A Phase 3, Randomized, Investigator-blinded Trial Comparing Ceftobiprole With a Standard-of-care Cephalosporin, With or Without Vancomycin, for the Treatment of Pneumonia in Pediatric Patients

Antibiotics versus Non-Antibiotic in the treatment of Aspiration Pneumonia: analysis of the MIMIC-IV database

BACKGROUND

Aspiration pneumonia (AP) is a common complication in the intensive care unit (ICU), which is associated with significantly increased morbidity and mortality and has a significant impact on patient prognosis. Antibiotics are commonly used in the clinical treatment of AP. However, the prognostic impact of antibiotics on patients with AP has not been adequately characterized. The purpose of this study is to illustrate the relationship between the use of antibiotics and in-hospital mortality of AP patients, as well as to analyze the effects of different antibiotic treatment regimens on the prognosis of the patients, and to further understand the distribution of pathogens and drug resistance in AP patients, so as to provide guidance information for the rational use of medication for patients in the clinic.

METHODS

Clinical data of AP patients were extracted from the MIMIC-IV database. Statistical methods included multivariate logistic regression, propensity score matching (PSM), and inverse probability weighting (IPW) based on propensity scores to ensure the robustness of the findings. In addition, the characteristics of the medications used by patients with AP were described using statistical graphs and tables.

RESULTS

A total of 4132 patients with AP were included. In-hospital mortality was significantly lower in the group using antibiotics compared to the group not using antibiotics (odds ratio [OR] = 0.44, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.27- 0.71, P = 0.001). Furthermore, in the group using mechanical ventilation (MV), antibiotics use significantly reduced in-hospital mortality (OR = 0.30, 95% CI 0.15-0.57, P < 0.001). Vancomycin and cephalosporins are the most commonly used antibiotics to treat AP. Specifically, vancomycin in combination with piperacillin-tazobactam was used most frequently with 396 cases. The highest survival rate (97.6\%) was observed in patients treated with levofloxacin combined with metronidazole. Additionally, vancomycin combined with piperacillin-tazobactam had many inflammation related features that differed significantly from those in patients who did not receive medication.

CONCLUSIONS

Antibiotics use is closely associated with lower in-hospital mortality in ICU patients with AP. Moreover, understanding antibiotics use, the composition of pathogenic bacteria, and the rates of drug resistance in patients with AP can aid in disease prevention and prompt infection control.

Ceftobiprole Medocaril: A New Fifth-Generation Cephalosporin

OBJECTIVE

The objective was to review the pharmacology, efficacy, and safety of intravenous ceftobiprole in the treatment of bloodstream infections, acute bacterial skin and skin structure infections (ABSSSIs), community-acquired pneumonia (CAP), and hospital-acquired pneumonia (HAP), or ventilator-associated pneumonia (VAP).

DATA SOURCES

PubMed and ClinicalTrials.gov were searched using the following terms: ceftobiprole, ceftobiprole medocaril, ceftobiprole medocaril sodium, Zevtera, and BAL5788.

STUDY SELECTION AND DATA EXTRACTION

Articles published in English between January 1985 and August 15, 2024, related to pharmacology, safety, efficacy, and clinical trials were reviewed.

DATA SYNTHESIS

Ceftobiprole has shown similar efficacy to comparator antibiotics in CAP, ABSSSIs, and bloodstream infections. Overall treatment success in patients with bacteremia was 69.8% and 68.7%; 91.3% and 88.1% with ABSSSIs and 86.6% and 87.4% with CAP in ceftobiprole and comparator groups, respectively. Finally, in the management of HAP and VAP, ceftobiprole was inferior in the VAP population. Ceftobiprole had a favorable safety profile with gastrointestinal adverse effects occurring more frequently than comparators.

RELEVANCE TO PATIENT CARE AND CLINICAL PRACTICE IN COMPARISON TO EXISTING DRUGS

Clinicians have limited options to treat multidrug-resistant infections. Ceftobiprole has demonstrated efficacy against causative pathogens in specific infections including methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus bacteremia (SAB), ABSSSI, and CAP and may be considered a viable alternative. However, ceftobiprole's impact on HAP, VAP, and febrile neutropenia needs to be further delineated.

CONCLUSION

Ceftobiprole's broad-spectrum activity makes it a viable option for treating patients hospitalized with CAP, ABSSSI, and SAB. Further studies are needed in severely ill HAP or VAP, febrile neutropenia, and pediatric patients.

Antibiotics for hospital-acquired pneumonia in neonates and children

BACKGROUND

Hospital-acquired pneumonia is one of the most common hospital-acquired infections in children worldwide. Most of our understanding of hospital-acquired pneumonia in children is derived from adult studies. To our knowledge, no systematic review with meta-analysis has assessed the benefits and harms of different antibiotic regimens in neonates and children with hospital-acquired pneumonia.

OBJECTIVES

To assess the beneficial and harmful effects of different antibiotic regimens for hospital-acquired pneumonia in neonates and children.

