Impact of Food and Drug Administration Approval of Vismodegib on Prevalence of Orbital Exenteration as a Necessary Surgical Treatment for Locally Advanced Periocular Basal Cell Carcinoma

Oral Hedgehog Inhibitor, Vismodegib, for Locally Advanced Periorbital and Orbital Basal Cell Carcinoma: A Report by the American Academy of Ophthalmology

PURPOSE

To review the efficacy and safety of oral vismodegib (Erivedge; Genentech) in the management of locally advanced orbital and periorbital basal cell carcinoma (BCC).

METHODS

A literature search was conducted last in September 2023 in the PubMed database for English language original research that evaluated the effect of oral vismodegib on orbital and periorbital BCC. Sixty articles were identified and 16 met the inclusion criteria.

RESULTS

Most studies demonstrated high response rates, with up to 100% of patients responding to the medication in individual studies and initial complete regression occurring in up to 88% of patients. Vismodegib treatment resulted in significant reductions in tumor volume, resulting in globe preservation for most patients. However, in 12% of patients, the response was partial. Recurrences also occurred with substantial frequency, even after an initial complete response. As such, up to 79.4% of patients required surgical intervention, and up to 23% of patients still required exenteration. Use of these agents resulted in reductions in tumor volume that may delay or prevent the need for exenteration in some, but not all, patients. Importantly, molecular analysis of tissue excised after vismodegib therapy revealed persistent tumor in all patients, with frequent accumulation of mutations that may confer resistance to further hedgehog inhibitor therapy. Although most adverse events were rated as level I or II, side effects were common, with up to 100% of patients in studies experiencing at least 1 event. Muscle cramps, alopecia, weight loss, fatigue, and dysgeusia were the most common adverse events, and several patients discontinued therapy because of them. Furthermore, 1 patient died of sepsis that may have resulted from the therapy.

CONCLUSIONS

Although level I and II evidence are lacking, most studies indicate a benefit from the use of oral vismodegib to treat orbital and periorbital BCC tumor volume. However, patients should be cautioned about the adverse side effects of treatment and the persistence of tumor cells with mutations that may cause long-term resistance. Use of vismodegib as short-term neoadjuvant therapy may be effective in shrinking tumor volume to reduce surgical morbidity while reducing the frequency and severity of side effects.

FINANCIAL DISCLOSURE(S)

The author(s) have no proprietary or commercial interest in any materials discussed in this article.

Systemic Therapy for Non-Melanoma Skin Cancers: Latest Advances

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

This review provides an update on approved and emerging systemic therapies in the treatment of locally advanced or metastatic non-melanoma skin cancers (squamous cell carcinoma, basal cell carcinoma, Merkel cell carcinoma).

RECENT FINDINGS

Many studies demonstrate the effectiveness of immunotherapy for all types of non-melanoma skin cancer. For basal cell carcinoma (BCC), hedgehog inhibitors (HHI) remain first-line but with poor tolerability. Numerous clinical trials studying both neoadjuvant and adjuvant use of anti-PD-1 and anti-PD-L1 therapies in advanced NMSC are under investigation. There is a growing number of systemic therapies available to treat non-melanoma skin cancers. The advent of immunotherapy has revolutionized the field and greatly improved survival compared to historical survival rates with cytotoxic chemotherapy.

Targeted therapy in ophthalmic oncology: The current status

There have been rapid advancements in the field of ocular oncology for the diagnosis and management of intraocular, adnexal, and orbital tumors. Targeted therapy is in the forefront of medical research in all fields including ocular oncology. Targeted therapy include drugs that target specific genetic mutations, pathways or proteins involved in the development of cancer. In contrast to traditionally used chemotherapy, drugs used in targeted therapy are highly specific for tumor cells and preserve the function of normal cells. This review aims to familiarize ophthalmologists with the drugs that are currently approved or undergoing clinical trials for use in ocular oncology. Targeted therapy is particularly useful for locally advanced or metastatic tumors, including but not limited to eyelid and periocular basal cell carcinoma, periocular cutaneous and conjunctival squamous cell carcinoma, ocular adnexal lymphoma, conjunctival melanoma, and uveal melanoma. The results are promising with improved survival outcomes and better tolerability than chemotherapeutic drugs.

