Correlation of American Joint Committee on Cancer T category for eyelid carcinoma with outcomes in patients with periocular Merkel cell carcinoma

Merkel cell carcinoma and the eye

Merkel cell carcinoma (MCC) is a rare cutaneous neuroendocrine tumor with a poor five-year survival rate. Yearly cases have risen nearly 350% since the early 1980s, and these are predicted to increase as the overall US population ages. MCC of the eyelid is uncommon and can be misdiagnosed as other benign inflammatory and neoplastic eyelid disorders. Although MCC of the head and neck is often more aggressive than it is at other sites, eyelid MCC shows a lower disease-specific mortality rate. A biopsy is essential for accurate diagnosis, including an immunohistochemical panel of CK20 and TTF-1, although other markers may be necessary. Staging can be assessed clinically through physical examination findings and imaging and/or pathologically with sentinel lymph node biopsy or fine-needle aspiration. Pathologic staging more accurately predicts the prognosis. Eyelid MCC treatments include Mohs micrographic surgery to allow for complete clearance and adequate reconstruction of lost tissue, followed by adjuvant radiotherapy. In advanced disease, immunotherapies are preferred over traditional chemotherapy and are a subject of ongoing research.

An Effective Primary Treatment Using Radiotherapy in Patients with Eyelid Merkel Cell Carcinoma

BACKGROUND

Merkel cell carcinoma (MCC) is a rare type of neuroendocrine tumor. Palpebral localization represents 2.5% of MCCs. Surgery is not always possible due to the localization or comorbidities of elderly patients. We hypothesized that radiotherapy (RT) alone could be a curative treatment in patients contraindicated for oncological surgery.

METHODS

We performed a retrospective monocentric study of patients with localized eyelid MCC treated with curative intent using curative radiotherapy.

RESULTS

Overall, 11 patients with histologically confirmed eyelid MCC were treated with curative radiotherapy. The median age was 77 years old (range: 53-94). Curative RT was decided mainly due to difficult localization and significant co-morbidities. The median lesion dose was 57 Gy (range: 47-70). Most patients had adjuvant lymph nodes irradiation with a median dose of 50 Gy (n = 9; 82%). The median follow-up was 62 months (6-152 months). None of the seven deaths were MCC-related. None of our patients relapsed during follow-up. Side effects related to radiotherapy were mild (no grade ≥ 2) and rare (n = 3, 21%).

CONCLUSION

Our data suggest that curative radiotherapy is an effective and safe treatment for Merkel cell carcinoma of the eyelid and periocular region. Radiotherapy alone allows limiting the aesthetic and functional sequelae in elderly and comorbid patients who are contraindicated for oncological surgery.

Merkel cell carcinoma of the eyelid and periocular region: A review

Merkel cell carcinoma (MCC) is a rare primary cutaneous neuroendocrine carcinoma with a high mortality rate. It typically affects elderly Caucasians, with a slight predilection for males. It is associated with chronic sun exposure and/or immunosuppression. Almost half of all cases occur on the head or neck and an estimated 2.5%–10% arise on the eyelids or periocular skin. It ranks as the 5^th most common malignant tumor at these sites, preceded in frequency by basal cell, squamous cell and sebaceous carcinoma, as well as melanoma. Its clinical presentation as a violaceous nodule/plaque lacks specificity, and it can be mistaken for cysts, chalazia or basal cell carcinomas. Sub-specialized histopathological and immunohistochemical evaluations are required for diagnosis. Clinical staging defines the extent of disease and governs management. This includes surgery and adjuvant radiotherapy for localized tumors and of late, immunotherapy for metastatic disease. Significant advances in our understanding of the dual etiopathogenesis (Merkel cell polyomavirus- and Ultraviolet radiation-induced) and the biology of the neoplasm have been achieved in recent years. Issuing from the tumor's known susceptibility to host immunity, a recent therapeutic breakthrough has occurred whereby immune checkpoint inhibition has been shown to mitigate advanced disease. These factors and the increased global incidence of the tumor have brought it to the forefront of medical attention. This review provides a clinically relevant update on MCC, with special reference to cases arising on the eyelid/periocular region.

Merkel cell carcinoma of the forehead area: a literature review and case report

BACKGROUND

Merkel cell carcinoma (MCC) is an uncommon, aggressive malignancy of the skin, mostly affecting head and neck area in elderly white patients. Between head/neck sites, face accounts for 61% and forehead accounts for 17% of all face MCCs.

PURPOSE

We here present a literature review MCC cases arising in the forehead area, published in the English literature in the period 1987-2018, and report a personal observation with a late diagnosis and a treatment out of the current recommendations. The aims of this paper are to provide an up-to-date on MCC arising in the forehead area and to raise awareness about misdiagnosis of this type of lesion mimicking arteriovenous malformations (AVM).

MATERIAL AND METHOD

Literature review was performed on PubMed and Medline database and "Merkel cell carcinoma (MCC)," "forehead" and "MCC forehead location" were the terms the authors searched for. Patients' data have been drawn from descriptions of single cases and of short case series reports. For each case, data were collected about clinical characteristics, treatment modalities and outcomes. The study has been limited to the clinical features of the disease, excluding etiologic/pathogenic aspects.

