but only eight met the inclusion criteria and were used for analysis: four studies related to aortic valve replacement (AVR), four related to mitral valve (MV) intervention (total n = 810). The meta-analysis revealed the significantly shorter aortic cross-clamp time in the Cor-knot group compared to manual tying, both in AVR and MV surgeries (P < .05). Cardiopulmonary bypass time was significantly shorter in the Cor-knot group when analyzing studies in MV surgery (weighted mean difference [WMD]: 110.0; 95% confidence interval: 12.3-207.7; P = .027) The use of Cor-Knot did not increase the risk of permanent pacemaker implantation, paravalvular leak, and 30-day mortality. The majority of studies reported no change in the length of intensive unit care and total hospital stay.

CONCLUSION

We confirmed that the majority of existing literatures indicated the safety and intraoperative efficacy with automated fastener application. Nevertheless, there is currently no evidence to support automated fastened sutures can translate its intraoperative advantages to improved patient outcome.

Comparison of automated fastener device Cor-Knot versus manually-tied knot in minimally-invasive isolated aortic valve replacement surgery

BACKGROUND

The aim of our prospective study was to evaluate the efficacy and the safety of the Cor-Knot device in isolated aortic valve replacement by right anterior minithoracotomy.

METHODS

A single-center, prospective study was conducted between September 2009 and June 2018. Four hundred and forty patients were operated on for aortic valve replacement by right anterior minithoracotomy. Of these patients, 221 underwent isolated AVR surgery with stented prosthesis. Sutures were secured using the Cor-Knot titanium fastener in 63 patients (28.5%) and knots were hand-tied in 158 (71.5%). Statistical analyses were done using a propensity score with 1:1 matching for the automatically tied (AT) and manually tied (MT) patients.

RESULTS

The aortic cross-clamping and cardiopulmonary bypass times were significantly decreased in the AT group (74±13.8 minutes vs. 90.4±23.7 minutes, P<0.0001, and 100.8±20.6 minutes vs. 117.6±33.1 minutes, P<0.0001), compared with the MT group. Clinical outcomes were similar in the two groups, whether in the analysis of non-matched or matched groups. There was no difference in 30 day-mortality (1.2% vs. 0%, P=0.37), and the stroke and transient ischemic attack rates were comparable (2.5% vs. 1.6%; P=0.67). There was no significant increase in pacemaker implantation in the AT group (1.3% vs. 0%, P=0.36), and the rate of aortic regurgitation ≥ 2 was lower (3.9% vs. 0%; P=0.11) but not statistically significant.

CONCLUSIONS

The automated Cor-Knot fastener is an easy-to-use, time-saving device which does not increase perioperative morbidity and mortality in patients undergoing aortic valve replacement by right anterior minithoracotomy.

Titanium Fastener Utilization During HeartMate 3 Left Ventricular Assist Device Implantation

OBJECTIVE

The objective of this study was to investigate the feasibility of using titanium fasteners for securement of the inflow sewing ring during HeartMate 3 implantation. The secondary objective was to compare cardiopulmonary bypass and total operative times between the titanium fastener and hand-tied knot groups.

METHODS

Clearance between the sewing ring and the HeartMate 3 device was assessed in vitro. Thirty-one patients undergoing HeartMate 3 implantation via median sternotomy at a single center from April 2017 to February 2018 were reviewed. The sewing ring was secured with hand-tied knots (n = 18) or titanium fasteners (n = 13). Cannulation strategy and implantation technique were otherwise identical between groups. Central arterial and venous cannulation was performed for cardiopulmonary bypass. The left ventricular apex was cored, and the sewing ring was attached with hand-tied knots or titanium fasteners.

RESULTS

There was adequate clearance for the titanium fastener to secure the inflow sewing ring and then connect to the HeartMate 3 in vitro. The inflow sewing ring was successfully secured during HeartMate 3 implantation in the titanium fastener group. Cardiopulmonary bypass time was 75 and 92 minutes for the titanium fastener and hand-tied groups, respectively (P < 0.03). Total operative time was 177 and 193 minutes for the titanium fastener and hand-tied groups, respectively (P = 0.513).

CONCLUSIONS

The inflow sewing ring of the HeartMate 3 was efficiently secured using titanium fasteners. Titanium fasteners resulted in shorter cardiopulmonary bypass times compared with the hand-tied group. There was no difference in total operative time.