Advanced Periocular Basal Cell Carcinoma with Orbital Invasion: Update on Management and Treatment Advances

Purpose

Basal cell carcinoma (BCC) is the most frequent malignant periocular tumor. It is associated with exposure to ultraviolet radiation, and its incidence is gradually increasing. It may occasionally display more aggressive behavior and result in orbital or intracranial invasion. Mortality from periocular BBC with orbital invasion is very low, but the associated morbidity can be significant, from disfigurement to blindness. Traditionally, these cases have been treated with orbital exenteration or with radiotherapy (RT), but in recent years, hedgehog pathway inhibitors (HPIs) have emerged, are effective in more serious cases, and are used primarily or combined with surgery, changing our perspective on the management of these patients.

Methods

We studied 24 cases of periocular BCC with orbital invasion, some primary and others recurrent, which were treated between 2011 and 2021 in the same hospital. All patients had clinical or radiological evidence of orbital invasion. Orbital exenteration was performed on 9/24 of the patients (1 received vismodegib after surgery), and 12/24 were treated, surgically preserving the eyeball, with 3 of them receiving adjuvant vismodegib. Three of the twenty-four patients were treated exclusively with vismodegib (Erivedge®, Genentech).

Results

One patient died due to poor tumor evolution, but the rest evolved favorably and they have had no recurrences. Vismodegib was generally well tolerated, except for in one patient who discontinued treatment due to the side effects.

Conclusions

In advanced BBC with orbital invasion, mutilating surgical treatments such as exenteration or potentially vision-threatening treatments such as RT remain as options. In recent years, however, very promising new medical therapies have emerged, such as HPI, which can be used effectively instead of surgery or in combination with it, preserving the eye and vision, which implies a new approach to treatment.

Exploring vismodegib: A non-surgical breakthrough in the management of advanced periocular basal cell carcinoma

The management of periocular basal cell carcinoma (BCC) is challenging due to its proximity to the eyeball. Vismodegib, a Hedgehog pathway inhibitor, has emerged as a therapeutic option for locally advanced and metastatic BCC. To critically appraise the relevant evidence, we conducted a systematic review of observational and experimental studies assessing the efficacy and safety of vismodegib for periocular BCC. Thirty-seven trials, including 435 patients, were eligible. No randomized trials were retrieved. Complete and overall clinical response rates were 20-88 % and 68-100 %, respectively. Disease progression was observed at a maximum rate of 14 %. Recurrence rates varied between 0 % and 31 %. The most common side effects were muscle cramps, dysgeusia, weight loss and alopecia. Treatment with vismodegib improved health-related quality of life. In conclusion, vismodegib represents an important novel treatment for advanced periocular BCC, with good response rates and acceptable tolerability profile. Nevertheless, its full potential needs clarification through randomized controlled trials.

Periocular and ocular surface nonmelanoma skin cancer

Periocular and ocular surface nonmelanoma malignancies, including basal cell carcinoma (BCC), squamous cell carcinomas (SCC), and ocular surface squamous neoplasia (OSSN), are rare, but their management requires special considerations. The most common periocular malignancy is BCC, which constitutes 80% to 96% of tumors, followed by SCC, which represents 5% to 10% of tumors. OSSN represents a spectrum of diseases that encompass dysplastic alteration to the squamous epithelium of the eye. OSSN ranges from squamous dysplasia to conjunctival intraepithelial neoplasia/carcinoma in situ to invasive SCC, which is the most common ocular malignancy. These tumors can be staged using the eighth edition of the American Joint Committee on Cancer categorization system. The standard of care for periocular malignancies is Mohs micrographic surgery, while medical management with 5-fluorouracil (5-FU), interferon alfa-2b (INF), and mitomycin C (MMC) or "no touch" surgical excision are options for OSSN. Systemic therapies, including sonic hedgehog inhibitors for BCC and epidermal growth factor inhibitors and immune-checkpoint inhibitors for SCC, can be utilized for advanced disease. Recurrence rates are higher for periorbital and ocular malignancies than their respective cutaneous counterparts. These carcinomas and their respective treatments have unique side effects and considerations in an effort to preserve visual function.

