Utility of PROSE Device in the Management of Complex Oculoplastic Pathology

An Adjustable Magnetic Levator Prosthesis for Customizable Eyelid Reanimation in Severe Blepharoptosis II: Randomized Evaluation of Angular Translation

Purpose

Examine the effect of force modulation via angular translation of a static magnetic field for customizable treatment of severe blepharoptosis.

Methods

Prototype adjustable-force magnetic levator prostheses (aMLP) consisted of a spectacle-mounted magnet in rotatable housing and small eyelid-attached magnets embedded in a biocompatible polymer. Interpalpebral fissure (IPF) of 17 participants with severe blepharoptosis was continuously measured for one minute at five spectacle magnet angles, with order randomized and participant and data analyst masked. The hypothesis that angular position affected opening IPF (o-IPF), minimum blink IPF (m-IPF), and comfort ratings (1-10) was tested.

Results

The aMLP improved o-IPF from 4.5 mm without the device to 6.2 mm on the lowest force setting (P < 0.001) and 7.1 mm on the highest setting (P < 0.001) and allowed for complete volitional blink regardless of setting (average m-IPF 0.4 mm and no change with aMLP; P = 0.76). Spontaneous blink without the device (2.0 mm) was affected on the highest force setting (m-IPF 3.9 mm; P < 0.001) but only marginally so on the lowest setting (3.0 mm; P = 0.06). Comfort (7.6/10) did not vary with the angle (P > 0.36). Profile analysis found substantial individual responses to angle (P < 0.001), confirming the value of customization.

Conclusions

Angular translation provided adjustable force, which had a statistically and clinically meaningful impact on eye opening and the completeness of the spontaneous blink. This quantitative evidence supports continued use of the angular translation mechanism for force adjustment in the customizable magnetic correction of severe blepharoptosis.

Translational Relevance

Evidence for the benefit of customizable magnetic force via angular translation in a larger sample of participants than reported previously.

Ocular surface disease in thyroid eye disease: A narrative review

Ocular surface disease (OSD) in the setting of thyroid eye disease (TED) is traditionally thought of as a natural consequence of anatomical changes such as proptosis and corneal exposure. However, a growing body of research suggests that ocular surface inflammation and multi-factorial changes to the homeostasis of the ocular surface contribute substantially to the OSD seen in TED patients. In this paper we review the existing literature which highlights the work and existing theories underlying this new paradigm shift.

Adjunct Use of Therapeutic Scleral Lens for Exposure Keratopathy after Severe Chemical Burn

Severe chemical burns can damage the periocular area causing exposure keratopathy and resulting in ocular pain, foreign body sensation, epiphora, photophobia, and vision loss. A custom fit large diameter therapeutic scleral lens can protect the ocular surface by preventing desiccation and providing immediate improvement in comfort. This case describes the management of a patient with extensive chemical burn with complete lid loss and exposure keratopathy who has maintained excellent visual acuity and comfort with therapeutic scleral lens use.

Anatomical and physiological considerations in scleral lens wear: Eyelids and tear film

Scleral lenses can affect a range of anterior segment structures including the eyelids and the tears. The eyelids, consisting of the outer skin layer, the middle tarsal plate, and the posterior palpebral conjunctiva, provide physical protection and house the meibomian glands and cilia which have important and unique functions. Tears consist of a mix of aqueous, mucus, and lipidomic components that serve vital functions of lubricity, protection, and nourishment to the ocular surface. Both the eyelids and the tear film interact directly with scleral lenses on the eye and can affect but also be impacted by scleral lens wear. The purpose of this paper is to review the anatomy and physiology of the eyelids and tear film, discuss the effects and impacts of the scleral lenses on these structures, and identify areas that require further research.

Therapeutic Contact Lenses in the Treatment of Corneal and Ocular Surface Diseases-A Review

Therapeutic contact lenses (TCLs) are often used in the management of a wide variety of corneal and ocular surface diseases (OSDs). Indications of TCL include pain relief, enhancing corneal healing, corneal sealing, corneal protection, and drug delivery. For painful corneal diseases such as bullous keratopathy, epidermolysis bullosa, and epithelial abrasions/erosions, bandage contact lenses (BCLs) provide symptomatic relief. Postoperatively in photorefractive keratectomy or laser epithelial keratomileusis, BCLs also alleviate pain. In severe OSDs such as severe dry eye, Stevens-Johnson syndrome/toxic epidermal necrolysis, gas-permeable scleral contact lenses are often used to enhance corneal healing. BCLs are used post-keratoplasty, post-trabeculectomy, and post-amniotic membrane transplantation to enhance healing. BCLs, with or without glue adhesives, are used to seal small corneal perforations and sometimes also used as bridging treatment before penetrating keratoplasty in larger corneal perforations. In patients with eyelid conditions such as trichiasis, ptosis, and tarsal scarring, BCLs are also effective in forming a mechanical barrier to protect the cornea. A relatively new use for TCLs is in ocular drug delivery where TCLs are used to maintain therapeutic concentrations of medication on the ocular surface. Contraindications of the use of TCLs include infective keratitis, corneal anesthesia, and significant exposure keratopathy with inadequate eyelid position or movement. Complications of TCL include infective keratitis, corneal hypoxia and associated complications, corneal allergies and inflammation, and poor lens fit. Overall, TCLs are effective in the treatment of corneal and OSDs but contraindications and complications must be considered.