SEARCH METHODS

We searched CENTRAL, MEDLINE, Embase, three other databases, and two trial registers to February 2021, together with reference checking, citation searching, and contact with study authors to identify additional studies.

SELECTION CRITERIA

We included randomised clinical trials comparing one antibiotic regimen with any other antibiotic regimen for hospital-acquired pneumonia in neonates and children.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

Three review authors independently assessed studies for inclusion, extracted data, and assessed risk of bias. We assessed the certainty of the evidence using the GRADE approach. Our primary outcomes were all-cause mortality and serious adverse events; our secondary outcomes were health-related quality of life, pneumonia-related mortality, non-serious adverse events, and treatment failure. Our primary time point of interest was at maximum follow-up.

MAIN RESULTS

We included four randomised clinical trials (84 participants). We assessed all trials as having high risk of bias. We did not conduct any meta-analyses, as the included trials did not compare similar antibiotic regimens. Each of the four trials assessed a different comparison, as follows: cefepime versus ceftazidime; linezolid versus vancomycin; meropenem versus cefotaxime; and ceftobiprole versus cephalosporin. Only one trial reported our primary outcomes of all-cause mortality and serious adverse events. Three trials reported our secondary outcome of treatment failure. Two trials primarily included community-acquired pneumonia and hospitalised children with bacterial infections, hence the children with hospital-acquired pneumonia constituted subgroups of the total sample sizes. Where outcomes were reported, the certainty of the evidence was very low for each of the comparisons. We are unable to draw meaningful conclusions from the numerical results. None of the included trials assessed health-related quality of life, pneumonia-related mortality, or non-serious adverse events.

AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS

The relative beneficial and harmful effects of different antibiotic regimens remain unclear due to the very low certainty of the available evidence. The current evidence is insufficient to support any antibiotic regimen being superior to another. Randomised clinical trials assessing different antibiotic regimens for hospital-acquired pneumonia in children and neonates are warranted.

Pharmacokinetics and Safety of Ceftobiprole in Pediatric Patients

BACKGROUND

Ceftobiprole, the active moiety of the prodrug ceftobiprole medocaril, is an advanced-generation, broad-spectrum, intravenous cephalosporin, which is currently approved for the treatment of adults with hospital-acquired or community-acquired pneumonia.

METHODS

Noncompartmental pharmacokinetics and safety were analyzed from 2 recently completed pediatric studies, a single-dose, phase 1 study in neonates and infants up to 3 months of age (7.5 mg/kg) and a phase 3 study in patients 3 months to 17 years of age with pneumonia (10-20 mg/kg with a maximum of 500 mg per dose every 8 hours for up to 14 days).

RESULTS

Total ceftobiprole plasma concentrations peaked at the end of infusion. Half life (median ranging from 1.9 to 2.9 hours) and overall exposure (median AUC ranging from 66.6 to 173 μg•h/mL) were similar to those in adults (mean ± SD, 3.3 ± 0.3 hours and 102 ± 11.9 μg•h/mL, respectively). Calculated free-ceftobiprole concentrations in the single-dose study remained above a minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) of 4 mg/L (fT > MIC of 4 mg/L) for a mean of 5.29 hours after dosing. In the pneumonia study, mean fT > MIC of 4 mg/L was ≥5.28 hours in all dose groups. Ceftobiprole was well tolerated in both studies.

CONCLUSIONS

Pharmacokinetic parameters of ceftobiprole characterized in the pediatric population were within the range of those observed in adults. In the pneumonia study, the lowest percentage of the dosing interval with fT > MIC of 4 mg/L was 50.8%, which suggests that pharmacokinetic-pharmacodynamic target attainment can be sufficient in pediatric patients. Ceftobiprole was well tolerated.

Optimizing Ceftobiprole Dosage in Pediatric Patients: A Model-Based Approach

Ceftobiprole is an advanced-generation cephalosporin for intravenous administration with activity against Gram-positive and Gram-negative organisms. A population pharmacokinetic (PK) model characterizing the disposition of ceftobiprole in plasma using data from patients in three pediatric studies was developed. Model-based simulations were subsequently performed to assist in dose optimization for the treatment of pediatric patients with hospital-acquired or community-acquired pneumonia. The population PK data set comprised 518 ceftobiprole plasma concentrations from 107 patients from 0 (birth) to 17 years of age. Ceftobiprole PK was well described by a three-compartment model with linear elimination. Ceftobiprole clearance was modeled as a function of glomerular filtration rate; other PK parameters were scaled to body weight. The final population PK model provided a robust and reliable description of the PK of ceftobiprole in the pediatric study population. Model-based simulations using the final model suggested that a ceftobiprole dose of 15 mg/kg of body weight infused over 2 h and administered every 12 h in neonates and infants <3 months of age or every 8 h in older pediatric patients would result in a ceftobiprole exposure consistent with that in adults and good pharmacokinetic-pharmacodynamic target attainment. The dose should be reduced to 10 mg/kg every 12 h in neonates and infants <3 months of age who weigh <4 kg to avoid high exposures. Extended intervals and reduced doses may be required for pediatric patients older than 3 months of age with renal impairment.