Review of Targeted Therapy, Vismodegib, for the Treatment of Periocular Basal Cell Carcinoma

PURPOSE

Periocular locally advanced basal cell carcinoma (POLA-BCC) is characterized by orbital involvement and/or extensive invasion of periocular structures. Hedgehog pathway inhibitors have been used for POLA-BCC with promising outcomes.

METHODS

The authors reviewed 11 articles published in English literature from January 2012 to July 2022 and reported the outcomes of patients with POLA-BCC who were treated with vismodegib.

RESULTS

A total of 384 patients were treated with vismodegib. The mean age was 72 years, and the median treatment duration was 9 months. The overall response rate was 75% with a median follow-up time of 14.4 months. Following vismodegib treatment, the median number of patients who required adjuvant surgery was 43% with a median time to surgery of 6.5 months. The exenteration rate was 6% (overall 8 patients). In total 93.7% of patients experienced grade I adverse events, 26.7% to 37.5% grade II, 8.8% to 10% grade III-IV, and 0.8% to 4.8% grade V. Major side effects included dysgeusia (30-100%), muscle spasm (15-100%), alopecia (47-75%), weight loss (23-83%), and decreased appetite (19-42%). The median percentage of patients who discontinued treatment due to toxicity was 29% with a median interval of 5 months before the development of side effects. The median recurrence rate following discontinuation of vismodegib was 7.8% with a median recurrence duration of 20 months.

CONCLUSIONS

In patients with POLA-BCC, vismodegib, a hedgehog pathway inhibitor, provided high rates of orbital preservation, reducing exenteration rates to 6%. Neoadjuvant therapy with vismodegib can also be suggested for patients with POLA-BCC. While extremely effective, side effects lead to temporary or permanent discontinuation of vismodegib in small numbers of patients.

Orbital Exenteration in Recurrence Cancer: 5 Years Experience

INTRODUCTION

The purpose of this study was to assess the overall survival (OS) and disease-free survival (DFS) of patients who underwent orbital exenteration for periorbital, conjunctival, and primary intraorbital carcinomas. Additionally, we assessed the outcomes of anterior retrograde temporalis muscle flap restoration.

METHODS

For all patients who had orbital exenteration in the previous five years, a non-comparative retrospective assessment of their medical records, histology, and radiographic imaging was carried out. We investigated the relationships between the various qualitative factors using Cramer's V Kaplan-Meier (KM) analysis. For each of the patient's categorical factors that were of relevance, estimates of the survival distribution were displayed, and log-rank tests were used to determine whether the survival distributions were equal.

RESULTS

This study looks at 19 participants. The sample is made up of 13 men (68%) and 6 women (32%). The degree of relationship (Cramer's V index) between lymph node metastases (N) and the existence of distant metastases (M) is high, at 64%, and is statistically significant because the p-value is 0.0034 < 0.005. Lymph node metastases had a statistically significant impact on overall survival (p = 0.04 < 0.05). Thirteen of the nineteen patients tested had no palsy (68%). There was no one presenting a CSF leak.

CONCLUSION

Our findings show how crucial it is to identify any lymph node involvement that orbital neoplasms may have. In patients who have received many treatments, sentinel lymph node biopsy (SLNB) may be used to determine the stage and spread of the cancer. To determine whether additional tumor characteristics may be explored, more expertise in the SLNB field for patients with orbital cancer who have received many treatments may be helpful. To prevent additional scarring and to be comparable to previous techniques for facial nerve lesions, the anterior retrograde approach and the transorbital procedure for temporal muscle flap in-setting are both effective methods.