RESULTS

Twenty-five patients with forehead MCC have been identified, coming from 20 sources. Nineteen presented a locoregional disease and 6 had an advanced pathology. TNM classification was reported in only two cases lacking for the other available data. Patients presented at mean age of 66 years with solitary or multiple nodules or dome-shaped/hemispherical mass, rarely ulcerated. Mean size of tumors was 1.13 cm of max diameter. Previous or concurrent malignancies or immune-hematologic disorders (AIDS) were often associated. At first investigation, lesion was often mistaken for other malignant or benign processes and, then, diagnosis was generally late. Some type of preoperative biopsy was performed in 3 patients, while the others had only a postoperative microscopic study of specimen. Initial treatment consisted in 6 cases (24%) in a not further specified about extent and width of margins local excision of the primary lesion, while a wide resection was reported in only 3 cases (12%). Surgical treatment of involved lymph-nodes was performed in 3 cases (12%). Six patients underwent radiotherapy for locoregional or distant recurrences. Mortality and overall survival rate at five years were 28% and 24%, respectively. Spontaneous regression was observed in 3 patients (12%).

CASE REPORT

Personal observation concerned an 82-year-old woman presenting with a forehead periorbital 5 × 5 cm red-bluish mass. The erythematous lesion was erroneously diagnosed as hemangioma on the base of color, the absence of any signs of malignancy, an angio CT indicating a hypervascular tissue and a FNA cytology (FNAC) lacking of malignant cells. The mass was excised as a benign lesion with about 1 cm margins extent without searching larger edges. Postoperative radiotherapy was offered to the patient after histology report, but she refused. After 4 months from surgery, she had a parotid metastasis and died from the illness in spite of platinum-based chemotherapy.

CONCLUSIONS

This study confirms the aggressiveness of forehead MCC, comparable with that of other face similar tumors. Personal case suggests that the deceitful benign feature of lesion may mimic an AVM and that FNAC may be misleading and diagnostic failure worsen prognosis. Our experience suggests that in the face smaller than 2-3 cm margins resection may increase the risk of locoregional recurrence. Therefore, postoperative wide-field irradiation should be ever delivered, after forehead MCC surgery, not only when clear margins are unattainable or involved with tumor, but also when negative microscopic edges are documented and residual cancer is thought not persist in the tumor bed. Orbit irradiation seems to be not dangerous for the eye.

Merkel cell carcinoma of the eyelid: A review

Merkel cell carcinoma (MCC) is a rare, aggressive tumor of both epithelial and neuroendocrine origin, which carries a mortality rate of up to 40%. MCC tumors typically present as painless, expanding nodules on the sun-exposed skin areas of older, white patients. Eyelid and periocular tumors comprise approximately 2.5% of all cases of MCC and may be mistaken for chalazia or basal cell carcinomas. Immunosuppression is a significant risk factor, particularly in solid-organ-transplant recipients, patients with chronic lymphocytic leukemia, and patients with HIV. Sentinel lymph node biopsy is often used for accurate staging of head and neck MCC. Treatment includes wide local excision, commonly with the addition of radiotherapy for improved locoregional disease control. Historically, adjuvant chemotherapy had been reserved for metastatic disease, but immunotherapy and targeted chemotherapies are currently being investigated for use in primary disease. The clinical characteristics of all available published cases of eyelid MCC are summarized in this article.

Sentinel lymph node biopsy in periocular merkel cell carcinoma: a case report

BACKGROUND

The National Comprehensive Cancer Network guidelines for Merkel cell carcinoma recommend performance of the sentinel lymph node biopsy in all patients with clinically negative nodal disease for staging and treatment. Nevertheless, sentinel lymph node biopsy in the periocular region is debated as tumors are typically smaller and lymphatic variability can make performance procedurally problematic.

CASE PRESENTATION

We present a case of a Caucasian patient in their seventies who presented with a 1.0 cm periocular Merkel cell carcinoma, who underwent Mohs surgery with a Tenzel flap repair, that was found to have a positive sentinel lymph node biopsy, but who, despite parotidectomy, selective neck dissection, and radiation, succumbed to the disease.

CONCLUSIONS

Evidence in both the site-specific and non-specific literature demonstrates: (1) Worsening prognosis with extent of lymph node burden, (2) improvements in our abilities to perform lymphoscintigraphy, (3) locoregional and distant metastatic disease in patients with tumor sizes ≤1 cm, and (4) significant rates of sentinel lymph node positivity in patients with tumor sizes ≤1 cm. Our case supports that sentinel lymph node biopsy should be considered in all clinically nodal negative periocular Merkel cell carcinoma, regardless of size, and despite limited site-specific studies on the subject.

Periocular dermatoses

The periocular area may be affected by infectious or noninfectious diseases such as inflammatory dermatoses, systemic disease, drug reactions, benign and malignant lesions, traumatic lesions, and esthetic complications. We present a review of the most common periocular dermatoses.

Merkel cell carcinoma of the eyelid and periocular region

Merkel cell carcinoma (MCC) in the eyelid and periocular region can be treated surgically, in most cases, with preservation of the eye and reasonable visual function. Adjuvant radiation therapy, sentinel lymph node biopsy, and chemotherapy should be considered for MCC of the eyelid and periocular region, especially for larger tumors that are T2b or more advanced and lesions that present with regional nodal or distant metastasis.