Chest Wall Resection and Reconstruction a True Thoracoscopic Approach

National trends, safety, and effectiveness of minimally invasive concomitant chest wall resection for locally advanced lung cancer

Objective

Concomitant chest wall resection for locally advanced lung cancer is traditionally performed via an open approach. The safety and effectiveness of minimally invasive approaches for chest wall resections are unknown.

Methods

We used the National Cancer Database to identify patients undergoing lobectomy/bi-lobectomy with concomitant chest wall resection from 2010 to 2020. We stratified patients into those undergoing a minimally invasive resection (video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery [VATS]/robotic) or open, while accounting for conversions. We also compared VATS with robotic approaches. The main outcomes were length of stay, mortality, readmissions, and overall survival. We used multivariable, Kaplan-Meier and Cox proportional models to identify associations.

Results

Of 2837 patients, 756 procedures (26.6%) were started minimally invasive, of which 23.1% were robotic. There were 237 (31.3%) conversions. Patients undergoing a minimally invasive operation were similar in terms of age (65.2 ± 9.8 years vs 66.0 ± 9.9 years), sex, race, tumor histology, and location (all P > .05) but had smaller cancers (5.4 ± 2.6 cm vs 6.2 ± 4.3 cm; P < .001) compared with those undergoing open. They also had shorter length of stay (8.6 ± 7.6 days vs 9.7 ± 9.3 days; P < .001) but similar unadjusted 90-day mortality (8.2% vs 8.0%; P = .999). Neoadjuvant therapy was associated with less minimally invasive approaches (adjusted odds ratio, 0.69; P ≤ .001). Larger cancers were associated with less minimally invasive operations and greater rates of conversions. However, the robotic approach was associated with lower conversion rates than VATS across all tumor sizes. Overall survival was equivalent.

Conclusions

The use of minimally invasive approaches to concomitant chest wall resection is increasing. Although conversions to open are common, this approach is safe and is associated with shorter hospital stays. Overall survival is equivalent to the open approach.

Thoracoscopic rib resection and reconstruction of chest wall: Our clinical experience

Chest wall resection is traditionally performed via open thoracotomy, a procedure that increases surgical morbidity and reduces postoperative quality of life. Conversely, thoracoscopic chest wall resection may minimize invasiveness but the optimal procedure remains uncertain. We previously reported rib resection using a pneumatic high-speed power drill during video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery for selected lung cancer patients. In this report, we present two cases of chest wall tumor resected using the drill via the thoracoscopic approach. We also report thoracoscopic chest wall reconstruction in one patient using a patch sheet.

Video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery lobectomy with chest wall resection

Lung cancer presents with chest wall invasion in 5-8% of patients, which imparts some treatment challenges. Surgical resection is currently the standard of care, and there are some controversies regarding the best approach. Published series and case reports confirm the safety and feasibility of video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery (VATS) in highly complex surgical cases including lobectomy with chest wall resection of locally advanced lung cancer. In this article, we present the clinical indications of locally advanced lung cancer that infiltrates the chest wall, the modalities for and importance of accurately staging lung cancers with chest wall invasion, and the technical aspects of accomplishing a safe and oncologically sound extended resection through VATS.

Video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery en bloc chest wall resection

In the latest two decades, the video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery (VATS) technique has gained recognition as an effective alternative to conventional open surgery, and the field of its application has gradually extended to more complex diseases, such as locally invasive non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) requiring combined lung and chest wall resection. The en bloc chest wall resection can be accomplished by using a typical VATS port placement, each time adjusted to allow a better thoracoscopic guidance and a correct resection of the tumour to achieve negative margins. Different approaches have been described by experienced surgeons, with a remarkable variability in the number and disposition of the ports, in the surgical tools used and in the strategy of sparing the covering tissues. The common denominator of these experiences is the aim of extending the criteria of functional and oncological operability to high-risk patients who are not suitable for a conventional thoracotomy. Indeed, the VATS approach has shown effectiveness in reaching unchanged oncological outcomes in comparison with the thoracotomic technique but involving significantly less postoperative pain, faster recovery, shorter hospitalisation and lower overall complications.

[Complete Single-Utility-Port Thoracoscopic Resection of Lung Cancer with Single-Rib Metastasis]

背景与目的

随着全胸腔镜手术经验的增加，其适应症也在向复杂的术式延伸。本研究旨在探讨单操作孔全胸腔镜下同期行肺叶联合肋骨切除术的可行性。

方法

结合我科为1例肺癌单发肋骨转移的患者进行了“单操作孔全胸腔镜下肺叶及部分肋骨切除术”进行病例分享并复习有关文献。

结果

肿瘤分期为T1N1M1。患者术后恢复良好并于术后第4天出院。最近一次随访于术后18个月，患者无病生存良好。

结论

筛选后的肺癌伴肋骨转移病例，适合行单操作孔全胸腔镜手术切除。

Single-Incision Thoracoscopic Right Upper Lobectomy with Chest Wall Resection by Posterior Approach

Lobectomy requiring chest wall resection is usually performed by thoracotomy, but thanks to the advances in the field of thoracoscopic surgery, this procedure can be performed by video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery (VATS). Recent improvements in surgical devices and previous VATS experience have allowed this complex surgery for advanced stages to be undertaken safely. Most of the thoracoscopic lobectomies with rib resection are performed using three to four incisions. We report a different minimally invasive technique for chest wall resection (minimally invasive posterior approach) and VATS right upper lobectomy (single-incision anterior approach).