Emerging therapeutic options for periorbital and orbital cutaneous basal and squamous cell carcinomas

PURPOSE

Recently, several new therapies have emerged to address locally advanced cutaneous basal cell and squamous cell carcinomas. Given the constraints of the ocular adnexa and orbit, this review was designed to discuss the role of these modalities in this region.

METHODS

A PubMed search was carried out to analyze the utility of United States Food and Drug Administration-approved therapies to address these malignancies. The data presented in the identified investigations were analyzed and abstracted.

RESULTS

Multiple novel interventions may be useful in the management of periocular cutaneous basal cell and squamous cell carcinomas, including imiquimod, hedgehog inhibitors, and immunotherapy. While many of these treatments have not been specifically explored in the orbit and ocular adnexa, the literature generally shows favorable response rates. However, adverse events were common in these studies.

CONCLUSIONS

Several novel treatments may address periorbital cutaneous malignancies, and these therapies may be particularly useful in patients with unresectable disease and those who are poor surgical candidates.

The initial rate of tumour response to vismodegib treatment, can predict a complete response outcome for periocular LA-BCC

PURPOSE

To establish a model to predict treatment outcome of periocular locally advanced basal cell carcinoma (POLA BCC) based on initial response to treatment with vismodegib (ErivedgeTM), a sonic hedgehog inhibitor.

DESIGN

Subgroup analysis of data from the STEVIE study database.

METHODS

Analysis of medical history, treatment protocol, and treatment outcome of POLA BCC tumours in a STEVIE study population of 244 POLA BCC patients treated with ≥1 dose of vismodegib.

RESULTS

A predictive model for complete response (CR) was established based on the initial treatment response. A cutoff value of 20% reduction in tumour size at 3 months of treatment identified the patients with a high probability (82.76%) to achieve CR. A second cutoff value of 67.7% reduction in tumour size at 6 months of treatment improved the prediction to a 95.42% probability of a CR outcome.

CONCLUSIONS

A treatment model was constructed based on the prediction of a CR outcome and the initial response to vismodegib treatment at 3 and 6 months. The study result provide significant new insights can facilitate decision-making on treatment management according to tumour response in patients with POLA BCC.

The Role of Surgery After Remission of Nonsystemic Extensive Periorbital Basal Cell Carcinoma Treated by Vismodegib: A Systematic Review

BACKGROUND

Eyelid basal cell carcinoma (BCC) is usually cured by surgery. However, for a minority of patients, extensive disease progression and recurrence contraindicate surgery or radiotherapy because of severe ocular morbidity. The hedgehog signaling pathway inhibitor vismodegib is becoming the key treatment for this specific form.

OBJECTIVE

The aim of this review was to define the role of surgery after vismodegib treatment.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A literature search of the PubMed, Cochrane Library, ScienceDirect, and Embase databases was conducted for all articles published up to March 2021 to identify studies that examined treatment of BCC of the eyelid by vismodegib.

RESULTS

Level 1 evidence was found for the use of vismodegib as neoadjuvant therapy in locally advanced eyelid BCC contraindicated to surgery and/or radiotherapy with a rather good tolerance of treatment. Level 3 evidence was found for the role of surgical excision of residual clinically suspicious lesions as for the indication of eyelid reconstruction after mapping or during residual tumoral resection if frozen sections or Mohs surgery were performed.

CONCLUSION

Vismodegib is a well-tolerated treatment for advanced periorbital BCC. The hedgehog signaling pathway inhibitor vismodegib is a potential treatment option in patients with these challenging tumors.

Outcomes of adjunctive therapies post hedgehog inhibitors in the management of locally advanced basal cell carcinoma: A systematic review and pooled analysis

Management of patients with locally advanced basal cell carcinoma (laBCC) with traditional strategies has yielded suboptimal outcomes. Targeted treatments including hedgehog inhibitor therapy (HHIT) present limitations when utilized as monotherapy. Herein, we report evidence-based outcomes from available literature on multimodality treatments adjuvant to HHIT in laBCC management. Utilizing a systematic search strategy in PubMed, we identified studies published from inception to April 15, 2020, screened for definitive inclusion/exclusion criteria, and performed individual study quality assessment and pooled analysis to assess impact of adjunctive treatment-based responses post-HHIT on clinical response and recurrence outcomes. Twenty-nine studies (n = 103) were included. Primary findings include a complete response (CR) rate of 90.5%, the median follow-up of 12 months post-HHIT completion. The recurrence rate was 10.8% with 12-month median time to recurrence. Mohs micrographic surgery (MMS) had 100% CR post-HHIT, while no difference was observed between surgery and radiation therapy (RT). MMS and surgery had comparable 2-year recurrence free rates (RFR) at 87% and 86% respectively, while RT had the lower 2-year RFR at 67%. Male gender portended a more advanced stage at diagnosis and worse outcomes. In a subset analysis, periorbital laBCCs with orbital involvement had a CR rate of 81.8% versus 100% in those without orbital involvement, with similar rates of recurrence. Limited available quantitative data and possible publication bias were limitations. Pooled analysis of observational data supports use of adjunctive therapies post-HHIT to improve treatment response in patients with laBCC. Longer-term follow-up is needed to study recurrence rates after combination therapy.

Long-term efficacy and safety of imiquimod 5% and fluorouracil 1% creams in medical monotherapy of complex eyelid basal cell carcinomas

PURPOSE

To study the long-term efficacy and safety of local application of imiquimod 5% and fluorouracil 1% creams in complex eyelid basal cell carcinomas (BCCs).

METHODS

A retrospective, non-comparative study in biopsy-proven, complex (involving canthi or >50% of eyelid length) eyelid BCC patients who were medically unfit for surgical procedures. All patients were medically treated with either of the creams using fixed-dose regimens for a minimum of 3 months. All received oral vitamin C 500 mg QID for 3 months as an adjunct for collagen healing. A minimum of "post-treatment" follow-up of 12 months was observed.

RESULTS

Of total 30 patients, imiquimod 5% and fluorouracil 1% were used in 16 and 14 patients, respectively. The mean age of our patients was 70.5 years. The co-morbidities included - severe coronary artery disease using blood-thinners (n = 19), poorly controlled diabetes (n = 12), poorly controlled hypertension (n = 6), on nebulization (n = 3), and tuberculosis with pulmonary fibrosis (n = 2). Complete clinical tumor resolution was noted in 10 and 8 patients over 12 and 16.5 weeks, respectively, in imiquimod and fluorouracil groups. Periocular skin erythema, chemical conjunctivitis, and skin depigmentation were seen in all the patients of imiquimod group. On the other hand, the local side-effect profile in fluorouracil patients was limited.

CONCLUSION

The medical treatment of complex eyelid BCC is a useful alternative to surgery in the elderly with significant co-morbidities. It provides a promising long-term relief with a tolerable side-effect profile. A prospective, randomized, double-blinded trial would provide stronger evidence for the efficacy of these drugs.

Outcomes of orbital exenteration for craniofacial lesions

BACKGROUND

Orbital exenteration (OE) is an ablative procedure used in the management of malignancies of the orbit of either primary or secondary origin. Publications evaluating this procedure have suffered from small patient numbers, heterogeneity of pathologies, and poor patient follow-up. The purpose of this study was to assess patient outcomes in a large cohort of patients undergoing OE at a tertiary cancer center.

METHODS

A retrospective review was conducted of 180 consecutive patients who underwent OE at the authors' institution. Overall survival (OS) was the primary end point measured in the study. Time to locoregional recurrence (progression-free survival [PFS]) and disease-free survival were secondary end points.

RESULTS

Between the years 1993 and 2011, 180 consecutive patients received OE for craniofacial malignancy at the authors' institution. The median follow-up for the cohort was 9.7 years (116 months). The median OS was 73 months, and the median PFS was 96 months. The presence of perineural invasion was associated with shorter OS (P = .01) and PFS (P < .01). Magnetic resonance imaging was predictive of perineural invasion (P < .01). Positive margins were associated with shorter PFS than negative margins (P < .01) but with no change in OS (P = .15). The overall complication rate was 15%. The major complication rate (Clavien-Dindo 3b or greater) was 2.8% (n = 5), and there was 1 death observed (0.6%).

CONCLUSIONS

Used judiciously in the setting of a multidisciplinary management plan, OE for tumor control is a safe therapy.

LAY SUMMARY

Between the years 1993 and 2011, 180 consecutive patients received orbital exenteration for craniofacial malignancy at the MD Anderson Cancer Center. The median follow-up for the cohort was 9.7 years. The presence of perineural invasion was associated with shorter overall survival (P = .01) and progression-free survival (P < .01). Magnetic resonance imaging was predictive of perineural invasion (P < .01). Positive margins were associated with shorter progression-free survival than negative margins (P < .01). The overall complication rate was 15%. The major complication rate (Clavien-Dindo 3b or greater) was 2.8% (n = 5).

Orbito-scleral-sinus invasion of basal cell carcinoma in an immunocompromised patient on vismodegib

A 45-year-old man presented with a progressively enlarging left lower lateral eyelid lesion. The initial biopsy was inconclusive; however, a repeat biopsy 5 years later revealed infiltrative morpheaform basal cell carcinoma with sclerosis. Two years later, the patient presented with ophthalmoplegia of the left eye. Computed tomography illustrated a heterogeneous enhancing soft tissue mass in the inferolateral orbit with erosion into the globe. Despite treatment with vismodegib for 1 year, the lesion progressed to involve the entire left lower eyelid and corneal-scleral junction with adjacent maxillary sinus invasion. The patient tested positive for human immunodeficiency virus and underwent a left orbital exenteration followed by adjuvant radiotherapy. The patient remained stable with no evidence of recurrent disease or distant metastasis 2 years after exenteration. This rare case highlights a neglected basal cell carcinoma in those immunocompromised with histopathological correlation of the aggressive disease on to the globe.

[Alternative treatment options for periorbital basal cell carcinoma]

BACKGROUND

Latest developments as well as established procedures offer alternative treatment approaches to basal cell carcinoma (BCC) when micrographically controlled surgical removal is not a valid option.

OBJECTIVE

Alternative treatment options for periorbital BCC are presented.

METHODS

A literature search was carried out and a structured display and analysis of the results are given.

RESULTS

Micrographically controlled surgical removal represents the gold standard in treatment of BCC. When for various reasons surgical removal is not a valid option, other procedures are required. The alternative treatment options can be divided into three main groups: treatment options for locally advanced or metastasized BCC, topical approaches for small and superficial BCC and prophylactic measures. While radiotherapy and systemic therapy are suitable for locally advanced BCC and are discussed in a tumor board, small and superficial BCC can be treated by topical medication. In cases of a previous BCC history, a prophylactic treatment can be considered. Combinations of systemic treatment and also neoadjuvant or adjuvant approaches before and after surgery are promising options for a successful outcome, which can further improve the standard treatment for locally advanced BCC.

CONCLUSION

Alternative treatment options for periocular BCC are available; however, the use is only indicated when microscopically controlled excision with subsequent oculoplastic reconstruction is not possible. According to the national guidelines a prior presentation to a suitable tumor board is practically compulsory.

Orbital exenteration and conjunctival melanoma: a 14-year study at the Jules Gonin Eye Hospital

Purpose

To report our 14-year experience with orbital exenteration and assess risk factors for poor prognosis by focusing on conjunctival melanoma.

Patients and method

A retrospective study was conducted in our tertiary care centre (Jules Gonin Eye Hospital, Lausanne, Switzerland) between 2003 and 2017. Inclusion criteria were patients aged  ≥18 years with a follow-up >12 months, without metastatic spread at the time of surgery. Data recorded were age, gender, tumour histology, surgical technique, postoperative complications, surgical margin status, local recurrence, postoperative radiation beam therapy and metastatic status.

Results

Twenty-five patients with a mean age of 63.2 years (38–92) were included. Conjunctival melanoma was the most frequently identified tumour (n = 14, 56%) followed by conjunctival squamous cell carcinoma (n = 4, 16%), sebaceous carcinoma (n = 3, 12%), choroidal melanoma (n = 2, 8%) and basal cell carcinoma (n = 2, 8%). Eighteen tumours (72%) originated from the conjunctival tissue. Clear surgical margins were achieved in 21 (84%) patients. Fourteen (56%) patients experienced distant metastases and died from metastatic spread after a mean follow-up of 52.3 months (6–120). The 1-, 3- and 5-year overall survival (OS) was 96%, 72% and 60%, respectively. In the univariate analysis, positive surgical margins, local recurrence and metachronous metastases were associated with a decreased OS (p = 0.002, p = 0.005 and p = 0.007, respectively). In the multivariate analysis, positive surgical margins and metachronous metastases were also associated with a decreased OS (p = 0.02 and p = 0.042, respectively). Conjunctival melanoma was not associated with a poorer prognosis (p = 0.280).

Conclusion

Free surgical margins are needed to increase OS. To achieve clearer surgical margins, neoadjuvant targeted therapies/immunotherapies may be considered.

Guidelines for vismodegib in the management of periocular basal cell carcinoma

OBJECTIVE

The management of advanced basal cell carcinoma (BCC) in the periocular region remains a clinical challenge. Vismodegib (Erivedge^TM) has been approved in 2013 by Health Canada for adult patients with "histologically confirmed metastatic BCC or locally advanced BCC inappropriate for surgery or radiation." An expert consensus was sought to create a standardised approach in the use of this novel treatment.

METHODS

Fourteen practicing oculoplastic surgeons across Canada were involved in formulating and reviewing guidelines until consensus was reached. A consultancy meeting was followed by further ratification of guidelines over email. Two voting surveys were performed of the group to objectively assess agreement over each statement within the guidelines. Ratification continued until at least two-thirds of the group agreed on every guideline statement.

RESULTS

The guidelines summarize 21 statements in a major and minor criteria format. A multidisciplinary team review is suggested for each patient with the involvement of recommended specialists. The internal survey revealed 100% agreement over 9 statements, 91.7% agreement over 8 statements, 83.3% agreement over 4 statements, and 2 statements had 66.7% and 58.7% agreement each. All statements with less than 91.7% agreement were surveyed again, and they were kept, modified, or removed on the basis of a consensus of over 66.7%.

CONCLUSIONS

These guidelines serve to act as a framework for physicians considering vismodegib for the medical management of patients with advanced or metastatic periocular BCC. Future applications, including neoadjuvant uses of the drug, may become apparent through further research.

Advances in Immunotherapy and Periocular Malignancy

Immunotherapy has significantly advanced the field of oncology in recent decades. Understanding normal immunosurveillance, as well as the ways in which tumor cells have evolved to evade it, has provided the knowledge for development of drugs that allow one's own immune system to target and destroy malignant cells (immunotherapy). Cutaneous malignancies are particularly sensitive to this class of drugs. In a very sensitive anatomic region such as the periocular tissue, where surgical excision may come with significant morbidity, this technology has had a strong impact in the successful treatment of historically challenging tumors.